Amendment 05 - 80GSFC23R0036.pdf

PDF 424 KB Posted

Attached to
Space Weather Next L1 Series Suprathermal Ion Sensor (STIS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC23R0036
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This document is an amendment to a federal solicitation for the Space Weather Next L1 Series Suprathermal Ion Sensor (STIS). The amendment revises the source selection and evaluation factors for the competitive negotiated acquisition. Specifically, it removes the requirement to follow the NASA Source Evaluation Board procedures and makes the Cost factor approximately equal in importance to the combined Mission Suitability and Past Performance factors. The original solicitation is for the design, development, fabrication, integration, testing, verification, evaluation, launch support, and mission operations of the STIS instrument, which is an ion spectrometer that measures solar ejecta to aid in predicting the arrival and strength of coronal mass ejections. The solicitation is being issued by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and NOAA.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Space Weather Next L1 Series Suprathermal Ion Sensor (STIS), newest first.
File Type Posted
QA AMD 04 - STIS.pdf PDF
Amendment 04 - 80GSFC23R0036.pdf PDF
Amendment 03 - 80GSFC23R0036.pdf PDF
Amendment 02 - 80GSFC23R0036.pdf PDF
QA 2 - STIS.pdf PDF
Amendment 01 - 80GSFC23R0036.pdf PDF
Exhibit - CPFF Completion Services by GFY v2.pdf PDF
Attachment O - Contract Data Requirements List II (1).pdf PDF
Attachment M - IT Security Applicable Documents List.pdf PDF
Attachment L - Contractor Proposed Enhancements.pdf PDF
Attachment G - GFP List - L1 Series STIS 01-17-24.pdf PDF
Attachment A - SOW- L1 Series STIS 01-17-24.pdf PDF
SF33 - STIS.pdf PDF
RFP Cover Letter - 1-19-2024.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 - QASP - L1 Series STIS 12-20-2023.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (Draft).pdf PDF
Attachment S - Radiation Harndness Assurance Requirements Document - STIS 11-03-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment R - Diversity Quality Inclusion Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment J - ITSMP.pdf PDF
Attachment I - OCI Avoidence Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Financial Management Reporting Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment F - Sub Contracting Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment D - MAR - L1 Series STIS 12-20-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment C - CDRL - L1 Series STIS 1-17-2024.pdf PDF
RFP - STIS 1-19-2024.pdf PDF
Attachment T - Radiation Requirements Document - STIS 11-03-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment Q - Diversity Equity Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment N - Saftey and Health Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment K - Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 - IT Security Management Plan Template.pdf PDF
Attachment P - Data Requierments Description - OCI Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Requirements Specification - L1 Series STIS 01-19-24.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Revise GSFC Provision 52.215-300 entitled “SOURCE SELECTION AND EVALUATION FACTORS - GENERAL (SEP 2019)” located on page M-1 as follows:

From:

GSFC 52.215-300 SOURCE SELECTION AND EVALUATION FACTORS - GENERAL.

(SEP 2019)

(a) Source Selection

This competitive negotiated acquisition shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.3, "Source Selection", and NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) 1815.3, same subject. The Source Evaluation Board procedures at NFS 1815.370, "NASA Source Evaluation Boards" will apply.

The attention of offerors is particularly directed to NFS 1815.305, "Proposal evaluation" and to NFS 1815.305-70, "Identification of unacceptable proposals".

A trade-off process, as described at FAR 15.101-1, will be used in making source selection.

(b) Evaluation Factors

The evaluation factors are Mission Suitability, Cost, and Past Performance. These factors, as described at NFS 1815.304-70, will be used to evaluate each proposal. This Section M provides a further description for each evaluation factor. Only the Mission Suitability factor is numerically scored.

(c) Relative Order of Importance of Evaluation Factors

The Cost Factor is approximately equal in importance to the combined importance of the Mission Suitability Factor and the Past Performance Factor. As individual Factors, the Cost Factor is the most important and the Mission Suitability Factor is more important than the Past Performance Factor.

(End of provision)

To:

GSFC 52.215-300 SOURCE SELECTION AND EVALUATION FACTORS - GENERAL.

(SEP 2019)

(a) Source Selection

This competitive negotiated acquisition shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.3, "Source Selection", and NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) 1815.3, same subject. The Source Evaluation Board procedures at NFS 1815.370, "NASA Source Evaluation Boards" will not apply.

The attention of offerors is particularly directed to NFS 1815.305, "Proposal evaluation" and to NFS 1815.305-70, "Identification of unacceptable proposals".

A trade-off process, as described at FAR 15.101-1, will be used in making source selection.

(b) Evaluation Factors

The evaluation factors are Mission Suitability, Cost, and Past Performance. These factors, as described at NFS 1815.304-70, will be used to evaluate each proposal. This Section M provides a further description for each evaluation factor.

(c) Relative Order of Importance of Evaluation Factors

The Cost Factor is approximately equal in importance to the combined importance of the Mission Suitability Factor and the Past Performance Factor. As individual Factors, the Cost Factor is the most important and the Mission Suitability Factor is more important than the Past Performance Factor.

(End of provision)

2024-03-18T23:13:03-0400
TAMMY SEIDEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .