Exhibit 13 Rev 1 - OMESIII PastPerfQues.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
NASA/GSFC Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (OMES) III FINAL Request for Proposal
Solicitation number
80GSFC21R0046_FinalRFP
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Enclosure CC Rev 1 - GPM Non-Mgmt DL Categories DL Hours and PDs 5-18-22.pdf PDF
Exhibit 13 Rev 1 - OMESIII PastPerfQues.pdf PDF
OMES III Amendment 002 pg.2.pdf PDF
OMES III Final RFP QA (Batch 2) 6-1-22.pdf PDF
SF30-16c Amendment 002 6-1-22.pdf PDF
SF30-Amendment 001 5-19-22.pdf PDF
OMES III Final RFP QA (Batch 1) 5-19-22.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1A-1C All IDIQ w. GPM.pdf PDF
OMES III Final Request for Proposal 4-28-22.pdf PDF
Enclosure EE - IT Security Mgmt Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure AA - Gov QASP Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment L - Form DD254 OMES III 1-5-21.pdf PDF
Attachment B - IDIQ Cost-Type Rate Mat.pdf PDF
Attachment I.2 - OCI Avoidance Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment J - IT Security Appl Doc List.pdf PDF
Attachment F - S_H Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment I.1 - OCI Plan DRD.pdf PDF
Attachment D - List of IAGP.pdf PDF
Exhibit 13 - OMESIII PastPerfQues.pdf PDF
Enclosure BB - RTOs.pdf PDF
Attachment M - Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure FF - GSFC Sample S-H Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure DD - Contract Historical Data.pdf PDF
Attachment G - SB Sub Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
SF33-14c.pdf PDF
Enclosure CC - GPM.pdf PDF
Attachment C - 533 Attach All IDIQ.pdf PDF
Exhibits 2 -12 All IDIQ by CY.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Contract Hist Data.pdf PDF
Attachment K - IT Security Mgmt Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment E - GFP MASTER LISTING.pdf PDF
Final Request for Proposal (RFP) Cover Letter Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment A - OMES III SOW.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP 80GSFC21R0046

EXHIBIT 13 OMES III

REVISION 1,

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP 80GSFC21R0046

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

(Updated May, 2018)

Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 lists the major work elements within our Statement of Work (SOW). Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific SOW Element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific SOW element was not performed under the contract.

S ection 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:

Very High

(VH)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.

High (H)
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Moderate

(M) The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Low

(L) The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Very Low

(VL)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.

N/R
Not Rated

Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TONASA Goddard Space Flight Center
BY JUNE 7, 2022.Attn: Tasha Williams, Code 210.M

Greenbelt, MD 20771 Phone: 301-286-3459 e-mail: tasha.williams@nasa.gov

RFP 80GSFC21R0046

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. C ontract Information

A. Name of Company/Division Being Evaluated:

B. Address:_ _

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or DUNS number

D. Contract Number: _

E. Contract Type: _

F. Period of Performance (including options): From: To: _

G. Total Contract Value:_ _

H. Award Information:Competitive: Yes_No_
Basis of Selection:Technical _ Cost/Price _ Other (specify)

2. Description of Contract

Briefly describe the services provided under this contract:

During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the:

Prime ContractorSignificant Subcontractor_ Team Member_
Other (describe)__

Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization?

Yes _ No _ . If yes, please describe:

3. E valuator Information

Name: _ Title: _ Agency/Company: _ _ E-mail Address: Phone: Date Questionnaire Completed: Role in Program/Contract: _ _ Length of Involvement in this Program/ Contract: _

P AST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

4. SOW Survey Relevance Ratings: Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)

SOW ELEMENT

SIGNIFICANT

MODERATE

MINIMAL/ DID NOT PERFORM

PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please circle)

FUNCTION 1 – Technology Development Services

Instrument Electronics Systems Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Thermal Control Systems Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Power Systems Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN&C) Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Cryogenic and Fluids Systems Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Robotic Technology Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

FUNCTION 2 – Pre-Formulation and Formulation Studies

System Definition Study Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

FUNCTION 3 – Implementation Phase Services

Mission Systems Engineering

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Software Systems Engineering, Studies, Analysis and Support

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Fabrication, Assembly and Testing Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Integration, Test, and Verification Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Mission Assurance and Systems Safety Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

EEE Parts Program Services

VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

5. General Performance Survey

NO
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please Circle)

QUALITY

1.
Quality of services and support provided
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
2.
Timely identification and mitigation of risks
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
3.
Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
4.
Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Comment:

SCHEDULE

5.
Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates and reporting
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
6.
Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Comment:

COST

7.
Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
8.
Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth.
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Comment:

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

9.
Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
10.
Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

11.

Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner.

VH

H

M

L

VL

N/R

12.
Adequacy of Contractor’s system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes.
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R
13.
Ability to meet Small Business Subcontracting Plan Goals
VH
H
M
L
VL
N/R

Comment:

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104.

RFP 80GSFC21R0046

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 6:

What is the Contract Value:

Initial ValueCurrent Value
Estimated Cost:$$_

Fee: $ $ _

Total Value: $ $

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain:

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one)

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain:

Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.

_ Rater’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .