8-5 AG Legal Services Scoresheet 022326.xls
XLS spreadsheet 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TR26-11
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Legal Services to Assist with Colorado River Litigation, issued by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Utah. The RFP seeks to establish a list of law firms eligible to enter into future professional service agreements (PSAs) with the OAG for a period of five years. Multiple contract awards are anticipated through this procurement. The evaluation process will identify successful offerors who meet minimum mandatory requirements and achieve a required technical point threshold of 350 points out of a possible 500 points.
The evaluation scoresheet assigns weighted scores across five technical criteria: Lead Counsel and Senior Attorneys qualifications (40% weight, 200 points possible), overall Litigation Team qualifications (20% weight, 100 points), offeror's experience with complex litigation and similar cases (30% weight, 150 points), reference materials and malpractice insurance documentation (5% weight, 25 points), and cost proposals (5% weight, 25 points). Mandatory pass/fail requirements include certification of team experience, conflict of interest verification, proof of legal malpractice insurance coverage of at least $5,000,000 per incident, background check completion, and non-debarment status. Vendors must guarantee pricing for one year, and scoring uses a scale of 0 (Fail) through 5 (Excellent) to assess proposal quality against RFP requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-1-AG Legal Services RFP and SOW 022326.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-3 AG Legal Services CostProposalForm 021926.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 7-6 AG Legal Services TermsandConditions 022326.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-2 AG Legal Services MMR and Technical Critieria 022326.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-4 AG Legal Services CoverSheet 021926.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||||
| 1. | Offeror must certify it meets the experience and requirements of the Litigation Team. | |||||||||
| 2. | Offeror must certify that no members of the Litigation Team to whom a matter is assigned or the law firm that employs them have, or appear to have, any conflict of interest in providing the assigned Legal Services. | |||||||||
| 3. | Offeror must certify they have or will commit to acquiring legal malpractice insurance coverage in an amount not less than $5,000,000 per incident, which covers all attorneys and paralegals from that firm who are part of the Litigation Team. | |||||||||
| 4. | Offeror must certify it will complete a background check. | |||||||||
| 5. | Offeror must certify that they are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or ineligible for contracting by a governmental entity. | |||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Lead Counsel/Senior Attorneys - Overall qualifications and experience of Lead Counsel and the designated Senior Attorneys. | 40 | 40.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Litigation Team - Overall qualifications and experience of the other members of the Litigation Team who may be called upon to assist as needed. | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Offeror’s experience with complex litigation, including the quality of results obtained by the Offeror. Law Firm’s ability, qualifications and general approach to the services required in RFP. Offeror’s description of any experience that they have in handling cases similar in nature. | 30 | 30.0% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Reference materials, conflicts of interest and malpractice insurance. | 5 | 5.0% | 25.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Cost proposal | 5 | 5.0% | 25.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||||
| 70% | 350.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Award methodology: Successful Offerors that receive 350 total points will be placed on a list of law firms eligible to enter into future professional service agreements "PSA". |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .