B05 Amendment 4 Additional QAs - Offers Due Pryor Clinic Expansion Construction.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Pryor Clinic Expansion Construction in Pryor
- Solicitation number
- 75H70126R00024
About this file
This is Amendment A00004 to Solicitation 75H70126R00024 for the Pryor Clinic Expansion Construction project, issued by the Indian Health Service (IHS) Division of Engineering Services in Seattle, Washington. The amendment extends the offers due date to August 18, 2026, and posts updated questions and answers (Q&As) addressing clarifications on project specifications and requirements. The solicitation is for general construction services to expand and renovate the Pryor Clinic, a federally funded healthcare facility. The contract is a firm-fixed-price (FFP) award, and a bid guarantee of 20 percent of the bid price or $3 million (whichever is less) is required. The contractor is responsible for obtaining building permits and must perform at least 15 percent of contract costs with its own employees or similarly situated entities under FAR 52.219-14.
Key technical clarifications provided in the Q&As include confirmation that a holeless hydraulic elevator with a 4-foot pit depth is required (not a traction elevator); a complete new standalone fire alarm system with approximately 90 devices is acceptable and recommended; voice notification is not required, only horn/strobe notification; all medical equipment will be procured by IHS, not the contractor; and intumescent fire barrier paint is required only in basement mechanical rooms 016 and 016A. The contractor must maintain clinic operations throughout construction, with all departments remaining open and phased into new spaces as they become available. Additional requirements include negative containment for all construction areas due to infection control, field painting of new galvanized guardrails and wood fascia (not add-alternates), and use of 30-mil white FlameOFF fire barrier paint at 1-hour fire rating for exposed wood ceilings. Several Q&As submitted after the deadline (questions 60-69) remain unanswered pending government response prior to the extended deadline.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
A00004
Daniel Cotto
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Pryor Clinic Expansion Construction
1. The purpose of this amendment is to post additional questions and answers (Q&As).
2. The Q&As are updated and attached below.
3. The offers due date is extended to 08/18/2026.
4. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
Indian Health Service (IHS) Division of Engineering Services (DES) - Seattle 701 5th Ave, Suite 1650 Seattle, WA 98104
75H70126R00024
BI21CR202C6
1 15
Same as 16C
06/16/2026
1/30/2026
Questions and Answers 08/03/2026
Project Title: Pryor Clinic Expansion Construction, BI21CR202C6 Solicitation #: 75H70126R00024
Below are the questions received in response to this solicitation and their respective answers:
- As of 08/03/2026, added the Q&As starting on #60.
1. I checked the page and noticed that the native CAD files aren't listed alongside the PDFs. Would it be unreasonable to ask the engineering team if those CAD files could be made available?
- Answer: We do not have the CAD files.
2. Equipment and Parts Substitution Requests:
- Answer: Refer to RFP Sections L.8. and Section M. Your proposal should explain how the proposed solution meets or exceeds the required specifications, how it affects short and long term costs, delivery details, etc. to better help the evaluators assess your proposal against the requirements and the other offers.
3. Elevator Specification Clarifications:
a. The specifications indicate a 4'-6" wide elevator door for a 2,500-pound capacity elevator.
Standard 2,500-pound elevator configurations typically utilize 3'-6" doors. Please confirm the intended door width.
i. Answer: The reference to a 4’6” wide elevator door is correct. The drawings and specifications call out a hydraulic elevator indicating a 4’ min. elevator pit. The contractor is proposing a traction elevator which has a 5’ pit requirement. Also the traction elevator does not have a 4’ 6” wide door option. (Ref. Spec Section 14 24 00 Article 1.1 Elevator Schedule and Details 3 & 4 / A-18).
b. For the proposed MRL traction elevator, a 5'-0" pit depth would be required rather than the specified 4'-0" pit depth. Is this acceptable?
i. Answer: See response to Question 3 above. The specified elevator is not an MRL traction elevator. It is a holeless hydraulic elevator. Based on elevator basis of design manufacturer’s information, only a 4’-0” pit depth is required. A 5’-0” deep pit is not acceptable. (Ref. Spec Section 14 24 00 Article 1.1 Elevator Schedule).
c. Section 1.10 references provisions for emergency generator operation. Will a standby generator be provided to support elevator operation during power outages?
i. Answer: A standby generator exists on the clinic.
d. Section 2.8 appears to require a dedicated on-site elevator monitoring system. Please confirm whether the Owner's intent can be satisfied through KONE's standard 24/7 Connectivity platform, which provides continuous remote monitoring, maintenance diagnostics, and owner access via web browser or mobile application.
i. Answer: This is acceptable.
e. Section 2.31 specifies hall lanterns. For a single elevator serving two floors, would a car-mounted riding lantern be acceptable in lieu of separate hall lanterns?
i. Answer: Hall lanterns are required.
f. Sections 2.33(E), (H), (I), and (K) specify 14-gauge and 16-gauge steel components. Would 20-gauge steel components be acceptable where utilized in the manufacturer's standard design?
i. Answer: This would not be acceptable.
g. Section 2.34 specifies roller guides. Would slide guides be acceptable? The proposed traction system utilizes slide guides and does not experience a reduction in performance or service life compared to roller guides.
i. Answer: This would be acceptable.
h. Section 2.37 specifies 14-gauge cab shell construction and 12-gauge ceiling construction. Would the manufacturer's standard construction of 20-gauge cab shell panels and 16-gauge ceiling panels be acceptable?
i. Answer: These would not be acceptable.
4. Sidewalk Cross Slope Exceeds ADA Maximum. Current design shows the sidewalk cross slope exceeding the ADA maximum of 2%. Please clarify the intended grading to ensure code compliance
- Answer: DT 6 shows ¼” per foot (1:48) or 2.08%. Consider this to be a max of 2.00%.
5. Existing Sanitary Line Clash with Elevator Pit Excavation. The existing sanitary sewer line appears to clash with the excavation required for the new elevator pit. Please provide a relocation plan or alternate routing.
- Answer: The sanitary piping goes out the back of the building and the elevator is in the front of the building.
The only existing sanitary line leaves from the north side of the building- opposite the side of the elevator pit. Is this in reference to the storm drain that is to be installed? –SD— on page C-5? If so, that line only penetrates the stem walls for the landing at the top of the ramp, which would have to be installed after backfill for the elevator pit excavation so it doesn’t appear to be a conflict.
6. Missing Electrical Power for Automatic Door Operators. The drawings for the new clinical spaces show automatic door operators, but no electrical power connections or circuiting are shown. Please provide electrical requirements and panel assignments.
- Answer: Drawing E-8 shows door power supply pointing to Panel G ckt. 10. The panel schedule on drawing E-21 also confirms this. In addition, the new entrance sliding door is also automatic with its power coming from Panel D ckt. 34 as shown in drawing E-9 and confirmed in the panel schedule on drawing E-20.
7. Discrepancy Between Helical Piers and Micropiles for Elevator Pit Foundation. There is a discrepancy between the Structural plans (Micropiles) and the Foundation notes (Helical Piers) for the elevator pit.
Please clarify which foundation type is required.
Answer: The intended foundation type is to be Micropiles. Helical pier note is a typo as each corresponding location.
8. SS-1 Breaker Size in Panel K Exceeds Equipment MOCP. The specified breaker size for SS-1 in Panel K exceeds the equipment's Maximum Overcurrent Protection (MOCP). Please clarify the correct breaker size to prevent equipment damage.
- Answer: Provide a 25 Amp, 240V, 2-pole circuit breaker for SS-1.
9. H.6. Key Personnel. Can the superintendent also be the safety officer and QC
- Answer: Refer to L.8. Tradeoff Evaluation Criteria, and M.3. Tradeoff Decision.
10. H.3 & 1 00 00 I (1) Work Hours. What parts of the building and medical departments will be operational inside the medical clinic during construction.
- Answer: All departments will stay open and will be phased into their new spaces as they become available. The Contractor shall provide a detailed phasing plan for IHS approval. The health center must remain operational at all times throughout the construction duration. Sheet G-5 provides general phasing notes. During phase 1, the entire first floor must remain operational while basement work is being performed. During phase 2, contractor must create a plan to minimize disruption. An outline of the sequence of work by zones has been provided on Sheet G-5.
11. Drawing S-1. Can we receive the Geotechnical recommendations referenced on drawing S-1. The document is noted as - PREPARED BY:TERRACON.
- Answer: Attached is Geotechnical Report.
12. What is the warranty period?
- Answer: Refer to H.47. Warranty of Construction, H.48. Closeout and Warranty, 52.246-21. Also perform a search for the term “warranty” in the specifications as there are too many to list here.
13. What is the Engineers Estimate?
- Answer: Refer to block 10 of the SF-1442.
14. Survey Staking is by whom?
- Answer: Contractor’s responsibility.
15. Testing by whom?
- Answer: Contractor’s responsibility.
16. How thick is the basement concrete slab?
- Answer: According to the existing structural drawings, the existing concrete slab-on-grade is 100mm thick (or approximately 4").
17. Are micropiles to be used at bottom of footing?
- Answer: Yes, new micropiles are to be installed below the new footings. The new micropiles installed at the existing footings shall be installed to either the inside or outside face of the existing footings and attachment details shall be by micropile designer.
18. Is there a legal dumpsite in Pryor for site demolition, clear & grub?
- Answer: Not that we know about.
19. Please confirm that all items in the basement of the building will be relocated prior to project start and not be the responsibility of the contactor.
1. Answer: Confirmed. IHS will relocate all items in the basement prior to the project start
20. Due to phasing requirements there will need to be multiple connex storage boxes onsite. Due to the small size of the parking lot and the rear areas being off limits, where is the proposed staging area. IF no area onsite is capable, is there an offsite area for staging available?
2. Answer: The east side of the front parking lot can be used for staging
21. The existing roof for the building is in bad shape, it is not advised to tie in new roofing to roofing in this poor of shape as it could negatively affect performance. Please advise.
- Answer: Wholesale reroofing of the building is not part of the scope of this interior renovation project, and the reroofing area shown on the drawings is approximately 4% of the total roof area – not justifying total reroofing. However, to address the roof tie-in issues mentioned above, contractor shall extend reroofing to a new perimeter formed by the eaves, the rakes, and the two valleys intersecting the main roof. The expanded reroofing area construction shall match details 1 & 2 /A-33. The valley reroofing tie-in with the main roof shall be similar to detail 3/A-33. All other requirements remain the same.
22. Can we please get details on how the engineer would like the existing pit in the basement to be filled in.
- Answer: As per notes on plan (Sheet S-6) and Section 9/S-11, existing pit shall be filled in w/ ¾” clean rock and capped with 5” concrete slab (reinforced with #4 rebar @ 16” on-center each way).
23. Please provide current flow test for fire suppression system.
- Answer: Riser: size 1.25, Static pressure 110 psi, Residual pressure 100 psi, Pressure after 110 psi.
24. Can you provide current T&B reports for HVAC system. Is all system maintenance up to date to ensure new system functionality alongside modifications (i.e. flow)?
- Answer: No current T&B reports. Maintenance is current.
25. The spec names three different, incompatible systems for what's already in the building: a Radionics D7212 (1.1.F), Edwards EST3 devices (2.1.A), and a Simplex 4100ES control unit (2.3.A). From being on site, we can confirm there is no Simplex there. Please advise.
- Answer: Although it was the original intent of the IHS to reuse the existing fire alarm control unit (FACU), upon further review, a replacement is recommended. Jensen Hughes recommends replacing the existing Radionics D7212 FACU with a Bosch B9512G.
- The contractor shall replace all fire alarm devices, regardless of whether they are expressly depicted on the design drawings. The contractor should anticipate replacement or new installation of approximately 90 fire alarm devices. The contractor is responsible for the provision of a fully operating fire alarm system.
26. The existing panel is a Bosch/Radionics combination fire and intrusion unit. It's fully operational for the building's current needs, but it's obsolete and out of production, and it cannot be expanded to add devices or meet current code. The instruction to "expand the existing system" can't be built as written.
Please advise.
- Answer: See above.
27. Will IHS accept a complete new standalone fire alarm system as the basis of design, confirmed by addendum?
- Answer: Yes. Although it was the original intent of the IHS to reuse the existing fire alarm control unit (FACU), upon further review, a replacement is recommended. Jensen Hughes Inc recommends replacing the existing Radionics D7212 FACU with a Bosch B9512G.
- The contractor shall replace all fire alarm devices, regardless of whether they are expressly depicted on the design drawings. The contractor should anticipate replacement or new installation of approximately 90 fire alarm devices. The contractor is responsible for the provision of a fully operating fire alarm system.
28. Is voice evacuation actually required, or will horn/strobe notification suffice? This is a significant cost driver.
- Answer: Voice notification is not required. Horn/strobes will be sufficient.
29. Drawing G5, Phasing Notes, Architectural, #3: says radiology equipment must be “approved by IHS, and procured and stored by Contractor” before Zone 2E. That conflicts with the OFOI tags. Is IHS procuring all medical equipment, or is the contractor?
3. Answer: IHS will be procuring all medical equipment
30. Is the current Phasing plan for upstairs set or is available to me modified (with approval) to create efficiencies and protect patient care areas from unnecessary traffic and noise.
- Answer: a modified phasing plan can be submitted and may be utilized upon approval
31. Is there a specific OFCI, OFOI, schedule/matrix available?
- Answer: There is no schedule/matrix for OFCI and OFOI items. However, below is a summary of where these items can be found on the drawings. This summary shall not be construed as a complete list of every item but intended to assist prospective bidders find the information they are looking for on the drawings. All these items are already clearly indicated as either OFCI or OFOI on the drawings.
OFCI Items
1. Medical supply cabinet (A-3, A-6)
2. Dry erase boards (A-15, A-22, A-23)
3. Script Pro (A-15, A-23)
4. Refrigerators (A-15, A-22)
OFOI Items
1. Storage racks (A-5)
2. Chairs, Lab Stool (A-15, A,-22, A-25)
3. Paper towel dispensers (A-15, A-22, A-23, A-24, A-25)
4. Waste baskets (A-15, A-22, A-23, A-24)
5. Mirrors (A-15, A-22, A-23, A-2)
6. Soap dispensers (A-15, A-22, A-23, A-24, A-25)
7. Toilet paper dispensers (A-15, A-22, A-23, A-24)
8. Radiology equipment (A-15, A-25)
32. Due to different security needs by different clinics, please confirm the badging/security check requirements for all workers
- Answer: Show up during regular business hours, check in with Security to get visitor badge.
33. Section L.8 requires relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 to be at least 75% construction-progress complete. To promote robust competition, would the Government consider revising this requirement to allow offerors to submit up to two of the five relevant projects that are at least 50% construction-progress complete, provided the offeror demonstrates that the completed portion of the project includes work similar in size, scope, and complexity to this requirement and provides verifiable past performance information, such as CPARS, PPQs, or customer references?
- Answer: No.
34. Citations: Section L, Price (the “Construction by General Contractors” provision); FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Deviation Feb 2026); Attachment J05, Self-Performed Calculation Sheet.
Section L states that the concern will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees. FAR 52.219-14 and Attachment J05 apply the similarly situated entity framework, under which, for general construction, no more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government, excluding the cost of materials, may be paid to firms that are not similarly situated, and the 15 percent may be met by the prime contractor together with similarly situated entities.
(a) Please confirm whether the 15 percent must be performed by the prime contractor with its own employees only, or whether it may be satisfied by the prime contractor together with similarly situated entities under FAR 52.219-14.
- Answer: With similarly situated entities under FAR 52.219-14.
(b) Please confirm which standard governs completion of Attachment J05 and the price evaluation if the provisions conflict.
- Answer: Notice on “J05 Self Performed Calculation Sheet Pryor Clinic Constr” that items b and c deduct profit, fees, and cost of materials. The statement in Section L is a brief summary to call attention to the information on the form.
35, Citations: Section L, Price (bid bond requirement); FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee; SF-1442, Block 13c.
Section L requires a bid bond in accordance with FAR 52.228-1. The required penal sum or percentage is not stated in the solicitation, and the offer guarantee selection in SF-1442 Block 13c is not legible in our copy.
(a) Please confirm whether a bid guarantee is required for this solicitation.
- Answer: 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (Sept 1996) is added in full text as follows:
(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.
(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier’s check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds-
(1) To unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids; and
(2) To the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.
(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be _20% percent of the bid price or $3 million, whichever is less.
(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.
(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.
(End of provision)
(b) If a bid guarantee is required, please state the required penal sum or percentage of the bid price and the acceptable forms of bid guarantee.
- Answer: The amount of the bid guarantee shall be _20% percent of the bid price or $3 million, whichever is less.
36. Please clarify whether the TERO fee is 1.5% or 4% for this contract.
- Answer: Refer to H.50 in the RFP. Contact the TERO office for those details.
37. Cost Proposal- Please clarify how the TERO fee should be shown in the cost proposal. (line item, not at all, etc.)
- Answer: Refer to L.2. The requested proposal type is firm-fixed-priced (FFP). Also refer to B.1 and B.2. The requested FFP proposal price is fully-burdened.
38. Is there a current Infection Control Plan? Please provide a copy.
- Answer: Not developed for this project yet.
39. Please provide contact information for current contractors performing HVAC, Fire Suppression/notification, electrical maintenance
- Answer: Fire: Ostlund Fire Protection Inc, 406-348-2621.
40. Due to infection control, are there any technical requirements for negative containment areas for the lab and pharmacy?
- Answer: Negative containment, for all construction areas.
41. A-9. See the attached A-9, Should there be additional headers to include to break up the ceiling grid at these locations.
Answer: Headers are not needed at the two referenced locations. Contractor may, at no additional cost to the Government, add headers for their convenience at these two locations as long as exposed header surfaces are finished with gypsum board painted to match the ceiling color and flush with the bottom of ceiling in order avoid impacting airflow within the corridor.
43. Fire Alarm Spec Section 28 31 00. One problem must be resolved with the fire alarm system as designed. The spec names three different, incompatible systems for what's already in the building: a Radionics D7212 (1.1.F), Edwards EST3 devices (2.1.A), and a Simplex 4100ES control unit (2.3.A). From being on site, we can confirm there is no Simplex there. The existing panel is a Bosch/Radionics combination fire and intrusion unit. It's fully operational for the building's current needs, but it's obsolete and out of production, and it cannot be expanded to add devices or meet current code. The instruction to "expand the existing system" can't be built as written.
43.a. Will IHS accept a complete new standalone fire alarm system as the basis of design, confirmed by addendum?
- Answer: Although it was the original intent of the IHS to reuse the existing fire alarm control unit (FACU), upon further review, a replacement is recommended. Jensen Hughes recommends replacing the existing Radionics D7212 FACU with a Bosch B9512G.
The contractor shall replace all fire alarm devices, regardless of whether they are expressly depicted on the design drawings. The contractor should anticipate replacement or new installation of approximately 90 fire alarm devices. The contractor is responsible for the provision of a fully operating fire alarm system.
43.b. Is voice evacuation required, or will horn/strobe notification suffice? This is a significant cost driver.
- Answer: Voice notification is not required. Horn/strobes will be sufficient.
44. Bullet Resistant Walls, Doors, and Windows (see attached BR Drawings). See the attached drawing A- 6, Please confirm areas highlighted in red are bullet resistant paneling. Refer to drawing A-20.1 details 1 thru 3. Please confirm details match intent of bullet resistant paneling as shown on A-6. Specifically detail 2 note 6 at the counter windows.
Answer:
1. The walls highlighted in red in the attachment are UL752 Level 3 bullet resistant walls (Ref.
Plan 1/A-6).
2. Windows type A, C, D, and E highlighted in yellow in the attachment are UL752 Level 3 bullet resistant windows (Ref. Plan 1/A-6).
3. Detail 1/A-20.1 orientation is correctly shown on A-6 with bullet resistant panel installed on the waiting room side of the wall.
4. Detail 2/A-20.1 orientation is correctly shown on plan 4/A-15 with bullet resistant panel installed on the passage side of the wall. Note 6 on detail 2/A-20.1 refers to the full height security mesh that must be installed all around on the pharmacy room side of the wall (Ref.
plan 4/A-15 sheet note 34 and detail 5/A-20.1).
5. Detail 3/A-20.1 orientation is correctly shown on plan 4/A-20.1 with the bullet resistant panel installed on the consult room side of the wall.
6. Detail 6/A-20.1 orientation is correctly shown with on plan A-6 with bullet resistant window on the waiting side of the wall. Disregard note 6 on this detail only. All other scope of work remains the same.
7. Detail 2/A-38 orientation is correctly shown on plan 1/A-6 with bullet resistant panel installed on the waiting side of the wall.
45. Bullet Resistant Walls, Doors, and Windows (see attached BR Drawings). Refer to drawing A-6, Vestibule room 101. Drawing A-31 Door Schedule door 102. The door 102 is surrounded by bullet resistant materials. Should this door be bullet resistant. A besides door 101, should any other door require the 15-minute forced entry resistance. For example, doors 102 or existing doors.
Answer:
1. Door No. 2 IS NOT a bullet resistant door (Ref. Spec Section 08 41 13 and Door schedule on sheet A-31). The wall segment supporting door No. 2 shall remain as a bullet resistant wall.
a. Please note the following typos regarding door No. 2:
i. Section 08 41 13 paragraph 2.3.A.1 shall read “3000 Series” instead of “7000TL
Series”.
ii. Plan 1/A-6 and door schedule on A-31 should indicate door package unit width as
8’-0” instead of 8’-8”.
iii. All other scope of work shall remain the same.
2. The doors requiring a 15-minute forced entry resistance are doors No. 1 and No. 78 (Ref.
Door Schedule Remark No. 9 on sheet A-31).
46. SPECIAL COATING (SC) SYSTEM — The finish schedule marks (SC) walls/ceilings in the toilets, blood draw, soiled, and clean rooms. Please confirm the intended system: epoxy (MPI 101 primer + 2 coats MPI 98 high-build epoxy) or a scrubbable latex. This is a large pricing swing.
Answer: For gypsum board wall and ceiling surfaces indicated to receive special coating (SC), provide MP101 primer + 2 coats of MPI 98 high-build epoxy (Ref. Section 09 91 00 Paragraph 3.7.G.2.a).
47. INTUMESCENT COATING, MECH 016/016A EXPOSED WOOD CEILINGS — Three conflicts to resolve:
a. The spec calls for a thin-film fire-retardant coating (MPI 66/67), while the drawing keynote calls for FlameOFF Fire Barrier at 30-mil DFT with a 1-hour rating. Which governs?
Answer: Follow the drawing sheet note and provide 1-HR Fire Rated FlameOFF Fire Barrier Paint at 30-mil DFT (Ref. Sheet Note 8/A-9).
48. Color: the schedule lists White, the keynote says Clear. Note the manufacturer's ASTM E119 1-hour rated Fire Barrier Paint is produced in white only; their clear product is a flame-spread coating that does not carry the 1-hour rating. Please confirm required product and color.
Answer: Follow the interior finish schedule and provide White 1-HR FlameOFF Fire Rated Flame Off Fire Barrier Paint. Disregard “Clear” (Ref. Interior Finish Schedule on sheet A-32).
49. Extent: please confirm the intumescent scope is limited to Mech 016/016A (basement) only.
Answer: The 1-HR fire rated intumescent coating only applies to the underside of the first floor at the exposed ceilings of rooms 016 and 016A (Ref. Interior Finish Schedule on sheet A-32).
50. WEST ELEVATION EIFS — No west elevation is included in the drawing set. Please issue the west elevation or confirm whether the west wall is in the EIFS repaint scope.
Answer: Re-painting of all exterior EIFS surfaces is required. The west elevation is not shown because there is no major exterior construction occurring on that wall (Ref. Sheets A-16 and A- 17). Contractors shall ensure bids include complete exterior painting, and re-painting, of the new and existing EIFS system.
51. NEW GALVANIZED GUARDRAILS/HANDRAILS (ramp/steps) — Field painted or left galvanized? The drawings are silent; we currently carry painting as an add alternate.
Answer: This should NOT be an add alternate. Guardrails and handrails shall be painted. Shop priming and Field painting of new galvanized metal guardrails and handrails is required (Ref.
Section 05 50 00 Paragraphs 1.1.B.11, 1.2.B, and 2.4.F.3 / Ref. Section 09 91 00 Paragraph 3.8.C.1).
52. NEW 2x8 PT WOOD FASCIA (roof infill + elevator dormer) — Field painted or metal-wrapped? We currently carry painting as an add alternate.
Answer: This should NOT be an add alternate. At the dormer and other exterior exposed wood locations, field prime and field paint 2x8 PT Fascia board as well as any other exterior exposed wood surfaces. This includes, but is not limited to exterior exposed fascia boards, underside of roof deck, rafter tails, and other exposed wood framing members, nailers, and blocking (Ref.
Section 09 91 00 paragraphs 3.4.B, 3.7.E.1.a, and 3.8.B).
53. PIPE ID MARKERS/STENCILS & MECH EQUIPMENT PAINTING — Is this the painter's scope under 09 91 00, or carried by Div 22/23?
Answer:
a. Plumbing piping ID (markers/stencils) is governed by spec sections are 22 05 11 2.7 and 3.8, not
09 91 00.
b. Mechanical piping ID (markers/stencils) is governed by spec sections are 23 05 11 2.8 and 3.8, not 09 91 00.
c. Except for prefinished equipment, field painting of Div. 22 and 23 equipment is governed by Section 09 91 00.
54. ACCESS PANELS — Please confirm access panels are field painted by the painter to match adjacent walls. We carry an allowance count of 12.
Answer: Confirm with Government if an “allowance” is acceptable. It is usually the Contractors responsible to determine the final location and number of access panels and include this as part of the bid.
a. Wall and ceiling access panels in dry locations shall receive a manufacturer’s standard powder-coat finish to match adjacent wall/ceiling color (Ref. Section 08 31 13 Paragraph 2.6.A). Contractor is responsible to coordinate between the trades to ensure the right color match is applied.
b. Wall and ceiling access panels in wet locations shall be stainless steel and shall not be painted (Ref. Section 08 31 13 Paragraph 2.6.B).
c. Please refer to general project notes indicating the quantity of wall and ceiling access panels to assume for bidding purposes (Ref. general project note 41/G-2).
55. EIFS PATCH PREP — Please confirm grinding/edge prep of EIFS patches is by the EIFS trade (07 24 00), with the painter spot-priming and painting only.
Answer: Contractor is responsible for coordinating which trade does the work and ensuring only qualified and trained individuals are doing their respective work (Ref. Section 07 24 00 Paragraphs 1.5.F, 1.6.A, and 3.2.A / Ref. Section 09 91 00 Paragraphs 1.5.A, 1.5.B, 3.4.A, 3.6, and 3.10).
56. Product/system conflict — spec vs. drawings.
The Reflected Ceiling Plan keynote and the Interior Finish Schedule both call for a FlameOFF 30-mil DFT, 1-hour fire-rated intumescent fire barrier paint (or approved equal) over all exposed wood ceiling construction in the mechanical rooms. However, Specification Section 09 91 00 (Painting) specifies thin fire-retardant intumescent top-coats — MPI 67 / MPI 66, one to two coats — for exposed wood in fire-rated rooms. A 30-mil structural barrier and a 1–2 coat MPI top-coat are very different products at very different costs. Please confirm which governs for the mechanical rooms. We are assuming the 30-mil FlameOFF (or approved equal) 1-hour barrier per the drawings and finish schedule, since a true 1-hour rated assembly requires it, but we need it confirmed in writing.
Answer: Follow the drawings and interior finish schedule. Disregard “MPI 67 / MPI 66” in Section 09 91 00. All other requirements remain the same.
57. Color — white vs. clear.
The Interior Finish Schedule lists the product as "FlameOFF 30 mils DFT 1-HR Fire Barrier Paint, White," while the RCP keynote calls for "FlameOFF FR Clear fire barrier coating or approved equal." These are different products. Please confirm whether white or clear is required.
Answer: Follow the interior finish schedule. The color is “white” and disregard “clear”. All other requirements remain the same.
58. Extent of the coating.
The finish schedule applies the 1-hour intumescent to the exposed wood ceilings in the basement mechanical rooms (016/016A). A separate keynote references prep of exposed first-floor wood surfaces to receive a 1-hr F.R. intumescent coating in that area. Please confirm the full extent — is the intumescent limited to Mech 016/016A, or are there additional first-floor exposed-wood areas to include?
Answer: Intumescent fire barrier paint is only required in rooms 016 and 016A. Sheet note 12 on sheet A2 refers to the prep work, per manufacturer instructions, to be done on the underside of the first floor at the exposed ceiling above rooms 016 and 016A, before the intumescent fire barrier paint is applied.
59. If you have an approved-equal product list for this coating, that would also help us get accurate supplier pricing.
Answer: We do not have a list of approved-equal products.
The following questions were asked after the deadline for submitting questions. The Government will attempt to provide answers prior to the extended offers due date of 08/18/2026 but the answers timeline might not be possible.
60. I am still unsure what size tile to bid. There aren’t sizes listed for floors or walls. And I’m not sure the design intent on the wainscot accent tile. There are no details on the elevations.
Answer:
61. I can not find the wall elevations for the basement or the 1st floor. There is one detail on Sheet A-19 Detail four in basement, but I am unsure if it is a true elevation. This is for my drywaller.
Answer:
62. I am just working on the horizontal cabling portion of this quote and have a question. The legend page has these symbols
The electrical power plan, page E-8, has this symbol that is not on the legends page I do not know how many cables are wanted at this location. Please confirm how many cables go to that symbols and also please confirm that (4) cables go to this symbol location .
Answer:
63. Alternative solutions and substitutions:
Answer: Refer to RFP Sections L.8. and Section M. Your proposal should explain how the proposed solution meets or exceeds the required specifications, how it affects short and long term costs, delivery details, etc. to better help the evaluators assess your proposal against the requirements and the other offers.
You may propose this alternative system as part of your bid and the Government may then decide to do a deeper assessment if yours is the lowest offer being evaluated; remember that this is a LPTA solicitation. In your offer, I suggest you address the following questions:
- Is this product fully compatible?
- What are the vapor and off-gassing implications of product(s) with regard to infiltration into the facility?
Daniel Cotto Highlight
- Are there multiple products such as cleaner, primer, coating, perhaps others for repairs prior to coating?
- What is the warranty available for this particular installation? Make sure the warranty is stated clearly.
64. Is the contractor responsible for building permits. Who is the governing body for permitting.
Answer: The Contractor.
65. Amendment 0003 removed the scope of work associated with fire alarm system products and maintenance services portion. Please confirm if the conduit/raceways/junction boxes associated with the fire alarm system are to be provided by the contractor for this solicitation.
66. Elevator: Specifications 14 24 00-2.2 A. – Is Canton Elevator (NIDEC) an acceptable manufacturer?
67. Construction Means and Methods proposal: During the Phase 1 construction phase, would it be acceptable to temporarily remove a window at the rear of the building to facilitate the loading and unloading of construction materials into the basement? Please confirm if this approach is acceptable and advise of any required procedures or restrictions.
68. Construction activity: What are the acceptable construction activity decibel units allowed when the clinic is open and operational?
69. Construction Schedule: The construction schedule, for the Phase 1 activities, works out that most of build out will occur in from January to April. Will there be an allotment in the schedule to move the activities to spring due to the building during the harsh winter months?
- Answer:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .