J-11 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Contact Center Operations
- Solicitation number
- 75FCMC24R0010
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under Solicitation Number 75FCMC24R0010 for Contact Center Operations.
The RFP seeks to acquire continued support for CMS's nationwide 24x7 contact center operations, including 1-800 MEDICARE and the Marketplace (Exchange) call centers. The Contractor shall provide accurate and high-quality customer service across multiple communication channels such as telephone, mail, TDD/TTY, fax, and web chat. The Past Performance Questionnaire requests information from customers/clients to evaluate the past performance of offerors seeking to be awarded this contract. It covers key performance areas including quality, cost control, schedule, management, and small business utilization. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale of 0-4 and provide comments to justify the ratings. The questionnaire results may be shared with offerors as part of exchanges regarding past performance information.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30 Amendment 4.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1.zip | ZIP file | |
| J-1 Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-2 Award Fee Evaluation Plan.pdf | ||
| J-3 Incremental Funding Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| J-5 Government Furnished Property Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-10 Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP_75FCMC24R0010.pdf | ||
| J-6 Contractor-Offeror Conflict of Interest.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-7 Wage Determinations.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-8 CMS Accessibility Conformance Checklist.zip | ZIP file | |
| J-9 Proposal Assumptions.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-4 Statement of Work (SOW).zip | ZIP file |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP: 75FCMC24R0010
Attachment J-11, Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name, Address and Contact information Date
SUBJECT: RFP: 75FCMC24R0010, Contact Center Operations
Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for RFP number 75FCMC24R0010 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform ____________________________________________.
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.
Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Reference Name Title
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B3-30-03 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
SUBJECT: RFP: 75FCMC24R0010, Contact Center Operations
To Whom It May Concern:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS.
CMS may engage in exchanges with offerors regarding past performance information submitted to CMS in connection with the subject solicitation. If CMS engages in such exchanges, CMS may share information disclosed in this survey with the Offeror to whom it pertains, as permitted or required by the FAR. Otherwise, CMS will only share information from this survey outside the agency pursuant to a protective order or as otherwise required by law
The questionnaire is arranged by the following performance areas: customer service, financial management, operational excellence, innovations and general performance. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire to:
Email PDF: brian.humes@cms.hhs.gov
Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire.
| Sincerely, |
| /s/ |
| Deborah S. Lester |
| Contracting Officer |
INSTRUCTIONS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
The information from this questionnaire will be utilized in accordance with the 1994 Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, Section 1091 to evaluate the past performance of offerors.
The questionnaire is arranged by general performance areas, i.e., quality, cost control, schedule, management, and Utilization of Small Business. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to that aspect of performance. We ask that you rate the contractor on a scale of 0 through 4 by circling the appropriate number. The following table describes the rating scale in more detail:
Rating Scale:
| N/A |
| Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report |
| 0 |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| 1 |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| 2 |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| 3 |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| 4 |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially of situations that warranted very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced contract. Once completed, please e-mail your response to Brian Humes, Contract Specialist, brian.humes@cms.hhs.gov by (Offerors please include the date and time that Phase 2 proposals are due).
Category 0 or 1 responses will be referred to the contractor to permit rebuttal. Neither your name nor position within your organization will be divulged either during or after this survey has been completed.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation No. _________________
| Contractor: _____________________ | Referenced Agency: ______________________ | ||
| Address: _____________________ | Contact Person: ______________________ | ||
| _____________________ | Telephone No.: ______________________ |
Q1. What type of product(s)/services was provided under your contract?
Q2. What type of contract?
Q3. Competitive or non-competitive?
Q4. Total value of contract?
Q5. Period of Performance?
Ratings: Summarize contractor's performance and circle in the column on the right the number which corresponds to the performance rating for each rating category. See Rating Guidelines 0-Unsatisfactory 1-Marginal 2-Satisfactory 3-Very Good 4-Exceptional
Q1. Quality: Did the Offeror demonstrate the execution of quality efforts resulted in effective performance outcomes for work activities?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q2. Cost Control: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to ensure costs were within budget?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q3. Schedule: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to consistently meet project milestones and deliverables on time?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q4. Management: Did the Offeror demonstrate a past track record of notifying its contractors/customers of problems, remaining flexible and reliable, and being responsive to contract requirements and recommending solutions? How well did the Offeror match the qualifications of the key position, as described in the contract, with the person that filled the key position? Did the Offeror support key personnel so they were able to work effectively?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q6. Utilization of Small Business: Did the Offeror demonstrate and implement an effective and efficient small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting plan?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
| Q6. Would you recommend this contractor to others? |
| a. Yes |
b. No
| Q7. Any other comments regarding the contractor's performance? |
| Comments: |
PRINT NAME: ____________________________________
SIGNATURE: ____________________________________
TITLE: ____________________________________
DATE: ____________________________________
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .