73000-00007263 ITA .docx
DOCX document 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-44300-00007262
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This is a Notice of Intent to Award from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for Real Property Management Services RFP #73000-00007263. ODOT has selected Commonstreet Consulting, LLC as the top-ranked firm for negotiations of a price agreement to provide personal services. The solicitation involved four evaluators who scored proposals and follow-up questions, with Commonstreet Consulting achieving a final cumulative score of 434 compared to EPIC Land Solutions' score of 421 and Stevens & Norris' score of 263. Projects will be assigned via Work Order Contract (WOC) assignment options as described in the price agreement's Exhibit I. The negotiation schedule establishes a timeline for completing the Scope of Work discussions, billing rate submissions, legal sufficiency review, and contract execution, with negotiations anticipated to be completed within the specified business day parameters depending on project complexity. The Notice of Intent to Award was issued on March 28, 2024, with a protest period deadline of April 3, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. for competing proposers. No work is authorized until the Price Agreement and subsequent WOCs are executed and the consultant receives written Notice to Proceed from the ODOT Project Manager.
Award submittal requirements include certificates of insurance, a list of subconsultants, a Responsibility Inquiry Form, business registry number, W-9 Form, and authorization for Direct Deposit via Automated Clearing House (ACH). The Responsibility Inquiry Form requires the selected firm to demonstrate financial capacity, years of relevant business experience, sufficient cash flow, absence of contract termination history, freedom from criminal charges related to public contracts, clean bankruptcy and tax records, proper licensing and authorization to do business in Oregon, and satisfactory performance on previous similar contracts. Wendy Elstun serves as the Price Agreement Administrator and primary contact regarding billing rates, amendment requests, and subcontractor approvals. The Price Agreement Administrator and assigned ODOT Project Managers will manage the ongoing administration of individual WOC assignments. If negotiations cannot be completed within the specified timeframe despite good faith efforts, ODOT reserves the right to terminate negotiations and begin discussions with the next highest-ranked firm.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5664-0 Sole Source Determination~1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Notice of Intent to Award DATE: March 28, 2024 TO: Commonstreet Consulting, LLC EPIC Land Solutions, Inc.
SUBJECT: Real Property Management Services RFP #73000-00007263 (35723) Commonstreet Consulting, LLC., is the top ranked firm selected for negotiations of a price agreement, to provide Personal Services as specified in the above referenced RFP. The scores and rankings of all Proposers are shown in the score matrix accompanying this notice. The award submittal requirements stated in the RFP are summarized on Attachment 1 of this notice.
As stated in the RFP, projects will be assigned via the WOC assignment options described in Exhibit I of the price agreement. Please reference the above number in all correspondence related to this price agreement, 73000-00007263. Wendy Elstun will be the Price Agreement Administrator for this price agreement. The Price Agreement Administrator will be the primary contact regarding billing rates, amendment requests and approval of changes/additions to subcontractors under the price agreement. Any WOC assignments your firm receives will be assigned an ODOT Project Manager (PM) as the primary contact for the WOC project. To set expectations for the contracting phase, listed below is a schedule for completing negotiations, and securing approvals for both the Consultant and ODOT to follow:
| Activity |
| Responsible Party |
| Business Days |
| Negotiations |
| Establish work session to discuss the SOW with Consultant |
| ODOT PM |
| Within 5-10 days of this notice (days depend on size and complexity of the project) |
| Respond to work session with comments/edits to SOW |
| Consultant |
| Within 5 days of work session |
| Respond to SOW comments/edits |
| ODOT PM |
| Within 3 days of receipt of Consultant comments/edits |
| Submission of BOC / Billing Rates |
| Consultant |
| Within 5-10 days of final ODOT scope (days depend on size and complexity of the project) |
Respond to BOC, billing rates, negotiate, and
Submit for legal sufficiency
ODOT PM
OPO
Within 5-10 days of Consultant submission of the BOC (days depend on the size and complexity of the project)
| Legal Sufficiency |
| OPO, ODOT PM, and DOJ |
| Within 15 (Mini-Solicitation) & 20 (Formal) days of submission by ODOT PM |
| Signature routing and execution |
| OPO, Consultant, and ODOT Expenditure Authority (if required) |
| Within 6-8 days from initial routing |
| Issue Notice to Proceed (NTP) |
| ODOT PM |
| 1 day after execution |
Negotiations are anticipated to be completed (ready to submit to for legal sufficiency) within the schedule set forth in this notice.
If the schedule for negotiations cannot be met and the Consultant and ODOT are negotiating in good faith, additional time may be mutually agreed upon.
If agreement on costs, tasks, or other Price Agreement requirements cannot be reached within this time frame, ODOT may terminate the negotiations and begin negotiations with the next highest ranked firm as provided in the solicitation and governing Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs).
Note that no work is authorized until the Price Agreement and subsequent WOC(s) are executed and Consultant has received a written NTP from the ODOT PM.
Because this notice is being emailed, the date of this notice will start the protest period for competing proposers to submit a written selection protest (REF Section 5.2.1 of the RFP). Any proposer who claims to have been adversely affected or aggrieved by the selection of a higher ranked proposer must deliver a written selection protest to my attention and received at the email address below no later than 3:00 p.m. on April 3, 2024. ODOT shall not consider a selection protest submitted after the deadline established herein. To be adversely affected or aggrieved, a protestor must demonstrate that the protester was ranked higher than other selected proposers and that higher ranked proposers are ineligible for selection.
ODOT would like to thank each Proposer for your time and efforts in preparing a response to this solicitation.
Sincerely, Wendy Elstun Contract & Procurement Specialist Email: Wendy.Eltsun@odot.oregon.gov
Attachment 1 – Award Submittal Requirements Please email to me, the Price Agreement Coordinator, the following items if marked as “REQUIRED” in the RFP (see detailed requirements and due date for each item in Section 5.3of the RFP).
· Certificates of Insurance
· List of Subconsultants
· Responsibility Inquiry form-Attachment A.1
· Business Registry Number
· W-9 Form
Direct Deposit via Automated Clearing House (ACH). For Consultants that receive ongoing monthly payments from Agency on one or more contracts or work orders, Agency prefers making Consultant payments via ACH direct deposit. While not required, if Consultant has not previously authorized ACH direct deposit via their OregonBuys supplier account they are encouraged to do so. Consultant should make reasonable efforts to offer ACH direct deposit payments.
A.1 Responsibility Inquiry Form
RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY
Agency will determine responsibility of a firm prior to award and execution of a contract. In addition to this form, Agency may obtain any information Agency deems necessary to make the determination. Agency will notify the firm of any other documentation required, which may include, but is not limited to, Oregon Department of Revenue Letter of Debt Compliance, recent profit-and-loss history; current balance statements and cash flow information; assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims; availability of short and long-term financing; bonding capacity; insurability, credit information; material; equipment; facility and personnel information; record of performance under previous contracts; etc. Agency may postpone the award of the Contract in order to complete its investigation and evaluation. Failure to promptly provide requested information and clearly demonstrate Responsibility may result in offer rejection and ineligibility of contract award.
| 1. | Does your firm have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of the firm to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES |_| / NO |_|. |
| 2. | Number of years in business providing the services/goods/equipment required under the prospective contract: |
| 3. | a) Is your firm experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? |
YES |_| / NO |_|. b) Does your firm have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES |_| / NO |_| If "YES” on question 3.a or “NO” on question 3.b, please provide additional details.
Response:
4. Within the last 3-year period, has your firm had one or more contracts terminated for contractor default by any federal, state or local government agency, or any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES |_| / NO |_|. If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)
Response:
5. Is your firm, a major partner or major shareholder (defined as a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of your firm), a major subcontractor (defined as receiving 10% or more of the total Contract amount), or any principal officer of your firm, major partner, major shareholder, or major subcontractor presently, or within the last 3 years has been convicted of, indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with the commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Proposals; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property?
YES |_| / NO |_|. If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment and names and summary of charges.
Response:
6. Within the last 3-year period, has your firm filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES |_| / NO |_|. If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.
Response:
7. a) Within the last 3-year period, has your firm been notified of any delinquent Federal or State taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied. YES |_| /NO |_|.
b) Does your firm have any liquidated and delinquent debt owed to the State or any department or agency of the State? If "YES" on 7.a or 7.b or both, please explain. YES |_| /NO |_| Response:
8. Does your firm have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is the firm legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon. YES |_| /NO |_|. If "NO," please explain.
Response:
9. Within the last 3-year period, has your firm completed previous contracts of a similar nature with a satisfactory record of performance? [For purposes of this question, a satisfactory record of performance means that to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform a previous contract remained within your firm′s control, your firm stayed within the time and budget allotted for the procurement and otherwise performed the contract in a satisfactory manner.] YES |_| /NO |_|. If "NO," please explain.
Response:
10. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if your firm employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract or price agreement is estimated to exceed $500,000. This requirement does not apply to architectural, engineering, photogrammetric mapping, transportation planning or land surveying and related services contracts. If applicable, does a current authorized representative of your firm possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES |_| / NO |_| / N/A |_|. (If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Proposal submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.)
Comments:
RESPOND TO ITEMS 11 & 12 IF THE PROSPECTIVE CONTRACT INCLUDES SALE OF EQUIPMENT TO Agency. (If this information was provided in the Bid or Proposal submitted for this solicitation, then it is not necessary to repeat it here. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response fields.)
| 11. | Number of factory-authorized service representatives in the State available to provide warranty services under the Contract to be awarded: |
| 12. | Locations of representatives indicated in item 11 above, including contact names, company names, physical addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers and hours of service: |
| 1 |
| 2 |
(Create additional rows or use additional sheets if necessary)
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Bidder/Proposer certifies that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.
| Name of Firm: |
| RFP/ITB # (if applicable): |
Project Name:
Authorized Signature Date
Print Name Title
RFP Number: 35723 Project Name: Real Property Management Services
EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY
SOP Evaluation Summary Scores
| Number of Proposal evaluators: |
| 4 |
Score
Firm
Eval #1
Eval #2
Eval #3
Eval #4
| Total |
| Avg |
| Rank |
EPIC
| 80 |
| 1 |
| 81 |
| 1 |
| 79 |
| 2 |
| 76 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 316 |
| 79 |
| 2 |
Commonstreet
| 78 |
| 2 |
| 79 |
| 2 |
| 82 |
| 1 |
| 78 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 317 |
| 79 |
| 1 |
Stevens & Norris
| 66 |
| 3 |
| 66 |
| 3 |
| 65 |
| 3 |
| 64 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 261 |
| 65 |
| 3 |
Follow up Questions Evaluation Summary Scores
| Number of Question evaluators: |
| 4 |
Score
Firm
Eval #1
Eval #2
Eval #3
Eval # 4
| Total |
| Avg |
| Rank |
EPIC
| 30 |
| 1 |
| 30 |
| 1 |
| 14 |
| 2 |
| 28 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 102 |
| 26 |
| 2 |
Commonstreet
| 27 |
| 2 |
| 28 |
| 2 |
| 28 |
| 1 |
| 29 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 112 |
| 28 |
| 1 |
FINAL AVERAGE SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
Proposal
Interview
Enter
Final Scores
Firm
Average
Average
Cost Scores
Rank
Epic
| 79 |
| 2 |
| 26 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 108 |
Commonstreet
| 79 |
| 1 |
| 28 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 112 |
Stevens Norris
| 65 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 67 |
FINAL CUMULATIVE SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
Round 1
Round 2
Enter
Final Scores
Firm
Cost Scores
Rank
Epic
| 316 |
| 2 |
| 102 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 421 |
Commonstreet
| 317 |
| 1 |
| 112 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 434 |
Stevens Norris
| 261 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 263 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .