DO2 - Jordans Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened - PIRS ALL 3 7 2021 FINAL.pdf

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened

PIRS

2.a Liters of water per capita per day supplied for domestic uses (context indicator) 3

2.1.a Cubic meters of water provided or saved as a result of USG assistance 5

2.1.1.a Number of people receiving improved service quality from an existing basic drinking or safely managed water service as a result of USG assistance (HL.8.1-3) 7

2.1.2.a Number of people gaining access to safely managed sanitation services as a result of USG assistance (F HL.8.2-3) 10

2.1.2.b Number of additional cubic meters of treated wastewater reused annually as a result of USG assistance 13

2.1.3.a Percentage of Non-Revenue Water (by utility) 15

2.1.4.a Value of new funding mobilized to the water and sanitation sectors as a result of USG assistance (HL 8.4-1) 17

2.2.a Number of policies, regulations and administrative procedures relating to water passed, or being implemented as a result of USG assistance 20

2.2.1.a Number of action plans implemented for water security, integrated water resource management, and/or water source protection as a result of USG assistance 22

2.1.4.a Value of new funding mobilized to the water and sanitation sectors as a result of USG assistance (HL 8.4-1) 24

2.2.2.b Percent change in cost recovery of water sector 27

2.2.3.a Number of people educated on tools, approaches, and/or methods for water security, integrated water resource management, and/or water source protection as a result of USG assistance 29

2.3.a Cubic meters of water saved annually by end users through water-saving technologies and techniques as a result of USG assistance 31

2.3.2.a Percentage of people in targeted areas who have retained the use of recommended water-saving technologies and techniques six months after intervention completion. 33

2.3.3.a Number of adoptions of new technologies or techniques to save water or increase reuse of water 35

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 1

2.4.a Number of people who participated in public-private dialogues surrounding water sector decisions 37

2.4.1.a Number of inclusive water sector public-private dialogues conducted 39

2.4.2.a Number of women and girls benefitting from new or improved USG-supported social services targeted at improving career opportunities for women and girls 41

2.4.2.b Number of youth and women with an internship or new or better employment in the water sector as a result of USG support 43

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 2

USAID/Jordan Mission Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS)

IDENTIFICATION

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened

IR: N/A

Sub IR: N/A Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.A LITERS OF WATER PER CAPITA PER DAY SUPPLIED FOR DOMESTIC

USES (CONTEXT INDICATOR)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator? ⛝ No ☐ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies) USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators):

This refers to the supplied liters of water per day per person. Due to Jordan’s extreme water scarcity and intermittent supply, the country only manages to provide low quantities of water per capita for domestic uses. USAID’s interventions will help to provide more water through new water supply projects and through improved management and efficiency of existing water systems with the aim of increasing per capita water supply to bridge the gap between demand and supply.

This is a context indicator for the whole country and will not only capture USAID-funded interventions.

Precise Definition (If applies): N/A Unit of Measure: Liters Method of Calculation: Numerator: Number of Liters of water supplied per person per day Denominator: Total population Per capita will be calculated by dividing the numerator over the denominator.

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Geographic area (Governorate) Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality ☐ District ⛝ Governorate ☐ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Annual domestic water supplied divided by the population in Jordan.

Data Source(s): Implementing partners, Ministry of Water and Irrigation and Water utilities Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): USAID Water Resources and Environment (WRE) Team

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 3

Location of Data Storage: Reported annually in Quarter 4 (fiscal year) by IP via DevResults, the data will be collected officially from MWI. All data should be reported in line with the USAID fiscal year/quarterly schedule.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: This data will be used as a context indicator to determine the overall status of the water sector in Jordan.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

THIS SHEETWAS LAST UPDATED ON: DECEMBER 2020

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 4

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub-IR: N/A Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.A CUBIC METERS OF WATER PROVIDED OR SAVED AS A RESULT OF

USG ASSISTANCE

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator? ☐ No ⛝ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020 - 2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies) USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): This indicator measures the volume, in cubic meters, of water provided or saved as a result of USG interventions.

“Water provided” refers to additional water that was provided by water operating entities to either residential, commercial or agricultural customers. This will typically refer to additional water (frequency, volume, etc) that was provided, compared to what the utility was able to provide prior to the intervention. This could be due to additional capacity added or water saved.

“Water saved” refers to water that was being lost due to leaks, illegal tapping or other types of water losses that had been fixed as a result of the intervention, thus allowing additional water to be provided.

Each Implementing Partner will provide further detail about the type of intervention that this indicator will measure specific to their project. For every area where work is completed, water savings generated are calculated annually based on the supplied water in a reporting period.

Precise Definition: N/A Unit of Measure: Cubic meters per year (not cumulative but progress should be reported on a quarterly basis) Method of Calculation: Number is calculated by operating entities Disaggregated by (location, age, sex):Water utility (JVA, WAJ/ Miyahuna-Amman/Yarmouk Co./ Aqaba Water Co/ Miyahuna-Zarqa/Miyahuna Madaba)

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 5

Reporting Level: ☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality☐ District ☐ Governorate ⛝ Kingdom (by utility)

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Implementing partners will collect the primary data and report to WRE on quarterly basis. Data will be collected based on measured quantities of water saved in the restructured and rehabilitated district areas as a result of USGs interventions, i.e current NRW quantities - baseline NRW quantities per quarter. In addition to the measured quantities of water saved through fixing leaks and network repairs implemented as a result of USG’s NRW interventions, water provided may also include treated wastewater effluent, or reuse, that is then provided for irrigation as well as water from new supply systems and this data would be provided by the water utility or Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP).

Data Source(s): Implementing partners and water utilities Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): USAID Water Resources and Environment (WRE) Team Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and in the Mission’s performance management system, DevResults. The implementing partner will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID Water Resources and Environment Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: DQAs will be conducted every 3 years by the Mission in coordination with each implementing partner. Additionally, IPs are encouraged to conduct additional data quality assessments on a routine basis.

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): Poor metering of water systems may lead to incorrect measurement of total cubic meters of water saved.

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: Method of calculation will be based on the water metering system (old or new) - thus calculation differs from one area to another.

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 6

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub-IR 2.1.1 Strategic Investments in Long-Term Water Supply Increased Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.1.A NUMBER OF PEOPLE RECEIVING IMPROVED SERVICE QUALITY

FROM AN EXISTING BASIC DRINKING OR SAFELY MANAGED WATER

SERVICE AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE (HL.8.1-3)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ⛝ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⛝ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020 - 2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies) A person is counted for this indicator when their current primary drinking water service qualifies as a “basic,” or “safely managed” (see indicators HL.8.1-1 and HL.8.1-2) but, the quality of “service” they receive is further “improved” as a result of USG assistance in terms of its ease of accessibility, reliability, water quality and/or affordability.

Specifically, “improved service quality” is defined as being achieved if:

● The accessibility measure, time taken to collect water from a basic or safely managed service, is further reduced to less than the minimum requirements for a basic water service (see indicator HL.8.1-1) or safely managed water service (see indicator HL.8.1-2);

and/or

● Reliability of supply improves such that the person’s main service is available regularly or more frequently, i.e. there is no regular rationing of supply or regular seasonal failure of their improved service; and/or,

● Water quality improvements are made that would be reasonably expected to result in long term improvements to the fecal, biological or chemical contamination of a drinking

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 7 water sources (e.g. construction of water treatment systems, support to service provider to consistently chlorinate water, implementation of a water safety plan); and/or,

● Affordability of their basic or safely managed drinking water services improves such that the average price they pay for water is no higher than two times the average water tariff for piped water into the dwelling in their country (where applicable).

USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition (If applies): N/A Unit of Measure: Number Method of Calculation: Numbers of subscribers for an improved source X the average person per household number OR the population projected to benefit from the “improved drinking water source” **The standard household average of 4.8 people per family in Jordan should be used by all implementing partners. Sex should be calculated using the 2015 census data for the national average (47% female/53% male).

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Geographic area (Governorate), sex (male/female) Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality ☐ District ⛝ Governorate Location of water service/ people ☐ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Upon completion of construction, rehabilitation, or upgrading of water services, data must be collected by USAID staff, implementing partners, or a third party evaluator. USAID staff, implementing partners, or a third party evaluator must reasonably demonstrate the linkage between USG assistance and new services provided in order to attribute results to this indicator. Acceptable method(s) by which data for this indicator should be collected are:

● Program records and observations of water supply systems constructed/renovated.

● Household surveys of a representative and statistically significant sample of those who received improved drinking water service quality

● Intercept survey at the point of water distribution. An intercept survey is a short structured interview carried out by an enumerator at a desired location, which, in this case, would be the water distribution point

● Water quality testing must be used to confirm results related to improvements in water quality upon completion of the intervention

These data sources require that a baseline must be established among potential beneficiaries before the start of activity implementation to measure current “time to collect”, and type of existing “main drinking water services” through an initial household survey, using a representative sample of households, conducted by the implementing partner or a third party. Water quality improvements require baseline testing of water quality.

Service quality improvement information will be defined as:

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 8

● Accessibility: the total time to collect water from the service

● Reliability: the number of days within each quarter that the service was operational

● Affordability: price per volume of water sold.

● Quality: the chemical, physical, and/or biological characteristics of water.

This indicator can be difficult and time consuming to measure accurately and requires robust data quality assurance on the part of USAID.

Note: The same beneficiaries cannot be counted against this indicator and indicator HL.8.1-1 or

HL.8.1-2.

Data Source(s): Implementing partners Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and in the Mission’s performance management system, DevResults. The IP will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID WRE Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): This indicator relies on data from utilities (number of subscribers) which cannot be independently verified by implementing partners.

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: IPs will ensure data quality by developing/enhancing utilities’ M&E system and build their capacity to track on required data.

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 9

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub IR 2.1.2: Expanded Treatment and Reuse of Wastewater Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.2.A NUMBER OF PEOPLE GAINING ACCESS TO SAFELY MANAGED

SANITATION SERVICES AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE (F

HL.8.2-3)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ⛝ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⛝ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020-2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies) A safely managed sanitation service is defined as a basic sanitation facility service (see below) that is not shared with other households and where excreta is safely disposed of in situ or removed to be treated off-site.

Safely managed sanitation services are those that effectively separate excreta from human contact, and ensure that excreta do not re-enter the immediate environment. This means that household excreta are contained, extracted, and transported to designated disposal or treatment sites, or, as locally appropriate, are safely re-used at the household or community level.

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 10

Persons are counted as “gaining access” to a safely managed sanitation service if their household did not previously have similar “access”. This may include households who previously had a basic sanitation facility, but did not have safe removal or disposal of excreta.

A basic sanitation service, defined according to the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP), is a sanitation facility that hygienically separates human excreta from human contact, and that is not shared with other households. Sanitation facilities meeting this criteria include:

● flush or pour/flush facility connected to a piped sewer system;

● a septic system or a pit latrine with slab;

● composting toilets;

● or ventilated improved pit latrines (with slab).

All other sanitation facilities do not meet this definition and are considered “unimproved.”

Unimproved sanitation includes: flush or pour/flush toilets without a sewer connection; pit latrines without slab/open pit; bucket latrines; or hanging toilets/latrines. Households that use a facility shared with other households are not counted as using a basic sanitation facility. A household is defined as a person or group of persons that usually live and eat together.

USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition: This number is not counted cumulatively and will only report on the number of people benefiting in the year that the improved sanitation facility is completed. People gaining access to the facility in subsequent years (due to factors such as population growth) will not be counted in this indicator.

Unit of Measure: Number Method of Calculation:

The number of people will be calculated using the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant at the design phase triangulated with the current or anticipated population served in the target area during the year of completion (based on Department of Statistics data) and the average effluent per person per year for the target community.

**The standard household average of 4.8 people per family in Jordan should be used by all implementing partners. Sex should be calculated using the 2015 census data for the national average (47% female/53% male).

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Water utility (WAJ/Miyahuna-Amman/Yarmouk/Aqaba Water Co./Miyahuna-Zarqa), sex (male/female).

Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality☐ District ☐

Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method:

(Standard F method): Data must be collected by USAID staff, implementing partners, or a third party evaluator. USAID staff, implementing partners, or a third party evaluator must reasonably demonstrate the linkage between USG assistance and new services provided in order

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 11 to attribute results to this indicator. Acceptable method(s) by which data for this indicator can be collected are:

● Direct count of beneficiary households and estimates of the number of people living in those households by the USAID partners implementing activities in the zone of influence.

(This method would be most appropriate when the technical approach being pursued involves some direct household engagement by the USAID implementing partner).

(USAID/Jordan method): The number of people will be calculated using the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant at the design phase triangulated with the current or anticipated population served in the target area during the year of completion (based on Department of Statistics data) and the average effluent per person per year for the target community.

Data Source(s): Implementing partners reporting on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Quarterly Frequency of Reporting: Quarterly Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and in the Mission’s performance management system, DevResults. The IP will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID WRE Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): Due to the unreliable nature of the subscriber numbers from utilities, an estimate is being used. Additionally, this indicator only shows a snapshot in time at the time of completion of the sanitation facility and thus, does not show the full picture of beneficiaries of these interventions.

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 12

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub IR 2.1.2: Expanded Treatment and Reuse of Wastewater Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.2.B NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL CUBIC METERS OF TREATED

WASTEWATER REUSED ANNUALLY AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator? ⛝ No☐ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies):

This indicator measures the volume, in cubic meters, of treated wastewater (reclaimed/effluent) reused as a result of USG interventions. The USG interventions might be construction/ rehabilitation and/or expansion of wastewater treatment plants and/or construction/ rehabilitation of treated wastewater facilities or pipelines.

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 13

Wastewater treatment is a process used to remove contaminants from wastewater/sewage /influent and convert it into a treated wastewater (reclaimed/effluent) that can be returned to the water cycle with acceptable impact on the environment, or reused for various purposes, based on the related standards/ regulations.

Reuse of treated wastewater: to use the treated wastewater (reclaimed/effluent) directly/ indirectly in agriculture, industry, or discharge in wadis/ valleys and rivers to be eventually used for agricultural and industrial purposes.

Each Implementing Partner (IP) will provide further detail about the type of intervention that this indicator will measure specific to their project. For every area where work is completed, treated wastewater generated is calculated annually.

USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition: N/A Unit of Measure: Cubic meters per year Method of Calculation: Number is calculated by IPs

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Location and Water utility (JVA, WAJ/ Miyahuna-Amman/Yarmouk Co./ Aqaba Water Co/ Miyahuna-Zarqa/Miyahuna Madaba)

Reporting Level:☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality ☐ District ☐ Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Implementing partners will collect the data and report to WRE on a yearly basis. Data will be collected based on actual and design capacities data as a result of USGs interventions.

Data Source(s): Implementing partners reporting on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and in the Mission’s performance management system, DevResults. The IP will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID WRE Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): variation in wastewater flows, and the difference between the current and the design capacities/ flows.

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 14

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

THIS SHEETWAS LAST UPDATED ON: DECEMBER 2020

USAID/Jordan Mission Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS)

IDENTIFICATION

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub-IR 2.1.3 Water Loss in the System Reduced Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.3.A PERCENTAGE OF NON-REVENUE WATER (BY UTILITY)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator? ⛝ No☐ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies): N/A USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators):

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 15

Non-revenue drinking water is water supplied by a utility operator for which revenue is not collected.

Non-revenue drinking water consists of: apparent losses (which include unauthorized consumption and metering inaccuracies), and real losses (leakages on transmission or distribution mains, and leakages on service connections). This indicator counts all types of non-revenue drinking water.

Precise Definition (If applies): N/A Unit of Measure: Percentage Method of Calculation:

Numerator: Total annual cubic meters of non-revenue drinking water for a utility.

Denominator: Total annual cubic meters of water supplied by the same utility.

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Water Utility, when applicable. (WAJ, Miyahuna-Amman, Yarmouk, Aqaba Water Co., Miyahuna Madaba and Miyahuna-Zarqa).

Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality☐ District ⛝Governorate Location of utility ☐ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Implementing partners will collect the primary data from water utilities. IPs will only report on NRW for utilities that they work with. They should report 0 for utilities that are not applicable when entering disaggregated data.

Implementing partners will collect the primary data and report to WRE on an annual basis, Data will be collected annually from water utilities/entities based on the measured quantities of water supply (obtained from supply and operation directorates), and cubic meters of water billed (obtained from billing and subscribers directorate) Data Source(s): USAID implementing partners will report on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team via DevResults. The IP will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data will be analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID Water Resources and Environment Team on an annual basis following reporting.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): Poor metering of water resources will affect accuracy of supplied water quantities and might result in wrong NRW percentages.

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: Install new smart meters, validate data and verify supply quantities against billed quantities within specific service areas, and use portable meters to randomly check resource meter accuracies.

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 16

THIS SHEETWAS LAST UPDATED ON: DECEMBER 2020

USAID/Jordan Mission Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS)

IDENTIFICATION

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub-IR 2.1.4: Increased Engagement of the Private Sector to improve financial viability, and increase investment in the water sector (F. HL.8.4-1) Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.4.A VALUE OF NEW FUNDING MOBILIZED TO THE WATER AND

SANITATION SECTORS AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE (HL 8.4-1)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ⌧ Standard F ⌧ Mission PMP

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 17

Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⌧ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020-2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies):

This indicator will measure the total value (USD) of new funding mobilized to expand or improve water or sanitation services, or implement water resource management activities. Funding must be allocated to the relevant ministry in government or disbursed by other organizations in order to count as mobilized.

Funding under this indicator may include:

● Domestic public resources (budget allocations, taxes)

● Domestic public financing (bond issuance)

● User payments (tariffs) - (not relevant to Jordan)

● Private/commercial financing (such as via a commercial bank or microfinance institution)

● Private financing through public-private partnerships (PPPs) or Global Development

Alliances (GDAs)

● Development partner or donor funds leveraged

*Note that this may not include USG funding This funding must be applied towards the water and sanitation sector including:

● capital investment projects for the new construction, replacement, rehabilitation or improvement of WASH infrastructure

● operation and maintenance of existing WASH infrastructure

● new WASH product development and marketing

● expansion capital for small businesses providing water and sanitation products or services

● government social behavior change campaigns

● water resource management activities

Funding counted towards this indicator must be new funding that would not be available to the sector without USG assistance. USG assistance leading to mobilization of funding may include:

● advocacy for increased national and county budgets for WASH and allocation of public funds

● development of financial proposals, pipelines and financial products

● structuring and implementation of PPPs or GDAs

● creation of development credit guarantees

● capacity improvements that enhance credit-worthiness of service providers or small businesses

Mobilized finance reported under this indicator should be disaggregated as domestic or international. Domestic finance is investment which originated within the country in which it is implemented (e.g. national government funds to support implementation of a project within that country) and international finance is cross-border finance (e.g. a private company based in one country contributing funds for a project in a different country).

USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition (If applies):N/A Unit of Measure: Number

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 18

Method of Calculation: Value in USD of all funds mobilized.

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex):

Funding Source: Domestic/ International, Funding Type: Public/Donor/ Private, Sector: Water/ Sanitation/ Water Resources Management, location. (Cross-disaggregation).

Reporting Level:

☐ Location (please attach GPS Coordinates)☐ Municipality ☐ District ☐ Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Data will be collected by USAID and from implementing partners. At minimum, data sources must demonstrate that new funding was mobilized and that USG activities resulted in this mobilization.

Potential data sources for measurement of this indicator include:

● project documentation to demonstrate outcomes of USG-funded activities

● documentation of loans made by commercial banks or microfinance institutions

● documentation of funds leveraged through GDAs or PPPs

● national or sub-national budget information showing an increase in allocations and disbursements for water Activities reporting on this indicator must monitor appropriate intermediate outcomes to demonstrate the linkage between USG activities and finance.

Data Source(s): USAID implementing partners will report on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and DevResults. The contractor will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID Water Resources and Environment Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations:

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 19

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.2Water sector governance and management strengthened Sub-IR : N/A Name of Activity Result Measured:IPs only

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 20

2.2.A NUMBER OF POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURES RELATING TO WATER PASSED, OR BEING IMPLEMENTED AS

A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⛝ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020-2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies): N/A USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition (If applies): There are 5 different stages, each measuring a successive stage in the progression from analysis to implementation. Regulations will be counted individually by region or utility if they are not nationwide. Nationwide regulations will be counted as one policy.

Administrative procedures specific to a utility will be counted per utility (e.g. a management plan that needs to be created or customized per utility). Administrative procedures that only need to be implemented once across utilities will be counted as one policy.

This indicator counts the number of policies/laws/agreements/national strategy/regulations/administrative procedures in the areas of water conservation, water resource management and accountability, water and wastewater standards and regulation, water conservation in agriculture, public investment, natural resource or water management and climate change adaptation/mitigation as it relates to water that:

Stage 1: …underwent the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. analysis (review of existing policy/regulation/administrative procedure and/or proposal of new policy/regulation/administrative procedure).

Stage 2: …underwent the second stage of the policy reform process. The second stage includes development or draft amendment at existing and public debate and/or consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised policy/regulation/administrative procedure.

Stage 3: … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the policy environment.

Stage 4: … underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy/regulation/administrative procedure by relevant authority.

Stage 5: … completed the policy reform process (implementation of new or revised policy/regulation/administrative procedure by relevant authority).

Please count the highest stage completed during the reporting year.

Unit of Measure: Number Method of Calculation: A tally of the number of policies, regulations and administrative procedures worked on during that reporting period. If no work was done on a policy, regulation or procedure during that reporting period it should not be counted (i.e. this is not cumulative). If a

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 21 policy, regulation or procedure went through more than one stage during the reporting period, tally the highest stage that was reached during the reporting year. Each policy, regulation and procedure should only be counted once during a reporting period but can be counted again during each subsequent report period where work was done on it.

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Stage (stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, stage 5), type (policy, regulations, procedure). Parallel - disaggregated. The reporting level is national.

Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality☐ District ☐

Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: IP Technical and Progress Reports, Minutes of Meetings (MOM), IP correspondence sent to counterparts, COR and COP weekly meetings, public documents in the official gazettes.

Data Source(s): Implementing partners whose programs target water sector policy and regulation reform will report on this indicator based on their engagement with the national government and water sector utilities.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Implementing partners will report this data during Q4 (fiscal year) via DevResults. Implementing partners should detail in the comments section the specific information about each law, policy or procedure (e.g. stage 1 with a procedure for Miyahuna (and 1 sentence on what the procedure is) or stage 5 with a national policy (and 1 sentence on what the policy is). All data should be reported in line with the USAID fiscal year/quarterly schedule.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets. Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID WRE Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

THIS SHEETWAS LAST UPDATED ON: DECEMBER 2020

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 22

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.2Water sector governance and management strengthened Sub-IR 2.2.1 Ability of the Water Sector to Plan, Govern and Manage its own Operations Improved Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.2.1.A NUMBER OF ACTION PLANS IMPLEMENTED FOR WATER

SECURITY, INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, AND/OR

WATER SOURCE PROTECTION AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator? ⛝ No ☐ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies): N/A USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): These action plans are for water security, Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM), and/or protection of water sources and its use in Jordan. In addition to action plans that are results-based, and mainly related to financial sustainability and operational improvement on the water utility level. Action Plans include the vision, goals, and objectives, and are developed through a process of stakeholder participation.

Each action within a plan must include an implementation strategy with details on financing, timeline, implementation partners, monitoring, and reporting. Attention is specifically devoted to safeguarding sustainable access to adequate levels of acceptable water quality to support human and ecosystem populations in the face of climate variability and change at the basin or country level.

An action is considered implemented when it has been finalized and adopted by entities.

Definitions:

Water security refers to safeguarding sustainable access to adequate levels of acceptable water quality to support human and ecosystem populations while reducing risks from floods and droughts.

Integrated Water Resource Management is a process which promotes the management and coordinated development of water, land, and other related resources to sustain ecosystems while maximizing social and economic welfare.

Water source protection refers to measures taken to ensure the hygienic safety of water for human consumption and other designated uses.

Precise Definition (If applies): N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 23

Method of Calculation: Count Disaggregated by (location, age, sex): Action Plan Type (water security, integrated water resource management, and/or water source protection).

Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality ☐ District ☐ Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Document review of hard and soft copies of action plans Data Source(s): Implementing partners Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the WRE team and in the Missions performance management system, DevResults. The IP will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID WRE Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 24

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.1 Jordan’s ability to meet water demand improved Sub-IR 2.1.4: Increased Engagement of the Private Sector to improve financial viability, and increase investment in the water sector (F. HL.8.4-1) Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.1.4.A VALUE OF NEW FUNDING MOBILIZED TO THE WATER AND

SANITATION SECTORS AS A RESULT OF USG ASSISTANCE (HL 8.4-1)

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ⌧ Standard F ⌧ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⌧ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020-2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies):

This indicator will measure the total value (USD) of new funding mobilized to expand or improve water or sanitation services, or implement water resource management activities. Funding must be allocated to the relevant ministry in government or disbursed by other organizations in order to count as mobilized.

Funding under this indicator may include:

● Domestic public resources (budget allocations, taxes)

● Domestic public financing (bond issuance)

● User payments (tariffs) - (not relevant to Jordan)

● Private/commercial financing (such as via a commercial bank or microfinance institution)

● Private financing through public-private partnerships (PPPs) or Global Development

Alliances (GDAs)

● Development partner or donor funds leveraged

*Note that this may not include USG funding This funding must be applied towards the water and sanitation sector including:

● capital investment projects for the new construction, replacement, rehabilitation or improvement of WASH infrastructure

● operation and maintenance of existing WASH infrastructure

● new WASH product development and marketing

● expansion capital for small businesses providing water and sanitation products or services

● government social behavior change campaigns

● water resource management activities

Funding counted towards this indicator must be new funding that would not be available to the sector without USG assistance. USG assistance leading to mobilization of funding may include:

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 25

● advocacy for increased national and county budgets for WASH and allocation of public funds

● development of financial proposals, pipelines and financial products

● structuring and implementation of PPPs or GDAs

● creation of development credit guarantees

● capacity improvements that enhance credit-worthiness of service providers or small businesses

Mobilized finance reported under this indicator should be disaggregated as domestic or international. Domestic finance is investment which originated within the country in which it is implemented (e.g. national government funds to support implementation of a project within that country) and international finance is cross-border finance (e.g. a private company based in one country contributing funds for a project in a different country).

USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): N/A Precise Definition (If applies):N/A Unit of Measure: Number Method of Calculation: Value in USD of all funds mobilized.

Disaggregated by (location, age, sex):

Funding Source: Domestic/ International, Funding Type: Public/Donor/ Private, Sector: Water/ Sanitation/ Water Resources Management, location. (Cross-disaggregation).

Reporting Level:

☐ Location (please attach GPS Coordinates)☐ Municipality ☐ District ☐ Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Data will be collected by USAID and from implementing partners. At minimum, data sources must demonstrate that new funding was mobilized and that USG activities resulted in this mobilization.

Potential data sources for measurement of this indicator include:

● project documentation to demonstrate outcomes of USG-funded activities

● documentation of loans made by commercial banks or microfinance institutions

● documentation of funds leveraged through GDAs or PPPs

● national or sub-national budget information showing an increase in allocations and disbursements for water Activities reporting on this indicator must monitor appropriate intermediate outcomes to demonstrate the linkage between USG activities and finance.

Data Source(s): USAID implementing partners will report on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team and DevResults. The contractor will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 26

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data analyzed and reviewed by the implementing partner and USAID Water Resources and Environment Team.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations:

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 27

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.2Water sector governance and management strengthened Sub IR 2.2.2:Water Sector Financial Sustainability Improved Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.2.2.A PERCENT CHANGE IN COST RECOVERY OF WATER SECTOR

Indicator Type:☐ Activity Custom ☐ Standard F ⛝ Mission PMP Is this a PPR indicator?☐ No ⛝ Yes, for Reporting Year(s)

2020-2025

DESCRIPTION

Standard F Definition (If applies): N/A USAID Definition (for Mission and F indicators): Cost recovery in the water sector is defined as the measure to recover the water sector operational expenditures. Generally, cost recovery is simply recovering the costs of any given expense (revenues/expenditures). This measure will only include operations and maintenance related costs, not capital costs. Utilities in Jordan do not currently calculate total cost recovery; therefore, it is prudent to focus just on Operational and Maintenance costs. Operational costs include pumping (electricity), desalination, water purchase and salaries. Maintenance includes all other costs related to operation of the system.

Precise Definition (If applies): N/A Unit of Measure: Percent change Method of Calculation:

Numerator: (annual figure - baseline) Denominator: baseline Disaggregated by (location, age, sex):Water Utility (Yarmouk, Miyahuna, Aqaba Water) Reporting Level:

☐ Location or Facility (please attach GPS Coordinates) ☐ Municipality☐ District ☐

Governorate ⛝ Kingdom

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING

Data Collection Method: Utility records will be obtained from each utility to determine the percentage change in cost recovery.

Data Source(s): USAID implementing partners will report on this indicator.

Timing/Frequency of Data Collection: Annually Frequency of Reporting: Annually

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 28

Individual Responsible (title): For IPs to fill out Location of Data Storage: Data will be kept with the Water Resources and Environment Team via DevResults. The contractor will maintain a copy as well as maintain all records on the disaggregated data for this indicator.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed against baselines and targets.

Initial Data Quality Assessment: N/A Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A

CHANGES TO INDICATOR & OTHER NOTES

Changes to Indicator: N/A Other Notes: N/A

USAID/Jordan PMP PIRS, January 2021 29

Linkage to Mission Results Framework (DO, IR, & Sub-IR):

DO 2: Jordan’s Ability to Improve its Water Security Strengthened IR 2.2Water sector governance and management strengthened Sub-IR: 2.2.3: Water Sector Regulatory Capacity Strengthened Name of Activity Result Measured: IPs only

2.2.3.A NUMBER OF PEOPLE EDUCATED ON TOOLS, APPROACHES,

AND/OR METHODS FOR WATER…