NNMS_RFP_Attachment 8_NNMS_Past Performance Questionnaire (dated 07312023).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70T01023R7663N001
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance
| NATIONWIDE NETWORK OF MEDICAL SERVICES (NNMS) |
| RFP 70T01023R7663N001 |
| Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire |
| General Instructions: The Qfferor shall complete Part I, then provide the document to the Reference to complete Part II |
| The Reference shall email the completed questionnaire directly to: JANINE.SHERBONDY@TSA.DHS.GOV and EDWARD.CHO@TSA.DHS.GOV |
Part I
| Part I Instructions: The Offeror shall complete the highlighted areas below before providing this document to the Reference |
| Offeror Information |
| Company |
| Street Address |
| City, State, Zip Code |
| Country |
| CAGE Code |
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number |
| Contract/Task Order Details |
| Contract Number |
| Award Date |
| Period of Performance |
| Dollar Value |
| Prime or Subcontractor? |
| Location(s) of Performance |
| Brief Contract Description |
Part II
| Part II Instructions: The Reference shall complete the highlighted sections below and email directly to: JANINE.SHERBONDY@TSA.DHS.GOV and EDWARD.CHO@TSA.DHS.GOV |
| Using the "Rating Descriptions" below as a guide, select a rating for each applicable area of performance through the dropdown and provide a narrative explaining the rating. |
| Rating Descriptions | |
| Exceptional | Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds many. Contract performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. To justify an exceptional rating, please identify multiple events that resulted in a beneficial outcome due to the contractor's efforts. There should be no significant weaknesses associated with performance. |
| Very Good | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some. Contract performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. To justify a very good rating, please identify an event that resulted in a beneficial outcome due to the contractor's effort. There should be no significant weaknesses associated with performance. |
| Satisfactory | Performance meets contractual requirements. Contract performance resulted in some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. To justify a satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without significant impact to the contract. There should be no significant weaknesses associated with performance. |
| Marginal | Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Contract performance reflects problems for which the contractor's corrective actions have had little impact. To justify a marginal rating, please identify a signficant event that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state the impact. |
| Unsatsifactory | Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and corrective actions are either not taken or ineffective. To justify an unsatisfactory rating, please identify multiple events or a single event of significant magnitude that the contractor could not overcome and negatively impacted performance. |
| N/A | Not applicable, section does not apply to this contract effort. |
| Reference Information |
| Assessor's Name |
| Assessor's Title |
| Assessor's Phone Number |
| Assessor's Email Address |
| Agency/Company |
| Street Address |
| City, State, Zip Code |
| Country |
| CAGE Code |
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number |
| Quality of Product or Service |
| Rating |
| Narrative |
| Schedule |
| Rating |
| Narrative |
| Cost Control |
| Rating |
| Narrative |
| Business Relations |
| Rating |
| Narrative |
| Management of Key Personnel |
| Rating |
| Narrative |
| Other Comments |
| Narrative |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .