Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionaire RFQ 70RFP322QE3000002.docx

DOCX document 203 KB Posted

Attached to
Removal and Replacement of a Video Surveillance System (VSS)
Solicitation number
70RFP322QE3000002
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 4 Contractor Checklist.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
70RFP322QE3000002 Amend 0001.pdf PDF
VSS Richmond Questions Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Contractor Checklist.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Past Project Form RFQ 70RFP322QE3000002.docx DOCX document
70RFP322QE3000002.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service Acquisition Division 701 Market Street Suite 3200 Philadelphia, PA 19106

PAST PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFP322QE3000002

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE:

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for the removal and replacement of security Video Surveillance System (VSS) equipment located at Richmond Federal Office Building. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten or typed responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, PLEASE EMAIL to thomas.schrank@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please submit in writing to the address listed above. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (TO DATE): NAME:

TITLE: COMPANY: TELEPHONE: EMAIL:

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we may determine any similarities to this contract:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS:

1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness.

Comments:

2. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness.

3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary?

4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.

Comments:

5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?

6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project.

7. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.

8. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

9. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. _____Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. _____Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .