2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016 - Gov Responses to Industry Questions.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OPLA Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70CMSD25Q00000016
- Issued by
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
About this file
This document is an Amendment 00001 containing Government Responses to Industry Questions for Request for Quote (RFQ) No. 70CMSD25Q00000016, which appears to be for a web-based Continuing Legal Education (CLE) platform. The amendment addresses seven key industry questions regarding volume organization, page limits, CLE course requirements, pricing matrix calculations, and submission guidelines. Significant updates include clarifying that Volumes I and II each have a 5-page limit, revising language about secondary practice area CLE course requirements, fixing mathematical errors in the pricing matrix, and removing Section 3.6 on EA Compliance from the Statement of Work.
The government provided specific guidance for vendors, including expectations for documenting developers' qualifications and pricing submission requirements. Vendors are instructed to complete two documents for their pricing submission: the Attachment 3 Pricing Matrix and a detailed breakdown of proposed classes with individual and total pricing. The solicitation seeks a professional development provider for CLE courses, with flexibility for courses developed internally by experienced faculty and subject matter experts, indicating a focus on quality and expertise in course development.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 1 - SOW - Amd 00001.pdf | ||
| 2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 3 - Pricing Matrix -Amd 00001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Amd 00001.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 3 - Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2.2.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 2 - Provisions-Clauses.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-FINAL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ No. 70CMSD25Q00000016 Government Responses to Industry Questions
Amendment 00001
Industry Question 1: In section 4.2 Organization/Page Limits, Table 1 - Quotation Organization, I believe the Volumes may be misnumbered. Volume I is listed twice, and in section 4.5 Pricing Information, Volume III is mentioned.
Government Response: Volume information has been updated in document, “2.4.1-RFQ- 70CMSDQ00000016-Amd 00001”
Industry Question 2: Related to question 1, the page limit for Volume I Factor 1 is up to 5 pages and Volume I Factor 2 is up to 5 pages. Does that mean Volume 1 can be up to 10 pages? Or that there is a Volume I with up to 5 pages and a Volume 2 that is up to 5 pages?
Government Response: Volume information has been updated in document, “2.4.1-RFQ- 70CMSDQ00000016-Amd 00001”. Volumes I and II each have a 5-page limit.
Industry Question 3: Should this section of 2.2.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-FINAL.pdf read differently?
How it reads: Secondary accredited CLE course work. Must provide at least one course per secondary practice areas accredited in each of the mandatory jurisdictions listed in 2.3 (except 2.5.49). listed in SOW, Section 2.5 – 2.5.56.
How it may be: Secondary accredited CLE course work. Must provide at least one course per secondary practice areas listed in 2.3 accredited in each of the mandatory jurisdictions listed in 2.5 (except 2.5.49). listed in SOW, Section 2.5 – 2.5.56.
Government Response: This section has ben revised to, “Secondary accredited CLE course work.
Must provide at least one course per secondary practice areas accredited in each of the mandatory jurisdictions listed in 2.5 (except 2.5.49) listed in SOW, Section 2.5 – 2.5.56”.
Industry Question 4: The math in Attachment 3 Pricing Matrix appears to be off. In square "F9" the formula from "F8" is repeated to show a total, =D8*E8. Then that formula is carried down so the line items do not equal the proper squares.
Government Response: Formulas have been fixed. See “2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016- Attachment 3 - Pricing Matrix -Amd 00001”.
Industry Question 5: Can you confirm which EA compliance, IPv6, shipping, and hardware/software requirements apply to web-based CLE platforms? For requirements that are not applicable to a purely web-based environment, is it acceptable for vendors to note them as “not applicable” or request a waiver?
Government Response: Section 3.6. EA Compliance, has been removed from the SOW.
RFQ No. 70CMSD25Q00000016
Industry Question 6: Could you clarify how “professional development provider” is defined under this solicitation? Specifically, if courses are developed internally by experienced faculty and subject matter experts, does that satisfy the intent of this requirement?
Government Response: A statement in your RFQ addressing the developers’ qualifications will suffice.
Industry Question 7: The solicitation states that Volume II – Factor 3: Price shall include all assumptions, conditions, and exceptions (written in red on the first page), with a standalone price quote covering each class and the overall total. Attachment 3 appears to provide the price schedule. Could you please clarify whether Volume II is intended to be submitted solely as Attachment 3, or if vendors should incorporate Attachment 3 within a traditional, formatted Volume II that includes the required assumptions page followed by the attachment?
Government Response: Quoters are expected to complete and submit two documents.
1. Complete and submit “2.4.1-RFQ-70CMSD25Q00000016-Attachment 3 - Pricing Matrix - Amd 00001”
2. Submit a detailed breakdown of all proposed classes with the price for each class, detailing how the total cost was developed in Attachment 3.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .