RFP_20103712_-_Attachment_3_-_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CBP Pre-Command Leadership Training
- Solicitation number
- 70B06C18R00000024
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70B06C18R00000024_Pre-Command_Notice_of_Award_Letter.pdf | ||
| RFP_70B06C18R00000024_-_SOW_-__Attachment_1_Feb_2018.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-Command_Combined_Synopsis_Amendment_70B06C18R00000024A0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 70B06C18R00000024A0002_SF30.pdf | ||
| RFP_70B06C18R00000024_-__Pricing_Sheet_-_Attachment_2_A0002_(2).xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Pre-Command_SF1449_RFP_Final.pdf | ||
| Pre-Command_SF1449_RFP_Final.pdf | ||
| Pre-Command_Combined_Synopsis_Rev2_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 70B06C18R00000024A0001.pdf | ||
| RFP_70B06C18R00000024_QandA.pdf | ||
| RFP_20103712_-_SOW_-__Attachment_1_Feb_2018.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP_20103712_-__Pricing_Sheet_-_Attachment_2.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Pre-Command_Combined_Synopsis_Rev1_Final.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 20103712 – CBP Pre-Command Training Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire
The references completing the past performance questionnaire shall submit directly to Bryan.I.Campbell@cbp.dhs.gov NLT 3:00 EST, April 10, 2018.
A. Respondent/Agency Information:
Agency Name:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Phone No.:
Email:
B. Contract/Project/Task Order Information: Complete the general contract information below.
Name of Contractor:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Contract Type:
Project Title/Scope of Work:
Value/Dollar Amount of Contract:
Performance Period:
C. Past Performance Survey: In connection with the subject solicitation, the Government must evaluate the above-listed contractor’s capability and capacity to successfully perform certain requirements. To assist this evaluation, please assess the contractor’s performance on your contract, task order or project using the following ratings in your assessment. Please include comments in the “Narrative” space provided to explain each rating given. You may be contacted to clarify comments and/or ratings:
Very Good – Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Satisfactory – Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Poor - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Unacceptable - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Unknown - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
1. The quality of the faculty and staff provided by the contactor.
Very Good
| |_| Satisfactory |
| |_| |
Poor
| |_| Unacceptable |
| |_| |
Unknown
NARRATIVE:
2. Contractor managed scheduling and deadlines of the contract (i.e. reports due, meeting attendance, delivery of services, etc.)
| |_| Satisfactory |
| |_| |
Poor
| |_| Unacceptable |
| |_| |
3. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements.
| |_| Satisfactory |
| |_| |
Poor
| |_| Unacceptable |
| |_| |
4. Overall performance of the contractor.
| |_| Satisfactory |
| |_| |
Poor
| |_| Unacceptable |
| |_| |
5. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
YES or NO (Please provide explanation)
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it.