7-EXHIBIT 2 - 25217.00-Halifax Health Wing 200-Lmtd IAQ and Micro Rpt-CMBND.pdf

November 11, 2025

Mr. Chad Hutchinson

Manager, Facility Operations

Halifax Health

303 North Clyde Morris Blvd.

Daytona Beach, Florida 32114

Subject: Limited Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and Microbial Assessment Report

200 Wing

Halifax Health – Child and Adolescent Behavioral Services

841 Jimmy Ann Drive

Daytona Beach, Florida 32117

EMS Project No.: 25217.00

Dear Mr. Hutchinson:

Enclosed with this letter is the limited indoor air quality (IAQ) and microbial assessment report for the above-referenced behavioral health facility located at 841 Jimmy Ann Drive in Daytona Beach, Florida. This initial assessment was performed on Monday, November 3, 2025, and was conducted in response to concerns regarding moisture and microbial impacts within the patient rooms and staff-occupied areas of the 200 wing.

The purpose of this assessment was to identify moisture issues and associated microbial amplification within these areas.

Environmental Management Services, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to work with you and Halifax Health on this project. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this survey report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (302) 593-1930 or emsflinc@gmail.com.

Sincerely, Environmental Management Services, Inc.

Glenn “Chip” Gruber

Principal

BGC Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) 12093CP

BCSP Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 24804

Florida Licensed Asbestos Consultant (LAC) AX106

Florida Licensed Mold Assessor MRSA 2853

Enclosure: (1)

Cc: Electronic File mailto:emsflinc@gmail.com

LIMITED INDOOR AIR QUALITY AND

MICROBIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Project Location:

Halifax Health – Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health 200 Wing 841 Jimmy Ann Drive Daytona Beach, Florida 32117

Client:

Mr. Chad Hutchinson Manager, Facility Operations Halifax Health 303 North Clyde Morris Blvd.

Daytona Beach, Florida 32114

EMS Project No.: 25217.00

Survey Date: November 3, 2025 Report Date: November 11, 2025

25217.00 - Halifax Health Child and Adolescent Behavioral Services facility – Daytona Beach, FL 200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………. 3

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ………………………………………………………………………………. 3

3.0 METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………………………………… 3

3.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations …………………………………………………… 3

3.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters ………………………………………………. 3

3.3 Swab Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures………………………………….. 3

3.4 Air Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures ……………………………………. 3

4.0 LIMITATIONS ……………………………………………………………………………………. 4

5.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ……………………………………………………………………... 4

5.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations ……………………………………………………. 4

5.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters ………………………………………………. 4

6.0 RESULTS AND EVALUATION ………………………………………………………………... 5

6.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations …………………………………………………… 5

Table 1: Visual and Olfactory Observations ………………………………………... 5

6.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters ………………………………………………. 6 Table 2: Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters ……………………………………. 7

6.3 Results of Air and Swab Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures ……………….. 7 Table 3: Ambient Air Sample Results Summary …….……………………………… 8

Table 3a: Composite Swab Sample Results Summary …….……………………… 9

7.0 CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………………………..…. 10

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS …………………………………………………………………….……. 11

9.0 MOLD DISCLAIMER ……………………………………………………………………………. 13

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Photographic Log Appendix B: Moisture Map Appendix C: Laboratory Analytical Results and Chain of Custody Appendix D: Certificates of Calibration Appendix E: Certifications and Licensure

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

1.0 INTRODUCTION

At the request of Halifax Health, Environmental Management Services (EMS) conducted a limited indoor air quality (IAQ) and microbial impact assessment at the Halifax Health Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health facility located in Daytona Beach, Florida. The assessment, performed on Monday, November 3, 2025, was intended to identify indoor air quality and microbial amplification issues specific to the 200 wing at the facility.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Chip Gruber, a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) and a Florida-licensed Mold Assessor, visited the above-referenced behavioral health facility to conduct a limited indoor air quality and microbial assessment within the targeted 200 wing spaces. EMS used an environmental sampling strategy that consisted of visual observations, photographic documentation, the measurement of indoor air quality comfort parameters, and the evaluation of potential microbial populations in the air and on latent surfaces.

The investigative methods and analytical results are described in the following sections. Mr. Gruber’s applicable licensing and certifications are presented in Appendix D.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

The indoor air quality assessment was performed based on visual and olfactory observations and the collection of scientific data regarding microbial populations in outdoor and indoor air samples.

3.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations

EMS assessed the visual condition of areas of concern using experience-based knowledge regarding potentially poor IAQ factors such as water damage, water staining, visible mold growth, odors, rusted metal, peeling and/or bubbling of finished material surfaces, discoloration, and other conditions.

3.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters

Indoor air quality (IAQ) comfort parameters were monitored as a means of evaluating the basic air quality. Parameters measured included air temperature, relative percent humidity, and carbon dioxide concentrations. Standards set for each IAQ constituent sampled with the TSI Q-Trak are listed and described below in Section 5.0.

3.3 Swab Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures

The collection of swab samples was used for the rapid analysis of mold species present on surfaces within the spaces. These include fungal spores, pollen, insect parts, skin cell fragments, fibers, and inorganic particulates. Swabs are collected as “composite” samples, whereby the swab is swiped across several homogeneous surfaces. Results are a representation of the mold species found to be present on each type of surface where a sample is collected. Swab samples are not meant to represent or infer what potential spore concentrations in the air may be. Swab sample results are reported as surface concentrations being rare, medium, high or very high.

3.4 Air Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures

The Spore Trap Air Sampling Cassette is a sampling device designed for the rapid collection and analysis of a wide range of airborne aerosols. These include fungal spores, pollen, insect parts, skin cell fragments, fibers, and inorganic particulates. Air enters the cassette, the particles become impacted on the sampling substrate, and the air leaves through the exit orifice. The

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report airflow and patented cassette housing are designed in such a way that the particles are distributed and deposited equally on a special glass slide contained in the cassette housing, called the “trace.” The cassette is designed to operate at a recommended flow rate of 15 liters per minute (lpm), which is field-calibrated prior to sample collection and validated post-collection. Results are reported as spores per cubic meter (spores/m3).

4.0 LIMITATIONS

The scope of work performed was limited to potential moisture and microbial-related issues within the patient rooms and staff-occupied spaces of the 200 wing at the Halifax Health Child and Adolescent Behavioral Services facility in Daytona Beach, Florida. All adjoining spaces and Halifax Health facilities are outside of the scope of this assessment.

5.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

This section identifies the IAQ criteria used for the evaluation of site-specific data collected during the recent assessment.

5.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations

Visual and olfactory observations are subjective and open to interpretation by others. EMS considers general housekeeping, cleanliness, odors, and other signs of moisture-related issues during walk-through IAQ assessments.

5.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters

Recommended Temperature Standards

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recommends a summer indoor temperature range between 73.0 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and

79.0°F. During the winter months, ASHRAE suggests a range between 68.5°F and 76.0°F. This reference is taken from ASHRAE Standard 55-102, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human

Occupancy.

Relative Humidity Recommended Standards

ASHRAE acceptable ranges of operative temperature (a combination of air and radiant temperatures) are for relative humidity levels between 30% and 60%. Indoor humidity levels in excess of 60% can support fungal growth; therefore, ASHRAE recommends that indoor relative humidity be maintained below 60%. There is no recommended lower level of humidity for achieving thermal comfort; however, as dry conditions can lead to increased static electricity and health problems, such as skin irritation, the relative humidity should be greater than 30%.

Carbon Dioxide Recommended Standard

ASHRAE recommends a carbon dioxide concentration of 700 plus the outdoor concentration. The reference to the recommended ASHRAE Standards for carbon dioxide was taken from the

ASHRAE 62 Standard, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Outdoor concentrations of carbon dioxide typically range between 350 and 450 parts per million (ppm).

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

6.0 RESULTS AND EVALUATION

This section presents site-specific visual and olfactory observations, air comfort parameter measurements, and the results of air and composite swab sampling conducted on November 3, 2025, at the Halifax Health Child and Adolescent Behavioral Services facility located at 841 Jimmy Ann Drive in Daytona Beach, Florida.

6.1 Visual and Olfactory Observations

Visual and olfactory observations were made and documented during the site visit on November 3, 2025. A photographic log produced from photos collected during the site visit is provided in Appendix A. A moisture map is included in Appendix B. Notable visual and olfactory observations by section are presented in Table 1 below:

TABLE 1: VISUAL AND OLFACTORY OBSERVATIONS

Location Parameters

Observations Olfactory

Patient Room 2200

• Elevated moisture in patient room

• Water staining and possible microbial amplification on the exterior wall and under the window return of the patient room

• Drywall damage on the exterior wall of the patient room

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Microbial amplification on the ceilings and walls of the bathroom, and paint cracking/spidering

• N/A

Patient Room 2201

• Elevated moisture in the patient room

• Water staining and possible microbial amplification on the exterior wall

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Paint cracking/spidering in bathroom

• N/A

Patient Room 2202

• Elevated moisture in the patient room

• Small area of possible microbial amplification on the exterior wall

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Microbial amplification on the ceilings and walls of the bathroom, and paint cracking/spidering

• Rust and water staining on bathroom HVAC vent

• N/A

Patient Room 2203

• Room is shut down and polyed off

• Microbial amplification on the removed drywall and exposed insulation

• Curling of floor tile edges

• N/A

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

TABLE 1: VISUAL AND OLFACTORY OBSERVATIONS

Location Parameters

Observations Olfactory

Patient Room 2204

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Microbial amplification on the ceilings and walls of the bathroom, and paint cracking/spidering

• N/A

Patient Room 2205

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Paint cracking/spidering in bathroom

• N/A

Patient Room 2206

• Elevated moisture in the patient room

• Water staining and possible microbial amplification on the exterior and East walls

• Drywall damage on the exterior wall of the patient room

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Curling of floor tile edges

• Paint cracking/spidering in bathroom

• Rust and water staining on bathroom HVAC vent

• N/A

Patient Room 2207

• Elevated moisture in the patient room

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base in patient room

• Possible microbial amplification on exterior sheathing above the ceiling on exterior wall (access hatch accessible)

• Curling of floor tile edges

• N/A

TV Area

• Dirty supply diffusers

• Curling of floor tile edges

• N/A

Conference Room/Lounge

• Casting from supply diffusers onto adjacent ceiling tiles

• One water-stained ceiling tile below a possible leak in the hard duct

• Possible microbial amplification on the back (above ceiling) side of the supply diffuser housing, which isn’t insulated

• N/A

Therapy Room

• Microbial amplification under vinyl cove base

• FRP on walls up to 4’

• N/A

6.2 Indoor Air Quality Comfort Parameters

Measurements of indoor air quality comfort parameters recorded during the November 3, 2025, site visit are summarized in Table 2 below. Measurements were collected using a TSI IAQ Calc model 7545 with a factory certificate of calibration dated September 4, 2025. Copies of the

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report certificates of calibration for equipment utilized during this assessment are included as Appendix

D of this report.

TABLE 2: INDOOR AIR QUALITY COMFORT PARAMETERS

Location

Parameter

Temperature (ᵒF) Relative Humidity

Carbon Dioxide

(ppm)

Exterior Pre 74.6 55.6 442

Nurse’s Station 70.5 61.4 480

Conf/Lounge 67.5 53.2 495

Mid-Main Corridor 70.0 67.9 448

Patient Room 2200 72.5 62.4 437

Patient Room 2201 72.0 61.9 441

Patient Room 2202 72.7 60.2 448

Patient Room 2204 74.0 60.0 432

Patient Room 2205 72.3 61.8 423

Patient Room 2206 74.5 59.5 438

Patient Room 2207 72.5 59.3 412

Therapy Room 74.2 56.0 422

Quiet Room 72.1 56.4 434

Multi-Purpose Room 72.9 57.9 437

Office (Adjacent to Nurse’s

Station) 72.7 56.8 457

Exterior Post 87.8 35.5 398

ASHRAE Recommended Standards/Limitations

Summer: 73 - 79°F Winter: 68.5 - 76°F

30 – 60% < 1,120 ppm

EXPLANATION: ᵒF = degrees Fahrenheit % = percent ppm = parts per million

Based on the site-specific air comfort monitoring data, with the exception of humidity, the air comfort parameters measured throughout the target areas were generally within the recommended ranges. In a number of locations where measurements were taken, the humidity levels were at or above the upper recommended range.

It should be noted that higher than recommended humidity levels are favorable for mold amplification and result in increased dry time for porous, moisture-impacted materials.

6.3 Results of Air and Swab Sampling for Non-Viable Mold Structures

While on site, EMS collected a total of twelve (12) spore trap air samples; ten (10) air samples were collected from the interior of the affected spaces, and two (2) samples were collected from the building exterior for comparison purposes.

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

In addition, EMS collected nine (9) microbial swab samples from latent surfaces from within the affected areas.

All samples were transported under chain of custody to Eurofins, an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)-accredited laboratory in Altamonte Springs, Florida, for analysis of fungal spores and particulates by optical microscopy. A moisture map is presented in Appendix B, with laboratory analytical reports provided in Appendix C. Air sample results are summarized in Table 3 below, and swab sample results are summarized in Table 3a.

TABLE 3: AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE RESULTS SUMMARY

Sample ID No.

Location Sample

Type

Total Concentration

(spores/m3) Predominant Genera (spores/m3)

HH-A-1 Exterior Pre Spore

Trap Air 2,700

Ascospores 370 Basidiospores 370 Bipolaris/Drechslera Group 27 Cercospora 13 Cladosporium 1,900 Curvularia 27 Rusts 13 Sporidesmium 13

HH-A-2

Nurse’s Station

Spore Trap Air

Ascospores 110 Aspergillus/Penicillium 160

HH-A-3 Conf/Lounge Spore

Trap Air

Basidiospores 53 Chaetomium 13 Cladosporium 320 Stachyboytrys 53

HH-A-4

Mid-Main Corridor

Spore Trap Air

Chaetomium 13 Nigrospora 13 Stachyboytrys 13

HH-A-5

Patient

Room 2200 Spore

Trap Air

Ascospores 53 Chaetomium 13 Curvularia 13

HH-A-6

Patient

Room 2201 Spore

Trap Air

Ascospores 110 Basidiospores 53 Chaetomium 27 Curvularia 13

HH-A-7

Patient

Room 2206 Spore

Trap Air

Basidiospores 110 Chaetomium 27 Aspergillus/Penicillium 53

HH-A-8

Patient

Room 2202 Spore

Trap Air

Ascospores 53 Chaetomium 40 Cladosporium 160 Aspergillus/Penicillium 320

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

TABLE 3: AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE RESULTS SUMMARY

Sample ID No.

Location Sample

Type

Total Concentration

(spores/m3) Predominant Genera (spores/m3)

HH-A-9

Patient

Room 2205 Spore

Trap Air

Cladosporium 320

HH-A-10

Patient

Room 2207 Spore

Trap Air

Ascospores 110 Cladosporium 590 Curvularia 67 Aspergillus/Penicillium 110

HH-A-11

Multi-

Purpose Room

Spore Trap Air

Chaetomium 40 Curvularia 13

HH-A-12 Exterior Post Spore

Trap Air 1,800

Ascospores 430 Basidiospores 160 Cladosporium 1,200 Pithomyces 13 Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 13

TABLE 3a: COMPOSITE SWAB SAMPLE RESULTS SUMMARY

No.

Location Sample

Type

Relative Spore Concentrations by Species

Direct Examination

HH-SW-1

Patient Room 2201 North (exterior) wall

Composite Swab

Chaetomium – Very High Aspergillus/Penicillium – High

HH-SW-2

Patient Room 2200 South (exterior) wall

Composite Swab

Chaetomium – Very High Aspergillus/Penicillium – Very High Stachybotrys – Very High

HH-SW-3

Patient Room 2206 South (exterior) wall

Composite Swab

Aspergillus/Penicillium – Very High

HH-SW-4

Patient Room 2205 North (exterior) wall

Composite Swab

Chaetomium – Very High Aspergillus/Penicillium – Very High

HH-SW-5

Patient Room 2202 Bathroom Walls and

Ceiling

Composite Swab

Aspergillus/Penicillium – High

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

TABLE 3a: COMPOSITE SWAB SAMPLE RESULTS SUMMARY

No.

Location Sample

Type

Relative Spore Concentrations by Species

Direct Examination

HH-SW-6

Patient Room 2204 Bathroom Walls and

Ceiling

Composite Swab

Cladosporium – Moderate

HH-SW-7

Diffusers in the TV Area, Nurse’s Station, and Conference Room/Lounge

Composite Swab

Cladosporium – Very High

HH-SW-8

Diffusers in Patient Rooms 2200-2207

(except 2203)

Composite Swab

Cladosporium - Moderate

HH-SW-9

Above Ceiling Along the North Exterior Wall of Patient Room 2207

Composite Swab

Aspergillus/Penicillium – Low Stachybotrys – Very High

Depositing Level Definitions: 0 - <1+ Rare; 1+ Low; 2+ Moderate; 3+ High; 4+ Very High

Review of the November 3, 2025, data presented in Table 3 above indicates that outside air samples ranged between 1,800 and 2,700 fungi spore counts per cubic meter of air (m3), while the total fungi spore counts per cubic meter of air (m3) on the air samples collected in the interior spaces described ranged between 40 and 870. While many of the identified spore species are typical of the exterior environment, the presence of Stachybotrys and Chaetomium in the air, along with elevated levels of Aspergillus/Penicillium, is indicative of water intrusion. Because Stachybotrys is a slower-growing, oily, microbial species, aerosolization in any concentration is an indicator of a longer-term moisture intrusion issue.

The swab samples submitted for analysis also revealed elevated mold spore deposits of Aspergillus/Penicillium, Cladosporium, Chaetomium, and Stachybotrys. The presence of Stachybotrys, in any concentration, is indicative of long-term moisture intrusion and active microbial growth.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

With the compilation of observations and sampling data from the site visit conducted on November 3, 2025, EMS offers the following conclusions:

While the wing has had the PTAC wall units removed and a central HVAC system installed, the humidity levels are running at the upper and in excess of the upper limit of 60%. It is believed that this may be due to a number of factors including HVAC system insulation and duct sealing issues, dehumidification capability and the introduction of trapped moisture in to the wing at the exterior walls.

Swab and air samples collected indicate the presence of microbial amplification both on surfaces and in the air. It is believed that residual issues stemming from the PTAC units and their removal, as well as prior impacts on the exterior envelope, are the primary contributors to the microbial amplification.

EMS understands from the client that the roof for the target wing was recently replaced, although an inspection by EMS was not performed during this site visit. Information provided by Halifax Health, 200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report combined with onsite observations of the exterior elevations, revealed that the exterior wall penetrations had been repaired and that new rain leaders and downspouts were recently installed along the 200 wing.

New resealing around the new rain leaders and all exterior windows was observed to have taken place at the wall connection. Additionally, the exterior was recently painted. While significant improvements have been made to the roof and exterior envelope, it is believed that there may still be some deficiencies around the lower areas of the exterior windows where cracking in the stucco was observed, and a possible sealing deficiency around the rain leader located in the East area of the North elevation.

Due to a limited number of ceiling access hatches, especially along the exterior elevations, direct observation of the below-roof deck building envelope materials was limited.

Although EMS was unable to visually assess the newer supply duct connections, based on observations of the older diffusers that have not been replaced and the casting around them, it is concluded that the older ductwork insulation and duct connections should be evaluated for proper sealing to prevent the introduction of heated air into the conditioned air stream.

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

EMS makes the following recommendations based upon the observations made and the data collected on November 3, 2025.

To be performed by a Florida-Licensed Building Forensics Professional.

• Have the exterior elevations scanned by a licensed thermographer (or x-ray technician) to determine the extent and location of any water intrusion around any windows, mechanical fasteners, or wall cracks. It is further recommended that this be performed after a significant precipitation event or in conjunction with water testing.

To be performed by a Florida-Licensed General Contractor (GC):

• Correct any exterior envelope deficiencies found through thermography (or x-ray).

To be performed by a Florida-Licensed and NADCA Certified (HVAC) Mechanical Contractor:

• Evaluate the current HVAC system(s)’ current use and function against design specifications, as well as for short cycling conditions. This should include an evaluation of the system’s capability of maintaining humidity levels below 60%, optimally between 30 and 50%. Validate the correct sizing, testing, and balancing of the HVAC systems and make needed repairs, adjustments, or replacements as necessary.

• Evaluate the sealing around all rooftop units, pass-through ducting, and correct any breaches as required.

• Evaluate the above ceiling ductwork and duct connections for proper sealing.

• Clean and sanitize the HVAC systems servicing the 200 wing. This should include drip pans, spiral fans, AHU interior and exterior, ducts, coils, gaskets, diffusers, and return grills. Any internally lined ducts are to be additionally encapsulated.

To be performed by a Florida-Licensed Mold Remediator:

• Place the affected rooms, as indicated on the attached moisture map under a negative pressure, HEPA-filtered, and exterior exhausted containment.

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

• Remove and bag, for disposal, impacted wallboard materials, as well as any impacted insulative materials, as indicated on the attached moisture map.

• Remove all vinyl cove base from inside the patient rooms. Walls with any affected areas under the removed vinyl cove base are to receive an initial floor-to-2’ flood cut with the associated wallboard materials, as well as any impacted insulative materials bagged for disposal. Any microbial-impacted vinyl cove base is to be bagged for disposal.

• After drywall and insulation removal, evaluate the open cavities, including insulation, studding, and remaining wallboard, for moisture damage and microbial amplification that may necessitate additional removal. If deemed necessary as a result of inspection, remove drywall ceilings to 2’ off of impacted walls.

• Exposed structural components, including studding, headers, and sill plates, are to be inspected to verify structural integrity. Any compromised structural components are to be repaired or replaced.

• Inspect for any unknown additional moisture sources that may require correction.

• Perform structural drying throughout the wing as required.

• Clean all exposed structural components, followed by HEPA vacuuming, sanitization by wet wiping with Bioesque anti-microbial or an EPA-approved equivalent, and re-vacuuming.

• Encapsulate any exposed wood, rusted metal and/or exposed exterior sheathing using

Bioesque Lubrizol-certified encapsulant or equivalent.

• Strategically place ULV cold foggers using Bioesque anti-microbial above ceilings throughout the wing and treat for above ceiling microbial amplification. Emphasis is to be placed along exterior elevations, which may require that access cuts be made to place foggers.

• After repairs and drywall build-back, perform a surface-by-surface top-down cleaning and sanitization of the contained areas as well as uncontained areas. This is to be accomplished by HEPA vacuuming, wet wiping using Bioesque, or an equivalent EPA-approved anti-microbial, followed by re-vacuuming.

• The flooring throughout the wing is to be cleaned and sanitized using high-heat cleaning of not less than 160 degrees Fahrenheit using an EPA-approved antimicrobial. Cleaning is to be performed in a “back out” manner to avoid cross-contaminating cleaned and sanitized flooring.

• At the conclusion of the air scrub cycle, a final visual inspection and post-remediation verification sampling should be performed to verify all project remediation activities have been properly completed and the spaces are safe for re-occupancy.

− Spore trap and/or swab sampling media are to be used.

− Samples are to be representative of remediated spaces.

− Samples are to be analyzed by an accredited microbiology laboratory.

Because the air sample results have detected airborne Stachybotrys, it is recommended that the wing remain unoccupied until such time as remediation activities have been completed and analytically verified as effective.

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

EMS recommends that remediation and demolition activities take place within a negative air containment that isolates target areas from other occupied spaces. Remediation activities should follow an established mold remediation protocol developed specifically for this project, with post-remediation air verification sampling performed to verify the effectiveness and completeness of the remediation work.

Should you require guidance in implementing these recommendations, EMS is prepared to provide guidance specifications to implement these efforts and can present a proposal for this scope of work if deemed necessary by the client. EMS recommends that as these efforts are completed, proper visual and air clearance protocols be instituted to confirm the successful conclusion of the recommended activities.

Should site conditions change from those observed and tested on the date specified herein, further testing may be necessary to verify the quality of indoor air and the suitability of the building for occupancy.

9.0 MOLD DISCLAIMER

Please note that the work recommended when completed may not eliminate all sources for potential mold growth associated with the building or the target patient wing. Signs of mold may or may not develop in the future for reasons other than those described herein. Mold amplification, which is visible to the unaided eye, may be a recurring event due to a number of causes and may affect other areas of this building or wing. Improper or incomplete preventive maintenance, product deterioration, moisture problems (condensation, plumbing leaks, etc.), weather events, and building usage may also contribute to mold amplification.

END OF REPORT

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE

Please be advised that all information contained herein is protected under federal law that protects intellectual property. The information presented herein is the sole property and creation of Environmental Management Services, Inc., and is being made available for reference purposes only. This information shall not be copied, distributed, or otherwise used for outside reference purposes. Upon full payment of consideration for the professional services rendered to create this document, ownership will be conveyed in full to Halifax Health.

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

APPENDIX A

Photographic Log

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Project Location: Halifax Health – Child and Adolescent Behavioral Services Facility

841 Jimmy Ann Drive, Daytona Beach, FL

Work Area: 200 Wing

Date (s): November 3, 2025

EMS Project #: 25217.00

Photo 1 -

Subject Property.

Photo 2 -

New paint, window sealing and leaders with downspouts.

23217.00-Photographic Log 200 Wing- Halifax Health-Child and Adolescent BHU Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 3 -

Patient room

2200.

Photo 4 -

Patient room 2200 interior (facing south exterior wall).

Photo 5 -

Degraded drywall in the northeast corner of room.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 6 -and water staining in area where

PTAC was removed.

Photo 7 -

Microbial amplification under cove base.

Photo 8 -

Curling of floor tile edges.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 9 -

Elevated moisture in drywall.

Photo 10 -

Bathroom entry.

Photo 11 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and walls of the bathroom.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 12 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and

Photo 13 -

2201.

Photo 14 -

Patient room 2201 interior (facing north exterior

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 15 -

Water staining on drywall in area where PTAC was

Photo 16 -

Photo 17 -

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 18 -

Photo 19 -

Crackling paint on the ceiling of the bathroom (no noticeable microbial amplification).

Photo 20 -

2202.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 21 -

Patient room 2202 interior (facing

Photo 22 -

Small area of microbial amplification on south exterior wall.

Photo 23 -

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 24 -

Photo 25 -

Photo 26 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 27 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and

Photo 28 -amplification on the bathroom door jamb.

Photo 29 -

2203.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 30 -

Room polyed off.

Photo 31 -

Partial removal of north wall.

Photo 32 -amplification on old drywall and new drywall installed where

PTAC was

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 33 -

Impacted wall insulation and rusted studding.

Photo 34 -

Impacted exterior wall sheathing.

Photo 35 -

2204.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 36 -

Patient room 2204 interior (facing

Photo 37 -

Photo 38 -

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 39 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and

Photo 40 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings and

Photo 41 -amplification on the bathroom door jamb.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 42 -

2205.

Photo 43 -

Patient room 2205 interior (facing

Photo 44 -

Light microbial amplification on exterior wall.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 45 -the cove base.

Photo 46 -

Photo 47 -

Crackling paint on the ceiling of the bathroom (no noticeable amplification).

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 48 -

2206.

Photo 49 -

Patient room 2206 interior (facing

Photo 50 -amplification on the south exterior wall.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 51 -and water staining in the area where the PTAC was

Photo 52 -amplification under the cove base

(south and east walls).

Photo 53 -amplification under cove base (south and east walls).

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 54 -in drywall (south and east walls).

Photo 55 -

Photo 56 -amplification and crackling paint on the ceilings of the bathroom around vent fan.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 57 -

2207.

Photo 58 -

Patient room 2207 interior (facing

Photo 59 -amplification under the cove base

(north wall).

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 60 -amplification under the cove base

(north wall).

Photo 61 -amplification on exterior sheathing above north wall -materials dry.

Photo 62 -in drywall (north wall and around chase in north east corner).

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 63 -

Multipurpose room.

Photo 64 -

Water staining on the back of the access hatch door directly below the duct.

Photo 65 -

TV area.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 66 -

Casting on and around diffusers.

Photo 67 -

Casting on and around diffusers.

Photo 68 -

Nurse’s station.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 69 -

Casting and rust on diffuser with amplification.

Photo 70 -

Conference room/lounge.

Photo 71 -

Casting around the diffuser and water stain on tile.

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 72 -

Water stained ceiling tile directly below duct.

Photo 73 -

Second water stained ceiling tile directly below duct

(not showing on tile face).

Photo 74 -

Poorly sealed duct insulation to supply discharge along with possible microbial amplification on back of discharge housing (poor seal observed on older duct work).

Daytona Beach, FL

Photo 75 -

Therapy room.

Photo 76 -

Therapy room

(facing south exterior wall).

Photo 77 -the cove base.

Daytona Beach, FL

These photographs are based on field observations during EMS’s onsite visit on November 3, 2025. They do not intend to represent every condition present as of that date.

END OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Photo 78 -

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

APPENDIX B

Moisture Map

DATE:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

REVISIONS::

CONSULTANTS:

DRAWN BY:

E D C B A

E D C B A

NOTES:

- Field verification required for all measurements.

CG

MM-1.0

Initial Assessment -

Moisture Map - Halifax Health Child and Adolescent BHUNotes

Elevated Moisture - Floor to 2'

Elevated Moisture - Floor to 4'

Impacted Flooring

Impacted Ceiling Tile(s)

Impacted Drywall/Plaster Ceiling

Damaged Casework

Impacted Insulation (above-ceiling) Ductwork / Condensation

D

Origin Point / Source

Moisture Level

No Moisture Detected

Containment

Elevated Moisture - Floor to Ceiling

LEGEND

MOISTURE MAP

Halifax Health Child and Adolescent Behavioral Facility 841 Jimmy Ann Drive Daytona Beach, Florida 32117

Wing 200 Suggested Containment Location

N Halifax Health-BHU - Daytona Bch., FL

H al ifa x

H ea lth C hi ld a nd

A do le sc en t B eh av io ra l H ea lth F ac ili ty

Ji m m y

A nn

D riv e D ay to na B ea ch

, F L chipg Line chipg Line chipg Text Box

THERAPY ROOM

chipg Text Box

STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT

chipg Text Box

QUIET ROOM

chipg Text Box

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

chipg Text Box

NURSES STATION

chipg Text Box

OFFICE

chipg Text Box

KITCHEN

chipg Text Box

CONFERENCE/LOUNGE

chipg Text Box

MEDS.

chipg Text Box

TV AREA

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box

PATIENT ROOM

chipg Text Box 200 Wing chipg Text Box 11.03.25 chipg Text Box 11.03.25 chipg Text Box 25217.00 chipg Text Box 200 Wing chipg Image chipg Rectangle chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Line chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Callout initial 2'flood cut due to microbial growth under cove base -wall cavity inspection to occur chipg Callout initial 2'flood cut due to microbial growth under cove base -wall cavity inspection to occur chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Callout impacted exterior sheathing visible above ceiling access hatch chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Ellipse chipg Text Box chipg Text Box

NOTES:

- questionable sealing of hard ducts and duct insulation

- suspected impacts to exterior sheathing above ceiling

- suspected water entrapment in wall post roof replacement and PTAC replacement chipg Callout water stained ceiling tile directly below hard duct chipg Callout water stained ceiling tile directly below hard duct chipg Arrow

200 Wing - Ltd. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment Report

APPENDIX C

Laboratory Analytical Results and Chain of Custody

Approved by:

Technical Manager Tran Annie Nguyen

Report for:

Mr. Chip Gruber Environmental Management Services 510 Bahama Drive Indian Harbour Beach, FL 32937

Regarding:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC Project: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs&Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

EML ID: 4298025

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. Information supplied by the client which can affect the validity of results: sample air volume.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Spore trap analysis: 11-06-2025

Service SOPs: Spore trap analysis (EB-MY-S-1038) AIHA LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #276611

Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending.

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 1 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC 481 Newburyport Avenue, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Environmental Management Services C/O: Mr. Chip Gruber Re: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs& Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

Date of Sampling: 11-03-2025 Date of Receipt: 11-06-2025 Date of Report: 11-07-2025

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: HH-A-1:

Exterior Pre

HH-A-2:

Nurses Station Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 21509814-1 21509815-1

Analysis Date: 11/06/2025 11/06/2025 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 7 25 370 2 25 110 Basidiospores 7 25 370 Bipolaris/Drechslera group 2 100 27 Cercospora 1 100 13 Chaetomium Cladosporium 35 25 1,900 Curvularia 2 100 27 Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 3 25 160 Pithomyces Rusts 1 100 13 Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Sporidesmium 1 100 13 Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 < 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 75 75 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 2,700 270 Comments:

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 2 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

§ Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision.

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Environmental Management Services C/O: Mr. Chip Gruber Re: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs& Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

Date of Sampling: 11-03-2025 Date of Receipt: 11-06-2025 Date of Report: 11-07-2025

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: HH-A-3:

Conference/Lounge Room

HH-A-4:

Mid Main Corridor Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 21509816-1 21509817-1

Analysis Date: 11/06/2025 11/06/2025 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores Basidiospores 1 25 53 Bipolaris/Drechslera group Cercospora Chaetomium 1 100 13 1 100 13 Cladosporium 6 25 320 Curvularia Myrothecium Nigrospora 1 100 13 Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Sporidesmium Stachybotrys 4 100 53 1 100 13 Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 4+ 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 75 75 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 440 40 Comments:

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 3 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Environmental Management Services C/O: Mr. Chip Gruber Re: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs& Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

Date of Sampling: 11-03-2025 Date of Receipt: 11-06-2025 Date of Report: 11-07-2025

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: HH-A-5:

Patient Room 2200

HH-A-6:

Patient Room 2201 Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 21509818-1 21509819-1

Analysis Date: 11/06/2025 11/06/2025 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 1 25 53 2 25 110 Basidiospores 1 25 53 Bipolaris/Drechslera group Cercospora Chaetomium 1 100 13 2 100 27 Cladosporium Curvularia 1 100 13 1 100 13 Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Sporidesmium Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 < 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 75 75 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 80 200 Comments:

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 4 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Environmental Management Services C/O: Mr. Chip Gruber Re: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs& Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

Date of Sampling: 11-03-2025 Date of Receipt: 11-06-2025 Date of Report: 11-07-2025

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: HH-A-7:

Patient Room 2206

HH-A-8:

Patient Room 2202 Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 21509820-1 21509821-1

Analysis Date: 11/06/2025 11/06/2025 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 1 25 53 Basidiospores 2 25 110 Bipolaris/Drechslera group Cercospora Chaetomium 2 100 27 3 100 40 Cladosporium 3 25 160 Curvularia Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 1 25 53 6 25 320 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Sporidesmium Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 < 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 75 75 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 190 570 Comments:

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 5 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Environmental Management Services C/O: Mr. Chip Gruber Re: 25247.00-Halifax BHU Daytona-200 Wing-Airs& Swabs; Lmtd IAQ and Micro 200 Wing of the BHU

Date of Sampling: 11-03-2025 Date of Receipt: 11-06-2025 Date of Report: 11-07-2025

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: HH-A-9:

Patient Room 2205

HH-A-10:

Patient Room 2207 Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 21509822-1 21509823-1

Analysis Date: 11/06/2025 11/06/2025 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 2 25 110 Basidiospores Bipolaris/Drechslera group Cercospora Chaetomium Cladosporium 6 25 320 11 25 590 Curvularia 5 100 67 Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 2 25 110 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Sporidesmium Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 2+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 67 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 75 75 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 320 870 Comments:

EMLab ID: 4298025, Page 6 of 8Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others…