L.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Flight Program Aircraft Management System (FPAMS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-18-R-00097
About this file
L.2 Past Performance Questionnaire (docx)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FPAMS – Attachment L.2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FPAMS SIR 6973GH-18-R-00097
Please return the completed questionnaire directly to the Contract Specialist at: darrell.l.hafer@faa.gov Prior to July 27, 2016, 3:00 PM CST.
Please complete and/or verify the following reference check information:
1. Name of Contractor: ______________________________
2. What type of Service was provided (i.e. cost accounting, budgeting, financial management, etc.)?
3. Type of Contract/Agreement for Pricing (i.e. firm fixed-price, fixed rate per hour (labor-hour, T&M), cost-reimbursable, etc.) _______________________________________________
4. Contract Number: _________________________________
5. Total Contract Amount: $____________________________
6. Date of Contract Award: ____________________________
7. Contract Period of Performance: Start ________________ Complete ______
8. Contractor Role / Responsibility (circle one): Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor
Please complete and/or verify the following responder information:
Name of Responding Point of Contact: _________________________________________
Agency / Organization: __________________________________________
Mailing Address: _________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _____________________
Fax Number: __________________________________
E-mail Address: _____________________
1. Quality/Timeliness of Service.
a. How would you rate the contractor's general overall compliance with contract requirements?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor's service - delivered reports on time and adhering to the required schedule?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
c. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to meet contract requirements?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) |
d. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to solve problems?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) |
e. How would you rate the contractor on the timeliness of its responses to inquiries or other administrative matters?
| Extremely timely | ( ) | |
| Generally timely | ( ) | |
| Generally not timely | ( ) | |
| Seldom timely | ( ) |
2. Cost Control.
a. If applicable, to what extent did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates?
| Less than estimated cost | ( ) | ||
| Comparatively equal to estimate | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded the costs | ( ) | ||
| Considerably surpassed estimate | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's initiative, if any, in reducing overall costs to the Government?
| Extremely efficient | ( ) |
| Generally efficient | ( ) |
| Generally inefficient | ( ) |
| Extremely inefficient | ( ) |
3. Business Relations - Effective Management.
a. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government (or entity with requirement) counterparts?
| Considerably successful | ( ) | |
| Generally successful | ( ) | |
| Little Success | ( ) | |
| No success | ( ) |
b. To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting contract requirements?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) |
c. Was the contractor's selection and use of personnel appropriate for the performance of this contract?
| Provided highly qualified personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided qualified personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided minimal personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided insufficient personnel | ( ) |
d. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government's (or other) staff?
| Extremely effective | ( ) |
| Generally effective | ( ) |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) |
e. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance or delivery schedules.)
( ) No
f. Has it ever been necessary to send this Contractor a Notice to Cure letter?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain and indicate the status.
( ) No
g. How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel?
| Extremely effective | ( ) |
| Generally effective | ( ) |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) |
4. Customer Satisfaction.
a. To what extent did the contractor provide timely assistance, when responding to problems?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's response to inquiries related to administrative issues?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) |
c. Would you select this contractor again?
( ) Yes ( ) No
5. Integrity.
a. Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain.
( ) No
b. Did the contractor maintain integrity during contract performance? If not, please provide reason.
( ) Yes ( ) No If no, please explain.
6. Please provide any other comments you may have.
7/12/2018
File details come from the government source that posted it.