Question and Answer.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693JJ326Q000018
About this file
This is a Question and Answer document for RFQ No. 693JJ326Q000018 issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for a study on roadway design and infrastructure factors influencing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) in mitigating rural roadway departure crashes. The Q&A clarifies submission requirements and technical expectations for contractor proposals. Key clarifications include: pricing schedules must be submitted as separate Excel files attached to technical proposals; Google Maps Platform is suggested but not required for data collection; contractors may use alternative data sources such as LiDAR data for roadway feature extraction; AI/ML extraction is not limited to Google Street View images if other data collection approaches are available; and no specific subscription to Google Maps Platform is mandated. The document specifies that FHWA requires collection of roadway features including lane-width, pavement markings, and horizontal-curves that impact ADAS performance, with final feature specifications to be determined collaboratively between the research team and FHWA as data collection progresses.
The Q&A further clarifies that crash data collection requirements span five years from the date of award rather than a specific historical period, and confirms this is a new project with no incumbent contractor. The responses indicate flexibility in methodology and data sources, emphasizing that contractors may propose alternative approaches to Google Maps Platform if capable of collecting large-scale, roadway-specific feature data. These clarifications were issued in response to vendor questions, with the vendor question period now expired.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| RFQ No. 693JJ326Q000018 | ||
| Question | Answer | |
| 1 | Should the Pricing Schedule be submitted as a separate pricing worksheet Excel file, or should the table be included within the technical approach proposal file? | Submit Excel pricing schedule as separate document/attachment within same email as technical proposal. |
| 2 | According to RFQ p. 9, "this project necessitates the use of the Google Map Platform", but the performance work statement does not specify how the platform must be used. What is FHWA's expectation for using the Google Maps platform for this project? Is it limited to Google Street View images or other Google Analytics data? | Google Maps Platform refers to a tool that can be utilized for collecting roadway features. No; the PWS was updated to remove "this project necessitates the use of Google Map Platform". Instead, the PWS states that "Google Maps Platform is suggested, but not required". |
| 3 | Does all AI/ML extraction need to be Google Street View image-based? | No. If the necessary data can be collected through other approaches or data sources, there is no need to use AI/ML to collect data. |
| 4 | Could another data source, such as LiDAR data, be used for feature extractions (e.g., lateral offset, slopes, clear zone)? USGS Open LiDAR data is widely available across the US. | Yes; another data source may be used for feature extractions if the other tool(s) is/are capable of collecting large-scale and specific roadway feature data. |
| 5 | What basic features does FHWA expect or need to be collected/extracted in this project? | FHWA requires road features including (but not limited to) lane-width, pavement markings, and horizontal-curves that potentially impact ADASs in mitigating roadway departure crashes. As data collection progresses, the research team and the FHWA will discuss and decide on a final decision. |
| 6 | What role does FHWA intend for the Google Map Platform subscription to have in the analysis, and could other sources of data be an acceptable substitute? | As stated in the answer of Q2, Google Maps Platform refers to a tool that can be utilized for collecting roadway features. The PWS was updated remove "this project necessitates the use of Google Map Platform". Instead, the PWS states that "Google Maps Platform is suggested, but not required". |
| 7 | Does FHWA intend that the contractor collect five years of historical crash data back from award date, or specifically from 2018 to present? | The PWS was updated to state that "FHWA requires crash data for each year over the past five years". |
| 8 | Is this a new requirement or if there is an incumbent contractor? | This is a new project and there is no existing contactor. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .