Amendment-693C7324R000013-0003.pdf

(x)

693C7324R000013 x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

ASHBURN VA 20147

693C73

SUITE E2-3-300

QUANTUM PARK, 22001 LOUDOUN COUNTY PKWY

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Transportation04/04/20240003

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

02/21/2024

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

To solicit an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Contracts (IDIQCs) for

Transportation Planning, Pavement Design, Performance Management, Traffic Monitoring, Safety Reports & Studies, Asset Management, Environmental Compliance, and associated engineering services in connection with the preparation of transportation studies and reports, project development activities, deployment of traffic counting and monitoring equipment and similar activities. The provision of these services would be in support of

Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMA) such as the National Park Service (NPS), the U.S.

Forest Service (USFS), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land

Management (BLM), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), etc. and other state, local, or special-purpose governmental type units (such as municipal authorities) within the United

States and its territories.

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 7

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

693C7324R000013/0003

The purpose of this amendment is to provide updated information on Evaluation and Weighting

Criteria. All other requirements, terms and conditions of this solicitation remain the same.

The IDIQ contract solicitation will result in the award of 4 Multiple Award Task Order Contracts

(MATOC). The contracts will be for a Base, 4 option years and tentative 6 months with a ceiling for all the MATOCs combined for

$60,000.000.00. It is anticipated that multiple task orders will be procured via the MATOC IDIQ.

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

693C7324R000013- Transportation Planning

PROPOSED EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation and Weighting Criteria: All Offerors will be evaluated on the following evaluation factors and Confidence ratings:

1. Specialized experience and technical competence. Most important. (Factor 1 importance weight factor = 30%)

2. Professional qualifications. Second most important. Factor 2 and Factor 3 are equally important. (Factor 2 importance weight factor = 25%)

3. Capacity to accomplish all work in the required time. Second most important.

Factor 2 and Factor 3 are equally important. (Factor 3 importance weight factor = 25%)

4. Past performance. Third most important. (Factor 3 importance weight factor = 20%)

(1) Specialized experience and technical competence of the firm in providing transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated engineering services as listed in this RFQ. Offerors shall complete Section F of SF 330 to demonstrate specialized experience and technical competence. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:

Factor 1: Specialized Experience and Technical Competence Confidence Rating

Description / Indicators

High Confidence

The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention.

Some

The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas and will be successful in performing the contract with some Government intervention.

Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas or will be successful in performing the contract even with Government intervention.

(2) Professional qualifications necessary for performance of these types of services as listed in this RFQ. The Project Manager / Contract Manager must be currently registered as a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) in at least one state or is a licensed American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). The designated functional area lead for each of the listed technical areas Should be either a licensed PE in at least one state or a licensed AICP. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:

Factor 2: Professional Qualifications

Rating

Description / Indicators

High Confidence

The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.

Some Confidence

The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.

Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.

(3) Capacity to accomplish all work in the required time. List numbers of teams and established offices in all three (3) of the Federal Land Highway multistate regions (Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD), Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), and Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD)) available to do the types of services as listed in this RFQ including subcontractors.

The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:

Factor 3. Offeror’s Capacity to Accomplish All Work in the Required Time

Rating

Description / Indicators

High Confidence

The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

Some Confidence

The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

Low Confidence

The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

(4) Past performance will be evaluated on previously accomplished or currently ongoing transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts with Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies and Private Industry in terms of quality of work, cost control, and compliance with performance schedules. Firms must identify references for past performance that include a point of contact (POC), current telephone number, dates of performance, name of project, and the POC’s e-mail address. The period of performance end date for all these cited past performance assignments must be within the past 7 years. Provide interim or final past performance evaluations for the example projects identified in Section F of the SF330. In addition to the example projects listed in Section F of the SF330, no more than five (5) additional past performance evaluations for similar assignments completed within the past five (5) years may also be provided. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:

Factor 4. Offeror’s Past Performance

Rating

Description / Indicators

High Confidence

The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings above Satisfactory or equivalent.

Some Confidence

The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings above Marginal or equivalent.

Low Confidence

The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.

CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings below Satisfactory or equivalent.

Unknown Confidence

The Offeror does not have a record of relevant past performance or information on past performance is not available.