Amendment-693C7324R000013-0003.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C7324R000013
About this file
This document is a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Transportation Planning, Pavement Design, Performance Management, Traffic Monitoring, Safety Reports & Studies, Asset Management, Environmental Compliance, and associated Engineering Services.
The key details are:
- The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD), plans to award multiple IDIQ contracts for these services to support Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) such as the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, and others.
- The total shared capacity of the contracts is not to exceed $60 million.
- The evaluation criteria include specialized experience, technical competence, professional qualifications, capacity to accomplish the work, and past performance. Offerors will be evaluated using "Confidence Levels" of High, Some, and Low for each factor.
- No solicitation package is available, and the successful firms will be awarded IDIQ contracts based on their SF330s, past performance references, and other available information. Interviews may be conducted.
- The proposed work duration is one base year with four one-year options. All task orders will be firm-fixed price.
- Interested firms must submit Parts I and II of the SF330 form, and joint ventures must also submit a copy of the joint venture agreement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment-693C7324R000013-0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment-693C7324R000013-0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment-693C7324R000013-0001.pdf | ||
| REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - 02212024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
693C7324R000013- Transportation Planning
PROPOSED EVALUATION FACTORS
Evaluation and Weighting Criteria: All Offerors will be evaluated on the following evaluation factors and Confidence ratings:
1. Specialized experience and technical competence. Most important. (Factor 1 importance weight factor = 30%)
2. Professional qualifications. Second most important. Factor 2 and Factor 3 are equally important. (Factor 2 importance weight factor = 25%)
3. Capacity to accomplish all work in the required time. Second most important.
Factor 2 and Factor 3 are equally important. (Factor 3 importance weight factor = 25%)
4. Past performance. Third most important. (Factor 3 importance weight factor = 20%)
(1) Specialized experience and technical competence of the firm in providing transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated engineering services as listed in this RFQ. Offerors shall complete Section F of SF 330 to demonstrate specialized experience and technical competence. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:
Factor 1: Specialized Experience and Technical Competence Confidence Rating
Description / Indicators
High Confidence
The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Some
The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas and will be successful in performing the contract with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understands the requirements based on the Offeror’s specialized experience and technical competence in all technical areas or will be successful in performing the contract even with Government intervention.
(2) Professional qualifications necessary for performance of these types of services as listed in this RFQ. The Project Manager / Contract Manager must be currently registered as a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) in at least one state or is a licensed American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). The designated functional area lead for each of the listed technical areas Should be either a licensed PE in at least one state or a licensed AICP. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:
Factor 2: Professional Qualifications
Rating
Description / Indicators
High Confidence
The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.
Some Confidence
The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s key personnel's professional qualifications and experience.
(3) Capacity to accomplish all work in the required time. List numbers of teams and established offices in all three (3) of the Federal Land Highway multistate regions (Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD), Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), and Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD)) available to do the types of services as listed in this RFQ including subcontractors.
The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:
Factor 3. Offeror’s Capacity to Accomplish All Work in the Required Time
Rating
Description / Indicators
High Confidence
The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
Some Confidence
The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
Low Confidence
The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s number of teams and established offices in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
(4) Past performance will be evaluated on previously accomplished or currently ongoing transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts with Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies and Private Industry in terms of quality of work, cost control, and compliance with performance schedules. Firms must identify references for past performance that include a point of contact (POC), current telephone number, dates of performance, name of project, and the POC’s e-mail address. The period of performance end date for all these cited past performance assignments must be within the past 7 years. Provide interim or final past performance evaluations for the example projects identified in Section F of the SF330. In addition to the example projects listed in Section F of the SF330, no more than five (5) additional past performance evaluations for similar assignments completed within the past five (5) years may also be provided. The evaluation of this factor will make use of “Confidence Levels” of “High,” “Some,” and “Low” as described below:
Factor 4. Offeror’s Past Performance
Rating
Description / Indicators
High Confidence
The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings above Satisfactory or equivalent.
Some Confidence
The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings above Marginal or equivalent.
Low Confidence
The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understand the requirements and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention based on the Offeror’s past performance in transportation planning, asset management, performance management, traffic monitoring, safety reports & studies, environmental compliance, and associated services contracts performed in EFLHD, CFLHD, and WFLHD regions.
CPARS and/or past performance evaluations for the Offeror show ratings below Satisfactory or equivalent.
Unknown Confidence
The Offeror does not have a record of relevant past performance or information on past performance is not available.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .