5140-198P1594_Redacted.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation FY19
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-R-000002
About this file
This federal contract opportunity notice seeks proposals for pavement preservation work on approximately 53.40 miles of roadway on the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia. The project includes thin asphalt overlay or chip seal overlay with fog seal of the roadway from Milepost 0.0 to 27.2, Milepost 37.5 to 45.3, and Milepost 46.1 to 64.5. Additional work comprises asphalt patching, pavement markings, and miscellaneous tasks. Offerors must demonstrate experience in thin asphalt overlay or chip seal overlay. The total project value is estimated between $1 million to $5 million. Proposals are due by the date specified in Solicitation 693C73-20-R-000002. The contract must be completed by December 11, 2020. Interested vendors should register on the Federal Business Opportunities website to receive notifications. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency seeking these pavement preservation services on the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 46.87
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/15/12
Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166
Federal Highway Administration
Report prepared by: ES
MILE POINT:
KILOMETER POINT:
46.87 75.48 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 46.87 INSPECTION DATE: 10/15/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 14.9 FT (4.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 14.9 FT (4.5 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 42.5 FT (13.0 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.8 FT (9.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILINGS INSTALLED.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 46.87 (KM PT 75.48)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.2 MILES FR. VA. RTE. 60
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. These include a moderate accumulation of soil, gravel, and debris along the curblines of the underpass roadway; settlement of the gravel approach surfacing at both underpass approaches; several potholes in the west underpass approach; and vegetation growth encroaching on the structure.
The underpass approaches should be regraded, as uneven approaches increase the likelihood of inadvertent collision damage to the structure. In addition, the vine and vegetation growth should be periodically removed.
INSPECTION TEAM: A. IMMEL, T. POWELL (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
AARON IMMEL, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/13
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.9 REGRADE UNDERPASS APPROACHES. REMOVE SOIL, GRAVEL, AND DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY FLOOR SLAB.
1 LS
60 PERIODICALLY REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND AROUND STRUCTURE. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
N1. DECK SLAB
N2. EXPANSION JOINTS
G3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 8
N
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
1. BEARING DEVICES
N
G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
58.3, 222.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT.
58.6, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILS.
60.1 MINOR SPALLING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS OVER FORM TIES.
MINOR SCRAPE ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT WEST END.
WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
PEELING OF CONCEALMENT PAINT.
60.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF SOUTHEAST AND NORTHEAST
WINGWALLS. MINOR VEGETATION AND MODERATE MOSS GROWTH
ON WINGWALLS. GRAFFITI ON WINGWALLS IN SEVERAL
LOCATIONS.
N8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ABUTMENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. N
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. G
WEEP HOLES 7. G
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)
N N G G G G N G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N
222.5 MINOR EROSION AT ENDS OF SOUTH WINGWALLS.
222.9 MODERATE SOIL, GRAVEL, AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG
CURBLINES OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY FLOOR SLAB. MINOR
LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF UNDERPASS
ROADWAY FLOOR SLAB. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF UNDERPASS
APPROACH GRAVEL SURFACING AT ENDS OF FLOOR SLAB; MINOR
EDGE SPALLING OF FLOOR SLAB. FOUR LARGE POTHOLES AT
WEST UNDERPASS APPROACH.
36.D RAIL ENDS NOT TERMINATED SAFELY.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 22 20 36 33
TYPE 3S2 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3-3 42 38 70 63
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 46.87
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-198P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 198P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
009 - AMHERST
161000010
COUNTY ROAD
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
5140198P0000000
1.2 MILES FR. VA. RTE. 60
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
46.87 (KM PT 75.48)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
14.9 FT (4.5 M)
14.9 FT (4.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.1 TONS (40.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 29.8 FT (9.1 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°43'31.50"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°18'34.90"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 01
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 1.0 FT (0.3 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1N10
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
42.5 FT (13.0 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
29.8 FT (9.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.33 FT (0.71 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
13.83 FT (4.22 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2009-STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILINGS INSTALLED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:79�18'34.90 http:37�43'31.50
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-198P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE
PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CHECKING OF RAILINGS,
WEST RAIL NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING OF NORTHBOUND PAVEMENT
NEAR SOUTH BRIDGE END
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL GUARDRAIL ENDS NOT TERMINATED SAFELY,
SOUTHEAST RAIL END SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL EROSION AT WINGWALL ENDS, SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL END SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH
ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI
PHOTO #10 - CRACKING OF SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL; NOTE VEGETATION
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH ON
WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - POTHOLES IN WEST APPROACH
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS
ROADWAY LOOKING WEST; NOTE SOIL,
GRAVEL, AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG
CURBLINES
PHOTO #14 - CRACKING AND SPALLING ALONG
ENDS OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY SLAB, EAST
END SHOWN; NOTE SETTLEMENT OF
APPROACH
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .