5140-013P4250_Redacted.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation FY19
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-R-000002
About this file
This document provides details for a federal contract opportunity to perform pavement preservation work on the Blue Ridge Parkway. The solicitation is for proposals to complete pavement preservation of approximately 53.40 miles of roadway between Milepost 0.0 and 27.2, 37.5 and 45.3, and 46.1 and 64.5. Work will include one of two pavement preservation treatment methods, asphalt overlay or chip seal overlay with fog seal, as well as asphalt patching, pavement markings, and miscellaneous tasks. Proposals are due in November 2019, with construction to be finished by December 2020. The contract is valued between $1-5 million and will be awarded by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Offerors must demonstrate experience with the pavement preservation treatment methods.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
STRUCTURE SUMMARY
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
BARREL LENGTH: ............... 84 FT (26 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 43.0 FT (13.1 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 6 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 20.0 FT (6.1 M) 1957
YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 1G5-10 / 3007
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2009-RAILING SYSTEM INSTALLED.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 61.33 (KM PT 98.70)
STATE: .................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 0.8 MILES TO VISITORS CENTER
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... OTTER CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This two barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the masonry mortar joints throughout the structure with random cracked masonry stones in the north end wall, and moderate vertical cracking of the concrete section of the intermediate wall. Additional problems include heavy vegetation growth along the top of both headwalls and minor spalling with exposed rebar on the slab underside in the south barrel.
The north barrel is blocked by an accumulation of silt and stacked stones which conforms to the surrounding topography; the stream therefore flows along the south end wall.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, L. ELLIS
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
REINALDO SILVESTRY, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/17
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
62.3 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWING ALONG TOP OF HEADWALLS. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
61.4, 62.1 REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS IN BARREL WALLS AND
WINGWALLS AS NECESSARY.
1 LS
61.1 REDIRECT CHANNEL AWAY FROM SOUTH WALL WITH ENGINEERED
RIPRAP.
1 LS
62.1 EPOXY INJECT OR SEAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE PORTION OF
INTERMEDIATE WALL.
1 LS
62.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AND COAT WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT.
1 LS
62.10 SEAL CRACKS ON WEARING SURFACE 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
61. CHANNEL 5
F ALIGNMENT1.
G EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
N 3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
P4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
N 5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
NORMAL VELOCITY MED 7.
11 FT. AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
STONES, SAND
62. CUL VERT 6
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS 9.
ADEQUACY OF COVER 8.
SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION 7.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 6.
5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT
4. WINGWALLS
3. HEADWALLS
2. FOOTINGS
1. BARREL(S)
ROADWAY SURFACE10.
11. RIDEABILITY
12. OTHER
F
N
G
F
F
G
F
G
G
G
G
N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER9.
8. ALIGNMENT
SIGNS 7.
6. SETTLEMENT
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N
G
G
G
G
N
G
N
223. RETAINING WALL N
6. OTHER
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. FOUNDATION
2. WEEP HOLES
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
B. TRANSITIONS
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 17
61.1,4, 62.5 CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST SOUTH BARREL WALL. SILT AND STONE
ACCUMULATION BLOCKS FLOW THROUGH NORTH BARREL
(CONFORMS TO SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY).
HEAVY DEBRIS (CUT TREES) ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
62.1,7 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
LEAKAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, PRIMARILY IN SOUTH BARREL.
MINOR LEAKAGE AND EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION
JOINTS. SEVERAL MINOR SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO
INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH
BARREL.
MODERATE CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF BARREL WALL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON MASONRY
WALLS AT JOINT WITH CONCRETE SLAB. MODERATE VERTICAL
CRACKING, UP TO 1/4"W, ON BOTH FACES OF CONCRETE PORTION
OF INTERMEDIATE WALL NEAR CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN TOP SLAB.
TWO CRACKED MASONRY STONES AT EAST SIDE OF NORTH END
WALL; ONE AT WEST SIDE.
62.3 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE FROM MASONRY HEADWALLS AND RING
STONES. NUMEROUS SMALL TREES AND HEAVY VEGETATION ON
TOP OF HEADWALLS.
62.4 MODERATE CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;
MINOR EFFLORESCENCE FROM JOINTS IN SOME LOCATIONS.
62.6 SEVERE (UP TO 4.3') UNDERMINING OF CONCRETE APRON AT
UPSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH BARREL WALL; VOID (10"D) BETWEEN
APRON AND BASE OF WALL. APRON APPEARS TO ONLY BE
CONCRETE OVERRUN FROM CONSTRUCTION AND SERVES NO
PURPOSE TO STRUCTURE.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62.9, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILS AND RAIL POSTS.
BACKING PLATES.
MINOR RUSTING OF TIMBER RAIL STEEL
62.10, 222.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND MAP CRACKING OF PAVEMENT.
36.D RAIL ENDS NOT TERMINATED SAFELY.
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
TRUCK TYPE
TONS
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC)
METRIC TONS METRIC TONSTONS
OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
H
HS
TYPE 3
TYPE 3S2
TYPE 3-3
DESIGN LOADING:
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS:
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
TOP SLAB
8/15
X
X
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7
H15 (M13.5)
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - AMHERST
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-013P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... OTTER CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........013P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140013P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.8 MILES TO VISITORS CEN
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1G5-10 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 61.33 (KM PT 98.70)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3007 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
19 - CULVERT
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
43.0 FT (13.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION:
N - NOT APPLICABLE
YES(218) IS SALT USED?:
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:
2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:
R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/16 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE:
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°34'24.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°20'58.10" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 23 MI (37 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 474 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 6 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 521 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 8 - TIMBER/OTHER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.33 FT (0.71 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: .................................N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1N10
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2009-RAILING SYSTEM INSTALLED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
CULVERT LENGTH = 85'.
http:79�20'58.10 http:37�34'24.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE
PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
PAVEMENT THROUGHOUT NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND LANES;
NOTE ALSO DETERIORATION OF SAFETY EDGE OF PAVEMENT
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013PPHOTOGRAPHS
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CHECKING OF
STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILS AND RAIL
POSTS; WEST RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF
BARREL #2 LOOKING WEST
PHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE FROM
RING STONES; EAST HEADWALL OVER
BARREL #1
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #8 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE AT EAST END OF SOUTH BARREL
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON
SLAB UNDERSIDE AT EAST END OF BARREL #1
SHOWN
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH
BARREL WALL; NOTE ALSO ACCUMULATED
SEDIMENT ALONG BARREL
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND
DETERIORATION OF BARREL END WALL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; NORTH BARREL
WALL NEAR WEST END SHOWN
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #12 - VERTICAL CRACKING SEEN ON
BOTH FACES OF CONCRETE PORTION OF
INTERMEDIATE WALL NEAR CONSTRUCTION
JOINT IN TOP SLAB; NORTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF
WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE; NORTHEAST WINGWALL
SHOWN
OTTER CREEK CULVERT #7 INSPECTION DATE: 11/1/16
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #14 - UNDERMINED CONCRETE APRON
AT UPSTREAM END OF BARREL #2 END WALL
WITH A VOID BETWEEN APRON AND BASE OF
END WALL
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #15 - CLOSE-UP OF VOID DEPTH AT
BASE OF SOUTH END WALLS AND TOP OF
APRON SLAB
PHOTO #16 - DEBRIS ALONG SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION ADJACENT TO
WINGWALL BASE
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 013P
PHOTO #17 - LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #18 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH SOUTH BARREL
(PHOTO FROM 10/29/2014 INSPECTION REPORT)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .