5140-011P12750_Redacted.pdf

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

OTTER CREEK CULVERT #5 INSPECTION DATE: 11/2/16

STRUCTURE SUMMARY

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

BARREL LENGTH: ............... 59 FT (18 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 46.1 FT (14.1 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 20 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 21.3 FT (6.5 M) 1957

YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 1G9 / 3004

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 1983-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 59.79 (KM PT 96.22)

STATE: .................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.7 MILES TO VA ROUTE 130

FACILITY CARRIED: ............. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... OTTER CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This two barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. However, the culvert is poorly aligned with the stream flow; the stream approaches the culvert at a 90 degree angle, with the flow mainly against the south wall of the south barrel. Other problems include cracking of the wingwall and barrel wall masonry mortar joints, cracking of the slab underside, and debris accumulation on the upstream side of the intermediate wall and rock and silt accumulation along the north end of both barrels. There is also some scour along the barrel walls.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, L. ELLIS

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

REINALDO SILVESTRY, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

61.4, 62.5 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM UPSTREAM SIDE OF INTERMEDIATE WALL. REMOVE

ACCUMULATION OF SILT AND STONE FROM BOTH BARRELS.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

NO (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

REHAB. RECONSTR.

62.9, 222.3 INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM OVER STRUCTURE AND AT

APPROACHES.

1 LS

62.1,4 REPOINT WINGWALL AND BARREL WALL MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 5

F ALIGNMENT1.

F EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

N 3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

F4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

N 5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

NORMAL VELOCITY MED 7.

8 FT.AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

SILT, ROCK, STONES

62. CUL VERT 6

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS 9.

ADEQUACY OF COVER 8.

SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION 7.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 6.

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT

4. WINGWALLS

3. HEADWALLS

2. FOOTINGS

1. BARREL(S)

ROADWAY SURFACE10.

11. RIDEABILITY

12. OTHER (WEEP HOLES)

F

N

G

F

F

F

F

G

N

G

G

G

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER9.

8. ALIGNMENT

SIGNS 7.

6. SETTLEMENT

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N

N

G

G

G

N

G

N

223. RETAINING WALL N

6. OTHER

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. FOUNDATION

2. WEEP HOLES

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

B. TRANSITIONS

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 18

61.1,4 STREAM APPROACHES CULVERT AT NEARLY 90 DEGREE ANGLE.

STREAM FLOW IS MAINLY AGAINST SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH

BARREL DUE TO ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AT INTERMEDIATE

WALL; SEE 61.4, 62.5.

61.2, 62.6 MINOR SCOUR (UP TO 1'-6") ALONG SOUTH AND INTERMEDIATE

WALLS; SCOUR HOLES AT UPSTREAM END OF BOTH WALLS.

INTERMEDIATE WALL RESTS ON BEDROCK.

MINOR EROSION OF SOUTH UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK; TREES

UNDERMINED.

61.4, 62.5 MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION (UP TO 4' DEEP) ON

UPSTREAM END OF INTERMEDIATE WALL. MINOR SILT AND ROCK

ACCUMULATION AGAINST NORTH FACE OF BOTH BARRELS.

ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT (UP TO 2') AND VEGETATION

DOWNSTREAM OF SOUTH BARREL.

62.1 MINOR TO MODERATE MAP, LONGITUDINAL, AND TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE.

MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM BARREL WALL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING (UP

TO 1/8" WIDE) OF NORTH AND SOUTH BARREL WALLS AT ENDS.

62.3 MODERATE TO HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE FROM RING STONE

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH

OVERHANGING HEADWALLS.

62.4,7 MODERATE TO SEVERE (UP TO 1/2" WIDE) CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS,

INDIRECTLY LIKELY SETTLEMENT.

62.10 MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.7 NO HEADWALL MARKERS PRESENT.

36,A,B,C,D NO GUARDRAIL SYSTEM PRESENT.

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

INSPECTION DATE: 11/2/16

TRUCK TYPE

TONS

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC)

METRIC TONS METRIC TONSTONS

OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

H

HS

TYPE 3

TYPE 3S2

TYPE 3-3

DESIGN LOADING:

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS:

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

POSITIVE MOMENT

7/16

X

X

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING

OTTER CREEK CULVERT #5

UNKNOWN

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... OTTER CREEK CULVERT #5 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - AMHERST

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-011P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... OTTER CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........011P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140011P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.7 MILES TO VA ROUTE 130

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1G9 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 59.79 (KM PT 96.22)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3004 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

19 - CULVERT

21.3 FT (6.5 M)

46.1 FT (14.1 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION:

N - NOT APPLICABLE

NO(218) IS SALT USED?:

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:

0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:

R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/16 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE:

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°35'13.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°19'38.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 38.0 FT (11.6 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 8.0 FT (2.4 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 8.0 FT (2.4 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 474 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 20 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 521 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 38.0 FT (11.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 0 - N/A

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.90 FT (30.45 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: .................................N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT:

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0000

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1983-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

CULVERT LENGTH = 58'.

http:79�19'38.80 http:37�35'13.30

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE

PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE OVER

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST, BARREL #1

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE NEAR EAST END OF BARREL #1

OTTER CREEK CULVERT #5 INSPECTION DATE: 11/2/16

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE FROM

RING STONE MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;

EAST SIDE OF BARREL #2 SHOWN

PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #9 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF

INTERMEDIATE WALL

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH BARREL WALL

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011PPHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERMEDIATE WALL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; NORTH FACE NEAR EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF NORTH AND SOUTH BARREL

WALLS AT ENDS; SOUTHEAST END OF BARREL #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CRACK PROPAGATING INTO WINGWALL FROM

ABUTMENT BREAST WALL WITH EFFLORESCENCE BUILD-UP; NOTE

FRACTURED STONE IN WINGWALL AT END OF CRACKING

PHOTO #14 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL SEDIMENT AND STONE ACCUMULATION AGAINST

END WALLS OF BARRELS; BARREL #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; NORTHEAST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - LATERAL MOVEMENT OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL WESTWARD; FULL

HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS

OTTER CREEK CULVERT #5 INSPECTION DATE: 11/2/16

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 011P

PHOTO #18 - LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #19 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM