BIP Cumb River Bridge 5130-001P.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

CUMBERLAND RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/26/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 3 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE / STEEL YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... DACW62-81-B- / QIT80 SKEW ANGLE:

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... SNOOPER INSPECTION 9/92, 5/01, 4/06, AND 4/10.

LOCATION

628.0 FT (191.4 M)

220.0 FT (67.1 M)

36.8 FT (11.2 M)

33.5 FT (10.2 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: ..................... 2.31 (KM PT 3.72)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.31 MILES FROM EAST PARK

ENTRANCE. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LEATHERWOOD FORD RD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BIG S. FORK OF CUMBERLAND RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel girder bridge is in fair condition overall, but has some ongoing problems that require attention. These include damaged bearing devices at both abutments; loose expansion joint armoring; missing and loose bolts securing the parapet steel fascia plates; and moderate cracking of the curbs and parapets.

The loose joint armoring is of special concern, as this condition could pose a traffic hazard if the armoring were to break away from the deck concrete. Repairs to expansion joints and bearings are currently programmed under Project No. SER BMS FY17(2) IDIQ TASK ORDER #6.

Other problems include minor debris accumulation and vegetation growth in the curblines, and under rail post bases;

vine growth on the wingwalls, piers, and retaining wall which extends over the approach parapets; debris accumulation in the deck drains and expansion joints; and trees growing under the bridge.

In addition, settlement at both sides of the east approach has resulted in moderate cracking and deterioration of the pavement, which has led to undermining of the approach slab corners.

The condition of the bearing devices will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles. Corrective action for the remaining problems should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/18/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

60.6,13, 223.1

REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS, PIERS, RETAINING WALL,

AND OVER WEST APPROACH PARAPETS.

1 LS

58.7 CLEAN CLOGGED DECK DRAINS. 1 LS

61.4 REMOVE TREES FROM UNDER BRIDGE. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

222.4,5,6 REPAIR EROSION AND SETTLEMENT OF ROADWAY SHOULDERS AT

EAST APPROACH AND UNDERMINING OF APPROACH SLAB AT EAST

END; PATCH PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY 70%

TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

F G N G N G N N G

N G

F G F F P G

N

G

G

F

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS. WIDESPREAD MODERATE SPALLING

AND DELAMINATION OF EDGES OF OVERHANGS ALONG

WINGWALLS, WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT SOUTHEAST CORNER.

MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE AT SOUTH SIDE OF

CENTER SPAN.

CONCRETE ENCASING TOP FLANGES OF STRUCTURAL STEEL

MEMBERS (GIRDERS, DIAPHRAGM, STRINGERS) NEAR EAST

ABUTMENT IS CRACKED AND DELAMINATED.

MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE HAUNCH OVER SOUTH GIRDER AT

EAST ABUTMENT.

58.2 EXPANSION JOINT WERE TO HAVE BEEN REPLACED AFTER

ROUTINE INSPECTION.

MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION

JOINTS. MINOR PONDING IN JOINTS (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING

THIS INSPECTION). NEOPRENE SEALS IN BOTH JOINTS ARE

RUPTURED, AND LEAKAGE THROUGH DECK JOINTS IS EVIDENT.

JOINT OPENING OF WEST EXPANSION JOINT IS 2 1/2" GREATER

THAN EAST EXPANSION JOINT.

SNOW PLOW DAMAGE TO EAST EXPANSION JOINT. APPROACH

PORTION OF EAST EXPANSION JOINT 7/8" HIGHER THAN BRIDGE

PORTION AT NORTH SIDE AND 1/2" HIGHER AT SOUTH SIDE;

SEVERAL DISPLACED AND MISSING JOINT ANCHOR BOLTS. JOINT

ARMORING AT EAST ABUTMENT IS LOOSE AND MAKES LOUD NOISE

UNDER VEHICLE LOADING. IT APPEARS GROUT WAS NOT PLACED

IN CHANNELS ALONG EXPANSION JOINTS DURING CONSTRUCTION.

MODERATE CRACKING OF CONCRETE AT EAST EXPANSION JOINT.

58.2,6 SEVERE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTH PARAPETS

UNDER JOINT ARMORING AT WEST EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR

SPALLING AND CRACKING AT SAME LOCATION OF OTHER BRIDGE

CORNERS. BENT ANCHOR BOLT ON SOUTH RAILING NEAR CENTER

OF BRIDGE.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION G

12. OTHER (STAIRCASE) G

PIER(S)

G13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

G15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

G17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G F N

MED

SUFF

43 FT.

STONES, SILT, CLAY

222. APPROACHES 6

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (MONITORING STATION)

G N G F F F G G G

223. RETAINING WALL 7

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G N N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

58.3 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING THROUGHOUT

ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKS

ADJACENT TO LAYDOWN SEAMS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT.

MINOR SEPARATION ALONG LONGITUDINAL LAYDOWN SEAMS.

MODERATE ABRASION HAS EXPOSED AGGREGATE. MINOR POT

HOLE 6" DIA. X 1" DEEP IN NORTH LANE OF CENTER SPAN.

58.5,6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE AT WEST END OF

NORTH CURB. EXTENSIVE MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS AND

PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT. MINOR RUST

STAINING ON CONCRETE PARAPET FROM A588 WEATHERING STEEL

RAIL. MOSS GROWING UNDER BASE PLATES OF SOME BRIDGE

RAIL POSTS AND ALONG TOP EDGE OF CONCRETE PARAPET.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH IN SOUTH CURBLINE; MINOR

GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN NORTH CURBLINE. MOST DECK DRAINS

ARE CLOGGED. MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTH DRAIN IN

EAST SPAN AT UNDERSIDE OF DECK.

58.8 2" DIAMETER STEEL CONDUIT AND 1" DIAMETER CONDUIT ON

NORTH GIRDER. MINOR SEPARATION AT CONDUIT JOINT, WEST

SPAN, ADJACENT TO FIRST SPLICE FROM WEST PIER. UTILITY BOX

ATTACHED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NORTH PARAPET.

59.1 NUTS ON ABUTMENT BEARING DEVICE SOLE PLATES HAVE

SHEARED DUE TO THERMAL EXPANSION. ABUTMENT BEARING

STIFFENERS ARE NOT CENTERED OVER BEARINGS.

59.2 A588 WEATHERING STEEL SUPERSTRUCTURE IS GENERALLY IN

GOOD CONDITION. REMNANTS OF INSECT EGG SACKS ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGES, MAINLY EXTERIOR GIRDERS.

CORROSION AND FLAKING RUST AT BOTTOM OF WEB, EXTERIOR

SIDE, OF NORTH EXTERIOR GIRDER FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET

FROM WEST ABUTMENT. FRECKLED RUST ON TOP AND BOTTOM

FLANGES THROUGHOUT; RELATIVELY HEAVY ON THICKENED

PORTION OF BOTTOM FLANGE OF CENTER GIRDER IN WEST SPAN.

59.4,6 FRECKLED RUST THROUGHOUT STRINGERS, CROSS FRAMES, AND

DIAPHRAGMS.

59.6 BENT VERTICAL STIFFENERS AT BOLTED CONNECTION IN WEST

SPAN, ADJACENT TO SPLICES NEAR PIER. BEND IN STIFFENERS

PROBABLY FROM INITIAL PLACEMENT AT CONSTRUCTION.

60.1 MINOR VINE GROWTH ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

WIDESPREAD MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

NORTH CORNER OF WEST ABUTMENT. MINOR CRACKING

THROUGHOUT BOTH BREASTWALLS. CONCRETE FORMED TO

MATCH MSE WALL.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

60.1, 222.9 ACCESS DOOR TO WEST APPROACH SPAN WAS LOCKED DURING THIS INSPECTION.

WATER MONITORING STATION INSIDE WEST APPROACH SPAN, ACCESS THROUGH NORTH SIDE OF WEST

ABUTMENT. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF APPROACH SPAN.

60.4 MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF BACKWALLS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS, WORSE AT CORNERS. MINOR

STAINING FROM JOINT LEAKAGE.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR TO MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON

WINGWALLS.

60.9 EXPOSED FILTER FABRIC ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL AT TOP OF SLOPE.

60.12 MINOR CRACKING WITH SPALLING AROUND HANDRAIL POST AT TOP OF STAIRCASE ALONG NORTH SIDE OF

WEST ABUTMENT.

60.13 MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON PIERS. MINOR RUSTING OF PROTECTIVE STEEL COVER AROUND PIERS.

60.17 MINOR SCOUR ALONG UPSTREAM SIDE OF EAST PIER AND ALONG WEST FACE OF WEST PIER; PIER BASES ARE

PROTECTED BY LARGE RIPRAP, HOWEVER.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 TREES GROWING BENEATH ALL SPANS OF BRIDGE.

222.1 MINOR CRACKING IN ASPHALT ON APPROACH SLABS.

222.3 CABLE IS LOOSE AT NORTHWEST GUARDRAIL END TREATMENT.

222.4,5,6 MODERATE SETTLEMENT AND EROSION AT BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY SHOULDERS AT EAST APPROACH WITH MODERATE CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF PAVEMENT; MINOR PONDING (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION). SMALL HOLE IN ROADWAY SURFACE ON SOUTH SIDE OF EAST APPROACH. MINOR CRACKING OF PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH. NORTH AND SOUTH CORNERS AT EAST END OF EAST APPROACH SLAB (CANTILEVERED PORTION) ARE UNDERMINED UP TO 5', WORSE AT

SOUTH.

222.7 "BIG SOUTH FORK RIVER" SIGNS POSTED AT BOTH APPROACHES. TYPE 3 (B/Y) OBJECT MARKER REFLECTIVE

TAPE IS DAMAGED AT NORTHWEST END TREATMENT.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

223.1,4 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EMBANKMENT (MSE) RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO SOUTHWEST WINGWALL;

LEANING OUT 1/2" IN 3'. HEAVY VINE GROWTH ON WALL AND IN SOME PANEL JOINTS; VINE GROWTH EXTENDS OVER TOP OF APPROACH PARAPET. SMALL CREEK FLOWS ALONG BASE OF RETAINING WALL AND CONTINUES PARALLEL TO WEST SPAN ON SOUTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE; CREEK EMPTIES INTO RIVER. MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG CREEK CHANNEL BANKS; MINOR EROSION BELOW STORM DRAIN OUTLET IN MSE WALL.

HEAVY RUST STAINING AT MSE WALL AND ABUTMENT BACKFACE JOINT AT NORTHWEST. DIAGONAL CRACK

FROM ABUTMENT BACKWALL EXTENDS VERTICALLY INTO JOINT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 16 15 28 25

HS 29 26 48 44

TYPE 3 24 22 41 37

TYPE 3S2 39 35 65 59

TYPE 3-3 48 44 80 73

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: STRINGER & FLOOR TRUSS

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... CUMBERLAND RIVER BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5130-001P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 001P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ DACW62-81-B-

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... QIT80

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

151 - SCOTT

161000100

BIG S. FORK OF CUMBERLA

LEATHERWOOD FORD RD

5130001P0000000

2.31 MILES FROM EAST PAR

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

2.31 (KM PT 3.72)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

220.0 FT (67.1 M)

628.0 FT (191.4 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 04 - TEE BEAM

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 2

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 29.0 TONS (26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 48.0 TONS (43.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°28'35.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 84°40'05.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.8 FT (11.2 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 99 MI (159 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (7.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 4.0 FT (1.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 370 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 407 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 33.4 FT (10.2 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.83 FT (0.86 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

SNOOPER INSPECTION 9/92, 5/01, 4/06, AND 4/10.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

DE-ICING SALTS ARE USED ON APPROACH ROADWAYS, BUT NOT ON BRIDGE; HOWEVER, SALT SPLASH ON BRIDGE FROM

APPROACH TRAFFIC IS LIKELY.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-001P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #5 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF NORTH SHOULDER

PAVEMENT AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE CRACK IN NORTH CURB

PHOTO #6 - UNDERMINED PORTION OF EAST END OF EAST APPROACH

SLAB AT SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, EAST

APPROACH, WESTBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL DETERIORATING

ROADWAY STRIPPING

PHOTO #9 - VERTICAL CRACK THROUGH SOUTH SIDE OF EAST

APPROACH SLAB

PHOTO #10 - SETTLEMENT OF NORTH SHOULDER PAVEMENT AT WEST

APPROACH (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #11 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG SOUTH CURBLINE,

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #12 - CRACKED AND DELAMINATED ENCASEMENT CONCRETE,

NORTH SIDE NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION

PHOTO #14 - MISSING ANCHOR BOLTS FOR

JOINT ARMORING, EAST EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #15 - EAST EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE RUPTURED NEOPRENE

SEAL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN JOINT (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016

INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #16 - EAST EXPANSION DECK JOINT 1/2" LOWER THAN

BACKWALL, NEAR SOUTH EDGE OF LANE LINE (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016

INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #17 - EAST EXPANSION DECK JOINT 7/8" LOWER THAN

BACKWALL, NEAR NORTH EDGE OF LANE LINE (PHOTO FROM

5/12/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #18 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CONCRETE HEADER AT

EAST END NEAR EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST

EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION IN JOINT

PHOTO #20 - CLOSE-UP OF WEST EXPANSION

JOINT OPENING, 2 1/2" GREATER THAN EAST

JOINT (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016 INSPECTION

REPORT)

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL CLOGGED DECK DRAIN, NORTH CURB, WEST

END SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH PARAPET AT

WEST EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE VERTICAL CRACK IN BRIDGE PARAPET

PHOTO #23 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH PARAPET AT

WEST JOINT

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PARAPET EAST EXPANSION

JOINT; NOTE DECK IS LOWER THAN ABUTMENT (PHOTO FROM

5/12/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #25 - HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN EAST

APPROACH PARAPET SOUTH RAIL

PHOTO #26 - MISSING ANCHOR BOLT ON SOUTH PARAPET FASCIA

PLATE, SOME BLOTS ARE LOOSE

PHOTO #27 - MOSS GROWING BETWEEN CURB AND RAIL POST BASE

PLATE; NORTH RAIL, EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PARAPET EAST EXPANSION

JOINT; NOTE DECK IS LOWER THAN ABUTMENT AND CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE IN PARAPET

PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS,

NORTHWEST APPROACH CURB SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT EAST ABUTMENT,

NORTH BEARING SHOWN

PHOTO #31 - DETERIORATION OF REFLECTIVE TAPE AT NORTHWEST

APPROACH RAIL END

PHOTO #32 - LOOSE CABLE AT NORTHWEST END TREATMENT (PHOTO

FROM 5/12/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #33 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #34 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #35 - FLAKING RUST AT WEST END OF

NORTH GIRDER NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #36 - GENERAL VIEW OF BENT

STIFFENER ON NORTH GIRDER IN WEST SPAN

NEAR WEST PIER; NOTE SEPARATION OF

UTILITY CONDUIT

PHOTO #37 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT ABUTMENTS,

NORTH BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE BEARING

STIFFENER IS NOT CENTERED OVER BEARING

PHOTO #38 - CLOSE-UP OF CONNECTION BOLTS ON SOLE PLATE IN

CONTACT WITH BEARING, NORTH BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #39 - GENERAL VIEW OF CENTER POT BEARING ON WEST PIER

PHOTO #40 - TYPICAL RUST SCALE ON BOTTOM FLANGE OF CENTER

GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN NEAR WEST PIER

PHOTO #41 - REMNANTS OF INSECT EGG SACKS ON BOTTOM OF

GIRDER FLANGES IN CENTER SPAN; NOTE TYPICAL DECK DRAIN

EXTENSION (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #42 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #43 - VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT BACKWALL

BETWEEN CENTER AND NORTH GIRDERS; NOTE CRACK STARTS AT

VENTILATION OPENING FOR WATER MONITORING STATION

PHOTO #44 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL BETWEEN BEARING SEATS FOR BEAMS #1 AND #2

PHOTO #45 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE OF WEST ABUTMENT AND

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #46 - TYPICAL CRACKING AT CORNERS

OF WEST ABUTMENT, SOUTH CORNER

SHOWN (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016 INSPECTION

REPORT)

PHOTO #47 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE OF WEST ABUTMENT AND

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #48 - CRACKING AND SPALLING OF

STAIRWAY CONCRETE AT NORTHWEST

CORNER OF BRIDGE (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016

INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #49 - ACCESS DOOR INTO WEST

APPROACH SPAN (LOCKED AT TIME OF

INSPECTION) (PHOTO FROM 5/12/2016

INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #50 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST

RETAINING WALL; NOTE HEAVY VEGETATION

GROWTH

PHOTO #51 - CREEK RUNNING PARALLEL TO

BRIDGE ALONG SOUTH SIDE, WEST END;

NOTE OPEN ENDED PIPE EXPOSED ON

NORTH CREEK BANK

PHOTO #52 - EROSION OF CREEK BOTTOM

EXPOSED PIPE

PHOTO #53 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST FACE OF WEST PIER; NOTE

VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #54 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST FACE OF EAST PIER; NOTE

VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #55 - SCOUR AT UPSTREAM END OF EAST PIER

PHOTO #56 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #57 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #58 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK

PHOTO #59 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK