BIP Bandy Creek Bridge 5130-002P.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted

Attached to
Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000012
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - NP-BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - NP BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
BIP Cumb River Bridge 5130-001P.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
NEPA CE BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - NP BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
PVT Rpt BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
VETS-4212 - Form - 2019.pdf PDF
Plans - NP BISO 10(2).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis - NP-BISO 10(2).doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

BANDY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/26/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 12 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 55.0 FT (16.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 55.0 FT (16.8 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ OTHER CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... DACW62-81-B- / QIT80 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-GUARDRAIL REPAIRED.

LOCATION

BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: ..................... 3.97 (KM PT 6.39)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.97 MILES FROM EAST PARK

ENTRANCE. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LEATHERWOOD FORD ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BANDY CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This precast concrete box beam bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include transverse cracks in the wearing surface over the abutments; a 9 inch wide x 8 foot long pothole in the center of the eastbound lane near the west abutment; cracked and undermined concrete drainage chutes at the northeast and southeast corners; adhesion failure and peeling of guardrail object markers; and several missing connection bolts from the I-Beam spacer blocks along the bridge and approach railing.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/18/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7 CLEAN DECK DRAINS AS NECESSARY AND REMOVE CHIP DEBRIS FROM DECK

SHOULDERS.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

60.8 REPLACE VERTICAL JOINT FILLER AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS

58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE. 1 LS

60.9,12 SEAL CRACKS AND REPAIR UNDERMINING OF CONCRETE

DRAINAGE CHUTES AT EAST CORNERS.

1 LS

58.6, 222.3 REPLACE MISSING CONNECTION BOLTS FROM I-BEAM SPACER

BLOCKS ALONG BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAILS.

1 LS

36.D REPLACE RETROREFLECTIVE ADHESIVE SHEETING ON NOSE OF

GUARDRAILS.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY 70%

TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N N N N G

N G

F G G F F N

N

N

G

G

58.1 DECK OVERHANGS BOTH ENDS OF WEST ABUTMENT BY 1 1/4",

APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED THAT WAY.

58.2,3, 222.4 DECK JOINTS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER; UP TO 1" WIDE

TRANSVERSE CRACKS OVER JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH IN CRACKS AT SHOULDER AREAS. LONGITUDINAL

CRACKS HAVE FORMED NEAR WEST END OF BRIDGE, WITH A 9"

WIDE BY 8' LONG POTHOLE AND STANDING WATER.

58.5,6, 222.3 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR

SURFACE RUSTING OF WEATHERING STEEL RAILINGS; MINOR RUST

STAINING ON CURBS FROM RAILINGS. 22 MISSING CONNECTION

BOLTS FROM I-BEAM SPACER BLOCKS. SEVERAL RAIL POSTS

ALONG SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAILING ONLY HAVE ONE

CONNECTION BOLT, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN FABRICATED IN THIS

MANNER AS THERE ARE NO HOLES DRILLED FOR SECOND BOLT.

58.7 MODERATE CHIP DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES. ONE

DECK DRAIN IS CLOGGED.

59.1 ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS FOR EXTERIOR BOX BEAMS

OVERHANG BEARING SEAT SLIGHTLY.

59.2 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING BETWEEN SEVERAL

BOX BEAMS. MINOR RUST STAINING FROM RAILING SYSTEM ON

EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR BOX BEAMS.

59.9 MINOR DIFFERENCES IN CAMBER BETWEEN BOX BEAMS.

60.1 SEVERAL FULL-HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS IN WEST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL, ONE WITH RUST STAINING, RANGING FROM

HAIRLINE TO 1/32" WIDE. MINOR STAINING ON WEST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL DUE TO JOINT LEAKAGE.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS G

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION G

12. OTHER (DRAINAGE CHUTE) F

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F G N F N

LOW

SUFF

15 FT.

ROCK, SAND, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (VEGETATION)

N N F G G G G G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT WINGWALLS NEAR

BEARING SEATS WITH EFFLORESCENCE; MINOR WIDESPREAD MAP

CRACKING. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WEST WINGWALLS. ONE

VERTICAL CRACK WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE IN SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL.

60.9,12 END OF CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHUTE ALONG NORTHEAST

WINGWALL IS COMPLETELY UNDERMINED UP TO 5'; SOUTHEAST

CHUTE IS UNDERMINED UP TO 1.6'. CRACKED CONCRETE

THROUGHOUT CHUTE ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL, WATER IS

PIPING UNDERNEATH CHUTE AT TIME OF INSPECTION.

61.1 CHANNEL MAKES 90-DEGREE BEND JUST UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES AND MINOR DEBRIS IN DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL.

222.3 MINOR DENT ON TOP OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAIL NEAR

BRIDGE AND ON TOP OF SOUTHEAST APPROACH RAIL 25' FROM

BRIDGE.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS ON GUARDRAIL ENDS, ALL

FOUR CORNERS HAVE MINOR TO MODERATE DAMAGE. OBJECT

MARKERS ARE PEELING AND FADING.

222.9 VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SHOULDERS, BOTH APPROACHES.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 59 54 98 89

HS 73 66 123 112

TYPE 3 68 62 114 103

TYPE 3S2 93 84 156 142

TYPE 3-3 110 100 183 166

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: CAPACITY OF PRESTRESSED BOX BEAMS

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BANDY CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5130-002P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 002P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ DACW62-81-B-

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... QIT80

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

151 - SCOTT

161000100

BANDY CREEK

LEATHERWOOD FORD ROAD

5130002P0000000

3.97 MILES FROM EAST PAR

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

3.97 (KM PT 6.39)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

05 - BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE

55.0 FT (16.8 M)

55.0 FT (16.8 M)

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 73.0 TONS (66.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°28'29.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 84°41'23.50" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (7.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (2.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (2.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 370 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 407 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.54 FT (0.77 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2009-GUARDRAIL REPAIRED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST TOWARD PARK HEADQUARTERS

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN ASPHALT

PAVEMENT OVER EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #6 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN ASPHALT

PAVEMENT OVER WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #7 - POTHOLE IN EASTBOUND LANE AT WEST END

PHOTO #8 - CLOSE-UP OF POTHOLE; NOTE STANDING WATER IN

POTHOLE

PHOTO #9 - VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SOUTH CURB, WEST END

SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - CLOGGED DECK DRAIN ON NORTH CURB, WEST END

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION AND ADHESION FAILURE OF

OBJECT MARKER TAPE, NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST GUARDRAIL

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL MISSING RETAINING BOLTS ON I-BEAM

SPACERS, NORTH RAIL NEAR EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DRAINAGE CUTE AT

NORTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #15 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON

DRAINAGE CUTE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #16 - CRACKING AND UNDERMINING

OF DRAINAGE CHUTE AT NORTHEAST

CORNER; NOTE WATER PIPING UNDERNEATH

CHUTE

PHOTO #17 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON NORTH

SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE DISPLACED

BEARING PAD

PHOTO #18 - LATERAL SHIFT AT NORTHWEST

CORNER OF ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - LATERAL SHIFT AT SOUTHWEST

CORNER OF ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE AND

LEAKAGE BETWEEN BEAMS, BEAM #6 AND #7

SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE FOUNDATION

SUPPORTED ON BEDROCK

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS

WITH RUST STAINING AND ALGAE GROWTH

ON WEST ABUTMENT, NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - MAP CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL; NOTE VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #25 - EROSION AT NORTHWEST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #26 - EROSION AT END OF SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #27 - EROSION AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #28 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #29 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE DOWNED TREES

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .