BIP Bandy Creek Bridge 5130-002P.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000012
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NP-BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 - NP BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| BIP Cumb River Bridge 5130-001P.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| NEPA CE BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation - NP BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| PVT Rpt BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| VETS-4212 - Form - 2019.pdf | ||
| Plans - NP BISO 10(2).pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Synopsis - NP-BISO 10(2).doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
BANDY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/26/18
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 12 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 55.0 FT (16.8 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 55.0 FT (16.8 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ OTHER CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... DACW62-81-B- / QIT80 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-GUARDRAIL REPAIRED.
LOCATION
BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: ..................... 3.97 (KM PT 6.39)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.97 MILES FROM EAST PARK
ENTRANCE. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LEATHERWOOD FORD ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BANDY CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This precast concrete box beam bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include transverse cracks in the wearing surface over the abutments; a 9 inch wide x 8 foot long pothole in the center of the eastbound lane near the west abutment; cracked and undermined concrete drainage chutes at the northeast and southeast corners; adhesion failure and peeling of guardrail object markers; and several missing connection bolts from the I-Beam spacer blocks along the bridge and approach railing.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/18/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7 CLEAN DECK DRAINS AS NECESSARY AND REMOVE CHIP DEBRIS FROM DECK
SHOULDERS.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
60.8 REPLACE VERTICAL JOINT FILLER AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS
58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE. 1 LS
60.9,12 SEAL CRACKS AND REPAIR UNDERMINING OF CONCRETE
DRAINAGE CHUTES AT EAST CORNERS.
1 LS
58.6, 222.3 REPLACE MISSING CONNECTION BOLTS FROM I-BEAM SPACER
BLOCKS ALONG BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAILS.
1 LS
36.D REPLACE RETROREFLECTIVE ADHESIVE SHEETING ON NOSE OF
GUARDRAILS.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY 70%
TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G G N N N N N N G
N G
F G G F F N
N
N
G
G
58.1 DECK OVERHANGS BOTH ENDS OF WEST ABUTMENT BY 1 1/4",
APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED THAT WAY.
58.2,3, 222.4 DECK JOINTS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER; UP TO 1" WIDE
TRANSVERSE CRACKS OVER JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION
GROWTH IN CRACKS AT SHOULDER AREAS. LONGITUDINAL
CRACKS HAVE FORMED NEAR WEST END OF BRIDGE, WITH A 9"
WIDE BY 8' LONG POTHOLE AND STANDING WATER.
58.5,6, 222.3 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR
SURFACE RUSTING OF WEATHERING STEEL RAILINGS; MINOR RUST
STAINING ON CURBS FROM RAILINGS. 22 MISSING CONNECTION
BOLTS FROM I-BEAM SPACER BLOCKS. SEVERAL RAIL POSTS
ALONG SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAILING ONLY HAVE ONE
CONNECTION BOLT, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN FABRICATED IN THIS
MANNER AS THERE ARE NO HOLES DRILLED FOR SECOND BOLT.
58.7 MODERATE CHIP DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES. ONE
DECK DRAIN IS CLOGGED.
59.1 ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS FOR EXTERIOR BOX BEAMS
OVERHANG BEARING SEAT SLIGHTLY.
59.2 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING BETWEEN SEVERAL
BOX BEAMS. MINOR RUST STAINING FROM RAILING SYSTEM ON
EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR BOX BEAMS.
59.9 MINOR DIFFERENCES IN CAMBER BETWEEN BOX BEAMS.
60.1 SEVERAL FULL-HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS IN WEST ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL, ONE WITH RUST STAINING, RANGING FROM
HAIRLINE TO 1/32" WIDE. MINOR STAINING ON WEST ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL DUE TO JOINT LEAKAGE.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS G
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION G
12. OTHER (DRAINAGE CHUTE) F
PIER(S)
N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F G N F N
LOW
SUFF
15 FT.
ROCK, SAND, GRAVEL
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (VEGETATION)
N N F G G G G G G
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT WINGWALLS NEAR
BEARING SEATS WITH EFFLORESCENCE; MINOR WIDESPREAD MAP
CRACKING. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WEST WINGWALLS. ONE
VERTICAL CRACK WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE IN SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL.
60.9,12 END OF CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHUTE ALONG NORTHEAST
WINGWALL IS COMPLETELY UNDERMINED UP TO 5'; SOUTHEAST
CHUTE IS UNDERMINED UP TO 1.6'. CRACKED CONCRETE
THROUGHOUT CHUTE ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL, WATER IS
PIPING UNDERNEATH CHUTE AT TIME OF INSPECTION.
61.1 CHANNEL MAKES 90-DEGREE BEND JUST UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES AND MINOR DEBRIS IN DOWNSTREAM
CHANNEL.
222.3 MINOR DENT ON TOP OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAIL NEAR
BRIDGE AND ON TOP OF SOUTHEAST APPROACH RAIL 25' FROM
BRIDGE.
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS ON GUARDRAIL ENDS, ALL
FOUR CORNERS HAVE MINOR TO MODERATE DAMAGE. OBJECT
MARKERS ARE PEELING AND FADING.
222.9 VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SHOULDERS, BOTH APPROACHES.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 59 54 98 89
HS 73 66 123 112
TYPE 3 68 62 114 103
TYPE 3S2 93 84 156 142
TYPE 3-3 110 100 183 166
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: CAPACITY OF PRESTRESSED BOX BEAMS
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER & RECREATION AREA
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BANDY CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5130-002P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 002P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ DACW62-81-B-
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... QIT80
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
151 - SCOTT
161000100
BANDY CREEK
LEATHERWOOD FORD ROAD
5130002P0000000
3.97 MILES FROM EAST PAR
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
3.97 (KM PT 6.39)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
05 - BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE
55.0 FT (16.8 M)
55.0 FT (16.8 M)
5 - OTHER
5 - OTHER
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 73.0 TONS (66.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°28'29.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 84°41'23.50" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (7.0 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (2.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (2.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 370 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 407 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.54 FT (0.77 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2009-GUARDRAIL REPAIRED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5130-002P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST TOWARD PARK HEADQUARTERS
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN ASPHALT
PAVEMENT OVER EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #6 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN ASPHALT
PAVEMENT OVER WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #7 - POTHOLE IN EASTBOUND LANE AT WEST END
PHOTO #8 - CLOSE-UP OF POTHOLE; NOTE STANDING WATER IN
POTHOLE
PHOTO #9 - VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SOUTH CURB, WEST END
SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - CLOGGED DECK DRAIN ON NORTH CURB, WEST END
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION AND ADHESION FAILURE OF
OBJECT MARKER TAPE, NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST GUARDRAIL
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL MISSING RETAINING BOLTS ON I-BEAM
SPACERS, NORTH RAIL NEAR EAST END SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DRAINAGE CUTE AT
NORTHWEST CORNER
PHOTO #15 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON
DRAINAGE CUTE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER
PHOTO #16 - CRACKING AND UNDERMINING
OF DRAINAGE CHUTE AT NORTHEAST
CORNER; NOTE WATER PIPING UNDERNEATH
CHUTE
PHOTO #17 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON NORTH
SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE DISPLACED
BEARING PAD
PHOTO #18 - LATERAL SHIFT AT NORTHWEST
CORNER OF ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - LATERAL SHIFT AT SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE AND
LEAKAGE BETWEEN BEAMS, BEAM #6 AND #7
SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE FOUNDATION
SUPPORTED ON BEDROCK
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS
WITH RUST STAINING AND ALGAE GROWTH
ON WEST ABUTMENT, NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - MAP CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL; NOTE VINE GROWTH
PHOTO #25 - EROSION AT NORTHWEST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #26 - EROSION AT END OF SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #27 - EROSION AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #28 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #29 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE DOWNED TREES
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .