NEPA_(Categorical_Exclusion_Form).pdf

PEPC Planning, Environment & Public Comment (PEPC) user: Barbara Hatcher | logout

Home Project / Search Parks Reports Tools Admin

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of Maintenance Service Road, Maintenance Parking and Quarters Parking and Pavement Sealing of the Knob Creek Parking Lot (89504)

NEPA (View)

NEPA Status: Closed Complete

Current NEPA Type: CE

CE - Categorical Exclusion Internal Scoping Start: Jul 16, 2019 Internal Scoping End: Jul 19, 2019

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: Pavement Preservation of Maintenance Service Road, Parking Area, Quarters Parking and Pavement Sealing of Knob Creek Parking Lot

CE Superintendent Signed Date: Jul 19, 2019

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety?

No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers;

national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands;

wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988);

national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2) (E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

No

CE (current NEPA type) EA EIS Memo Other

Glossary

• CE (Categorica

CE/CX)

• DEIS (Draft En

Impact Stateme

• EA (Environme

Assessment)

• EIS (Environme

Statement)

• Environmental process

• FONSI (Finding

Significant Impa

• Finding of No S

Impact (FONSI

• Memorandum (

• NEPA (Nationa

Policy Act)

• NEPA Action

• NEPA Docume

• NEPA Process

• NEPA Type

• NOA (Notice of

• NOI (Notice of

• RD (Regional D

• ROD (Record o

• Cumulative Imp

• NEPA Pathway

• NEPA Review

• Scope

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

• DO 28

Cultural Resou

• DO 41: Wildern Stewardship

• Fuels and Reha Template

HELP: HIDE

Page 1 of 2PEPC 89504

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=89504

PEPC Guide NPS.gov USA.Gov Disclaimer Accessibility Privacy Po

Last Updated Date: Jul 19, 2019

Last Updated By: stacy_humphreys

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Page 2 of 2PEPC 89504

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=89504

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Visitor Center Entrance Road and Parking Lot (54772)

NEPA (View)

NEPA Status: CE

Current NEPA Type: CE

CE - Categorical Exclusion Internal Scoping Start: Feb 5, 2018 Internal Scoping End: Feb 5, 2018

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: pavement preservation (sealing) of Birthplace entrance road and visitors center parking lot.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: Mar 19, 2018

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety?

No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers;

national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands;

wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988);

national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2) (E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by

No

CE (current NEPA type) EA EIS Memo Other

Glossary

• CE (Categorica

CE/CX)

• DEIS (Draft En

Impact Stateme

• EA (Environme

Assessment)

• EIS (Environme

Statement)

• Environmental process

• FONSI (Finding

Significant Impa

• Finding of No S

Impact (FONSI

• Memorandum (

• NEPA (Nationa

Policy Act)

• NEPA Action

• NEPA Docume

• NEPA Process

• NEPA Type

• NOA (Notice of

• NOI (Notice of

• RD (Regional D

• ROD (Record o

• Cumulative Imp

• NEPA Pathway

• NEPA Review

• Scope

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

• DO 28

Cultural Resou

• DO 41: Wildern Stewardship DO Wilderness Ste

• Fuels and Reha Template Fuels Memo Templat

Page 1 of 2PEPC

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54772

Last Updated Date:

Last Updated By:

Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Page 2 of 2PEPC

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54772

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Picnic Area Loop Road And Parking Lot (54773)

NEPA (View)

NEPA Status: CE

Current NEPA Type: CE

CE - Categorical Exclusion Internal Scoping Start: Feb 5, 2018 Internal Scoping End: Feb 5, 2018

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: Pavement preservation (sealing) of Birthplace Picnic Area traffic loop and parking lot.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: Mar 19, 2018

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety?

No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers;

national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands;

wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988);

national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2) (E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by

No

CE (current NEPA type) EA EIS Memo Other

Glossary

• CE (Categorica

CE/CX)

• DEIS (Draft En

Impact Stateme

• EA (Environme

Assessment)

• EIS (Environme

Statement)

• Environmental process

• FONSI (Finding

Significant Impa

• Finding of No S

Impact (FONSI

• Memorandum (

• NEPA (Nationa

Policy Act)

• NEPA Action

• NEPA Docume

• NEPA Process

• NEPA Type

• NOA (Notice of

• NOI (Notice of

• RD (Regional D

• ROD (Record o

• Cumulative Imp

• NEPA Pathway

• NEPA Review

• Scope

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

• DO 28

Cultural Resou

• DO 41: Wildern Stewardship DO Wilderness Ste

• Fuels and Reha

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?projectID=54773&

Last Updated Date:

Last Updated By:

Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?projectID=54773&

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of Maintenance Service Road, Maintenance Parking and Quarters Parking and Pavement Sealing of the Knob Creek Parking Lot (89504)

NHPA (View)

Form Prepared: Jul 16, 2019 Data Entered By: Stacy Humphreys

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: Parking lot of Maintenance Area at the Birthplace, Service Road, Parking Area of Quarters. Knob Creek Parking Lot. All work is being done in the current footprint.

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer

A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes

B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes

C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? Yes

Property Name Location NR Status LCS Park # Asset #

Knob Creek Tavern

E. Historic structures/resources present? Yes

Property Name Location NR Status LCS Park # Asset #

Knob Creek Tavern

F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes

Property Name Location NR Status LCS Park # Asset #

Knob Creek Tavern

G. Ethnographic resources present? No

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

No

Archeology / ARPA / NAGPRA / Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No

Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No

Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No

Permit Number:

H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by

NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

Yes

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

Glossary

• ACHP (Advisor

Historic Preserv

• ARPA (Archeol

Resources Pro 1979)

• Adverse Effect

• Archeological R

• Archeological S

• Area of potentia

• Assessment of

(AOE)

• Cultural Landsc

(CLI)

• Cultural Landsc

• Ethnographic re

• Historic propert

• List of Classifie

(LCS)

• Memorandum o

(MOA)

• NHPA (Nationa

Preservation Ac

• National Histor

Act (NHPA)

• No adverse effe

• No historic prop

(NHPA)

• Programmatic a

• Survey Sources

• THPO (Tribal H

Preservation O

• National Histor

(NHL)

FAQ

• Does your proje

National Histor

(NHL)?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

• DO 28

Cultural Resou

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?projectID=89504&

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply) N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No

O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No

P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No

Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No

R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No

S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No

T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No

U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assessment of Effect Assessment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review (PA)

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking

Areas Explanation:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date:

Jul 19, 2019

Last Updated Date: Jul 19, 2019

Last Updated By: stacy_humphreys

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?projectID=89504&

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Visitor Center Entrance Road and Parking Lot (54772)

NHPA (View)

Form Prepared: Feb 5, 2018 Data Entered By: Stacy Humphreys

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: Birthplace entrance road and visitors center parking lot.

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer

A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes

B. Have NRHP resources been identified? No

C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No

E. Historic structures/resources present? No

F. Cultural landscapes present? No

G. Ethnographic resources present? No

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

No

Archeology / ARPA / NAGPRA / Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No

Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No

Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No

Permit Number:

H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by

NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

Yes

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply) N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No

O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No

P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No

Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No

R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No

S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No

Glossary

• ACHP (Advisor

Historic Preserv

• ARPA (Archeol

Resources Pro 1979)

• Adverse Effect

• Archeological R

• Archeological S

• Area of potentia

• Assessment of

(AOE)

• Cultural Landsc

(CLI)

• Cultural Landsc

• Ethnographic re

• Historic propert

• List of Classifie

(LCS)

• Memorandum o

(MOA)

• NHPA (Nationa

Preservation Ac

• National Histor

Act (NHPA)

• No adverse effe

• No historic prop

(NHPA)

• Programmatic a

• Survey Sources

• THPO (Tribal H

Preservation O

• National Histor

(NHL)

FAQ

• Does your proje

National Histor

(NHL)?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54772

T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No

U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review (PA)

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking

Areas Explanation:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date:

Mar 19, 2018

Last Updated Date: Mar 14, 2018

Last Updated By: stacy_humphreys

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54772

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Picnic Area Loop Road And Parking Lot (54773)

NHPA (View)

Form Prepared: Feb 5, 2018 Data Entered By: Stacy Humphreys

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: Birthplace Picnic area loop road and parking lot.

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer

A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes

B. Have NRHP resources been identified? No

C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No

E. Historic structures/resources present? No

F. Cultural landscapes present? No

G. Ethnographic resources present? No

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

No

Archeology / ARPA / NAGPRA / Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No

Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No

Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No

Permit Number:

H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by

NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

Yes

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply) N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No

O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No

P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No

Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No

R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No

S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No

Glossary

• ACHP (Advisor

Historic Preserv

• ARPA (Archeol

Resources Pro 1979)

• Adverse Effect

• Archeological R

• Archeological S

• Area of potentia

• Assessment of

(AOE)

• Cultural Landsc

(CLI)

• Cultural Landsc

• Ethnographic re

• Historic propert

• List of Classifie

(LCS)

• Memorandum o

(MOA)

• NHPA (Nationa

Preservation Ac

• National Histor

Act (NHPA)

• No adverse effe

• No historic prop

(NHPA)

• Programmatic a

• Survey Sources

• THPO (Tribal H

Preservation O

• National Histor

(NHL)

FAQ

• Does your proje

National Histor

(NHL)?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54773

T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No

U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review (PA)

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking

Areas Explanation:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date:

Mar 19, 2018

Last Updated Date: Mar 14, 2018

Last Updated By: stacy_humphreys

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=54773

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of Maintenance Service Road, Maintenance Parking and Quarters Parking and Pavement Sealing of the Knob Creek Parking Lot (89504)

Project Home

Pavement Preservation Of Maintenance Service Road, Maintenance Parking and Quarters Parking and Pavement Sealing of the Knob Creek Parking Lot Project ID: 89504 Other Project ID:

Project Status: Proposed Compliance Status: Closed Complete

PMIS ID: 277831

Sensitive: No Project Creation Date: Jul 16, 2019

NEPA Status: CE Approved Project Target Start Date: Aug 1, 2019

Description:

This project is for the pavement preservation of the Maintenance service road, maintenance parking and Qtrs parking. The estimate for this project was derived from the South East Region (SER) Pavement Preservation Program Recommendation. The cost for this project may change upon investigation from the Pavement Preservation Team. The work for this project will include:

Light rehabilitation of road and parking areas.

This project is a L3R - Light Rehabilitation according to the South East Region (SER) preservation recommendations.

This project is performed on PP Class 6 Principal Park Road which constitutes the main access route for park operations; Section ID ABLI-0400-00.000 Route Number 400.

This project also includes the maintenance Area Parking lot that serves operational and administrative needs; Section ID ABLI-0903-00.000 Route number 903 and Qtrs Parking area; Section ID ABLI-0905-

00.000 Route number 905.

The work will consist of applying a preventive maintenance action to the roadway surface that includes minor spot repairs (patching), crack sealing and the application of a surface seal or non-structural overlay.

Preventive maintenance is a pavement preservation tool to provide cost effective treatment to the surface of a structurally sound pavement to preserve the system and retard future deterioration. Since preventive maintenance treatments are inexpensive in comparison to resurfacing or reconstruction projects, a pavement preservation program is a cost-effective means of meeting pavement performance goals. Pavement preservation is an important tool in practicing sound asset management.

Please note that this project also covers the sealing of the Knob Creek parking lot located at the Boyhood Home Unit at Knob Creek. The parking lot will only be sealed due to the fact that it was installed in 2014.

Project Leader: Scott Powell

NEPA Specialist: Jennifer Jones, Jami Hammond

NHPA Specialist: Stacy Humphreys

Project Type: Preventive Maintenance

Project Category: Parking Area

External Agency: Admin Record Contact: Elizabeth McDougal

Division/Office: Admin Record Location: Headquarters

General Notes None

IDT Team Filter: IDT Members (found total 10 ) - click headings to sort.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Beth Byrd 106 Advisor 404-507-5793

Danita Brown Historical Architect 404-507-5801

Jami Hammond NEPA Specialist 404-313-6349

Jennifer Jones NEPA Specialist 270-358-3137

John Cornelison Archeologist 850-580-3011 127

Keliah Spann Historian 404-507-5719

Margaret Frisbie Historical Landscape Architect 404-507-5783

Mary Troy Curator 404-507-5802

Glossary

• Compliance Sta

• Decision File

• External Agenc

• PMIS (Project M

Information Sys

FAQ

• How do I delete project?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=89504

Locations

Milestones Target Project Start: Aug 1, 2019 Actual Project Start:

Target Project End: Actual Project End:

Target Agreement: Actual Agreement:

Target Alternatives: Actual Agreement:

Step 1 Basic Information File List No files.

Step 3 Internal Scoping / IDT Task File List No files.

Step 4 Natural/Cultural Compliance File List No files.

Step 5 Internal Documents (* indicates peer review required)

Document Title Review Start Review End Peer Review Required

This project has no 'internal documents'.

Step 6 Public Documents

Document Title Review Start Review End TIC ID

This project has no 'public documents'.

Step 8 Project Closing No files.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Scott Powell Project Leader 270-758-2112

Stacy Humphreys NHPA Specialist 270-358-3137

Filter: Locations (found total 1 ) - click headings to sort.

County, State District, Section Geo. Marker Other Tract ID

Larue, KY

7/26/2019https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=89504

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Visitor Center Entrance Road and Parking Lot (54772)

Project Home

Pavement Preservation Of The Visitor Center Entrance Road and Parking Lot Project ID: 54772 Other Project ID:

Project Status: Proposed Compliance Status: Closed Complete

PMIS ID: 213981

Sensitive: No Project Creation Date: Sep 25, 2014

NEPA Status: Project Target Start Date: Jul 1, 2019

Funding: Funded in PMIS

Description:

This project is for the pavement preservation of the Visitor Center entrance road and the Visitor Center parking lot. The work for this project will include:

Removal of the parking blocks within the parking lot, 1 ½" milling of existing asphalt on the entrance road and parking lot, application of the tack coat along the entrance road and parking lot, replacement and compaction of 1 ½" of new asphalt, restriping of the entrance road and parking lot to the original layout, installation of the old parking blocks and replacement of two asphalt speed humps along entrance road.

This project is a L3R - Light Rehabilitation according to the South East Region (SER) preservation recommendations.

This project is performed on PP Class 1 Principal Park Road which constitutes the main access route for park visitors Section ID ABLI-0012-00.000 Route Number 12.

This project also includes the Visitor Center Parking Area that serves public and administrative needs.

Section ID ABLI-0900-00.000 Route number 900.

The work will consist of applying a preventive maintenance action to the roadway surface that includes minor spot repairs (patching), crack sealing and the application of a surface seal or non-structural overlay.

Preventive maintenance is a pavement preservation tool to provide cost effective treatment to the surface of a structurally sound pavement to preserve the system and retard future deterioration. Since preventive maintenance treatments are inexpensive in comparison to resurfacing or reconstruction projects, a pavement preservation program is a cost-effective means of meeting pavement performance goals. Pavement preservation is an important tool in practicing sound asset management.

This project will take place within the existing footprint.

Project Leader: James Ludwig

NEPA Specialist: Jami Hammond, Stacy Humphreys, Jennifer Jones

NHPA Specialist: Stacy Humphreys

Project Type: Cyclic Maintenance

Project Category: Road Paved

External Agency: Admin Record Contact: Rebecca Thomas

Division/Office: Admin Record Location: Headquarters

General Notes None

IDT Team Filter: IDT Members (found total 11 ) - click headings to sort.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Beth Byrd 106 Advisor 404-507-5793

David Hasty Historical Landscape Architect 404-507-5780

James Ludwig Project Leader

Jami Hammond NEPA Specialist 404-313-6349

Jennifer Jones NEPA Specialist 270-358-3137

Jessica Kelly Historical Architect

John Cornelison Archeologist 850-580-3011 127

Kate Funk Curator 404-507-5774

Keilah Spann Historian

Glossary

• Compliance Sta

• Decision File

• External Agenc

• PMIS (Project M

Information Sys

FAQ

• How do I delete project?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=54772

Milestones Target Project Start: Jul 1, 2019 Actual Project Start:

Target Project End: Actual Project End:

Target Agreement: Actual Agreement:

Target Alternatives: Actual Agreement:

Step 1 Basic Information File List No files.

Step 2 Funding File List No files.

Step 3 Internal Scoping / IDT Task File List No files.

Step 4 Natural/Cultural Compliance File List No files.

Step 5 Internal Documents (* indicates peer review required)

Document Title Review Start Review End Peer Review Required

This project has no 'internal documents'.

Step 6 Public Documents

Document Title Review Start Review End TIC ID

This project has no 'public documents'.

Step 8 Project Closing No files.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Stacy Humphreys NEPA Specialist 270-358-3137

Stacy Humphreys NHPA Specialist 270-358-3137

Filter: Locations (found total 1 ) - click headings to sort.

County, State District, Section Geo. Marker Other Tract ID

Larue, KY

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=54772

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

1 Project Setup

Basic Information Milestones Justification Project Development Questions Cooperating Agencies Joint Lead Agencies Print Forms

ABLI > Pavement Preservation Of The Picnic Area Loop Road And Parking Lot (54773)

Basic Information (View)

Project ID: 54773 Other Project ID:

Title: Pavement Preservation Of The Picnic Area Loop Road And Parking Lot

Lead Park: Abraham Lincoln Birthplace NHP

Project Status: Proposed Target Compliance Completion: Jan 1, 2019

Compliance Status:

Closed Complete Actual Compliance Completion: Mar 19, 2018

PMIS ID : 214003 PEPC Project Creation Date: Sep 25, 2014

Project Target Start: Jul 1, 2019

Sensitive Project: No Project Close Date:

Project Leader: James Ludwig

NEPA Specialists: Jami Hammond, Jennifer Jones, Stacy Humphreys

NHPA Specialists: Stacy Humphreys

Description:

This project is for the pavement preservation of the Picnic Area loop road and the Picnic Area parking lot. The work for this project will include:

Removal of the parking blocks within the parking lot, 1 ½" milling of existing asphalt on the loop road and parking lot, application of the tack coat along the loop road and parking lot, replacement and compaction of 1 ½" of new asphalt, restriping of the loop road and parking lot to the original layout, installation of the old parking blocks.

This project is a L3R - Light Rehabilitation according to the South East Region (SER) preservation recommendations.

This project is performed on PP Class 1 Principal Park Road which constitutes the main access route for park visitors; Section ID ABLI-0011-00.000 Route Number 11.

This project also includes the Picnic Area Parking lot that serves public and administrative needs; Section ID ABLI-0901-00.000 Route number 901.

The work will consist of applying a preventive maintenance action to the roadway surface that includes minor spot repairs (patching), crack sealing and the application of a surface seal or non-structural overlay.

Preventive maintenance is a pavement preservation tool to provide cost effective treatment to the surface of a structurally sound pavement to preserve the system and retard future deterioration. Since preventive maintenance treatments are inexpensive in comparison to resurfacing or reconstruction projects, a pavement preservation program is a cost-effective means of meeting pavement performance goals. Pavement preservation is an important tool in practicing sound asset management.

Work for this project will take place in the existing footprint.

External Agency/ Applicant:

Division/Office:

Designer: Conceptual Design Date:

RPRS ID:

Project Type: Cyclic Maintenance

Project Category: Road Paved

General Notes None

Locations

County/Borough, State District, Section Geo. Marker Other Tract ID

Larue, KY

Admin Contact Information Decision File Contact: Rebecca Thomas

Decision File Location: Headquarters

Glossary

• Compliance Sta

• Decision File

• External Agenc

• PMIS (Project M

Information Sys

• Project Catego

• Project Type

• RPRS (Resear

Reporting Syste

• Sensitive projec

FAQ

• How do I delete project?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/basicInformation.cfm?projectID=54773&

File List No files.

Last Updated Date: Dec 18, 2018

Last Updated By: stacy_humphreys

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/basicInformation.cfm?projectID=54773&

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

FODO > Pavement Preservation for Fort Donelson National Battlefield (50783)

NEPA (View)

NEPA Status: CE

Current NEPA Type: CE

CE - Categorical Exclusion Internal Scoping Start: Internal Scoping End:

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification:

CE Superintendent Signed Date: Aug 16, 2018

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety?

No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers;

national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands;

wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988);

national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2) (E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely

No

CE (current NEPA type) EA EIS Memo Other

Glossary

• CE (Categorica

CE/CX)

• DEIS (Draft En

Impact Stateme

• EA (Environme

Assessment)

• EIS (Environme

Statement)

• Environmental process

• FONSI (Finding

Significant Impa

• Finding of No S

Impact (FONSI

• Memorandum (

• NEPA (Nationa

Policy Act)

• NEPA Action

• NEPA Docume

• NEPA Process

• NEPA Type

• NOA (Notice of

• NOI (Notice of

• RD (Regional D

• ROD (Record o

• Cumulative Imp

• NEPA Pathway

• NEPA Review

• Scope

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

• DO 28

Cultural Resou

• DO 41: Wildern Stewardship DO Wilderness Ste

• Fuels and Reha

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=50783

Last Updated Date: Aug 16, 2018

Last Updated By: david_hamby affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=50783

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

FODO > Pavement Preservation for Fort Donelson National Battlefield (50783)

NHPA (View)

Form Prepared: Jan 29, 2014 Data Entered By: Bill Barley

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: All paved surfaces within FODO

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer

A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes

B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes

C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No

E. Historic structures/resources present? Yes

Notes: No affect F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes Notes: No affect G. Ethnographic resources present? No

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology / ARPA / NAGPRA / Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No

Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No

Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No

Permit Number:

H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by

NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No Verbal agreement with each tribe.

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply) N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No

O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No

P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No

Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No

R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

Glossary

• ACHP (Advisor

Historic Preserv

• ARPA (Archeol

Resources Pro 1979)

• Adverse Effect

• Archeological R

• Archeological S

• Area of potentia

• Assessment of

(AOE)

• Cultural Landsc

(CLI)

• Cultural Landsc

• Ethnographic re

• Historic propert

• List of Classifie

(LCS)

• Memorandum o

(MOA)

• NHPA (Nationa

Preservation Ac

• National Histor

Act (NHPA)

• No adverse effe

• No historic prop

(NHPA)

• Programmatic a

• Survey Sources

• THPO (Tribal H

Preservation O

• National Histor

(NHL)

FAQ

• Does your proje

National Histor

(NHL)?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=50783

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No

S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No

T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No

U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Historic Properties Affected

Documentation Method: Streamlined Review (PA)

Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas

Assessment of Effect Notes:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date:

Aug 16, 2018

Last Updated Date: Aug 16, 2018

Last Updated By: david_hamby

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=50783

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home FODO > Pavement Preservation for Fort Donelson National Battlefield (50783)

Project Home

Pavement Preservation for Fort Donelson National Battlefield Project ID: 50783 Other Project ID: PMIS 208592

Project Status: Proposed Compliance Status: Closed Complete

PMIS ID: 208592

Sensitive: No Project Creation Date: Jan 22, 2014

NEPA Status: CE Approved Project Target Start Date: Oct 1, 2018

Funding: Funded in PMIS

Description:

In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration a pavement preservation project will done for the roads and parking areas of Fort Donelson National Battlefield and National Cemetery. The preservation project will consist of the following.

Crack Sealing; Used to prevent water and other incompressibles from entering the pavement. Cracks may require routing prior to filling with sealant material.

Chip Sealing; A surface treatment in which a pavement surface is sprayed with emulsified asphalt and then immediately covered with aggregate and rolled. This is used primarily to seal the surface of a pavement and to improve surface friction. As an option, a fog seal may be placed on the top to help hold the aggregate in place, reduce raveling of the chip seal, and improve visibility of striping, or a cape seal used to provide a dense, waterproof surface with improved skid resistance. Often used on pavements showing higher distress levels.

Minor spot repairs; Patching; patching area should not exceed 5% of the total pavement area.

Justifications

Preventive maintenance is a pavement preservation tool to provide cost effective treatment to the surface of a structurally sound pavement to preserve the system and retard future deterioration. Since preventive maintenance treatments are inexpensive in comparison to resurfacing or reconstruction projects, a pavement preservation program is a cost-effective means of meeting pavement performance goals. Pavement preservation is an important tool in practicing sound asset management.

Measurable Results

Road and parking area pavement surfaces throughout the park will be improved and the life extended.

Project Leader: David Hamby

NEPA Specialist: Etta Spradlin

NHPA Specialist: Dwayne Scheid

Project Type: Other Maintenance Activities : Facility Maintenance

Project Categories:

Maintained Landscape, Parking Area, Road Paved

External Agency: Admin Record Contact:

Division/Office: Admin Record Location:

General Notes None

IDT Team Filter: IDT Members (found total 9 ) - click headings to sort.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Barbara Hatcher Engineering 865-436-1306

Beth Byrd 106 Advisor 404-507-5793

Brian McCutchen Superintendent 931-232-0829

David Hamby Project Leader 931-232-0830

David Hasty Historical Landscape Architect 404-507-5780

Dwayne Scheid NHPA Specialist 757-898-2429

Glossary

• Compliance Sta

• Decision File

• External Agenc

• PMIS (Project M

Information Sys

FAQ

• How do I delete project?

Links

• NPS NEPA Ha

Supplemental G

• DO 12

Conservation, P Environmental and Decision-M

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=50783

Milestones Target Project Start: Oct 1, 2018 Actual Project Start:

Target Project End: Actual Project End:

Target Agreement: Actual Agreement:

Target Alternatives: Actual Agreement:

Step 1 Basic Information File List

Step 2 Funding File List No files.

Step 3 Internal Scoping / IDT Task File List No files.

Step 4 Natural/Cultural Compliance File List No files.

Step 5 Internal Documents (* indicates peer review required)

Document Title Review Start Review End Peer Review Required

This project has no 'internal documents'.

Step 6 Public Documents

Document Title Review Start Review End TIC ID

This project has no 'public documents'.

Step 8 Project Closing No files.

Name Responsibility Phone# Ext

Etta Spradlin NEPA Specialist (423) 569-2404 254

John Cornelison Archeologist 850-580-3011 127

Rick Toomey Natural Resource Specialist 270-758-2145

Filter: Locations (found total 1 ) - click headings to sort.

County, State District, Section Geo. Marker Other Tract ID

Stewart, TN

File Size Type Uploaded Date

Pavement Preservation APE.pdf 1.9 MB PDF file Oct 4, 2017

FODO_SER PMS FY19_Design-Scoping-Report_Draft_Rev.pdf 14.9 MB PDF file Aug 14, 2018

Staging Area.jpg 1.0 MB Image file Aug 14, 2018

12/19/2018https://pepc.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=50783