Bridge_Insp_Report_Virginia_Route_603_Bridge_5140-162P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway, Project NP-BLRI 1E10
- Solicitation number
- 693C7318B000016
About this file
Bridge_Inspection_Report_Virginia_Route_603_Bridge_5140-162P
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16
STRUCTURE SUMMARY
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
CONCRETE
FRAME
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
N/A
CONCRETE
1E3 / G976P
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
LOCATION
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
35.0 FT (10.7 M)
30.7 FT (9.4 M)
N/A
25 °
NO
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 29.45 (KM PT 47.39)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 2.3 MILES FROM VA ROUTE 56
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 603
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include some deterioration of mortar joints throughout the masonry elements of the bridge, deterioration of the parapet expansion joint material, moderate transverse cracking of the pavement at the bridge ends and at both of the approaches, heavy vegetation growth around wingwalls, and a tree growing from the top of the northeast wingwall.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, L. ELLIS
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
REINALDO SILVESTRY, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/17
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.2 CLEAN AND SEAL PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS WITH FLEXIBLE MATERIAL. 1 LS $ $
60.1,6 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM NORTH ABUTMENT AND WINGWALLS.
REMOVE TREE FROM NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
1 LS $ $
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $
ITEM
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
NO (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.6, 60.6 REPOINT PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS
NECESSARY.
1 LS $ $ $0
58.3, 222.4 SEAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT AT BRIDGE ENDS AND BOTH
APPROACHES.
1 LS $ $ $0
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS $ $ $0
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
$0
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... $
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK N
DECK SLAB1. N
EXPANSION JOINTS2. F
WEARING SURFACE3. F
RIDEABILITY4. F
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN 5. N
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS6. F
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE7. G
UTILITIES8. N
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. N
OTHER10. N
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
BEARING DEVICES1. N
GIRDERS OR BEAMS2. N
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)3. G
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS4. N
TRUSSES5. N
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING6. N
7. PAINT N
FASCIA(E)8. G
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. G
ALIGNMENT10. G
OTHER11. N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
ABUTMENTS
58.2,6 SEVERE DETERIORATION AND LOSS OF MORTAR IN PARAPET
EXPANSION JOINTS.
58.3, 222.4 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING (UP TO 1/2" WIDE) OF
PAVEMENT AT BRIDGE ENDS AND BOTH APPROACHES.
58.4, 222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES CAUSING ROUGH RIDE.
MINOR SETTLEMENT OF SHOULDER EMBANKMENT AT PARAPET
JOINTS.
58.6 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS IN
SEVERAL AREAS OF EAST PARAPET; MINOR TO MODERATE
ELSEWHERE.
59.3 MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR (HAIRLINE)
TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE
NEAR WEST SIDE.
59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.
60.1 MINOR CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS. MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL.
60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS; HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT EAST
WINGWALLS. MINOR CRACK IN ONE STONE AT BASE OF
NORTHEAST WINGWALL NEAR BREASTWALL. MINOR VINE
GROWTH ON NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS; SMALL
TREE GROWING FROM NORTHEAST WINGWALL NEAR TOP.
11.
1 0.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12. OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
N
N
N
N
F
G
N
G
G
N
N
PIER(S)
N 13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N 14. PILE BENTS
N 15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N 16. FOUNDATIONS
N 17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N 18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N 19. OTHER
222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT. USGS MARKER ON EAST PARAPET
AT NORTH END, "ELEVATION 2887 FEET, 1962."
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS, 14' - 1", INSTALLED AT UNDERPASS
ROAD.
36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-6" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT
GUIDELINES OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PFIELD INSPECTION REPORT
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.
NORMAL VELOCITY7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.
OTHER5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER9.
ALIGNMENT8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
APPROACH SLABS1.
222. APPROACHES
OTHER6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
WALL1.
223. RETAINING WALL
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGS A.
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
N
N
N
N
N
F
G
G
G
G
N
N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
N
N
VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16
TRUCK TYPE
TONS
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC)
METRIC TONS METRIC TONSTONS
OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
H
HS
TYPE 3
TYPE 3S2
TYPE 3-3
DESIGN LOADING:
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS:
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
FRAME
6/15
X
X
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING
VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE
H15 (M13.5)
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 125 - NELSON
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-162P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 603
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........162P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140162P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.3 MILES FROM VA ROUTE 5
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1E3 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 29.45 (KM PT 47.39)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... G976P (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION:
N - NOT APPLICABLE
NO(218) IS SALT USED?:
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:
2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:
A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/16 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE:
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°51'47.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.7 FT (9.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°08'55.30" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 400 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 25 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 440 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.7 FT (9.4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 1.50 FT (0.46 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.33 FT (4.37 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: .................................N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: ..........................N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:79�08'55.30 http:37�51'47.40
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING ALONG CENTER LINE OF ROADWAY
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING
OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH
END SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING
OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH
BEGINNING SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING
OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH
END SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
PAVEMENT AT NORTH END
PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP OF TRANSVERSE
CRACK WIDTH AT NORTH APPROACH
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL LOSS OF MORTAR FROM
JOINTS IN LINE WITH TRANSVERSE CRACKS
IN DECK;
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
PARAPET MORTAR JOINTS, EAST PARAPET
SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES, EAST SIDE SHOWN;
NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #15 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH
ABUTMENT AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE TREE GROWING FROM
TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PPHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #17 - LATERAL MOVEMENT TOWARDS WEST IN NORTHWEST
WINGWALL BASE
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY LOOKING
EAST
STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PPHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN
File details come from the government source that posted it.