Bridge_Insp_Report_Virginia_Route_603_Bridge_5140-162P.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway, Project NP-BLRI 1E10
Solicitation number
693C7318B000016
Issued by

About this file

Bridge_Inspection_Report_Virginia_Route_603_Bridge_5140-162P

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16

STRUCTURE SUMMARY

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE

FRAME

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

N/A

CONCRETE

1E3 / G976P

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

LOCATION

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

30.7 FT (9.4 M)

N/A

25 °

NO

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 29.45 (KM PT 47.39)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 2.3 MILES FROM VA ROUTE 56

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 603

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include some deterioration of mortar joints throughout the masonry elements of the bridge, deterioration of the parapet expansion joint material, moderate transverse cracking of the pavement at the bridge ends and at both of the approaches, heavy vegetation growth around wingwalls, and a tree growing from the top of the northeast wingwall.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, L. ELLIS

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

REINALDO SILVESTRY, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.2 CLEAN AND SEAL PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS WITH FLEXIBLE MATERIAL. 1 LS $ $

60.1,6 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM NORTH ABUTMENT AND WINGWALLS.

REMOVE TREE FROM NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

1 LS $ $

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $

ITEM

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

NO (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6, 60.6 REPOINT PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS $ $ $0

58.3, 222.4 SEAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT AT BRIDGE ENDS AND BOTH

APPROACHES.

1 LS $ $ $0

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS $ $ $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... $

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK N

DECK SLAB1. N

EXPANSION JOINTS2. F

WEARING SURFACE3. F

RIDEABILITY4. F

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN 5. N

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS6. F

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE7. G

UTILITIES8. N

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. N

OTHER10. N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

BEARING DEVICES1. N

GIRDERS OR BEAMS2. N

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)3. G

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS4. N

TRUSSES5. N

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING6. N

7. PAINT N

FASCIA(E)8. G

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. G

ALIGNMENT10. G

OTHER11. N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

ABUTMENTS

58.2,6 SEVERE DETERIORATION AND LOSS OF MORTAR IN PARAPET

EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3, 222.4 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING (UP TO 1/2" WIDE) OF

PAVEMENT AT BRIDGE ENDS AND BOTH APPROACHES.

58.4, 222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES CAUSING ROUGH RIDE.

MINOR SETTLEMENT OF SHOULDER EMBANKMENT AT PARAPET

JOINTS.

58.6 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS IN

SEVERAL AREAS OF EAST PARAPET; MINOR TO MODERATE

ELSEWHERE.

59.3 MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR (HAIRLINE)

TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE

NEAR WEST SIDE.

59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.

60.1 MINOR CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS. MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL.

60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT EAST

WINGWALLS. MINOR CRACK IN ONE STONE AT BASE OF

NORTHEAST WINGWALL NEAR BREASTWALL. MINOR VINE

GROWTH ON NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS; SMALL

TREE GROWING FROM NORTHEAST WINGWALL NEAR TOP.

11.

1 0.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12. OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

N

N

N

N

F

G

N

G

G

N

N

PIER(S)

N 13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N 14. PILE BENTS

N 15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N 16. FOUNDATIONS

N 17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N 18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N 19. OTHER

222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT. USGS MARKER ON EAST PARAPET

AT NORTH END, "ELEVATION 2887 FEET, 1962."

VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS, 14' - 1", INSTALLED AT UNDERPASS

ROAD.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-6" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT

GUIDELINES OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PFIELD INSPECTION REPORT

STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

APPROACH SLABS1.

222. APPROACHES

OTHER6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

WALL1.

223. RETAINING WALL

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGS A.

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

N

N

N

N

N

F

G

G

G

G

N

N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

N

N

VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

INSPECTION DATE: 11/3/16

TRUCK TYPE

TONS

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC)

METRIC TONS METRIC TONSTONS

OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

H

HS

TYPE 3

TYPE 3S2

TYPE 3-3

DESIGN LOADING:

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS:

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

FRAME

6/15

X

X

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING

VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE

H15 (M13.5)

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 603 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 125 - NELSON

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-162P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 603

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........162P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140162P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.3 MILES FROM VA ROUTE 5

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1E3 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 29.45 (KM PT 47.39)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... G976P (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION:

N - NOT APPLICABLE

NO(218) IS SALT USED?:

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:

2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:

A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/16 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE:

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°51'47.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.7 FT (9.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°08'55.30" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 400 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 25 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 440 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.7 FT (9.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 1.50 FT (0.46 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.33 FT (4.37 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: .................................N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: ..........................N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:79�08'55.30 http:37�51'47.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162P

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING ALONG CENTER LINE OF ROADWAY

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH

END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH

BEGINNING SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH

END SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

PAVEMENT AT NORTH END

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP OF TRANSVERSE

CRACK WIDTH AT NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL LOSS OF MORTAR FROM

JOINTS IN LINE WITH TRANSVERSE CRACKS

IN DECK;

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

PARAPET MORTAR JOINTS, EAST PARAPET

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG RING STONES, EAST SIDE SHOWN;

NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE TREE GROWING FROM

TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PPHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #17 - LATERAL MOVEMENT TOWARDS WEST IN NORTHWEST

WINGWALL BASE

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY LOOKING

EAST

STRUCTURE NO. 5140 162PPHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN

File details come from the government source that posted it.