QA_03-09-2026.pdf
PDF 118 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056726R000003
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for the National Forest System Road 221 Rehabilitation project (ID FS NEZPR117 221(1)) issued by the U.S. Forest Service. The Q&A addresses 14 inquiries from potential contractors regarding contract specifications and requirements, with responses dated between February 12, 2026 and March 9, 2026.
Key technical clarifications include: control point locations will be established using provided Northing/Easting and Lat/Long coordinates rather than detailed plan markings; microsurfacing specifications will use Type II aggregate per the solicitation with application rates submitted per Subsection 409.04(g), with amendments pending; equipment must conform to Subsection 409.05 specifications; vacuum sweeping is the only acceptable method for aggregate cleanup within 24 and 48 hours post-application, with disposal permitted at designated pit sites; rolling of the cured microsurfacing product is not required; asphalt concrete pavement tonnage of 6,100 tons is distributed across multiple locations including deep patches, transition ramps, reinforced soil slopes, and culvert replacements; and the 6-inch underdrain systems are incidental to subexcavation costs. Multiple responses reference pending Amendment A001 and A002 for additional specification details. The U.S. Forest Service indicated that future prime contracting opportunities will be posted to SAM.gov under contract action identifier 690567, and that detailed microsurfacing specifications are available in Section 409 of the FP-24 federal specifications and referenced Special Conditions Requests.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA_03-16-2026.pdf | ||
| Amendment A002.pdf | ||
| QA_03-06-2026_3.pdf | ||
| QA_03-06-2026_2.pdf | ||
| Amendment A001.pdf | ||
| QA_03-06-2026.pdf | ||
| QA_03-02-2026.pdf | ||
| QA_02-27-2026.pdf | ||
| QA_02-12-2026.pdf | ||
| idf-nezpr221-1_SWPPP.pdf | ||
| idf-nezpr221-1_GEO_GM3025.pdf | ||
| idf-nezpr221-1_WFLHD-28.pdf | ||
| RFP_ID FS NEZPR117 221(1)_69056726R000003.pdf | ||
| idf-nezpr221-1_GEO_GR0625.pdf | ||
| idf-nezpr221-1_plans_RFP.pdf | ||
| Exisiting Ground Surface Files.zip | ZIP file | |
| idf-nezpr221-1_control-points.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| idf-nezpr221-1_USFS_National_Core_BMPs.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project : ID FS NEZPR117 221(1), National Forest System Road 221 Rehabilitation
# General Technical Question Answer Date
1 X
Can you provide clarity on the control sheets D1 and D2? You are giving point numbers up to C25, but there is some confusion in how to find the control on the ground. Typically, plans will show the control points along the horizontal alignment.
Are you able to provide more detail on where they go or give a mile marker to their locations? For example, on Sheet G.1, the pipe is called out (MP 8.638 CP 25101).
Something like that and detailing location from centerline (15’ RT) would help as of right now it’s difficult to locate.
Bid as shown per the plans and specifications, the Government has provided the Northing/ Easting and
Lat/Long coordinates to establish the control locations.
2/12/26
2 X
Regarding the Micro surfacing bid item in the contract. The contract language refers to ISSA A-143 for specifications on a portion of the contract. ISSA A-143 are not specifications per se, but a guideline to develop contact specific specifications.
This project is specified with TYPE II aggregate. NF System Road 221 is a mountainous area with low traffic volumes. The type II gradation being specified is a smaller aggregate size typically used for residential, parking lots, bike lanes etc. creating a smoother surface. Type III aggregate is a coarse gradation, more aggressive for skid resistance, a higher application rate that will provide better life cycle costs and duration. Along the same lines, ISSA A-143 indicates an application rate for type II of
10-20 lbs. of aggregate per square yard. Since the micro surfacing is bid by the square yard and not the lbs. of aggregate, having a range of 10-20 lbs. incentives the contractor to bid the least amount of aggregate per square yard to obtain the lowest cost per square yard. 10 lbs. of type II aggregate per square yard in this environment will not have the life cycle costs of a type III aggregate at a higher application rate.
WFL currently has a MATOC entitled Western Region Pavement Preservation.
Specifications for type II or III aggregate is much higher and the range is much less based on lbs. per square yard. My suggestion for creating a micro surfacing product that will provide the best overall value for the taxpayer and US Forest Service is using a type III gradation with an application rate of 25-30 lbs. of dry aggregate. If the type
II is the preference, then the application rate should be 17-22 lbs. especially using the micro surfacing to cover the new chip seal application.
Provide Microsurfacing, Type II according to the solicitation. Submit proposed application rates according to Subsection
409.04(g).
Revised Response: This will be addressed by Amendment A001
2/27/2026
3/6/2026
Check General or Technical
3 X
Along the same lines of specifications. ISSA A-143 does not specify the use of on type of equipment application over another. However, this project is 28 miles in length.
The micro surfacing industry has two primary uses of equipment. A continuous application and individual mixers. The continuous application is similar to HMA paving and chip seal. Meaning the process from the start continuously moves forward applying the micro surfacing. As long as micro surfacing material is supplied to the continuous paver, the process continuously moves and produces micro surfacing. With the individual mixers, each time a individual mixing unit empties the materials, that unit has to stop, remove the spreader box and another unit that is fully loaded begins the process. This creates a transverse joint every 500-600 feet.
This would create approximately 500 transverse construction joints for the final riding surface. A continuous operation could pave for 1-3 miles without creating a transverse joint. Along with the advantages using a continuous paving operation, the continuous operation uses (1) one paving machine. Individual mixers would use 3-4 mixing units. Each unit whether using on or the other need to be calibrated prior to beginning construction. Like a batch plant on wheels, this process is critical to the mix design, and the job mix formula for the micro surfacing materials. It is very difficult to have each machine placing the exact same proportions of aggregate, emulsified asphalt, mineral filler, water and other additives the same. Using (1) paving machine eliminates this challenge. Industry standards require applications that are miles of continuous work to be completed with he continuous method and will not allow individual mixing machines. For the reasons mentioned, specifically requiring the continuous method will provide a much better overall project.
Use equipment conforming to Subsection
409.05.
Revised Response: This will be addressed by Amendment A001
2/27/2026
3/6/2026
4 X
ISSA A-143 guidelines suggest using a scalping screen prior to being loaded into the mixing unit. This eliminates any oversized aggregate that may be inadvertently loaded from the stockpiled aggregate on the job site. This could create drag marks in the final surface and contaminate aggregate on the surface. Best practice is to require screening the finished aggregate prior to loading into the paving unit.
Use equipment conforming to Subsection
409.05.
Revised Response: This will be addressed by Amendment A001
2/27/2026
3/6/2026
5 X Please clarify if the micro surfacing final cured product will require rolling prior to allowing traffic to drive unrestricted on the new micro surfacing.
See Subsection 409.10 for rolling, curing, and opening to traffic. Rolling the cured
Microsurfacing is not required.
Revised Response: See Amendment A001, SCR 409.10
2/27/2026
3/6/2026
6 X
Where would I be able to get a copy of the Micro-Surfacing Specifications for the
National Forst System Road 221 Rehabilitation project? Project NO: ID FS NEZPR117
221(1)
See Section 409 of the FP-24
(https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/specs/fp-24) and the SCRs (RFP page
F-8).
Revised Response: See Amendment A001 for Section 409.
3/2/2026
3/6/2026
7 X How can we become a prime contractor on these projects in the future?
Our Multiple Award Task Order Contracts
(MATOC) are awarded through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process that is posted to SAM.gov. My suggestion would be to search “690567” in
SAM.gov; this is our contract action identifier number. All upcoming contract opportunities, including MATOC solicitations, will be posted to SAM.gov.
3/4/26
8 X
How are the 6” underdrain systems detailed on typical section sheet 4 of 4 paid? Are these incidental to the sub excavation or select borrow items?
The underdrain for this application is incidental to the subexcavation. 3/5/26
9 X
It appears the majority of roadway aggregate method 2 is for shoulder repair work.
Do you have a list of anticipated locations and tonnages dedicated to the shoulder repairs?
We don't have a list of locations to provide. Bid per plans. 3/5/26
10 X
On the line graph sheets regarding the culvert installations, the sheets reference “See
Section G” multiple times. Where is section G located within the specifications?
Section G is a section in the plans, not the specs (sheet G.1 of the plan sheets). 3/5/26
11 X
We’re having difficulty locating the majority of the quantity of line item number
A0040, pay item number 40301-000 Asphalt Concrete Pavement in the plan set. The bid quantity is listed as 6100 ton on the bid schedule. The four plan sheets with the project typical sections depict asphalt paving for this bid item on sheet 3 of 4 in the area of the reinforced soil slop (approximately 65 ton), and on sheet 4 of 4 in the location of the 5 deep patches (approximately 400 ton). There’s additional paving shown on sheet number C.6 which is paid under line item number A0600, pay item number 41801-2000 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Patch, Type 2. Please direct me to the plan sheets where the remainder of the paving quantity is located.
The asphalt tonnage for Line Item #A0440, pay item #40301-0000 Asphalt Concrete
Pavement, is distributed along the project corridor at the following locations:
1. Deep Patches (plan sheet C.4)
2. Deep Patch Transition/Ramps (plan sheet C.5)
3. Reinforced Soil Slope (plan sheet C.3)
4. Culvert Replacements (plan sheet G.1)
3/6/26
12 X
Regarding sweeping of the Type 1C chip seal in this solicitation, FP-24 SECTION 407 aggregate application page 381 states lightly Vacuum sweep the surface within 24 hours and again 48 hours after aggregate application.
Is it acceptable on the project to sweep the aggregate to the shoulder of the roadway with rotary sweepers in lieu of vacuum sweeping?
No 3/6/26
13 X
If Vacuum sweeping is the only acceptable method of sweeping the excess aggregate, can the contractor dispose of the excess aggregate at either Twin Cabins Pit or Adams
Camp Pit as designated in the project plans as material source and staging areas?
Yes 3/6/26
14 X
With this addition of the pipe trench patching, there’s a total of approximately 750 ton of asphalt concrete pavement in the plans. The plan quantity of the bid item is
6,100 ton.
This will be addressed by Amendment
A002.
3/9/26
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .