68-SOBTAT1124.pdf

PDF 466 KB Posted

Attached to
Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) Simulation Exercises
Solicitation number
68-SOBTAT1124
Issued by
North Carolina

About this file

This is a Request for Proposal (RFP #68-SOBTAT1124) issued by the University of North Carolina for Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) Simulation Exercises. The RFP seeks a contractor to work with UNC's seventeen constituent institutions and the North Carolina Arboretum to plan and perform comprehensive BTAT simulation training exercises focused on skill-building, competence development, and relationship building among multi-disciplinary team members. Proposals are due by noon EST on December 20, 2024, with written questions due by noon EST on December 6, 2024. The contract term is three years with two optional one-year renewals. The contractor must follow Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) guidelines and deliver 18 total simulation exercises, including planning meetings, training materials, and after-action reports.

The evaluation criteria are ranked in descending order of importance: 1) Vendor Technical Approach, 2) Vendor Qualifications and Experience, and 3) Pricing. Vendors must be registered in North Carolina's Electronic Vendor Portal (eVP) and submit proposals electronically. The RFP promotes the state's Historically Underutilized Business program with a goal of 10% utilization of diverse firms as 1st or 2nd tier subcontractors. The contractor must provide a dedicated project manager, conduct a minimum of two planning meetings per campus, deliver detailed bi-weekly progress reports, and complete comprehensive after-action reports within specified timeframes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
68-SOBTAT1124 - Addendum 02.pdf PDF
68-SOBTAT1124 - Addendum 01.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

University of North Carolina

Request for Proposal #: 68-SOBTAT1124

Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) Simulation Exercises

Date of Issue: November 26, 2024

Proposal Opening Date: December 20, 2024

At Noon EST

Direct all inquiries concerning this RFP to:

Bob Myers

Purchasing and Contract Analyst https://forms.gle/vVTmXGLsd6A5um3cA

Ver: 11/2023

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Request for Proposal #

68-SOBTAT1124

For internal State agency processing, including tabulation of proposals, provide your company’s eVP (Electronic Vendor Portal) Number. Pursuant to G.S. 132-1.10(b) this identification number shall not be released to the public.

This page will be removed and shredded, or otherwise kept confidential, before the procurement file is made available for public inspection.

This page shall be filled out and returned with your proposal.

Failure to do so may subject your proposal to rejection.

Vendor Name

Vendor eVP#

Note: For a contract to be awarded to you, your company (you) must be a North Carolina registered vendor in good standing. You must enter the vendor number assigned through eVP (Electronic Vendor

Portal). If you do not have a vendor number, register at https://vendor.ncgov.com/vendor/login

Electronic responses ONLY will be accepted for this solicitation.

https://vendor.ncgov.com/vendor/login

Ver: 11/2023

Refer ALL Inquiries regarding this RFP to:

Bob Myers Purchasing and Contract Analyst https://forms.gle/vVTmXGLsd6A5um3cA rbmyers@northcarolina.edu

Request for Proposal #: 68-SOBTAT1124 Proposals will be publicly opened:

December 20, 2024, at noon EST

Using Agency: University of North Carolina Commodity No. and Description: 80101709 – Emergency Response Management and Consultancy Services Requisition No.:

EXECUTION

In compliance with this Request for Proposals (RFP), and subject to all the conditions herein, the undersigned Vendor offers and agrees to furnish and deliver any or all items upon which prices are bid, at the prices set opposite each item within the time specified herein.

By executing this proposal, the undersigned Vendor understands that false certification is a Class I felony and certifies that:

this proposal is submitted competitively and without collusion (G.S. 143-54), none of its officers, directors, or owners of an unincorporated business entity has been convicted of any violations of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes, the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (G.S. 143-59.2), and it is not an ineligible Vendor as set forth in G.S. 143-59.1.

Furthermore, by executing this proposal, the undersigned certifies to the best of Vendor’s knowledge and belief, that:

it and its principals are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal or State department or agency.

As required by G.S. 143-48.5, the undersigned Vendor certifies that it, and each of its sub-Contractors for any Contract awarded as a result of this RFP, complies with the requirements of Article 2 of Chapter 64 of the NC General Statutes, including the requirement for each employer with more than 25 employees in North Carolina to verify the work authorization of its employees through the federal E-Verify system.

As required by Executive Order 24 (2017), the undersigned vendor certifies will comply with all Federal and State requirements concerning fair employment and that it does not and will not discriminate, harass, or retaliate against any employee in connection with performance of any Contract arising from this solicitation.

G.S. 133-32 and Executive Order 24 (2009) prohibit the offer to, or acceptance by, any State Employee associated with the preparing plans, specifications, estimates for public contracts; or awarding or administering public contracts; or inspecting or supervising delivery of the public contract of any gift from anyone with a contract with the State, or from any person seeking to do business with the State. By execution of this response to the RFP, the undersigned certifies, for Vendor’s entire organization and its employees or agents, that Vendor is not aware that any such gift has been offered, accepted, or promised by any employees of your organization.

By executing this proposal, Vendor certifies that it has read and agreed to the INSTRUCTION TO VENDORS and the NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS incorporated herein. These documents can be accessed from the ATTACHMENTS page within this document.

Failure to execute/sign proposal prior to submittal may render proposal invalid and it MAY BE REJECTED. Late proposals shall not be accepted.

COMPLETE/FORMAL NAME OF VENDOR:

STREET ADDRESS: P.O. BOX: ZIP:

CITY & STATE & ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: TOLL FREE TEL. NO:

PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS ITEM #21):

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

University of North Carolina

Proposal Number: 68-SOBTAT1124 Vendor: __________________________________________

Ver: 11/2023 2

PRINT NAME & TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING ON BEHALF OF VENDOR: FAX NUMBER:

VENDOR’S AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE*: DATE: EMAIL:

VALIDITY PERIOD

Offer shall be valid for at least sixty 60 days from date of bid opening, unless otherwise stated here: ______ days, or if extended by mutual agreement of the parties in writing. Any withdrawal of this offer shall be made in writing, effective upon receipt by the agency issuing this RFP.

ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL

If your proposal is accepted, all provisions of this RFP, along with the written results of any negotiations, shall constitute the written agreement between the parties (“Contract”). The NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS are incorporated herein and shall apply. Depending upon the Goods or Services being offered, other terms and conditions may apply, as mutually agreed.

FOR STATE USE ONLY: Offer accepted and Contract awarded this________ day of __________, 20____, as indicated on

The attached certification, by ____________________________________________________________________.

(Authorized Representative of the University of North Carolina)

Ver: 11/2023 3

Contents

1.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

1.1 CONTRACT TERM

2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

2.1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

2.2 E-PROCUREMENT FEE

2.3 NOTICE TO VENDORS REGARDING RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

2.4 RFP SCHEDULE

2.5 PROPOSAL QUESTIONS

2.6 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

2.7 PROPOSAL CONTENTS

2.8 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS

3.0 METHOD OF AWARD AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS

3.1 METHOD OF AWARD

3.2 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROHIBITED COMMUNICATIONS DURING EVALUATION

3.3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS

3.4 EVALUATION CRITERIA

3.5 PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

3.6 INTERPRETATION OF TERMS AND PHRASES

4.0 REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRICING

4.2 INVOICES

4.3 FINANCIAL STABILITY

4.4 HUB PARTICIPATION

4.5 VENDOR EXPERIENCE

4.6 REFERENCES

4.7 BACKGROUND CHECKS

4.8 PERSONNEL

4.9 VENDOR’S REPRESENTATIONS

5.0 SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE OF WORK

5.1 GENERAL

5.2 TASKS/DELIVERABLES

5.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION

5.4 TECHNICAL APPROACH

Ver: 11/2023 4

6.0 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

6.1 15

CONTRACT MANAGER AND CUSTOMER SERVICE

6.2 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

6.3 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK

6.4 TRANSITION ASSISTANCE

6.5 DISPUTE RESOLUTION

6.6 CONTRACT CHANGES

7.0 ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A: PRICING

ATTACHMENT B: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS

ATTACHMENT C: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS

ATTACHMENT D: HUB SUPPLEMENTAL VENDOR INFORMATION

ATTACHMENT E: CUSTOMER REFERENCE FORM

ATTACHMENT F: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR

ATTACHMENT G: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Ver: 11/2023 5

1.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

In adherence to Section VI of UNC System Regulation 1300.7[R] titled ‘Regulation on Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management Teams’, the UNC System is seeking a Contractor to work with the University’s seventeen (17) UNC constituent institutions as well as the North Carolina Arboretum to plan and perform a comprehensive Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) simulation training exercise for each of the constituent institutions and the North Carolina Arboretum. The simulation training exercises should focus on skill-building, developing competence and confidence, and building trust and relationships among the behavioral threat assessment multi-disciplinary team members. The Contractor shall develop an action program following the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) guidelines in effect at the time of performance of each activity. The HSEEP guidelines are hereby incorporated into this Scope of Work by reference thereto, and the Contractor is bound to comply with the HSEEP guidelines.

During these exercises, participants should build on essential skills and the understanding of roles, responsibilities, and interests that have been developed in campus policies and protocols, as well as previous exercises. The desired outcome of these exercises is to reinforce the campus’s plans and strategy for intake, assessment, making determinations, implement appropriate safety interventions, and following up on potential behavioral threats to the campus community. Additionally, stakeholders of all disciplines should conclude their participation in the simulation exercises possessing a holistic community-based approach to support crisis prevention, response, and recovery.

The intent of this solicitation is to award an Agency Contract.

1.1 CONTRACT TERM

The Contract shall have an initial term of three (3) years, beginning on the date of final Contract execution (the “Effective Date”).

At the end of the Contract’s initial term, the State shall have the option, in its sole discretion, to renew the Contract on the same terms and conditions for up to two (2) additional one-year terms. The State will give the Vendor written notice of its intent to exercise each option no later than sixty (60) days before the end of the Contract’s then-current term. In addition to any optional renewal terms, and with the Vendor’s concurrence, the State reserves the right to extend the Contract after the last active term.

Proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of this RFP and any addenda issued hereto.

2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

2.1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

This RFP is comprised of the base RFP document, any attachments, and any addenda released before Contract award, which are incorporated herein by reference.

2.2 E-PROCUREMENT FEE

ATTENTION: The E-Procurement fee may apply to this solicitation. See the paragraph entitled ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT of the North Carolina General Terms and Conditions.

General information on the E-Procurement Services can be found at: http://eprocurement.nc.gov/.

2.3 NOTICE TO VENDORS REGARDING RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

It shall be the Vendor’s responsibility to read the Instructions to Vendors, the North Carolina General Terms and Conditions, all relevant exhibits and attachments, and any other components made a part of this RFP and comply with all requirements and specifications herein. Vendors are also responsible for obtaining and complying with all Addenda and other changes that may be issued in connection with this RFP.

If Vendors have questions or issues regarding any component of this RFP, those must be submitted as questions in accordance with the instructions in the PROPOSAL QUESTIONS Section. If the State determines that any changes will be made as a result of the questions asked, then such decisions will be communicated in the form of an RFP addendum. The State may also elect to http://eprocurement.nc.gov/

Ver: 11/2023 6 leave open the possibility for later negotiation of specific provisions of the Contract that have been addressed during the question-and-answer period, prior to contract award.

Other than through the process of negotiation under 01 NCAC 05B.0503, the State rejects and will not be required to evaluate or consider any additional or modified terms and conditions submitted with Vendor’s proposal or otherwise. This applies to any language appearing in or attached to the document as part of the Vendor’s proposal that purports to vary any terms and conditions or Vendors’ instructions herein or to render the proposal non-binding or subject to further negotiation. Vendor shall include the full text of any proposed modifications of the State’s terms and conditions or any supplemental terms and conditions to be considered by the State in Vendor’s proposal (i.e., Vendor shall not attempt to include Vendor’s modifications via hyperlink or reference to documents outside of Vendor’s proposal). Proposed terms and conditions must be attached as an Exhibit to Vendor’s proposal otherwise they will not be considered by the State and will be void as to the terms of the Parties’ contract. The State may negotiate with one or more responsive Vendors prior to issuing its award, or may conditionally issue its award subject to the Parties negotiation of the proposed modifications of the State’s terms and conditions or supplemental terms and conditions. Vendor’s proposal shall constitute a firm offer that shall be held open for the period required herein (“Validity Period” above).

The State may exercise its discretion to consider Vendor proposed modifications. By execution and delivery of this RFP Response, the Vendor agrees that any additional or modified terms and conditions, whether submitted purposely or inadvertently, shall have no force or effect, and will be disregarded unless expressly agreed upon through negotiation and incorporated by way of a Best and Final Offer (BAFO). Noncompliance with, or any attempt to alter or delete, this paragraph shall constitute sufficient grounds to reject Vendor’s proposal as nonresponsive.

2.4 RFP SCHEDULE

The table below shows the intended schedule for this RFP. The State will make every effort to adhere to this schedule.

Event Responsibility Date and Time Issue RFP State November 26, 2024 Submit Written Questions Vendor By noon EST on December 6, 2024 Provide Response to Questions State December 10, 2024 Submit Proposals Vendor By noon on December 20, 2024 Contract Award State TBD

2.5 PROPOSAL QUESTIONS

Upon review of the RFP documents, Vendors may have questions to clarify or interpret the RFP in order to submit the best proposal possible. To accommodate the Proposal Questions process, Vendors shall submit any such questions by the “Submit Written Questions” date and time provided in the RFP SCHEDULE Section above, unless modified by Addendum.

Written questions shall be submited via https://forms.gle/vVTmXGLsd6A5um3cA by the date and time specified above. Questions received prior to the submission deadline date, the State’s response, and any additional terms deemed necessary by the State will be posted in the form of an addendum to the electronic Vendor Portal (eVP), https://evp.nc.gov, and shall become an Addendum to this RFP. No information, instruction or advice provided orally or informally by any State personnel, whether made in response to a question or otherwise in connection with this RFP, shall be considered authoritative or binding. Vendors shall rely only on written material contained in the RFP and an addendum to this RFP.

2.6 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

IMPORTANT NOTE: This is an absolute requirement. Late bids, regardless of cause, will not be opened or considered, and will be automatically disqualified from further consideration. Vendor shall bear the sole risk of late submission due to unintended or unanticipated delay. It is the Vendor’s sole responsibility to ensure its proposal has been received as described in this RFP by the specified time and date of opening. The time and date of receipt will be marked on each proposal when received. Any proposal or portion thereof received after the proposal deadline will be rejected.

https://evp.nc.gov/

Ver: 11/2023 7

All proposal responses shall be submitted electronically via the electronic Vendor Portal (eVP). Additional information can be found at the eVP updates for Vendors link: https://eprocurement.nc.gov/news-events/evp-updates-vendors.

If confidential and proprietary information is included in the proposal, also submit one (1) signed, REDACTED copy of the proposal.

Such information may include trade secrets defined by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-152 and other information exempted from the Public Records Act pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §132- 1.2. Vendor may designate information, Products, Services or appropriate portions of its response as confidential, consistent with and to the extent permitted under the statutes and rules set forth above. By so redacting any page, or portion of a page, the Vendor warrants that it has formed a good faith opinion, having received such necessary or proper review by counsel and other knowledgeable advisors, that the portions determined to be confidential and proprietary and redacted as such, meet the requirements of the Rules and Statutes set forth above. However, under no circumstances shall price information be designated as confidential.

PUBLIC RECORDS: The University of North Carolina is a state agency of the State of North Carolina, accordingly, it receives public records requests for Vendor proposals and contracts. In order to respond to such requests as promptly as possible, Vendor is strongly encouraged to submit a redacted (Proprietary and Confidential Information Excluded) copy of Vendor’s proposal(s) along with its proposal(s). Please note:

pursuant to 01 NCAC 05B .0103(d), COST INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE CONFIDENTIAL. The University of North Carolina will provide Vendor notice of any public records request it receives for Vendor’s redacted proposal. At all times Vendor shall be responsible for its redactions.

If the Vendor does not provide a redacted version of the proposal with its proposal submission, the Department may release an unredacted version if a record request is received.

Failure to submit a proposal in strict accordance with these instructions shall constitute sufficient cause to reject a Vendor’s proposal(s). Vendors are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to upload proposals.

Critical updated information may be included in Addenda to this RFP. It is important that all Vendors responding to this RFP periodically check the State’s eVP website for any Addenda that may be issued prior to the bid opening date. All Vendors shall be deemed to have read and understood all information in this RFP and all Addenda thereto.

2.7 PROPOSAL CONTENTS

Vendors shall populate all attachments of this RFP that require the Vendor to provide information and include an authorized signature where requested. Failure to provide all required items, or Vendor’s submission of incomplete items, may result in the State rejecting Vendor’s proposal, in the State’s sole discretion.

Vendor RFP responses shall include the following items and attachments, which shall be arranged in the following order:

a) Cover Letter, which must contain the following: (i) a statement that confirms that the proposer has read the RFP in its entirety, including all links, and all Addenda released in conjunction with the RFP, (ii) a statement that the Vendor agrees to perform in accordance with the scope of work, requirements, and specifications contained herein; and (iii) Vendor’s agreement to comply with all instructions, terms and conditions, and attachments.

b) Title Page: Include the company name, address, phone number and authorized representative along with the Proposal Number.

c) Completed and signed version of all EXECUTION PAGES, along with the body of the RFP.

d) Signed receipt pages of any addenda released in conjunction with this RFP, if required to be returned.

e) Vendor’s Proposal addressing all Specifications of this RFP. [Indicate relative section references as a guide to responding to sections requiring additional responses outside of the solicitation document. If not required, delete.]

f) Completed version of ATTACHMENT A: PRICING

g) Completed version of ATTACHMENT D: HUB SUPPLEMENTAL VENDOR INFORMATION

h) Completed version of ATTACHMENT E: CUSTOMER REFERENCE FORM

i) Completed version of ATTACHMENT F: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR

j) Completed and signed version of ATTACHMENT G: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Ver: 11/2023 8

2.8 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS

Unless provided otherwise in this RFP, Vendor may submit alternate proposals for comparable Goods, various methods or levels of Service(s), or that propose different options. Alternate proposals must specifically identify the RFP requirements and advantage(s) addressed by the alternate proposal. Any alternate proposal, in addition to the marking described above, must be clearly marked with the legend: “Alternate Proposal #___ [for ‘name of Vendor’]”. Each proposal must be for a specific set of Goods and Services and must include specific pricing. If a Vendor chooses to respond with various offerings, each must be offered with a separate price and be contained in a separate proposal document. Each proposal must be complete and independent of other proposals offered.

3.0 METHOD OF AWARD AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS

3.1 METHOD OF AWARD

North Carolina G.S. 143-52 provides a general list of criteria the State shall use to award contracts, as supplemented by the additional criteria herein. The Goods or Services being procured shall dictate the application and order of criteria; however, all award decisions shall be in the State’s best interest. All qualified proposals will be evaluated, and awards will be made to the Vendor(s) meeting the specific RFP Specifications and achieving the highest and best final evaluation, based on the criteria described below.

While the intent of this RFP is to award a Contract(s) to a single Vendor, the State reserves the right to make separate awards to different Vendors for one or more line items, to not award one or more line items or to cancel this RFP in its entirety without awarding a Contract, if it is considered to be most advantageous to the State to do so.

The State reserves the right to waive any minor informality or technicality in proposals received.

3.2 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROHIBITED COMMUNICATIONS DURING EVALUATION

While this RFP is under evaluation, the responding Vendor, including any subcontractors and suppliers, is prohibited from engaging in conversations intended to influence the outcome of the evaluation. See the Paragraph 29 of the Instructions to Vendors entitled

COMMUNICTIONS BY VENDORS.

Each Vendor submitting a proposal to this RFP, including its employees, agents, subcontractors, suppliers, subsidiaries and affiliates, is prohibited from having any communications with any person inside or outside the using agency; issuing agency; other government agency office or body (including the purchaser named above, any department secretary, agency head, members of the General Assembly and Governor’s office); or private entity, if the communication refers to the content of Vendor’s proposal or qualifications, the content of another Vendor’s proposal, another Vendor’s qualifications or ability to perform a resulting contract, and/or the transmittal of any other communication of information that could be reasonably considered to have the effect of directly or indirectly influencing the evaluation of proposals, the award of a contract, or both.

Any Vendor not in compliance with this provision shall be disqualified from evaluation and award. A Vendor’s proposal may be disqualified if its subcontractor and/or supplier engage in any of the foregoing communications during the time that the procurement is active (i.e., the issuance date of the procurement until the date of contract award or cancellation of the procurement). Only those discussions, communications or transmittals of information authorized or initiated by the issuing agency for this RFP or inquiries directed to the purchaser named in this RFP regarding requirements of the RFP (prior to proposal submission) or the status of the award (after submission) are excepted from this provision.

3.3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS

Only responsive submissions will be evaluated.

The State will conduct a One-Step evaluation of Proposals:

Proposals will be received according to the method stated in the Proposal Submittal Section above.

Ver: 11/2023 9

All proposals must be received by the issuing agency not later than the date and time specified in the RFP SCHEDULE Section above, unless modified by Addendum. Vendors are cautioned that this is a request for offers, not an offer or request to contract, and the State reserves the unqualified right to reject any and all offers at any time if such rejection is deemed to be in the best interest of the State.

At the date and time provided in the RFP SCHEDULE Section above, unless modified by Addendum, the proposal from each responding Vendor will be opened publicly and all offers (except those that have been previously withdrawn, or voided bids) will be tabulated. The tabulation shall be made public at the time it is created. When negotiations after receipt of bids is authorized pursuant to G.S. 143-49 and 01 NCAC 05B.0503, only the names of offerors and the Goods and Services offered shall be tabulated at the time of opening. If negotiation is anticipated, cost and price shall become available for public inspection at the time of the award. Interested parties are cautioned that these costs and their components are subject to further evaluation for completeness and correctness and therefore may not be an exact indicator of a Vendor’s pricing position.

The public opening of proposals will be conducted online via Microsoft Teams. Interested parties may witness the opening of proposals at https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDllOTZkYmQtZmY2Mi00OTNlLWFhZGMtMDZiZTU2OTE3YWJj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%2 2%3a%22b693ed9d-92e1-4e39-b82e-02f6fea6991e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22ae296e38-111d-4970-bf2e- 9e0f5ce2a884%22%7d.

At their option, the evaluators may request oral presentations or discussions with any or all Vendors for clarification or to amplify the materials presented in any part of the proposal. Vendors are cautioned, however, that the evaluators are not required to request presentations or other clarification—and often do not. Therefore, all proposals should be complete and reflect the most favorable terms available from the Vendor.

If negotiation is anticipated under 01 NCAC 05B.0503, pricing may not be public until award.

At their sole option, the evaluators may request oral presentations or discussions with any or all Vendors for the purpose of clarification or to amplify the materials presented in any part of the proposal. Vendors are cautioned, however, that the evaluators are not required to request presentations or other clarification—and often do not.

Upon completion of the evaluation process, the State will make award(s) based on the evaluation and post the award(s) to the State’s eVP website under the RFP number for this solicitation. Award of a Contract to one Vendor does not mean that the other proposals lacked merit, but that, all factors considered, the selected proposal was deemed most advantageous and represented the best value to the State.

The State reserves the right to negotiate with one or more vendors, or to reject all original offers and negotiate with one or more sources of supply that may be capable of satisfying the requirement, and in either case to require Vendor to submit a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) based on discussions and negotiations with the State.

3.4 EVALUATION CRITERIA

In addition to the general criteria in G.S. 143-52 which may or may not be relevant to this RFP, all qualified proposals will be evaluated, and award made based on considering the following criteria, to result in an award most advantageous to the State:

BEST VALUE: "Best Value" procurement methods are authorized by N.C.G.S. §§143-135.9 and 143B-1350(h). The award decision is made based on multiple factors, including: total cost of ownership, meaning the cost of acquiring, operating, maintaining, and supporting a product or service over its projected lifetime; the evaluated technical merit of the Vendor's offer; the Vendor's past performance; and the evaluated probability of performing the specifications stated in the solicitation on time, with high quality, and in a manner that accomplishes the stated business objectives and maintains industry standards compliance. The intent of "Best Value" procurement is to enable Vendors to offer and the Agency to select the most appropriate solution to meet the business objectives defined in the solicitation and to keep all parties focused on the desired outcome of a procurement.

https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDllOTZkYmQtZmY2Mi00OTNlLWFhZGMtMDZiZTU2OTE3YWJj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22b693ed9d-92e1-4e39-b82e-02f6fea6991e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22ae296e38-111d-4970-bf2e-9e0f5ce2a884%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDllOTZkYmQtZmY2Mi00OTNlLWFhZGMtMDZiZTU2OTE3YWJj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22b693ed9d-92e1-4e39-b82e-02f6fea6991e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22ae296e38-111d-4970-bf2e-9e0f5ce2a884%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDllOTZkYmQtZmY2Mi00OTNlLWFhZGMtMDZiZTU2OTE3YWJj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22b693ed9d-92e1-4e39-b82e-02f6fea6991e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22ae296e38-111d-4970-bf2e-9e0f5ce2a884%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDllOTZkYmQtZmY2Mi00OTNlLWFhZGMtMDZiZTU2OTE3YWJj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22b693ed9d-92e1-4e39-b82e-02f6fea6991e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22ae296e38-111d-4970-bf2e-9e0f5ce2a884%22%7d

Ver: 11/2023 10

A ranking method of source selection will be utilized in this procurement using evaluation criteria listed in order of importance in the Evaluation Criteria section below to allow the State to award this RFP to the Vendor(s) providing the Best Value and recognizing that Best Value may result in award other than the lowest price or highest technically qualified offer. By using this method, the overall ranking may be adjusted up or down when considered with, or traded-off against, other non-price factors.

EVALUTION METHOD: Narrative and by consensus of the evaluating committee, explaining the strengths and weaknesses of each proposal and why the recommended awardee(s) provide the best value to the State.

All qualified proposals will be evaluated, and award made based on considering the following criteria listed in descending order of importance, to result in an award most advantageous to the State:

1. Vendor Technical Approach (Sections 5.1-5.4)

2. Vendor Qualifications and Experience (Sections 4.3, 4.5, 4.6, and Attachment G)

3. Pricing (Section 4.1 and Attachment A)

3.5 PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

Vendor shall complete ATTACHMENT F: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR. In addition to any other evaluation criteria identified in this RFP, the State may also consider, for purposes of evaluating proposed or actual contract performance outside of the United States, how that performance may affect the following factors to ensure that any award will be in the best interest of the State:

a) Total cost to the State

b) Level of quality provided by the Vendor

c) Process and performance capability across multiple jurisdictions

d) Protection of the State’s information and intellectual property

e) Availability of pertinent skills

f) Ability to understand the State’s business requirements and internal operational culture

g) Particular risk factors such as the security of the State’s information technology

h) Relations with citizens and employees

i) Contract enforcement jurisdictional issues

3.6 INTERPRETATION OF TERMS AND PHRASES

This RFP serves two functions: (1) to advise potential Vendors of the parameters of the solution being sought by the State; and (2) to provide (together with other specified documents) the terms of the Contract resulting from this procurement. The use of phrases such as “shall,” “must,” and “requirements” are intended to create enforceable contract conditions. In determining whether proposals should be evaluated or rejected, the State will take into consideration the degree to which Vendors have proposed or failed to propose solutions that will satisfy the State’s needs as described in the RFP. Except as specifically stated in the RFP, no one requirement shall automatically disqualify a Vendor from consideration. However, failure to comply with any single requirement may result in the State exercising its discretion to reject a proposal in its entirety.

4.0 REQUIREMENTS

This Section lists the requirements related to this RFP. By submitting a proposal, the Vendor agrees to meet all stated requirements in this Section as well as any other specifications, requirements, and terms and conditions stated in this RFP. If a Vendor is unclear about a requirement or specification, or believes a change to a requirement would allow for the State to receive a better proposal, the Vendor is urged to submit these items in the form of a question during the question and answer period in accordance with the Proposal Questions Section above.

4.1 PRICING

Proposal price shall constitute the total cost to the State for complete performance in accordance with the requirements and specifications herein, including all applicable charges for handling, transportation, administrative and other similar fees. Complete

Ver: 11/2023 11

ATTACHMENT A: PRICING FORM and include in Vendor’s proposal. The pricing provided in ATTACHMENT A, or resulting from any negotiations, is incorporated herein and shall become part of any resulting Contract.

4.2 INVOICES

Vendor shall invoice the Purchasing Agency. The standard format for invoicing shall be Single Invoices meaning that the Vendor shall provide the Purchasing Agency with an invoice for each order. Invoices shall include detailed information to allow Purchasing Agency to verify pricing at point of receipt matches the correct price from the original date of order. The following fields shall be included on all invoices, as relevant:

Vendor’s Billing Address, Customer Account Number, NC Contract Number, Order Date, Buyer’s Order Number, Manufacturer Part Numbers, Vendor Part Numbers, Item Descriptions, Price, Quantity, and Unit of Measure.

INVOICES MAY NOT BE PAID UNTIL AN INSPECTION HAS OCCURRED AND THE GOODS OR SERVICES ACCEPTED.

4.3 FINANCIAL STABILITY

As a condition of contract award, the Vendor must certify that it has the financial capacity to perform and to continue to perform its obligations under the Contract; that Vendor has no constructive or actual knowledge of an actual or potential legal proceeding being brought against Vendor that could materially adversely affect performance of this Contract; and that entering into this Contract is not prohibited by any contract, or order by any court of competent jurisdiction.

Each Vendor shall certify it is financially stable by completing ATTACHMENT G: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION. The State is requiring this certification to minimize potential issues from contracting with a Vendor that is financially unstable. From the date of the Certification to the expiration of the Contract, the Vendor shall notify the State within thirty (30) days of any occurrence or condition that materially alters the truth of any statement made in this Certification. The Contract Manager may require annual recertification of the Vendor’s financial stability.

4.4 HUB PARTICIPATION

Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute G.S. 143-48, it is State policy to encourage and promote the use of small, minority, physically handicapped, and women contractors in purchasing Goods and Services. As such, this RFP will serve to identify those Vendors that are minority owned or have a strategic plan to support the State’s Historically Underutilized Business program by meeting or exceeding the goal of 10% utilization of diverse firms as 1st or 2nd tier subcontractors. Vendor shall complete

ATTACHMENT D: HUB SUPPLEMENTAL VENDOR INFORMATION.

4.5 VENDOR EXPERIENCE

In its Proposal, Vendor shall demonstrate experience with public and/or private sector clients with similar or greater size and complexity to the University of North Carolina. Vendor shall provide information as to the qualifications and experience of all executive, managerial, legal, and professional personnel to be assigned to this project, including resumes citing experience with similar projects and the responsibilities to be assigned to each person.

4.6 REFERENCES

Vendor may provide at least three (3) references, using ATTACHMENT E: CUSTOMER REFERENCE FORM, for which it has provided Services of similar size and scope to those proposed herein. The State may contact these users to determine whether the Services provided are substantially similar in scope to those proposed herein and whether Vendor’s performance has been satisfactory.

The information obtained may be considered in the evaluation of the Proposal.

4.7 BACKGROUND CHECKS

Any personnel or agent of Vendor performing Services under any Contract arising from this RFP may be required to undergo a background check at the expense of the Vendor, if so requested by the State.

Ver: 11/2023 12

4.8 PERSONNEL

Vendor warrants that qualified personnel shall provide Services under this Contract in a professional manner. “Professional manner” means that the personnel performing the Services will possess the skill and competence consistent with the prevailing business standards in the industry. Vendor will serve as the prime contractor under this Contract and shall be responsible for the performance and payment of all subcontractor(s) that may be approved by the State. Names of any third-party Vendors or subcontractors of Vendor may appear for purposes of convenience in Contract documents; and shall not limit Vendor’s obligations hereunder. Vendor will retain executive representation for functional and technical expertise as needed in order to incorporate any work by third party subcontractor(s).

Should the Vendor’s proposal result in an award, the Vendor shall be required to agree that it will not substitute key personnel assigned to the performance of the Contract without prior written approval by the Contract Lead. Vendor shall further agree that it will notify the Contract Lead of any desired substitution, including the name(s) and references of Vendor’s recommended substitute personnel. The State will approve or disapprove the requested substitution in a timely manner. The State may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Services of any person providing Services under this Contract. Upon such termination, the State may request acceptable substitute personnel or terminate the contract Services provided by such personnel.

4.9 VENDOR’S REPRESENTATIONS

If Vendor’s Proposal results in an award, Vendor agrees that it will not enter any agreement with a third party that may abridge any rights of the State under the Contract. If any Services, deliverables, functions, or responsibilities not specifically described in this solicitation are required for Vendor’s proper performance, provision and delivery of the Service and deliverables under a resulting Contract, or are an inherent part of or necessary sub-task included within such Service, they will be deemed to be implied by and included within the scope of the Contract to the same extent and in the same manner as if specifically described in the Contract. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, Vendor will furnish all of its own necessary management, supervision, labor, facilities, furniture, computer and telecommunications equipment, software, supplies and materials necessary for the Vendor to provide and deliver the Services and/or other Deliverables.

5.0 SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE OF WORK

5.1 GENERAL

The Contractor will work with the seventeen (17) UNC constituent institutions as well as the North Carolina Arboretum to plan and perform a comprehensive Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) simulation training exercise for each of the constituent institutions and the North Carolina Arboretum. The simulation training exercises should focus on skill-building, developing competence and confidence, and building trust and relationships among the behavioral threat assessment multi-disciplinary team members. The Contractor shall develop an action program following the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) guidelines in effect at the time of performance of each activity. The HSEEP guidelines are hereby incorporated into this Scope of Work by reference thereto, and the Contractor is bound to comply with the HSEEP guidelines.

During these exercises, participants should build on essential skills and the understanding of roles, responsibilities, and interests that have been developed in campus policies and protocols, as well as previous exercises. The desired outcome of these exercises is to reinforce the campus’s plans and strategy for intake, assessment, making determinations, implement appropriate safety interventions, and following up on potential behavioral threats to the campus community. Additionally, stakeholders of all disciplines should conclude their participation simulation exercises possessing a holistic community-based approach to support crisis prevention, response, and recovery.

Key objectives for the simulation exercises include:

• Review operating processes and procedures.

• Evaluate coordination and communication processes.

Ver: 11/2023 13

• Understand roles and responsibilities under the respective campus BTAT policy.

• Review decision-making processes and coordination within the multi-disciplinary Threat Assessment team and how this team briefs and links with their campus police department, wellness/counseling center, student affairs, student conduct, human resources, and local jurisdictions.

• Build partnerships with local/state/regional agencies and federal partners; and understand the laws and authorities guiding the inter-jurisdictional response.

• Assess strengths and vulnerabilities given current campus resources.

• Establish recommendations for immediate implementation.

• These simulation exercises shall “only” include one (1) training period per campus bringing together key campus departments and groups as well as outside agencies and departments as identified by the campus planning group.

• In support of the corrective action and improvement plans program, UNC requires detailed after-action reports following the conclusion of the simulation exercises.

• The purpose of these exercises is to test new processes and procedures, review existing responsibilities and roles, and build relationships between the multi-disciplinary Threat Assessment Team and campus stakeholders. In addition, the simulations will establish a clear understanding of the expectations for future operations to promote a cohesive and well-coordinated assessment and response to behavioral threats impacting UNC campuses.

5.2 TASKS/DELIVERABLES

TASKS

• The Contractor shall provide a dedicated project manager to support the training exercises identified under the contract.

• The contractor shall provide the UNC System Office project coordinator with bi-weekly progress updates and reports from the time the contract is awarded and throughout the duration of the contract. The primary purpose of these reports is to track the progress of the management on the exercise project.

• The contractor shall produce one (1), on-site simulation training exercise each for the following UNC System Institutions and Affiliates: Appalachian State University, East Carolina University, Elizabeth City State University, Fayetteville State University, North Carolina A&T State University, North Carolina Central University, NC State University, UNC Asheville, UNC Chapel Hill, UNC Charlotte, UNC Greensboro, UNC Pembroke, UNC School of the Arts, UNC Wilmington, Western Carolina University, Winston-Salem State University, The North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, and The North Carolina Arboretum. For a total of 18 simulation exercises.

• Prior to each training exercise/simulation, a minimum of two planning meetings will be held with the campus-designated project manager (each campus shall designate a project coordinator) and the campus to identify objectives, attendees, and scenarios. These meetings can be on-site or virtual.

• The contractor shall develop a project-training plan and supply it to the campus-designated project coordinator. The project-training plan shall be accompanied by a project schedule in Microsoft Excel format with bi-weekly status reports provided to the campus-designated project coordinator. Both the project plan and schedule shall comply with HSEEP requirements.

• Simulations will be built around pre-determined scenarios, which will be informed by each respective campus planning group. Simulations will focus and be driven by lessons learned as well as new plans and procedures.

Ver: 11/2023 14

• The contractor’s project manager shall be the primary point of contact for the campus. The contractor shall be working directly with the campus participants, but the campus Behavioral Threat Assessment Manager or his/her designee will make all final decisions regarding work performed under this contract.

• Issues important to campus management will be raised and discussed as scenarios unfold. The contractor shall work with each university to develop the objectives, goals, and structure for the simulation exercises. Discussions with the university and key participants should help to inform who should participate, the threat scenario, and scope of the issues.

DELIVERABLES

• Host an initial planning conference with each of the campuses, clarify objectives, desired outcomes, and the scope of the scenarios for the simulation exercises.

• Work with each of the Behavioral Threat Assessment Team Managers to establish a core-planning group (to include campus management).

• The contractor shall do the following for each of the simulation exercises o Conduct an initial planning meeting (the first of the two mandated campus meetings) to review exercise objectives and discuss possible scenario options.

o Interview individuals as selected by each campus planning group to gather information to optimize the utility of the scenarios and to further clarify, confirm, and/or refine requirements, parameters, objectives, and issues surrounding the training events.

o Coordinate with each established planning group to identify points of contact for gathering key reference documents, graphics, and write-ups that will be used in developing training event materials.

o Work with each campus to develop a training exercise agenda.

o Secure on-campus training exercise location with audio-visual capabilities to conduct simulation.

o Provide, or develop with campus, all personnel and resources to participate in the simulations.

o Develop training exercise materials to include situation manuals, master scenario event list, and scenario briefings.

o Present to the campus an exercise development package based upon the established Behavioral Threat Assessment Doctrine that will enable the campus to conduct their own future training exercises.

o Conduct after action debriefing at conclusion of simulation.

o Develop an After-Action Report (AAR) following the simulation and debriefings in Microsoft Word. The report must conform to HSEEP requirements.

o Provide a draft version of an After-Action Report (AAR) within fifteen (15) business days of the simulation exercise to the campus for review and input.

o Provide a final version of an After-Action Report (AAR) within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of campus-reviewed draft AAR.

Ver: 11/2023 15

5.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION

Vendor shall describe the organizational and operational structure it proposes to utilize for the work described in this RFP and identify the responsibilities to be assigned to each person Vendor proposes to staff the work.

5.4 TECHNICAL APPROACH

Vendor’s proposal shall include, in narrative, outline, and/or graph form the Vendor's approach to accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Scope of Work section of this RFP. A description of each task and deliverable and the schedule for accomplishing each shall be included.

6.0 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

All Contract Administration requirements are conditioned on an award resulting from this solicitation. This information is provided for the Vendor’s planning purposes.

6.1 CONTRACT MANAGER AND CUSTOMER SERVICE

The Vendor shall be required to designate and make available to the State a contract manager. The contract manager shall be the State’s point of contact for Contract related issues and issues concerning performance, progress review, scheduling, and service.

Contract Manager Point of Contact

Name:

Office Phone #:

Mobile Phone #:

Email:

The Vendor shall be required to designate and make available to the State for customer service. The customer service point of contact shall be the State’s point of contact for customer service-related issues (define roles and responsibilities).

Customer Service Point of Contact

Name:

Office Phone #:

Mobile Phone #:

Email:

6.2 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

The State encourages the Vendor to identify opportunities to reduce the total cost the State. A continuous improvement effort consists of various ways to enhance business efficiencies as performance progresses.

Ver: 11/2023 16

6.3 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK

Performance of the work and/or delivery of Goods shall be conducted and completed at least in accordance with the Contract requirements and recognized and customarily accepted industry practices. Performance shall be considered complete when the Services or Goods are approved as acceptable by the Contract Administrator.

The State shall have the obligation to notify Vendor, in writing ten (10) calendar days following completion of such work or delivery of a deliverable described in the Contract that it is not acceptable. The notice shall specify in reasonable detail the reason(s) it is unacceptable.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .