6_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation No. 140P5424R0003

Please Complete this Questionnaire and Email to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2

– South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number: 140P5424R0003 for the Remodeling/Renovation of the Headquarters Conference and Breakroom located within Everglades National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 04:00 PM EST on January 29, 2024. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

If you will not be available on January 29, 2024, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.

Alternate POC:

Alternate POC Phone Number:

Alternate POC Email Address:

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT REFERENCED

Contract or Identifying Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief Description:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency / Company:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

EVALUATION

Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions: The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

5BEXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

0BVERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

1BSATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

2BMARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

3BUNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

4BNOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

Unable to provide assessment.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Comments, if any.

QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Shipments

Comments, if any.

QUESTION 5: OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: