6 - Evaluation Criteria Template - LPTA.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q0336
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria template for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement related to a Mardi Gras fencing project for the VA Medical Center in New Orleans. The evaluation will be based on two factors: Technical Capabilities (evaluated on a pass/fail basis) and Price (evaluated for fairness and reasonableness). The technical factor requires offerors to demonstrate sufficient trained personnel for fence construction, capacity to deliver certification results on time, and adequate quality control procedures.
This template is tied to solicitation 36C25625Q0336, which requires installation of 3,200 linear feet of 6x12 temporary fence panels with bases around the VA Medical Center perimeter. The work must be performed between February 5-22, 2025, with removal after Mardi Gras on March 6, 2025. The procurement is a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business set-aside under NAICS 561790, with quotes due January 24, 2025, at 1:00 PM CT. A site visit is scheduled for January 14, 2025, at 10:00 AM CST, and questions are due by January 16, 2025.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25625Q0336 Modification 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q0336.docx | DOCX document | |
| WAGE DETERMINATION 2015-5189 REV 29.txt | TXT text file | |
| 2 -Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| Site Visit - Mardis Gras Fence - Southeast Louisiana VHCS.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Template Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
Basis of Award:
A Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable procurement is being conducted. As such, award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the non-cost factor. Past Performance history will be considered for responsibility determination purposes only (FAR 9.104-1(c). The evaluation factors are as follows:
Factor 1-Technical Factor 2-Price
Under the ‘technical factor,’ each offeror’s responses will be evaluated on a ‘pass/fail’ basis or ‘acceptable/unacceptable’ basis. This determination will be based on the offeror demonstrating in its proposal a technical solution that minimally meets the technical requirements specified in the Solicitation’s Statement of Work.
Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.
Factor 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES: Offerors must submit relevant information demonstrating technical capability to satisfactorily perform the following requirement as expressed in the Statement of Work in the Solicitation
1. Sufficient number of trained and qualified personnel to conduct the specified fence construction.
2. Sufficient capacity to deliver certification results on a timely basis specified in the Statement of Work.
3. Sufficient quality control policies, processes, and procedures to ensure contract compliance.
Factor 2 – PRICE: Prices will be evaluated on the basis of price fairness and reasonableness.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .