6-ANGETL 24-02 ANG Design Objectives & Procedures (Rev 10Sep2025).pdf

10 SEP 2025

AIR NATIONAL GUARD

DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES

ANG ETL 24-02

05 APR 2024

Change 1, 10 SEP 2025

ENGINEERING TECHNICAL LETTER (ETL)

AIR NATIONAL GUARD DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES

Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/)

Change No.

Date Location

01 10 SEP 2025 page 23, Ch 1, Clarified ANGETL applicability.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 24, Ch 1, Added reference to Department of Air Force

Guidance Memorandum (DAFGM) 2024-32-01 Civil Engineer Control Systems Security.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 29-34, Ch 3, Corrected administrative errors.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 30-31, Ch 3, Replaced DoDSAFE with “current

Construction Management Information System (CMIS)”.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 32-33, Ch 3, Added paragraphs for Wing Safety, Wing Corrosion Manager, and CMIS.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 35-42, Ch 4, Clarified design process.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 69, Ch 6, Added Explosive Site Plan Certificate of

Compliance as an Appendix to the Basis of Design (BOD).

01 10 SEP 2025 page 70, Ch 6, Clarified that GBCI or GBI may be used for

Third Party Certification (TPC).

01 10 SEP 2025 page 97, Ch 9, Added Brand Name Specification requirements.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 108, Ch 10, Added sentence “Indicate the estimate class on the cover sheet of the estimate.”

01 10 SEP 2025 page 113, Ch 10, Added paragraph on Cost Estimate

Review process.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 114, Ch 10, Clarified when a Cost and Schedule Risk

Analysis (CSRA) is mandatory.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 115, Ch 10, Clarified when a Value Engineering Study

(VES)is mandatory.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 126, Ch 12, Added “The following electronic deliverables are optional and should be negotiated during the Criteria Review Conference (CRC): Revit file and BIM model demonstration, Bluebeam file.”

01 10 SEP 2025 page 138, Ch 13, Clarified when the A-E is to complete the BOD, Part I (Design Intent).

01 10 SEP 2025 page 147-150, Ch 14, Added deliverables required for SCIF/SAPF projects.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 155, Ch 14, Clarified when CSRA requirement.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 160-162, Ch 15, Added deliverables required for

SCIF/SAPF projects.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 169-171, Ch 16, Added deliverables required for

SCIF/SAPF projects.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 182, Ch 18, Changed title to Revisions to Contract

Documents. Clarified when these services are typically provided.

Change 1, 10 SEP 2025

01 10 SEP 2025 page 189, Ch 19, Changed title. Clarified reference to FAR 52.236-23. Clarified when Type C services contract must be awarded.

Clarified when the Contract Line Item (CLIN) for the Code and Criteria Revie (CCR) will be included in the Type C services contract.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 190-193, Added Ch 20, Post Construction Award Services (Type C Services)

01 10 SEP 2025 page 201, Attach 1, Removed Installation and/or Wing Commander signature line.

01 10 SEP 2025 page 201, Attach 1, Added NGB/SEW signature line (for projects that involve an Explosive Site Plan (ESP)).

01 10 SEP 2025 page 201, Attach 1, Added “(recommended)” under the State Agency Representative signature line.

10 SEP 2025 page 201, Attach 1, Added Wing Corrosion Manager signature line.

01 10 SEP 2025 FSRM and MILCON Certifications: Clarified statement. “The total estimated Base plus Option Line Items (OLIs) or Additive Bid Items (ABIs) \1\ should be /1/ at or below the Maximum Construction Cost (MCC).”

01 10 SEP 2025 FSRM Certifications: Replaced signatures.

BCE signature is mandatory. NGB/A4I Project Manager and FSRM Program Manager signatures are required if the Current Working Estimate (CWE) exceeds the Maximum Construction Cost (MCC) and/or Scope does not meet DAFI 32-1020.

01 10 SEP 2025 MILCON Certifications: Replaced signatures. BCE signature is mandatory.

NGB/A4I Project Manager and MILCON Program Manager signatures are required if the CWE exceeds MCC and/or Scope does not meet DAFI 32-1020.

Attachments 9, 12, 15, and 18: Added FF&E, SCIF/SAPF, Corrosion, and Cost Estimate deliverables.

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 235-238. Attach 21, Added Basis of Estimate

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 239-241. Attach 22: Added Common Design Review Comments

01 10 SEP 2025 pages 242-244. Attach 23: Added Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA) Statement of Work (SoW).

This ANG ETL supersedes ANG ETL 10-03, dated 16 April 2010

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

FOREWORD

In accordance with Air Force Instruction 32-1023, the Chiefs of the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and Air Force Reserve develop supplementary instructions and or guidance unique to the Air National Guard (ANG) and Air Force Reserve Component (AFRC) construction programs and oversee management of their respective programs. In accordance with Title 10, U.S.C. Chapter 133 Service, Supply, Procurement, the ANG and the AFRC facilities programs are executed under Title 10. U.S.C., Chapter 1803. As such they may coordinate with Air Force Installation Mission Support Center (AFIMSC) and portions of Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), but execute under Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1803.

Air National Guard Engineering Technical Letters (ANG ETLs) provide requirements (i.e., defined by users and operational needs) and are intended for use with unified technical requirements published in DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). ANG ETLs are applicable only to the Air National Guard, and do not represent unified DoD requirements. Differences in requirements between DoD Components as well as local and state agencies may exist due to differences in policies and operational needs.

The UFC system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007G Standard Practice Unified Facilities Criteria, Facilities Criteria and Unified Facilities Guide Specifications and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applicable to the Military Departments, Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities. The UFC System also includes technical and functional requirements for specific facility types. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group.

ANG ETLs are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Military Department’s responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction.

ANG ETLs are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source:

• Whole Building Design Guide web site https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/ang/engineering-technical-letters-angetl

Refer to UFC 1-200-01, General Building Requirements, for implementation of new issuances on projects.

POINT OF CONTACT: The point of contact for this ANGETL is Ms. Mindy Leach, Architect of the Air National Guard, mindy.leach.2@us.af.mil

CHAD R. CALLAN, GS-15, DAF, P.E.

Associate Director, Engineering National Guard Bureau https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/ang/engineering-technical-letters-angetl https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/ang/engineering-technical-letters-angetl mailto:mindy.leach.2@us.af.mil

Change 1, 10 SEP 2025

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ETL

REVISION SUMMARY SHEET

Document: ANG ETL 24-02, Air National Guard Design Objectives and Procedures

Superseding: ANG ETL 24-02, Air National Guard Design Objectives and Procedures, 05 April 2025

Description: This ETL provides specific guidance on how and when to provide a project design deliverable for the ANG. This document is organized into design deliverables and design phases. Requirements for design deliverables, beyond or in more detail of what is already required by a Core UFC, are provided for ANG-only. The requirements for when or to what extent these deliverables are provided are in the Phase chapters.

Reasons for Document: Update procedures to coordinate with current commercial and government standards, procedures, and governing UFC’s.

Impact: Improve efficiency and consistency of design procedures across ANG.

Unification Issues: Design and Submittal procedures contained herein are pertinent to standards, software, and templates used, required, and unified within the ANG, and centered around the ANG organization and operation. ANG activities may be located on active-duty air force bases, air reserve bases, naval air stations/joint reserve bases, or ANG bases and stations which are either independent military facilities or collocated as tenants on civilian-controlled joint civil-military airports. Therefore, design procedures for ANG activities may differ from NAVFAC, USACE, and Air Force operations due to organizational and operational differences.

vii

05 April 2024

FOREWORD

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ETL REVISION SUMMARY SHEET

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1-1.1 Organization of Document

1-2 APPLICABILITY

1-3 GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

1-4 CYBERSECURITY

1-5 DEVIATIONS, EXCLUSIONS, OR MODIFICATIONS

1-6 REFERENCES

1-7 GLOSSARY

1-8 ATTACHMENTS

CHAPTER 2 POLICY

2-1 CRITERIA

2-2 METRIC POLICY

2-2.1 SI Definitions

2-2.2 General Policy

2-3 OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND DATA

2-4 OPERATION SECURITY (OPSEC)

2-4.1 OPSEC Review

2-4.2 Mission Information

2-4.3 Information Compilation

2-4.4 Sensitive or Critical Information

2-5 REGISTRATION

2-5.1 Certification

2-6 PROHIBITION OF POSTING CUI DESIGN DELIVERABLES ON UNSECURED

SERVERS

CHAPTER 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITES

3-1 CONTRACTING

3-2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

3-3 DESIGN MANAGEMENT

3-3.1 \1\ Installations Division (NGB/A4I). /1/ viii

3-3.2 Civil Engineer Technical \1\ Branch (CETB). /1/

3-3.3 Base Civil Engineer (BCE)

3-3.4 Base Using Activity (User)

3-3.5 Design Working Group (DWG)

3-3.6 Base Environmental Manager (BEM)

3-3.7 Site Security Manager (SSM)

\1\ 3-3.8 Wing Safety. /1/

\1\ 3-3.9 Wing Corrosion Manager. /1/

3-4 DESIGNER OF RECORD

3-4.1 Coordination with Air National Guard Bureau and Design Working Group. .. 33

\1\ 3-4.2 Construction Management Information System. /1/

3-4.3 Response to Review Comments

3-4.4 Final Approval

CHAPTER 4 OVERVIEW OF THE DESIGN PROCESS

CHAPTER 5 DELIVERABLE: FIELD INVESTIGATION

5-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

5-2 RESPONSIBILITIES

5-3 COORDINATION

5-4 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

5-5 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

5-5.1 Existing Information

5-5.2 Foundations and Soils Investigation

5-5.3 Geotechnical Report

5-5.4 Boring Logs

5-5.5 Foundation and Site Preparation

5-5.6 Airfield Pavements Evaluations

5-6 FIRE PROTECTION INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEY

5-6.1 Utilities and Infrastructure

5-6.2 Site and Building Surveys

5-6.3 Building Additions

5-7 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

5-7.1 Permits ix

5-7.2 Regulatory Notifications

5-7.3 Field Investigations

5-7.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)

5-7.5 Paint

5-7.6 Beryllium

5-7.7 Radon

5-7.8 Polychlorinated Biphenyls

5-7.9 Low-Level Radioactive Components

5-7.10 Animal Droppings

5-7.11 Mold and Spores

5-7.12 Storage Tanks

5-7.13 Contaminated Soil or Groundwater

5-7.14 Control and Management of Solid and Hazardous Waste

5-7.15 Other Environmental Requirements

5-7.16 Chlordane

5-8 COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 6 DELIVERABLE: BASIS OF DESIGN

6-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

6-2 FORMAT

6-3 PART I – DESIGN INTENT

6-3.1 Cover Sheet

6-3.2 Tab A

6-3.3 Tab B

6-3.4 Tab C

6-3.5 Tab D

6-3.6 Tab E

6-3.7 Tab F

6-4 PART II – DESIGN NARRATIVE

6-4.1 SUSTAINABILITY

6-4.2 ANTITERRORISM (AT)

6-4.3 GEOTECHNICAL

6-4.4 CIVIL

x

6-4.5 STRUCTURAL

6-4.6 FIRE PROTECTION

6-4.7 CYBERSECURITY

6-4.8 TELECOMMUNICATIONS

6-4.9 ARCHITECTURE

6-4.10 ELECTRICAL

6-4.11 MECHANICAL

CHAPTER 7 DELIVERABLE: CALCULATIONS

7-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

7-2 COMPUTER GENERATED CALCULATIONS

7-3 FORMAT

7-4 SUSTAINABILITY

7-5 GEOTECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

7-6 CIVIL

7-6.1 Low Impact Development (LID)

7-7 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

7-7.1 Calculations and Test Reports for Antiterrorism

7-7.2 Design for Lateral Forces

7-7.3 Computer Generated Calculations

7-8 FIRE PROTECTION CALCULATIONS

7-8.1 Hydraulic Demand Analysis

7-8.2. Fire Pumps

7-8.3. Fire Alarm/Detection and Reporting Systems

7-9 ARCHITECTURE

7-10 ELECTRICAL

7-11 MECHANICAL

CHAPTER 8 DELIVERABLE: DRAWINGS

8-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

8-2 PRESENTATION

8-3 PROPER USE OF NOTES ON DRAWINGS

8-4 CODE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY SHEET(S)

8-4.1 Building Code Site Plan xi

8-4.2 Building Code Summary

8-4.3 Life Safety Code Summary

8-4.4 Life Safety Plans

8-5 CIVIL DRAWINGS

8-5.1 Cover Sheet, Drawing Index, Vicinity Map, Location Plan, Abbreviations, Legend, and Notes, or First Civil Sheet

8-5.2 Demolition Plan

8-5.3 Site Plan

8-5.4 Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan

8-5.5 Water, Storm, and Sanitary Sewer Profiles

8-5.6 Grading and Drainage Plan

8-5.7 Site / Utility Details

8-6 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

8-6.1 Landscape Demolition Plan

8-6.2 Landscape Site Plan

8-6.3 Landscape Construction Details

8-6.4 Landscape Planting Plan

8-6.5 Plant Material Schedule Details

8-6.6 Landscape Irrigation Plan

8-6.7 Irrigation Equipment Schedule and Detail

8-7 GEOTECHNICAL DRAWINGS

8-8 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND NOTES

8-9 FIRE PROTECTION

8-9.1 Fire Sprinkler System

8-9.2 Fire Suppression Detail Sheets

8-9.3 Fire Alarm / Mass Notification System Plans

8-9.4 Fire Alarm / Mass Notification Detail Sheets

CHAPTER 9 DELIVERABLE: SPECIFICATIONS

9-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

9-2 GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

9-2.1 Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS)

9-2.2 Other Guide Specifications xii

9-2.3 UFGS Selection Order of Precedence

9-2.4 Design-Build Performance Technical Specifications

9-3 PROJECT PREPARATIONS POLICIES AND GUIDANCE

9-3.1 UFGS Version Date

9-3.2 Editing of Specifications for Project

9-3.3 Standard Plates, Sketches, and Details

9-3.4 Salient Characteristics

9-3.5 Contract Parties

9-4 COORDINATION OF SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS

9-4.1 DBB Contract Order of Precedence

9-4.2 DB Contract Order of Precedence

9-4.3 Coordination

9-5 USE OF UFGS AND SPECSINTACT

9-6 SPECIFICATIONS PACKAGE ORGANIZING STRUCTURE

9-6.1 Coversheet

9-6.2 Contract Documents

9-6.3 Format

9-6.4 General Requirements (Division 00 and 01) Specifications

9-6.5 Design-Build RFP

9-6.6 Project Reports

9-6.7 Combining Multiple Projects into One Solicitation Package

CHAPTER 10 COST ESTIMATES, RISK ANALYSIS, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES, AND

VALUE ENGINEERING

10-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

10-2 ESTIMATE CLASS STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

10-3 ESTIMATE DEVELOPMENT AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

10-3.1 User Generated Items

10-3.2 Level of Detail

10-3.3 Basis of Estimate

\1\ 10-4 COST ESTIMATE REVIEW. /1/

10-5 COST AND SCHEDULE RISK ANALYSIS (CSRA)

10-6 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

xiii

10-7 VALUE ENGINEERING STUDIES (VES)

10-7.1 VE/VA Team Requirements

10-7.2 VES Kick Off Meeting

10-7.3 Value Engineering Workshop (VEW)

10-7.4 VEW Preparations

10-7.5 VEW Process

10-7.6 VES Report

CHAPTER 11 DELIVERABLE: DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

11-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

11-2 DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INTRODUCTION

11-3 DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PRPOSAL FORMAT AND DOCUMENTS

11-3.1 RFP Format

11-4 DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENT PREPARATION. .. 121

11-4.1 Combining Multiple RFPs into One Bid Package

11-5 RFP ELECTRONIC DELIVERABLES

11-6 DB DESIGN SUBMITTALS

11-7 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

11-7.1 Locations of DB Submittal Requirements

11-7.2 Government Approval and Surveillance of DB Submittals

CHAPTER 12 ELECTRONIC DESIGN DELIVERABLES (EDD) FORMAT

12-1 SUMMARY

12-2 ELECTRONIC DESIGN DELIVERABLES (EDD)

12-3 EDD FORMAT REQUIRMENTS

12-3.1 Specifications

12-3.2 Drawings

12-3.3 Drawing Support Files

12-3.4 Cost Estimates

12-3.5 Preliminary Design Documents

12-3.6 Final Design Documents

12-3.7 Record Documents

12-4 EDD MEDIA AND ORGANIZATION

12-4.1 General xiv

12-4.2 Minimum Final Submittal Requirements

12-4.3 Minimum Record Drawing Submittal Requirements

CHAPTER 13 PHASE: PRELIMINARY DESIGN (TYPE A-1, 15%, CONCEPT PROPOSAL)

SUBMITTALS

13-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

13-2 DESIGN-BUILD CONCEPT PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

13-3 BASIS OF DESIGN

13-3.1 Geotechnical

13-3.2 Sustainability

13-3.3 Cybersecurity

13-4 Type A-1 CONCEPT PROPOSAL MEETING and DEVELOPMENT

13-4.1 DRAWINGS

13-5 CALCULATIONS

13-6 SUSTAINABILITY

13-6.1 ANG Sustainability Requirements Score Sheet High Performance Sustainable Building Compliance

13-6.2 Third Party Certification (TPC)

13-7 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

13-8 CONCEPT PROPOSAL (Type A-1, 15%) CERTIFICATION FORM

13-9 CONCEPT PROPOSAL (Type A-1, 15%) CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT MEETING

CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 14 PHASE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN (TYPE A-2, 35%) SUBMITTALS

14-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

14-2 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (Type A-2, 35%) MEETING

14-3 BASIS OF DESIGN

14-3.1 Sustainability

14-4 DRAWINGS

14-4.1 Architectural

14-4.2 Interior Design

14-4.3 Landscape Architecture

14-4.4 Geotechnical

14-4.5 Civil

14-4.6 Structural xv

14-4.7 Mechanical

14-4.8 Electrical

14-4.9 Fire Protection

\1\ 14-5 SCIF/SAPF FIXED FACILITY CHECKLIST ATTACHMENTS /1/

\1\ 14-6 SCIF/SAPF TEMPEST CHECKLIST ATTACHMENTS /1/

14-7 OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS

14-8 CALCULATIONS

14-8.1 Structural and Geotechnical

14-8.2 Civil

14-8.3 Architectural

14-8.4 Mechanical

14-6.5 Electrical

14-8.6 Fire Protection

14-9 REPORTS

14-9.1 Report – Asbestos Containing Materials

14-9.2 Report – Paint

14-9.3 Report – Beryllium

14-9.4 Report – Radon

14-9.5 Report – Polychlorinated Biphenyls

14-9.6 Report – Low-Level Radioactive Components

14-9.7 Report – Animal Droppings

14-9.8 Report – Mold and Spores

14-9.9 Report – Tanks

14-9.10 Report – Contaminated Soil or Groundwater

14-9.11 Report – Waste Characterization

14-9.12 Report – Chlordane

14-10 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION

14-10.1 Review

14-10.2 Documentation

14-11 DESIGN ANALYSIS OF ANTITERRORISM PROVISIONS

14-12 PERMIT APPLICATIONS

14-13 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

xvi

\1\ 14-14 COST AND SCHEDULE RISK ANALYSIS /1/

14-15 HPSB CHECKLIST(S) AND TPC CHECKLIST(S)

14-15.1 ANG Sustainability Requirements Score Sheet High Performance Sustainable Building Compliance

14-15.2 TPC Checklist

14-16 PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE

14-17 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (Type A-2, 35%) CERTIFICATION FORM

14-18 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (Type A-2, 35%) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

14-19 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (Type A-2, 35%) PRESENTATION

CHAPTER 15 PHASE: TYPE B-1 (65% DESIGN) SUBMITTALS

15-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

15-2 TYPE B-1 (65% DESIGN) CONTRACT DOCUMENTS DEVELOPMENT

MEETING (CDDM)

15-3 BASIS OF DESIGN

15-3.1 Sustainability

15-4 DRAWINGS

15-4.1 Architectural

15-4.2 Interior Design

15-4.3 Landscape Architecture

15-4.4 Civil

15-4.5 Structural

15-4.6 Mechanical

15-4.7 Electrical

15-4.8 Fire Protection

\1\ 15-5 SCIF/SAPF FIXED FACILITY CHECKLIST ATTACHMENTS /1/

\1\ 15-6 SCIF/SAPF TEMPEST CHECKLIST ATTACHMENTS /1/

15-7 SPECIFICATIONS

15-8 CALCULATIONS

15-8.1 Structural and Geotechnical

15-8.2 Civil

15-8.3 Architectural

15-8.4 Mechanical xvii

15-8.5 Electrical

15-9 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION

15-9.1 Review

15-9.2 Documentation

15-10 PERMIT APPLICATIONS

15-11 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

15-12 HPSB CHECKLIST(S) AND TPC CHECKLIST(S)

15-12.1 ANG Sustainability Requirements Score Sheet High Performance Sustainable Building Compliance

15-12.2 TPC Checklist

15-13 PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE

15-14 TYPE B-1 (65% DESIGN) CERTIFICATION FORM

15-15 TYPE B-1 (65% DESIGN) CDDM CHECKLIST

15-16 CONTRACT DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT MEETING MINUTES

CHAPTER 16 PHASE: TYPE B-2 (100% PRE-FINAL DESIGN) SUBMITTALS

16-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

16-2 BASIS OF DESIGN

16-2.1 Geotechnical

16-2.2 Sustainability

16-3 DRAWINGS

16-3.1 Civil

16-3.2 Landscape Architecture

16-3.3 Electrical

\1\ 16-4 SCIF/SAPF Fixed Facility Checklist Attachments /1/

\1\ 16-5 SCIF/SAPF TEMPEST Checklist Attachments /1/

16-6 SPECIFICATIONS

16-6.1 Sustainability

16-6.2 Environmental

16-7 INTERIOR DESIGN

16-7.1 Structural Interior Design (SID)

16-7.2 FF&E

16-8 CALCULATIONS

xviii

16-8.1 Mechanical

16-8.2 Electrical

16-9 STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

16-10 DRAFT DD FORM 1354

16-11 DB RFP DEVELOPMENT

16-12 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION

16-12.1 Review

16-12.2 Documentation

16-13 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

16-14 HPSB CHECKLIST(S) AND TPC CHECKLIST(S)

16-14.1 ANG Sustainability Requirements Score Sheet High Performance Sustainable Building Compliance

16-14.2 TPC Checklist

16-15 TYPE B-2 (100% PRE-FINAL DESIGN) CERTIFICATION FORM

16-16 TYPE B-2 (100% PRE-FINAL DESIGN) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 17 PHASE: TYPE B-3 (100% FINAL DESIGN) SUBMITTALS

17-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

17-2 BASIS OF DESIGN

17-2.1 Geotechnical

17-2.2 Sustainability

17-3 DRAWINGS

17-3.1 Plotstamp Record

17-3.2 Design-Build Shop Drawings

17-4 SPECIFICATIONS

17-4.1 Sustainability

17-4.2 Environmental

17-4.3 Design-Build Design Submittal Specifications

17-4.4 Report Source File

17-5 CONTRACTING DOCUMENTS

17-6 INTERIOR DESIGN

17-6.1 Structural Interior Design (SID)

17-6.2 FF&E

xix

17-7 CALCULATIONS

17-8 DRAFT FORM DD 1354

17-9 STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

17-10 RFP

17-10.1 Report Source File

17-11 FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT

17-12 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION

17-12.1 Review

17-12.2 Documentation

17-12.3 Design-Build Quality Control

17-13 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

17-14 HPSB CHECKLIST(S) AND TPC CHECKLIST(S)

17-14.1 ANG Sustainability Requirements Score Sheet High Performance Sustainable Building Compliance

17-14.2 TPC Checklist

17-15 TYPE B-3 (100% FINAL DESIGN) CERTIFICATION FORM

17-16 TYPE B-3 (100% FINAL DESIGN) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 18 PHASE: REVISIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

18-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

18-2 CHANGE NUMBERS

18-3 COST ESTIMATE CHANGES

18-4 CHANGE FORMAT

18-4.1 Language Format

18-4.2 Continuation Sheet

18-4.3 Proposed Change Sheet

18-4.4 Drawing Changes and Sketches

\1\ CHAPTER 19 PHASE: PROCUREMENT SUPPORT SERVICES / PRE CONSTRUCTION

AWARD SERVICES (TYPE C SERVICES CONTRACT) /1/

19-1 PRE-PROPOSAL/PRE-BID INQUIRES (PPI/PBI)

19-2 Cost Estimate

19-3 Code and Criteria Review (CCR)

\1\ CHAPTER 20 PHASE: POST CONSTRUCTION AWARD SERVICES (TYPE C SERVICES) /1/

xx

\1\ 20-1 MEETINGS AND COMMUNCIATION /1/

\1\ 20-2 DOCUMENTATION AND RECORD KEEPING/1/

\1\ 20-3 SUBMITTAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL /1/

\1\ 20-4 TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND DESIGN SUPPORT /1/

\1\ 20-5 PAYMENT REVIEW AND REOCMMENDATION /1/

\1\ 20-6 PROGRESS MONITORING AND REPORTING. /1/

\1\ 20-7 PRE-PROPOSAL/PRE-BID INQUIRES (PPI/PBI) /1/

\1\ 20-8 COMMISSIONING AND TESTING /1/

\1\ 20-9 PROJECT CLOSEOUT /1/

APPENDIX A REFERENCES

APPENDIX B GLOSSARY

APPENDIX C ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1 BASIS OF DESIGN COVER SHEET

ATTACHMENT 2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN thru DESIGN SCHEDULE

ATTACHMENT 3 CRITERIA REVIEW CONFERENCE

ATTACHMENT 4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN (Type A-1, 15%, Concept Proposal) FSRM Certification

ATTACHMENT 5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN (Type A-1, 15%, Concept Proposal) MILCON Certification

ATTACHMENT 6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN (Type A-1, 15%, Concept Proposal) Checklist

ATTACHMENT 7 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (Type A-2, 35%) FSRM Certification

ATTACHMENT 8 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (Type A-2, 35%) MILCON Certification

ATTACHMENT 9 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (Type A-2, 35%) Checklist

ATTACHMENT 10 DESIGN (Type B-1, 65%) FSRM Certification

ATTACHMENT 11 DESIGN (Type B-1, 65%) MILCON Certification

ATTACHMENT 12 DESIGN (Type B-1, 65%) Checklist

ATTACHMENT 13 DESIGN (Type B-2, 100% PREFINAL) FSRM Certification xxi

ATTACHMENT 14 DESIGN (Type B-2, 100% PREFINAL) MILCON Certification

ATTACHMENT 15 DESIGN (Type B-2, 100% PREFINAL) Checklist

ATTACHMENT 16 DESIGN (Type B-3, 100% FINAL) FSRM Certification

ATTACHMENT 17 DESIGN (Type B-3, 100% FINAL) MILCON Certification

ATTACHMENT 18 DESIGN (Type B-3, 100% FINAL) Checklist

ATTACHMENT 19

REVIEW COMMENTS

ATTACHMENT 20

COST ESTIMATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

\1\ ATTACHMENT 21

BASIS OF ESTIMATE /1/

\1\ ATTACHMENT 22

COMMON DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS /1/

\1\ ATTACHMENT 23

COST AND SCHEDULE RISK ANALYSIS STATEMENT OF WORK /1/

xxii

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE.

The Air National Guard (ANG) Design Objectives and Procedures, developed by the National Guard Bureau (NGB)/A4I, is established to define the overall objectives in accomplishing the ANG facilities design and construction management program and the procedures to be followed in achieving that end.

1-1.1 Organization of Document.

This document is organized into design policy, roles and responsibilities, design deliverables, and design phases. The design deliverables chapters contain general requirements that apply throughout the design process. For the disciplines, additional information is provided only if it is not already in another UFC; thus, a discipline paragraph may not be provided if the Core UFC already provides the requirements for that deliverable, or the level of completion of that deliverable. Core UFCs are defined and listed in UFC 1-200-01, DoD Building Code.

1-2 APPLICABILITY.

This document is applicable to both Design-Bid-Build (DBB) and Design-Build (DB) projects. Regardless of the execution method (i.e., offload to USACE, NAVFAC, etc.;

Appendix 1031; Facility, Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Cooperative Agreement (FSRMCA); or Military Construction Cooperative Agreement (MCCA), this document must be referenced and incorporated into all \1\ agreements and /1/ contracts for pre-design; design; post design/pre-construction award; and post construction award \1\ services /1/ for ANG projects.

1-3 GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

Comply with UFC 1-200-01, DoD Building Code, and UFC 1-200-02, High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements. Use UFC 1-200-02 in conjunction with UFC 1- 200-01 and the UFC and government criteria referenced therein. UFC 1- 200-01 provides applicability of model building codes and government-unique criteria for typical design disciplines and building systems, as well as for accessibility, antiterrorism, physical security, cybersecurity, high performance and sustainability requirements, and safety. UFC 1-200-02 provides minimum unified requirements and coordinating guidance for planning, designing, constructing, renovating, and maintaining high performance and sustainable facilities that will enhance DoD mission capability by reducing total ownership costs. Use this document in addition to UFC 1-200-01, UFC 1- 200-02, and the UFC and government criteria referenced therein.

Note: Paragraph 1-5.2 of UFC 1-200-01, DoD Building Code states the Building Official/Authority Having Jurisdiction represents the DoD design and construction agent responsible for accomplishing the project. The Design Working Group should incorporate other agencies (e.g., Airport authority, active-duty host, etc.), as applicable to the project.

1-4 CYBERSECURITY.

Plan, design, acquire, execute and maintain all facility-related control systems (including systems separate from a utility monitoring and control system) in accordance with UFC 4-010-06, Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems \1\ and Department of the Air Force Guidance Memorandum (DAFGM) 2024-32-01 Civil Engineer Control Systems Cybersecurity. /1/

\1\ Control system cybersecurity implementation is applicable even in non-secure spaces. /1/

Cybersecurity is implemented to mitigate vulnerabilities to all DoD real property facility-related control systems to a level that is acceptable to the System Owner and Authorizing Official.

1-5 DEVIATIONS, EXCLUSIONS, OR MODIFICATIONS.

Any deviations, exclusions, or modifications to the ANG Design Objectives and Procedures requirements in A-E contracts requires pre-approval of the NGB A4I Division Chief.

1-6 REFERENCES.

Appendix A contains a list of references used in this document. The publication date of the code or standard is not included in this document. In general, the latest available issuance of the reference is used.

1-7 GLOSSARY.

Appendix B contains abbreviations.

1-8 ATTACHMENTS.

Appendix C contains the attachments referenced in this document.

CHAPTER 2 POLICY

2-1 CRITERIA.

Design Air National Guard (ANG) facilities in accordance with all ANG and Department of Defense (DoD) Criteria. DoD Design Criteria are available from the Whole Building Design Guide web site (https://www.wbdg.org). Design criteria include general criteria, as well as specific criteria on particular elements of the work and facility types. Design requirements are typically in the form of Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). The contract will reference the specific requirements applicable to a particular project.

2-2 METRIC POLICY.

Comply with MIL-STD-3007 for the use of SI in projects and criteria documents.

2-2.1 SI Definitions.

Hard Metric measurement: The actual size, capacity, or other measurement characteristic of a product is changed to a rational metric value. This measurement is used in the manufacturing process.

Soft Metric measurement: A simple arithmetical change from inch/pound to SI units, using a conversion factor, so that actual measurable characteristics remain virtually unchanged, or at least within the former tolerance limits.

2-2.2 General Policy.

In accordance with Public Law 94-168, design and construction of new or renovated facilities must use the metric system of measurement, unless its use is impractical or is likely to cause significant inefficiencies or loss of markets to United States firms. Specify hard metric products unless such products are unavailable or uneconomical. Do not use dual units on drawings on any type of project. The design agent project manager is responsible for making the determination on whether or not to use the metric system of measurement on a project-by-project basis. Decisions to not use the metric system must be justifiable and documented in permanent project files.

2-3 OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND DATA.

The clauses set forth in DFAR 252.227-7023, Drawings and Other Data to Become Property of Government, DFAR 227.71, Rights in Technical Data, and DFAR 227.72 Rights in Computer Software and Computer Software Documentation, apply to all project documents and data.

2-4 OPERATION SECURITY (OPSEC).

The OPSEC process provides a means of screening information prior to public release in order to prevent aggregation with other information, ultimately revealing DoD intentions or capabilities. Publicly released documents such as field investigations, reports, studies, Basis of Design, calculations, drawings, specifications, or Design-Build https://www.wbdg.org/

Request for Proposals (RFP) must not reveal sensitive or critical information.

2-4.1 OPSEC Review.

Include an OPSEC review by the Base’s OPSEC Manager as part of the normal review process; prior to public release to identify any information that may require protection.

Where applicable, modify details and identifying information in order to eliminate information the Base OPSEC Manager has identified as sensitive or critical.

2-4.2 Mission Information.

DoD installations support units and missions that may be considered sensitive, critical or even classified. In addition, every DoD command performs a core, unclassified mission.

Although unclassified, individual tasks required for a command to accomplish its mission may contain information that when pieced together with other information, reveal sensitive, critical, or even classified information.

2-4.3 Information Compilation.

The compilation of information that is individually unclassified may be classified as a result of the compilation. Classification requires a classification decision by an Original Classification Authority (OCA).

2-4.4 Sensitive or Critical Information.

Sensitive or critical information is unclassified or controlled unclassified information (CUI) concerning the DoD activities, intentions, capabilities, limitations, or vulnerabilities. The following is provided to help avoid the disclosure of sensitive or critical information that must not be included in any publicly releasable material (e.g., BOD, drawings, specifications, etc.).

• Do not identify a command if their mission or portion of their mission is considered critical or classified

• Do not identify a command’s mission or the mission supported by a facility if the mission is considered critical or classified

• Do not identify the capabilities or vulnerabilities of physical security or antiterrorism protective measures.

• Do not identify the location of a Sensitive Compartmented Information

Facility (SCIF)

• Do not identify location of a Special Access Program Facility (SAPF)

• Do not identify Defense Critical Infrastructure

• Do not identify the location of Communications Security (COMSEC)

Equipment.

• Do not identify Take Charge and Move Out (TACAMO) systems or mission.

• Do not identify Nuclear Command, Control and Communications (NC3) systems or mission

• Do not identify Military Strategic and Tactical Relay (MILSTAR) systems or mission

• Do not identify Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) systems or mission

• Do not identify purpose or frequency range of antennas or communication systems

• Do not identify Low Frequency (LF) or Very Low Frequency (VLF) transmission systems, missions, or specific location or site of the LF or VLF system.

Sensitive area locations such as SCIF and SAPF, may be labeled as "Controlled Area," “Secure Area,” or "Restricted Area” and may be shown on public releasable documents with the approval from the Base’s Site Security Manager or Officer.

2-5 REGISTRATION

Develop project documents under the direction of a Registered Architect or a Professional Engineer currently licensed in accordance with FAR 52.236-25 Requirements for Registration of Designers.

Each drawing must only be signed, sealed, and dated by the Registered Architect or the Professional Engineer who is registered to practice in the particular field involved for work depicted on that drawing, serves as the Designer of Record (DOR) for that work, and complies with requirements of FAR 52.236-25. Sign Record Documents in accordance with Chapter 12, Electronic Design Deliverables (EDD) Format.

2-5.1 Certification.

Where special certifications are required for the design, certify in accordance with the contract and local requirements.

2-6 PROHIBITION OF POSTING CUI DESIGN DELIVERABLES ON UNSECURED

SERVERS.

Design deliverables may contain Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) such as For Official Use Only (FOUO) or Department of Defense Unclassified Controlled Nuclear

Information (DoD UCNI). The release of this type of information into the public domain may compromise an installation or facility’s antiterrorism (AT) or physical security protective measures. Examples include the design analysis where the design basis threat (DBT) is an explosive weight and the location of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) or Special Access Program Facility (SAPF). Protect deliverables, such as drawings, specifications, calculations, cost estimates, and other design related information, that contain CUI, in accordance with DoDI 5200.48, Controlled Unclassified Information.

CHAPTER 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITES

3-1 CONTRACTING.

The Contracting Officer (KO) is the only individual who has the authority to obligate federal funds on a contract. The Contracting Officer may designate a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), usually the Base Civil Engineer (BCE). The COR is given limited authority, as defined in the appointment letter, to communicate with the A-E and construction contractor. The Contracting Officer (KO) is the only individual who has the authority to negotiate, enter into, or \1\ modify contracts. /1/

The Contracting Officer (KO) incorporates the consolidated submittal review comments in the issuance of the Notice To Proceeds to (Type A-1, 15%, Concept Proposal; Type A-2, 35% Concept Development; and to Type B-1, 65% Design) and submittal acceptance of (Type B-1, 65% Design; Type B-2, 100% Pre-Final Design; and Type B-3, 100% Final Design).

If the A-E proceeds with the design, or any changes to the design, without the express authority of the Contracting Officer, the A-E does so at its own risk.

3-2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.

The Asset Management Division (NGB/A4FD) of the Installations and Mission Support Directorate, Air National Guard Readiness Center, located at Joint Base Andrews, MD, plans, budgets, and reviews projects (e.g., Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM); Specified Major Military Construction (MILCON); and Unspecified Minor Military Construction (UMMC)).

NGB/A4FD releases MILCON, UMMC, and selected high cost, complex SRM projects, for Advance Planning to finalize programming documentation.

NGB/A4FD release projects for design once all programming documentation is complete and projects have been approved by the appropriate authority.

The NGB/A4FD Programmer reviews projects and provides his/her submittal review comments to the NGB/A4I Project Manager.

NGB/A4FD does not have the authority to direct changes to the contract. If the A-E interprets any direction given by \1\ NGB/A4FD /1/ as a change in contract requirements, the A-E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the NGB/A4I PM before taking any action.

3-3 DESIGN MANAGEMENT.

3-3.1 \1\ Installations Division (NGB/A4I). /1/

The \1\ Installations /1/ Division (NGB/A4I) of the Installations and Mission Support Directorate, Air National Guard Readiness Center, located at Joint Base Andrews, MD, provides management, oversight, and acceptance of construction projects, including criteria, designs, and project funding.

NGB/A4I is the only office with the authority to change or clarify design criteria.

NGB/A4I is the acceptance authority for all submittals that are required to be submitted to NGB/A4F and NGB/A4I. The NGB/A4I PM provides the KO and BCE the submittal acceptance with the attached BCE and A4I review comments.

NGB/A4I does not have the authority to direct changes to the contract. If the A-E interprets any direction given by NGB/A4I as a change in contract requirements, the A-E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the NGB/A4I PM before taking any action.

3-3.2 Civil Engineer Technical \1\ Branch (CETB). /1/

The Civil Engineer Technical \1\ Branch (CETB) /1/, NGB/A4IC, located in Minot, ND.

NGB/A4IC has engineers in all major disciplines and technicians involved in specialty areas, including aircraft arresting systems; petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) facilities;

airfield pavements; and fire suppression systems.

NGB/A4IC will forward all review comments to the BCE and NGB/A4I PM.

The Contracting Officer (KO) will incorporate the review comments in the issuance of the NTP or acceptance of the submittal, as applicable.

NGB/A4IC does not have the authority to direct changes to the contract. If the A-E interprets any direction given by NGB/A4IC as a change in contract requirements, the A- E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the NGB/A4I PM before taking any

3-3.3 Base Civil Engineer (BCE).

For projects requiring NGB funding and/or approval, the Base Civil Engineer (BCE) develops and submits required programming documents to NGB/A4FD \1\ through the current Construction Management Information System (CMIS) (e.g., use Programming, Budgeting and Justification (P, B & J) Tool, Kahua, etc.). /1/

The BCE is the Government’s local engineering management coordinator and usually serves as the COR for the A-E contract.

The BCE is responsible for furnishing the Construction Security Plan (CSP), Mission Assurance Category (MAC), and existing information of on-site conditions, including Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) sites, utility locations, etc., and is the point of contact for the A-E to meet with the Base’s other offices.

The BCE will:

(1) compile and edit all Base level submittal review comments;

(2) complete the respective certification (Reference Attachment 4, Attachment 5, Attachment 7, Attachment 8, Attachment 10, Attachment 11, Attachment 13, Attachment 14, Attachment 16, Attachment 17); and

(3) send the Base Review Comments, completed Certification and Checklist; and all submittal documents identified on the Checklist to the NGB/A4I Project Manager, NGB/A4F Programmer, and NGB/A4IC Civil Engineer \1\ Technical Branch (CETB) via the current Construction Management Information System

(CMIS). /1/

The BCE does not have authority to change design criteria or direct changes to the contract. If the A-E interprets any direction given by the BCE as a change in contract requirements, the A-E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer before taking any

3-3.4 Base Using Activity (User).

The Base Using Activity (User) will be the occupant of the facility being designed. The User, in coordination with the BCE, is responsible for providing the A-E with information on its operations and on special or unique equipment that will be in the facility.

The User reviews projects and provides his/her submittal review comments to the BCE.

The User does not have the authority to change design criteria or direct any changes to the contract. If the information supplied by the User appears to conflict with criteria provided in the contract, the A-E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and BCE before taking any action.

3-3.5 Design Working Group (DWG).

The Design Working Group (DWG) is established for each project through written appointment by the Facilities Board chairperson. The DWG is the Base’s team that is responsible for providing functional area requirements to the design team and ensures these requirements are incorporated throughout the design process. The BCE usually serves as the DWG’s chairperson. Other members normally include, but are not limited to, representatives from the using activity, the fire department, safety, security, communications, and environmental management. Representatives of the User shall be assigned to the DWG for the duration of the project and should be available for all meetings, reviews, and other design activities. Representatives of the User must have delegated authority to speak for the User activity for all requirements. The same DWG should be retained and delegated to work with the A-E’s design team and provide information and guidance throughout the development of the Basis of Design (BOD) and project design process. The DWG will meet with the A-E’s design team as needed.

Each DWG member reviews projects and provides his/her submittal review comments to \1\ the BCE via the current Construction Management Information System (CMIS). /1/

The DWG does not have the authority to change design criteria or to direct changes to the contract. If the A-E interprets any direction given by the DWG as a change in contract requirements, the A-E shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer before taking any action.

3-3.6 Base Environmental Manager (BEM).

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Historic properties may include archaeological sites, individual buildings, historic districts, landscapes, structures, objects, and traditional cultural properties. In accordance with established procedures at each Installation (e.g., Base), the Base Civil Engineer files a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Checklist plus a copy of the Work Request or Project Description with the Base’s Environmental Manager. The Base Environmental Manager then reviews the Project Description and determines whether the project has the potential to affect historic properties or whether it is exempt from Section 106 compliance. The Base Environmental Manager will then either record that the undertaking is exempt or engage in consultation for Section 106 Compliance as required by 36 CFR 800.

3-3.7 Site Security Manager (SSM).

Special coordination is required for projects associated with a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) or Special Access Program Facility (SAPF). A designated, Government Site Security Manager (SSM) is assigned to the project. The SSM is responsible for the project’s security requirements and will prepare a Construction Security Plan (CSP), Fixed Facility Checklist (FFC) and the TEMPEST addendum to the FFC (referred to as the TEMPEST Form A) for the project. The SSM will submit these documents to the Accrediting Official (AO) for approval. \1\ The SSM must provide the Designers of Record (DOR) with the pertinent information (extracted from the AO-approved CSP, FFC and TEMPEST Countermeasure Review) that must be incorporated into the project drawings and specifications for the facility to be accredited. /1/ Refer to UFC 4- 010-05, Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities Planning, Design, and Construction, for additional information.

\1\ 3-3.8 Wing Safety. /1/

\1 Wing Safety develops the explosive site plan which consists of the transmittal memorandum; quantity-distance analysis and associated map; facility design information; and risk assessments. Wing Safety maintains the installation’s explosives location map based on the approved DoD Explosive Safety Board (DDESB) site plan in accordance with DAFI 91-202 paragraph 9.4.8. Wing Safety reviews the relationship of the project to established explosive arcs. Projects sited in an explosive safety zone or surface danger zone must be coordinated by the Wing Safety Office and approved by the DDESB. /1/

\1\ 3-3.9 Wing Corrosion Manager. /1/

\1\ Wing Corrosion Manager ensures the proper use of approved materials, manages the corrosion prevention and control program, trains personnel, and provides guidance to prevent and control corrosion on assigned assets. The Wing Corrosion Manager is the liaison with higher headquarters, overseeing approved materials and processes, coordinating inspections, developing local policies and participating in relevant technical programs. /1/

3-4 DESIGNER OF RECORD.

3-4.1 Coordination with Air National Guard Bureau and Design Working Group.

Engage in and provide liaison with the Air National Guard Bureau, and appropriate Design Working Group (DWG) personnel, as required by the contract, during the early design-development or Request for Proposal (RFP) development.

\1\ Projects sited in an explosive safety zone or surface danger zone must be approved by the Department of Defense Explosive Safety Board (DDESB). The DORs must coordinate with the Wing Safety Office. Guidance on explosive safety standards is provided in DESR 6055.09_DAFMAN 91-202, Explosives Safety Standards. /1/

\1\ The Designer of Record assigned to the project assists the SSM by providing the facility and site requirements necessary for the SSM to prepare the FFC and TEMPEST Countermeasure Review documents. The AO-approved CSP, FFC and TEMPEST Countermeasure Review contain project requirements that must be incorporated into the project for the facility to be accredited. /1/

The DOR is responsible for architectural and engineering aspects of the project to ensure reasonable facility cost appropriate for the functions to be performed through design and RFP development.

\1\ 3-4.2 Construction Management Information System. /1/

\1\ The A-E shall use the Construction Management Information System (CMIS) identified by the ANG for use on the project (e.g., Kahua). /1/

\1\ The ANG’s CMIS is a web-based project management tool which provides the ANG with an automated workflow, collaboration, document management and project management solution to help manage the ANG’s design and construction projects. /1/

\1\ The A-E shall use CMIS to upload, store, capture, preserve, record, maintain, update and route all project-related documentation to comply with document security requirements. Classified material is not permitted to be stored in the CMIS. /1/

\1\ The A-E shall use the workflow processes contained within the CMIS to submit and receive approval for project deliverables. /1/

\1\ The ANG will not furnish any equipment related to accessing CMIS. CMIS is web-accessible and can be accessed via any computer with an Internet connection. /1/

\1\ The ANG will provide no cost training to familiarize team members with CMIS. The ANG Project Manager will ensure that appropriate personnel should attend training and what roles will be set up within the system based on their project responsibilities. /1/

\1\ An HSPD-12 security clearance is required to access CMIS. /1/

3-4.3 Response to Review Comments.

Respond to comments in accordance with this document. The DOR or DB Contractor is responsible for the resolution and incorporation of government comments into the project design. At each submittal, return and address previous review comments. Provide responses to review comments that clearly indicate what action is being taken to resolve the comment. If the comment was incorporated into the design, a response must so indicate; otherwise, provide acceptable technical justification for comments not being incorporated. Prior to the next submittal, contact the Government reviewer to discuss and resolve any comment that will not be incorporated.

The DOR is responsible for using professional judgment and technically evaluating user comments that suggest technical changes to design.

3-4.4 Final Approval.

The DOR reviews and gives final approval for contract project documents prepared under their direction. The DOR must be registered in the discipline for the documents they approve as described in Chapter 2 in paragraph “Registration”.

CHAPTER 4 OVERVIEW OF THE DESIGN PROCESS

\1\ The design process is initiated when the NGB/A4I Project Manager (PM) issues the Base Civil Engineer (BCE) a Design Instruction (DI). The DI establishes the cost and scope and outlines the architecture and engineering (A-E) services required for the project. Once a Designer (i.e. A-E firm) has been selected, the Project Manager, Contracting Officer Representative (COR), BCE, and Contracting Officer conduct the Criteria Review Conference (CRC) with the A-E. During the CRC, the Government reviews this Technical Letter, along with the DI and Project Requirements Document (PRD), and defines the scope of architect and engineering services required for the project. The Project Manager approves and documents any changes to this Technical Letter, DI, and/or PRD on the CRC Addendum, Attachment 3. At the conclusion of the CRC, the Project Manager, COR, BCE, Contracting Officer, and A-E discuss a tentative design schedule. The Contracting Officer issues the A-E a Request for Price Proposal (RFPP). Upon contract award, the typical design process is as follows. /1/

\1\ Note: The Project Manager’s primary line of communication is with the BCE. The A-E’s primary line of communication is with the designated COR and Contracting Officer.

/1/ \1\ Note: The PRD must clearly state when work can proceed to the next design phase.