52.212-2 Evaluation Criteria addendum_Bulk Gas_4.17.2025.pdf
PDF 404 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911N225R0014
About this file
This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Criteria for a Bulk Gas and Cylinder Gas solicitation for Letterkenny Army Depot. The procurement will be awarded using a Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) methodology, where offerors must meet all technical requirements to be considered. Technical evaluation includes four sub-factors: 1) Compliance with OSHA standards, 2) Quality Control Plan demonstrating deficiency management, 3) Installation/Site Plan with equipment details, and 4) Past Experience validated through two invoices/work orders.
Offerors must provide comprehensive documentation including a letter confirming OSHA standard compliance, a quality control plan with preventive maintenance scheduling, an installation plan with equipment listings and drawings, and evidence of prior relevant contract experience. The government intends to make an award without discussions, requiring vendors to submit their most competitive initial pricing. Technical proposals will be rated as either Technically Acceptable or Technically Unacceptable, with the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer receiving the contract award through the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Notes_W911N225R0014_5.1.2025.pdf | ||
| SOLICITATION - W911N225R0014.pdf | ||
| ACWS TRANSITION - OFFERORS.pdf | ||
| Purchase Description-Bulk Gas.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all option periods to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option (s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, emailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer, whether there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, BASIS OF AWARD:
A. General Information:
1. The basis of award will be the Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable offer. Offerors must receive a rating of Technically Acceptable in all factors for their overall proposal to be determined Technically Acceptable.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and technical requirements.
3. The Government intends to make award without discussions, unless the Contracting Officer determines that discussions are necessary. Offerors should provide their most favorable prices in their initial offers.
B. Non-Price Evaluation Factors and Subfactors:
1. Factor 1-Technical:
a. Sub-factor 1 Narrative: Offeror shall provide a letter stating all equipment is following Standard 1910.110 of 29 CFR and OSHA Standards as applicable.
b. Sub-factor 2 Quality Control Plan (QCP): Offeror shall provide a QCP that describes their quality control/ inspection system to demonstrate how deficiencies are identified, corrected and how reoccurrence is prevented. The offeror shall provide a copy of their scheduled maintenance plan. The plan shall include the proposed schedule for standard preventive maintenance.
c. Sub-factor 3 Installation/Site Plan: Offeror shall provide information on their plan to install all the necessary equipment as required by the Purchase Description and/or SOW. The plan shall include pertinent information such as listing of equipment, drawings and time to install. The offeror shall provide documentation that the bulk gas to be supplied meets or exceeds the criteria required under 4.0, Specifications of the Purchase Description and/or SOW.
d. Sub-factor 4 Past Experience: The offeror shall provide two (2) invoices and/or work orders to validate past experience with this type of work. The offeror shall identify the contract title, contract number, dollar value, client name and address, location of work, point of contact with telephone number, and an explanation of how each project related to the work requirements of this solicitation.
C. Price Evaluation Factor: Offerors shall complete the Schedule B with pricing for each Contract Line-Item Number
(CLIN).
D. Proposals will be evaluated initially independently of the price to determine the Offerors’ ability to meet the Government’s requirement set forth in the solicitation. The Government may make a final rating determination based on the proposal as submitted without requesting any further information. For all proposals determined to be Technically Acceptable, the offer providing the lowest price will receive the contract award.
1. Offerors’ technical proposals will receive an overall rating based on the following:
a. Technically Acceptable: Offeror meets all requirements or technical specifications or has submitted all documentation requested in any technical evaluation criteria and all documentation meets the standard set forth in the solicitation.
b. Technically Unacceptable: Offeror fails to meet all requirements or technical specifications or has failed to comply in submitting requested documentation in any technical evaluation criteria or the submitted documentation fails to meet the standard set forth in the solicitation.
(End of Addendum)
c. Technically Acceptable: Offeror meets all requirements or technical specifications or has submitted all documentation requested in any technical evaluation criteria and all documentation meets the standard set forth in the solicitation.
d. Technically Unacceptable: Offeror fails to meet all requirements or technical specifications or has failed to comply in submitting requested documentation in any technical evaluation criteria or the submitted documentation fails to meet the standard set forth in the solicitation.
(End of Addendum)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .