5-JH26-23 ScoreSheet for Informational Purposes Only.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JH26-23 Orphan Well Subsurface Plugging
- Solicitation number
- JH26-23
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This document is a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) scoresheet issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for an Orphan Well Subsurface Plugging project. The contract is federally funded and estimated to span 5 years, with the primary objective of selecting a design professional service provider for subsurface abandonment, site surface restoration, and equipment decommissioning. The solicitation (JH26-23) seeks comprehensive qualifications from companies in areas including crew competency, equipment capabilities, maintenance processes, safety protocols, and relevant experience. The evaluation methodology uses a 0-5 scoring scale across multiple categories, with a total possible score of 1000 points, and will select the highest-ranking vendor to negotiate contract terms.
The project will be funded through a federal grant specifically targeting orphan well remediation, with separate contracts for subsurface plugging and site surface restoration. Importantly, vendors are instructed not to include pricing in their qualifications, and the state will determine compensation through negotiations with the highest-ranked vendor. If initial negotiations fail, the state may proceed with the next highest-ranked vendor. The solicitation emphasizes comprehensive evaluation of technical capabilities, safety metrics, crew experience, equipment maintenance, and previous work history, particularly focusing on subsurface abandonment work and compliance with regulations like the Davis Bacon Act.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Attachment B Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attachment C Scoreable Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Subsurface RFSQ Questionnaire
| Evaluator Scoring |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to missing information |
| 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in an unsatisfactory manner |
| 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ and in some respects exceeds them |
| 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ |
| Category | Question | Group Weighting | Q Weighting | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Element Score |
| Competency | What is the typical avg experience level of your rig crews? | 25% | 10% | 0% | |
| Competency | Describe your company culture and how it relates to continuity of crews and employee retention. Provide the average length of employment of your field hands. | 30% | 0% | ||
| Competency | What is the level of supervision provided for each crew and level of plugging experience required to reach this level of supervision? Please provide resume's for your current PA rig supervisors and pushers. | 60% | 0% | ||
| Equipment | Are BOPs owned or rented? If owned, provide mechanic certification service logs, and test logs for BOPs and accumulators. Provide details on your company's BOP training program and function testing protocols. | 15% | 25% | 0% | |
| Equipment | Describe your company's equipment maintenance processes. Provide equipment maintenance logs and age of major equipment that will be used on this project: rigs, pumps, cement equipment, etc. | 50% | 0% | ||
| Equipment | For plug and abandonment work, what tanks do you provide on each location and how do you manage them? Provide three location photographs with typical PA equipment layout. | 25% | 0% | ||
| Maintenance | Describe your company's process for managing a major equipment failure on a remote location. What is the expected response and repair time? | 10% | 30% | 0% | |
| Maintenance | In the event of an equipment breakdown that cannot be repaired in the field, what is your company's process for maintaining project progress? | 40% | 0% | ||
| Maintenance | How frequently are hoses and iron tested? Provide maintenance logs for last 5 years. | 30% | 0% | ||
| Safety | Describe your company's safety training program and culture. | 25% | 40% | 0% | |
| Safety | What are your primary safety metrics and 5 year trends? What is your TRIR 5 year trend. | 30% | 0% | ||
| Safety | What is your company's process when there is a significant safety event on location? | 30% | 0% | ||
| Experience | What is your company's process for complying with the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act? Provide examples of previous documentation or proposed documentation. | 25% | 10% | 0% | |
| Experience | How will you accomplish this scope of work? Provide a commentary of how the scope of work would be implemented. How will your company manage logistics considering the remote nature of most of the well locations on this project? | 40% | 0% | ||
| Experience | Has your company performed subsurface abandonment work for the state of Utah previously? If so, how many wells and what year/s was the work performed? | 25% | 0% | ||
| Experience | What plug and abandonment work has your company performed in the last two years onshore US? Please provide well counts, basins, and operators performed for. Note any well control or safety events. | 25% | 0% | ||
| Total Score | 0% |
JH26-23 ScoreSheet
| Orphan Well Subsurface Plugging |
| Solicitation #JH26=23 |
| RFSQ Evaluation Scoresheet |
| Firm Name:______________________________ | Evaluator Scoring |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |
| Evaluator:________________________________ | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Date: ___________________________________ | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ and in some respects exceeds them | |
| 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ |
| Question | Category | Question | Group Weighting | Q Weighting | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points Earned | Points Possible |
| 1 | Competency | What is the typical avg experience level of your rig crews? | 25% | 10% | 0.0 | 25 | |
| 2 | Competency | Describe your company culture and how it relates to continuity of crews and employee retention. Provide the average length of employment of your field hands. | 30% | 0.0 | 75 | ||
| 3 | Competency | What is the level of supervision provided for each crew and level of plugging experience required to reach this level of supervision? Please provide resume's for your current PA rig supervisors and pushers. | 60% | 0.0 | 150 | ||
| 4 | Equipment | Are BOPs owned or rented? If owned, provide mechanic certification service logs, and test logs for BOPs and accumulators. Provide details on your company's BOP training program and function testing protocols. | 15% | 25% | 0.0 | 37.5 | |
| 5 | Equipment | Describe your company's equipment maintenance processes. Provide equipment maintenance logs and age of major equipment that will be used on this project: rigs, pumps, cement equipment, etc. | 50% | 0.0 | 75 | ||
| 6 | Equipment | For plug and abandonment work, what tanks do you provide on each location and how do you manage them? Provide three location photographs with typical PA equipment layout. | 25% | 0.0 | 37.5 | ||
| 7 | Maintenance | Describe your company's process for managing a major equipment failure on a remote location. What is the expected response and repair time? | 10% | 30% | 0.0 | 30 | |
| 8 | Maintenance | In the event of an equipment breakdown that cannot be repaired in the field, what is your company's process for maintaining project progress? | 40% | 0.0 | 40 | ||
| 9 | Maintenance | How frequently are hoses and iron tested? Provide maintenance logs for last 5 years. | 30% | 0.0 | 30 | ||
| 10 | Safety | Describe your company's safety training program and culture. | 25% | 40% | 0.0 | 100 | |
| 11 | Safety | What are your primary safety metrics and 5 year trends? What is your TRIR 5 year trend. | 30% | 0.0 | 75 | ||
| 12 | Safety | What is your company's process when there is a significant safety event on location? | 30% | 0.0 | 75 | ||
| 13 | Experience | What is your company's process for complying with the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act? Provide examples of previous documentation or proposed documentation. | 25% | 10% | 0.0 | 25 | |
| 14 | Experience | How will you accomplish this scope of work? Provide a commentary of how the scope of work would be implemented. How will your company manage logistics considering the remote nature of most of the well locations on this project? | 40% | 0.0 | 100 | ||
| 15 | Experience | Has your company performed subsurface abandonment work for the state of Utah previously? If so, how many wells and what year/s was the work performed? | 25% | 0.0 | 62.5 | ||
| 16 | Experience | What plug and abandonment work has your company performed in the last two years onshore US? Please provide well counts, basins, and operators performed for. Note any well control or safety events. | 25% | 0.0 | 62.5 | ||
| Total Score | 0 | 1000 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .