Att J.5 Past Performance Evaluation Form.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47QREB-20-R-0001
- Issued by
-
GSA Federal Acquisition Service
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation form and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance evaluation form is a template to be filled out by customers evaluating a contractor's past work. It requests information on projects completed and ratings in areas like quality, schedule, cost control, management, and regulatory compliance.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for human capital and training solutions under the HCaTS 8(a) program. It seeks proposals for customized training, human capital strategy services, and organizational performance improvement. The NAICS codes listed are 611430, 611699, 624310, 541611, 541612, 541613, 541618, and 611710. Questions about the solicitation are due by December 20, 2019 and proposals are due by January 28, 2020. Awards will be made under this on-ramp to increase small business participation in the HCaTS vehicles managed by GSA.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J.5: Past Performance Evaluation Form Human Capital and Training Solutions 8(a)
Company Name DUNS Number
The Government will use the information on this form for source selection purposes.
* The Offeror must send this form to the customer for past performance evaluation purposes. After completing this form, the customer returns it to the Offeror (Contractor/Requestor).
** Once this attachment is complete, save it as a PDF, name it as: "Companyname_Att J.5_REP#.pdf" and include it in the "Volume 3" of the proposal under the corresponding REP.
To complete this form, use the following guidelines:
a. Project Number: The Contract/Task Order/Purchase Order/Project Number
b. Termination Type: If the contract has been terminated before completion, select one of the following:
- Termination for Default or Cause: The Contractor failed or was determined to be incapable to complete the project.
- Termination for Convenience: The project was terminated for other than the Contractor's fault.
c. Task Order Number: For a Collection of Task Orders, provide up to six task order numbers under the same project. Leave blank if only evaluating one contract, task order or purchase order.
d. Check only one of the NAICS Codes that best describes the service(s) provided under the project. To review NAICS Codes descriptions, visit http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business economy.
NOTE: If the project was awarded by the Federal government, this form shall only be filled out by a duly warranted Contracting Officer.
For each of the areas listed in Block e., choose one of the following ratings from the drop-down list:
EXCEPTIONAL, VERY GOOD, SATISFACTORY, MARGINAL, UNSATISFACTORY, or N/A.
Note that this rating system is subjective and depends on your experience with the Contractor. For each part, at minimum, consider the following areas:
Quality – In part, assess the contractor’s conformance to project requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical and professional standards). Include, as applicable, information on the following: Are reports/data accurate? Does the product or service provided meet the specifications of the contract/order? Does the contractor’s work measure up to commonly accepted technical or professional standards? What degree of Government technical direction was required to solve problems that arise during performance?
Schedule – Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the project milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
Cost Control – (Not required for Fixed Price type contracts/orders). Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling project cost. If the contractor is experiencing cost growth or under-run, discuss the causes and contractor-proposed solutions for the cost overruns or under-runs. For projects where task or contract sizing is based upon contractor-provided person hour estimates, the relationship of these estimates to ultimate task cost should be assessed. In addition, the extent to which the contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources, in each work effort should be assessed.
Management – Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract/order, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts.
GailMSchneider Line
NasimLashaninejad Highlight
NasimLashaninejad Highlight
Utilization of Small Business – FAR Subpart 19.7 and 15 U.S.C. 637 contains statutory requirements for complying with the Small Business Subcontracting Program. Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for Small Business (including Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) and Indian Tribes) (including Small Disadvantaged Businesses (which also includes ANCs and Indian Tribes), Women Owned Small Businesses, HUBZone, Veteran Owned, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, and ANCs and Indian Tribes that are not Small Disadvantaged Businesses or Small Businesses) to participate in contract/order performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract/order.
Regulatory Compliance – Assess compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract/order relating to applicable regulations and codes. Consider aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental (example: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act), safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract.
The following definitions apply to: Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Utilization of Small Business, and Regulatory Compliance.
EXCEPTIONAL Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Customer's benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
For Utilization of Small Business:
Exceeded all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.
VERY GOOD Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Customer's benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
For Utilization of Small Business:
Met all of the statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.
SATISFACTORY Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
For Utilization of Small Business:
Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order.
Fulfilled the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.
MARGINAL Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
For Utilization of Small Business:
Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place; however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so. Required a corrective action plan.
UNSATISFACTORY Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
For Utilization of Small Business:
Non-compliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative. Required a corrective action plan.
N/A (Not Applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.
N/A
a. Project Number: b. Termination Type: c. Task Order Numbers (up to six):
TO#1:
TO#2:
TO#3:
TO#4:
TO#5:
TO#6:
d. Check one that best describes the service(s) performed under this project:
611430 (Professional and Management Development Training) 611699 (All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction) 624310 (Vocational Rehabilitation Services) 541611 (Administrative Management & General Management Consulting Services) 541612 (Human Resources Consulting Services) 541613 (Marketing Consulting Services) 541618 (Other Management Consulting Services) 611710 (Educational Support Services) None of the above
e. Evaluate the contractor's performance in the following areas based on the provided guideline in this form.
Quality: Schedule: Cost Control:
Management: Utilization of Small Business: Regulatory Compliance:
This form shall be signed by an Assessing Official with direct knowledge or observation of the Contractor's past performance.
By signing below, I certify that the information provided in this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and believe it to be true and correct.
Organization/Agency Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Date:
Assessing Official Name:
Email Address:
Address:
Signature:
| J.2 WIP 1 |
| J.2 WIP 2 |
| J.2 WIP 3 |
| Blank Page |
| Blank Page |
| 2A_CONTRACT_NUMBER: |
| Termination Type: [Select...] |
| RadioButton1: Off |
| Task Order2: |
| Task Order3: |
| Task Order1: |
| Task Order4: |
| Task Order5: |
| Task Order6: |
| Rate4A: [Select...] |
| Rate4B: [Select...] |
| Rate4C: [Select...] |
| Rate4D: [Select...] |
| Rate4E: [Select...] |
| Rate4G: [Select...] |
| Agancy: |
| Name of ind: |
| Email: |
| Phonenum: |
| title: |
| Addresss: |
| Date: |
| CompName: |
| DUNSnum: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .