Historical_Preservation_IDIQ_Solicitation_Questions_and_Responses_as_of_10222018.xlsx.pdf

Item

Date Submitted Question Response

Date Response Responded By Responded in Amendment

1 10.17.2018 Please clarify if the response to the above referenced on-call is to ALSO include a response to task order Redden Federal Courthouse Historic Masonry and Sandstone Repair?

10.17.2018

Yes, the vendor's response is inclusive of a response to Evaluation Factor 3, JA Redden Sandstone Repair to include Factor 4 with pricing schedule for the Seed Project.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

2 10.17.2018 Or will the federal government first award the on-call contract and then identify successful firms to submit a proposal for the task order?

10.17.2018

No, up to (5) responsible contracts will be awarded under the Base Contract. Of that 5, the Contractor that submits the most highly rated technical proposal(s) will then be evaluated on Factor 5 in accordance with section M-12 of the solictation.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

3 10.17.2018 Will the Redden Courthouse FFP submitted by the respondent determine whether or not a firm is AWARDED the on-call?

10.17.2018 See section M-12 of the solicitation. CO / COR / Other AMD 03

4 10.17.2018 Is RFP 47PL0118D9000 for a 5 – state, potential multi-year Conservator as Contractor contract OR for Redden Federal Courthouse Masonry and Stone repair?

10.17.2018

The RFP is for a Base Contract + 4 year options for a Regional IDIQ that includes three ordering paths available.

Additionally, the RFP is evaluating the interested vendors on their proposed capabilities by submitting for the Seed Project. See solicitation for additional details.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

5 10.18.2018

Within the RFP section L-4.2. Factor 4, Subfactor 2 – Performance Quality Assessment, paragraph 2 states that if an offeror is unable to obtain a PPQ from a client to submit the first page of the PPQ within the proposal. However, paragraph 3 states that PPQs will be sent directly to the Government. If the PPQs are being sent directly to the Government, we may not know if a PPQ was received by GSA. However, the PPQ Exhibit 3 requests the client to send the PPQ back to the offeror.

Please clarify the submission requirements for Volume III Past Performance. If PPQs are required to be submitted within the proposal, they contain the same pertinent information as what is required for Section L-4.1 Could we simply eliminate the duplicate information by submitting at minimum the first page of the PPQ for this Volume to cover both Subfactor requirements?

PPQ Clients can inform the offeror if they have submitted a PPQ to GSA. They may not share the contents of the PPQ. Exhibit 3 has been updated to reflect the proper instructions. If the offeror is unable to confirm if a client has sent a PPQ into GSA, the offeror may fill out the first page of the survey per the instructions.

CO/CS AMD 03

6 10.18.2018 Is the PDF format acceptable for all electronic submissions for all volumes of our proposal?

No, please refer to Page 27, L2.8.6 Format for pricing format instructions CO/CS AMD 03

Date Submitted Question Response

Date Response Responded By Responded in Amendment

7 10.18.2018 We are forming a teaming relationship to propose on this IDIQ as a whole. Does our teaming agreement need to be submitted and follow the same requirements as listed for a JV such as financials, etc. as outlined in Section L-3.4?

No, a JV is a different type of agreement.

Please see website in question 12 for details on a CTA Agreement

CO/CS AMD 03

8 10.18.2018 Section L refers to Section M for submission requirements and Section M refers to Section L. However, Section M is missing Volume IV from Table M-1 for evaluation. Please advise.

Added and updated via AMD 003 CO/CS AMD 03

9 10.18.2018

Attachment C shows a list for the Proposal Content of the Seed Project which differs from the format within the RFP document format table L-1. Within the RFP document the seed project schedule and narratives are located in Volume 3, Tab 3.

Attachment C shows them being submitted with the price proposal and shows additional documents required outside those that are listed within the RFP document (such as the SBU Document or CSI level 3 versus Level 4). Which format are we to follow?

Attachment C is a Sample. The document is marked as such. GSA provided a TORFP sample to show the contractors what it might look like when receiving a TORFP.

Attachment C is not to be altered or followed in submitting for your proposal.

Requirements within the evaluation factors are to be used for this proposal.

CO/CS AMD 03

10 10.19.2018 What is the commitment letter reference on page 40. Does it have to do with teaming or the availability of staff for the task orders?

The commitment letter shall speak to your key personnel that are being designated in your proposal. The personnel you are submitting will be available for task order awards to your firm.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

11 10.19.2018 Is there a capital plan for improvements for 2019 to help understand expected project types and work load requirements

No, However, GSA has determined that there are projects that could fulfill the aggregate of the IDIQ contract over the 5 year term.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

12 10.19.2018 Can GSA review/comment on teaming arrangements prior to submittal to make sure that they meet GSA’s requirements? Can we talk to you about our agreement to make sure that it is structured per the regulations in the IDIQ?

Yes, we may give general comments to a draft teaming arrangement if submitted prior to Proposal Due Date. Vendors may also use the following link to review the requirements for a GSA Contractor Teaming Arrangement: https://www.gsa.

gov/small-business/choose-how-to-sell-to-gsa/partnering/contractor-team-arrangements

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

13 10.19.2018 Is there a formal designation of small business is required, or is providing financials enough. For Oregon State / City projects, in order to be a MWESB firm it has to be registered with the state COBID system.

The firms SAM record must be in compliance to show the Small Business Designation. Additionally your Reps and Certs will show your assertions to the responding NAICS code for this project which is 236220.

CO / COR / Other AMD 03

Date Submitted Question Response

Date Response Responded By Responded in Amendment

14 10.19.2018 We would like to request a one week extension for the deadline. An extension will not be authorized. CO / COR / Other AMD 03

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other

Date Submitted Question Response

Date Response Responded By Responded in Amendment

CO / COR / Other

CO / COR / Other