AM 01 Solicitation Attachment 02 - Past Performance Questionnaire AE.docx

ATTACHMENT 02 (Revised 01/09/2026)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer not later than 3:00 PM Mountain Time, January 23, 2026.

Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:

Shannon Sweeney, Contracting Officer at shannon.sweeney@gsa.gov

Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0025R0059, Lynden & Sumas LPOEs.”

A SIMILAR PROJECT For this evaluation subfactor, SP means a project having all of the following characteristics:

· SP construction was substantially completed within fifteen (15) years prior to the issuance of this RFP.

· The construction contract cost at award for the SP was greater than or equal to $50 million.

· The SP was for construction of a commercial building that is at least 20,000 gross square feet;

· The SP included comprehensive site planning, including but not limited to, design and construction of; site utilities, storm drainage, grading, commercial building(s), highways, roads, sidewalks, exterior lighting, security, and landscaping.

Additional favorable consideration may be given to the extent the offeror meets any of the following conditions:

· Two or three SPs are received for the A/E firm.

· Construction was delivered using the DB or Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) methods. For purposes of this evaluation factor, IPD is defined as the execution of a multiparty agreement in which the owner or developer contracted with a single Offeror to provide all, or substantially all, of the design and construction services for that project.

· The SP involved close coordination and phasing between two (2) or more construction locations. There should be at least a five-mile distance between at least two of the construction locations and construction at the two locations must have been performed concurrently.

SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR

Name of Offeror/Firm: ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Number: ________________________________________________________________________________________________

Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

Place of Performance (City and State): ________________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance (include start date and substantial completion date): ___________________________________________________

Was the delivery method DB or IPD: _________________________________________________________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Commercial Building Construction: ______________________________________________________________

Contract Value at initial award: $____________________________________________________________________________________

Total Contract Value (including modifications): $_______________________________________________________________________

Briefly describe all construction work performed under this contract (address construction of site utilities, storm drainage, grading, roads, and security): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Continued on next page

Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last fifteen (15) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________

Firm Name: _________________________________________________________

Address: ____________________________________________________________

Phone: _____________________________________________________________

Fax: _______________________________________________________________

Email: ______________________________________________________________

Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.

KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.

Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.

Average – An average rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.

Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.

Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.

Quality of Design and Construction Documents

Achieving Project Design Goals Within the Allowable Budget

Creativity of Solutions to Design Issues

Timeliness of Required Documentation

Communicating and Interfacing with Government/Company Personnel

Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance

Continued on next page

1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________

2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________

Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): __________________________________________________________________________________________________