47PH0623R0011 - Amendment 2.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.Contractor is not

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

is not extended.The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

CODE6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

AM #02

7PQC-DA

Brenna Lanphear

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

ACQUISITION NON-PROSPECTUS

1100 Commerce Street, Suite 720 DALLAS, TX 75242-0198 United States

Same as block #6

EQ7PACS-22-0084

47PH0623R0011

70159

PAGE OF PAGES

1 46

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

This amendment is being issued to provide the following: 1) Sign-in Sheet for the site visit for this project; 2) the updated Wage Determination (NM20230024 dated 01/06/23) that shall be used in the execution of this project; 3) revised Technical Evaluation Factors; and 4) the November 2019 Gallup Federal Building Asbestos Reinspection Report.

Additionally, the proposal due date is revised from January 20, 2023 by 4:00PM CST to January 30, 2023 by 4:00PM CST. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12/16/2022

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01/13/2023

16C. DATE SIGNED

1/13/2023

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION FAR 2.101 and 3.104

(1) Factor 1 - Experience on Similar Projects

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the extent of the Offeror’s or Offeror’s subcontractor’s past experience as a firm(s) in providing similar construction services, specifically to determine the firm’s experience in completing the tasks detailed in the performance work statement.

Acceptability Standard (Pass): The Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor must demonstrate successful experience as a General Construction (GC) Contractor or subcontractor responsible for the construction of at least two (2) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years. A “similar project” is defined as a project that is comparable in nature, type, and complexity as defined by all of the following characteristics.

For the purpose of this evaluation, similar project is defined as a NFPA Compliant Fire Alarm Upgrade Project and/or NFPA Compliant Fire Alarm Installation:

Project required to involve renovation, installation, upgrade or the modernization of comparably sized structure according to the specifications.

Project was performed in an occupied and functioning office building an occupied multi-story building;

Project may involve the following disciplines - architectural, electrical, fire alarm, fire sprinkler, elevator, and telecommunications;

Project includes requirements for noise control

The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract(s) was not less than $250,000.00.

(2) Factor 2 - Key Personnel

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the Offerors’ complete staffing plan detailing all team members to be assigned to the project and their demonstrated qualifications of proposed key personnel.

Acceptability Standard (Pass): The Offeror must provide (1) and Organizational Chart and Lines of Authority for the duration of the project and (2) a Resume for the following Key Personnel that includes the information identified below and must meet the minimum requirements stated here and within the specifications for this project. For each key person, identify the proposed duties on the project and identify the firm for which the employee works.

Project Manager for Construction

On-Site Construction Superintendent

Quality Control Manager

Project Scheduler [Resume must indicate Scheduling Software experience (e.g.,Primavera, Microsoft Project)

NICET Level IV Certified Fire Alarm Designer (Include copy of certificate)

NICET Level III Fire Alarm Technician or Installer, minimum (include copy of certificate)

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS - Changes from Amendment 1 version are made in Red.

This version is a revision made with Amendment 2.

All Resumes must include the following information and explain how the proposed Key Personnel’s experience meets the minimum requirements. Each Resume cannot exceed two (2) pages:

• Name and title

• Project assignment

• Name of firm with which associated Years of experience (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/discipline) and years of experience with other firms (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/ discipline)

• Project Manager for Construction – must possess a minimum of 5 years

• On-Site Construction Superintendent – must possess a minimum of 5 years

• Quality Control Manager – must possess a minimum of 5 years

• Project Scheduler – must possess a minimum of 5 years

• Education/degree(s)/Certifications(s), year, and institution (Identify minimum requirement for key personnel.

• Project Manager for Construction – Architectural or Engineering Degree, if applicable

Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable (Identify minimum requirement.)

• Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract

• List of projects in which the individual has worked to include: Name of project(s) &project location(s) within the last five years.

Note: No substitution to key personnel shall be made without prior approval of the Contracting Officer (CO) and the GSA FPE. In the event that the personnel approved by the CO are unable to perform their duties due to death, illness, resignation from the Contractor’s employment, the CO’s request for removal, or similar reasons, the Contractor shall promptly submit to the CO, in writing, the name and qualifications of a proposed replacement with equal or superior qualifications. This replacement, if approved by the CO, shall be submitted to the Government within three calendar days from the time of removal and shall in no way delay the project schedule. If the schedule is delayed due to the Contractor’s lack of timely submittal or lack of equally qualified submittal, the contractor shall be responsible for any and all resulting costs associated with the delay. Any approved substitutions shall be made at no increase in contract price and/or decrease in capabilities.

(3) Factor 3 – Past Performance

Questionnaire on Sample Projects

This subfactor addresses the past performance of the Offeror’s team as it relates to quality of work, timeliness of performance, management of personnel and subcontractors, and overall customer satisfaction for particular recent and relevant projects meeting the requirements listed below. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i). The Offeror will complete blocks 1-4 of the “Past Performance

Questionnaire” which is included in the solicitation. In the event that the Questionnaire is being sent for a major subcontractor’s reference only, be sure to indicate the Offeror for which the Questionnaire is part of the proposal

[e.g. Firm Name: Subcontractor (on behalf of Prime Contractor for this solicitation). If the Questionnaire is submitted for a major subcontractor, the major subcontractor’s role must also be demonstrated in the

Organizational Chart as described in the factor 2. The Offeror will send one to each sample project’s reference

(the client), and the clients will submit the fully completed Questionnaires directly to the applicable Government point of contact stated on the last page of the Questionnaire. The “client” is the organization, entity, or property owner for whom the work was performed; general contractors, partners, subcontractors, or designers who performed the work in whole or in part are not “clients” and should not complete or submit a Questionnaire. The

Offeror is solely responsible for providing the Questionnaire to their references/clients. The Offeror is solely responsible for following up with each reference/client to encourage the client’s timely submission of the fully completed Questionnaire directly to the Government POCs indicated on the Questionnaire. GSA will not accept completed Questionnaires sent directly from the Offeror, nor from any joint venture member, subcontractor, teaming member, parent company, or other affiliate, nor will GSA accept any Questionnaire other than the version attached to this solicitation. GSA evaluators will attempt to contact those clients who submit Questionnaires, based on email addresses and/or phone numbers provided. The Offeror is authorized to provide information on problems encountered on the identified sample projects and the Offeror’s corrective actions. GSA evaluators can also (but are not required to) consider past performance on projects which are not submitted or identified by the

Offeror’s team, but which are identified by other methods, previously obtained past performance information, and through other known sources. The Government is not required to obtain past performance information from other sources and can (but is not required to) base evaluation ratings on only the information identified through the

Offeror, if any.

For the purposes of this evaluation and this subfactor:

• “Recent” is defined as a contract, order, or call completed within the last five (5) years as of the date of the solicitation’s original issuance, or within five (5) years of the date the solicitation was amended to request proposals.

• “Relevant” is defined as a fixed-priced contract, order, or call that meets all the elements of scope, magnitude and complexity described below, which is similar in comparison to the types of work listed in the Statement of Work of the solicitation. The sample projects submitted may have been federal, state, or private sector contracts.

▪ Scope: Fixed-price fire alarm, installation, upgrade, and/or alteration to real property in or on a multi-story, occupied building

▪ Complexity: Similarity of technical difficulty, managerial involvement and/or coordination efforts, potential obstacles, specialized requirements or locations, and labor disciplines involved, in comparison to the objectives and work listed in the Scope of Work

▪ Magnitude: Similarity of the dollar value, meaning a final project equal to or greater than

$250,000.

• “Similar” project is defined as a NFPA Compliant fire alarm system upgrade project and/or NFPA

Compliant Fire Alarm Installation with construction costs equal to or greater than $250,000. The project may involve the following disciplines -- architectural, electrical, fire alarm, fire sprinkler, elevator, and telecommunications

• “Complete” as it pertains to the Questionnaire itself means that a client provided a clear rating for each of the nine (9) statements or questions on page three (3) of the

Questionnaire and signed and dated the Questionnaire. Missing or unclear ratings for any of the nine elements may be identified or clarified when the GSA representative contacts the client.

• “Major subcontractor” is defined as a subcontractor performing any of the following:

Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing (MEP) or fire alarm installation; and their work can be evaluated through Questionnaires.

• “Acceptable” is defined as a PBS Past Performance Questionnaire in the version in the solicitation for a project that is recent, relevant, similar, and complete; performed by the prime, a joint venture partner, a major subcontractor, or a parent company (if that parent company will be directly involved with performance of this contract), that addresses all rating elements, and is verifiable with the client. A CPARS report should not be provided by the contractor in lieu of a past performance questionnaire. Any CPARS report that is provided by the contractor is not acceptable.

• A project submitted on a Questionnaire cannot already have a completed final Contractor

Performance Assessment Report, as described in section 1.b. below.

• Although only one Questionnaire may be submitted by a client for each project, it is possible that Questionnaires for the same project(s) could be obtained by the Government from other sources. Sample projects that receive more than one Questionnaire will have their individual

Questionnaire result averaged for that sample project.

• “Client” is defined as the organization, entity, or property owner for which the work was done.

General contractors, partners, subcontractors, or designers who performed the work in question, in whole or in part, are not “clients” and should not complete or submit a Questionnaire. Any one client may submit Questionnaires for multiple sample projects – each project must be on a separate Questionnaire.

• “Occupied building” is defined as a building or structure populated in whole or in part by the client’s or organization’s personnel (including administrative, janitorial, and other staff)during the period of performance of the work to the degree that arrangements must be made to work around either personnel or schedules, considering noise, safety, entrances/exits, foot traffic, restroom access, lighting/electricity, heating/cooling/ventilation, water/plumbing, and maintaining the client’s business functionality. Work done in or on an unoccupied building or structure, such as new construction, is not considered relevant for evaluation purposes under this subfactor.

For a sample project to be included in the Questionnaire score it must be recent, relevant, similar, complete, and verified by the client for whom the project was performed or by the reference who submitted the

Questionnaire. The Offeror is solely responsible for ensuring that Questionnaires are for projects that meet all the requirements for acceptability.

Note:

The Offeror must demonstrate successful contract performance for no more than two (2) recent, similar, relevant, verified projects completed within five (5) years of the date of the issuance of the solicitation, or within five (5) years of the date the solicitation. Offerors must have two (2) acceptable Questionnaires for projects no less than $250,000. Offerors may ask clients to submit more than two (2) Questionnaires;

however, if more than three (3) Questionnaires are received the Government will disregard all beyond the first three (3) acceptable Questionnaires received (as determined by the date and time the email arrives in the GSA Contracting Officer’s email inbox) and may not evaluate them in any way. The

Government reserves the right to consider past performance projects that it identifies independently of and other than the Offeror’s submitted sample projects that the Government determines to be relevant to this solicitation.

PAST SAMPLE PROJECTS:

Sample projects submitted that are not complete, recent, relevant, or similar as defined above will not be considered acceptable or included in the evaluation. The Offeror is responsible for identifying only projects that are complete, recent, relevant, and similar as defined above, with factual information provided in blocks one through four (1-4) on page one (1) of the Past Performance Questionnaire attached to this solicitation. Questionnaires other than the form attached to this solicitation will not be accepted or evaluated in any way. If the Offeror materially misrepresents information relating to its past performance, the Government may reject the proposal in its entirety.

Submitted sample projects should be examples of the Offeror’s own work to the greatest extent possible.

If the Offeror does not have experience that fits the requirements stated above, sample projects can be submitted for work done by a major subcontractor of the Offeror, or by one or any of the joint venture partners if the Offeror is a joint venture. Past performance information is proprietary source selection information, and the Government will discuss it directly with the Offeror only with consent of the subcontractor; however, if there is a concern with a proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the

Offeror can be notified of the issue during discussions (if held) or debriefing (if requested). If the

Contracting Officer cannot determine that a sample project significantly correlates to the Offeror’s ability to perform the contract, that sample project’s Questionnaire may be removed from consideration and not be included. The Offeror will not be informed if a sample project is evaluated or removed from evaluation for any reason, unless a debriefing is requested in accordance with FAR subpart15.5. If one or more sample projects/Questionnaires are removed from evaluation for any reason, the Offeror will not have the opportunity to arrange for other sample projects/Questionnaires to be submitted.

The client shall submit completed questionnaires to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist directly.

The reference (client) listed on each Past Performance Questionnaire must be available to be contacted by the Government. The Government will make no more than two (2) attempts to contact each client. The

Offeror should ensure all contact information, phone numbers and email addresses are current and valid at the time the proposal is submitted. If the Government cannot contact a client, that project’s Questionnaire will not be included in the past performance result. The Offeror is solely responsible for following up with each client to encourage their timely submission of the completed, signed Questionnaire.

Questionnaires received by the Government later than the time and date specified in the Solicitation for receipt of proposals will not be accepted or evaluated. The Offeror will not be told by the Government how many Questionnaires were received or accepted unless a debriefing is requested in accordance with

FAR subpart 15.5.

The Government may consider references regarding the offeror’s performance on contracts not submitted by the offeror, whether similar or not, that the Government is aware of during the evaluation process. The

Government will not be responsible if reference telephone numbers provided by the offeror are not current; if reference declines to comment, or if references cannot be contacted within two (two) attempts.

Expressed facts and opinions obtained as part of the past performance evaluation constitute protected and proprietary “Source Selection Information”. GSA will only discuss past performance information directly with the prospective prime contractor that is being reviewed (the Offeror). If there is a concern with the past performance of a proposed subcontractor, the Offeror can be notified of an issue, but no details may be discussed without the subcontractor’s written permission.

Offerors will be provided an opportunity to respond to all adverse reports if they have not previously had the opportunity. Adverse is defined as past performance information that contains a less than satisfactory or acceptable assessment on any evaluated element. An unfavorable comment within past performance information which contains only satisfactory or better assessments on evaluated elements does not constitute adverse past performance. Offerors and subcontractors will not be provided an opportunity to see, respond to, or comment upon positive or satisfactory reports.

Standard of Evaluation

The standard of evaluation is met when the Offeror has documented significant experience providing construction/installation services for two (2) similar projects in the past five (5) years. The Offeror has satisfactorily demonstrated their knowledge and experience in providing fire alarm system buildout comparable to those to be encountered in this project. The Offeror has documented its ability to deliver the completed projects within a fixed schedule and within the prescribed budget. The Offeror has documented its ability to provide services that ensured compliance with the Scope of Work, prescribed budget, and schedule.

The references contacted provide favorable evaluations indicating that the projects have met or exceeded the customers’ requirements as set forth in the construction contract documents (drawings and specifications) in a timely manner, and within established budgets. The past performance reference must state the Client would hire the contractor again to be determined technically acceptable.

The Government has no obligation to ensure that an equal number of references are obtained for each

Offeror.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions; therefore, all proposals must be correct and complete at initial submission. If any information is missing or unclear, and/or if the Government cannot determine that a project is recent and relevant, the sample project’s Questionnaire will be removed from consideration and will not be included in the past performance result. The Offeror will not be informed if a sample project is evaluated or removed from evaluation for any reason, unless a debriefing is requested in accordance with FAR subpart 15.5. If one or more sample projects/Questionnaires are removed from evaluation for any reason, the Offeror will not have the opportunity to arrange for other sample projects/Questionnaires to be submitted.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions; therefore, all proposals must be correct and complete at initial submission. If any information is missing or unclear, and/or if the

Government cannot determine that a project is recent and relevant, the sample project’s Questionnaire will be removed from consideration and will not be included in the past performance score. The Offeror will not be informed if a sample project is evaluated or removed from evaluation for any reason, unless a debriefing is requested in accordance with FAR subpart 15.5. If one or more sample projects/Questionnaires are removed from evaluation for any reason, the Offeror will not have the opportunity to arrange for other sample projects/Questionnaires to be submitted.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

REGION 7

FORT WORTH REGIONAL

OFFICE Technical Services

Branch (7PMS) Fort Worth, TX

Asbestos Building Re-Inspection

Gallup Federal Building Gallup, THIRD AND HALL AVENUE

GALLOP NM

(NM0038)

NOVEMBER 2019

PREPARED BY

FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

1301 YOUNG STREET

DALLAS, TX 75202

Submitted: January 2020

Asbestos Audit –NM0038

1 Nov 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION Page 2

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION Page 2

III. SUMMARY OF ACM FINDINGS Page 2

Summary of the location and quantities of all identified asbestos containing materials according to EPA/AHERA categories for Thermal System Insulation and Miscellaneous

Materials

IV. PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF ACM CONDITIONS Page 4

Physical assessment of the ACM including the EPA/AHERA Decision Tree/Response Action Keys for prioritizing required administrative actions and identifying any damage and potential for future disturbance or release of ACM fibers.

V. ACTION PLAN PRIORITIES Page 5

Specific action plan description and estimated removal costs of identified ACM together with General Recommendations

APPENDICES

A. ACM FLOOR PLAN LOCATIONS

B. PHOTOGRAPHS

C. LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM

D. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

2 Nov 2019

I. INTRODUCTION

An Asbestos Building Audit Survey (ABAS) Re-inspection was conducted at the Gallup

Federal Building located at Third and Hill Streets in Gallup, New Mexico (NM0038). The purpose of the Re-Inspection was to assess the condition of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) previously identified in the ABAS conducted in January 1995, Re-

Inspections completed in December 2005, and August 2011. Additionally, any suspect materials not previously observed were sampled and documented as to condition and specific building location. Floor plans for room area locations and asbestos containing materials have also been updated to reflect the information available at the time of the

Reinspection.

This Re-inspection utilized information from the previous asbestos surveys conducted in 1995 December 2005, and August 2011. These surveys identified the following asbestos containing materials:

Boiler flue insulation

Vinyl floor tile and mastic Residual black tile mastic

Thermal System Insulation (TSI) in pipe chase

Building renovations have been performed since the last survey. On approximately

February 2019 asbestos containing floor tile and mastic was removed from rooms 146-

148, 207, 207A, 207B, 207E, 215, 224, 224B, 230, 301, 303, 307, 310, 310A, 311, 311A, 315, 315A, 317, 317A, 319, 319A, and 319B. On the third-floor asbestos containing TSI pipe insulation from the pipe chase was removed.

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Gallup Federal Building (NM0038ZZ) located at Third and Hill Streets in Gallup, New Mexico is a three-story building with an elevator penthouse. Adjacent to the facility is a one level parking garage with a mechanical room. At the southeast corner of the property is a building that formerly housed the BIA Soils Laboratory. It was constructed in 1968 and contains approximately 92, 500 square feet of usable floor space. At the time of the Reinspection, the building largely housed agencies associated with BIA.

A ground floor level hot water boiler provides building heating. Cooling is provided by a closed- loop chilled water system coupled with a cooling tower.

Interior finishes include plaster walls, wallboard walls, acoustical tile drop ceilings, carpet and adhesive, vinyl floor tile and mastic, and vinyl base cove and adhesive.

III. SUMMARY OF ACM FINDINGS

Findings below are based on results from the Building Audit Surveys conducted in

1995, 2005, 2010, 2019, and from additional sampling performed as part of this assessment. A total of 21 samples were collected and analyzed in an effort to update available records. Wall plaster and four different types of window caulking were collected.

These building materials were not collected during the previous surveys. All were found to contain no asbestos.

3 Nov 2019

Quantities listed below are rough estimates and should be confirmed prior to project estimating.

Thermal System Insulation This category includes all types and shapes of Insulation Materials (Pipe Lagging/

Fittings/Boiler Breeching, pipe insulation) used for temperature or condensation control.

Material Type Location Quantity Functional Space

Boiler Flue Insulation Room 119 250 sq. ft. Mechanical

TSI pipes Pipe Chase 1st and 2nd floor 40 linear feet Chase

Surfacing ACM Materials This category includes Spray-Applied and Troweled-On Coatings. No surfacing asbestos containing materials were identified.

Miscellaneous ACM Materials This category includes Floor Tile and Mastic, Ceiling Tile and Adhesives, Sealant, Vinyl base cove, and Caulking .

Material Type Location Quantity square ft Functional Space

Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 324 2976 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 324A 252 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 324B 196 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 326 1512 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 327 608 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 327A 198 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 327B 143 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 327C 143 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 327D 130 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 356 143 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 356A 182 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 356B 140 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 358 322 Mail room Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 346 924 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 346A 252 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 346B 196 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 346C 247 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 342 252 Conference room Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 201 378 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor RM 205 444 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 3rd floor Elevator lobby/halls 1620 Hallways Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor RM Conf 594 Conference room Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor Elevator lobby/halls 2761 Hallways Vinyl Floor Tile Mastic 2nd floor RM 272 1900 Office Vinyl Floor Tile Mastic 2nd floor RM 272A 272 Office Vinyl Floor Tile Mastic 2nd floor RM 272B 256 Office Vinyl Floor Tile Mastic 2nd floor RM 252 459 Conference room Vinyl Floor Tile Mastic 2nd floor RM 248A 144 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor RM 240 144 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor RM 240A 195 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2n floor RM 240B 130 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor RM 240C 169 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 2nd floor Foyer 290 Foyer

4 Nov 2019

Material Type Location Quantity square ft Functional Space Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 109 160 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 103 117 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor Hallways 360 Hallway Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 108 220 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 108A 216 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 108B 104 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 108C 153 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 108D 140 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 116 192 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 116A 238 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 106 80 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 117 252 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 118 783 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 118A 80 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 118B 80 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 118C 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 118D 322 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor NE Foyer 108 Foyer Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 130 205 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 130A 99 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor Security office 117 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 176 143 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 162-166 1373 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 164 370 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 164A 72 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 164B 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 164C 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 152 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 154 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 113 117 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 182 260 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 184 380 File room Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 133 104 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 131 126 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 129 187 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 1st floor RM 127 112 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 8 280 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 4 192 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 1 364 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 10 192 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 10A 144 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 11 144 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 11A 130 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 12 45 Office Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Soil Lab RM 13 176 Office

Vinyl floor tile and or mastic exists throughout the main building and in approximately 20% of the Soils Lab. In most cases, f loor tile and mastic are overlain by carpet.

A sample collected from the inside door surface of the abandoned air handler in garage mechanical room G-3 was found to contain asbestos. The material is non-friable. The material may be present elsewhere within the unit.

5 Nov 2019

Non-ACM Materials

This category includes materials that were considered suspect and were sampled during this re- inspection or during prior surveys and were not found to be asbestos containing:

Acoustical ceiling tile and ceiling tile mastic, wallboard (sheetrock) joint compound, texturing, duct insulation, sealants (white), cove base and mastic, mechanical pipe fittings, insulation, roof drain insulation, domestic water fitting insulations. plaster, and caulking.

Bulk Sample Results

The previous surveys included analytical results for 133 bulk samples. A total of 18 bulk samples were collected and analyzed as part of this Re-inspection. A summary of sampling and analytical results can be found in Appendix C.

IV. PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF ACM CONDITIONS

As a result of the survey, the presence of asbestos was documented for several types of building materials. The physical assessments and the appropriate EPA/AHERA

Decision Tree/Response Action Key for these materials are summarized below.

Response Action 7 - Low Concern

These identified Functional Spaces and Homogeneous Areas were positively identified to contain ACM Fibers. The physical assessments were all judged NO

DAMAGE, with a MODERATE Potential for DAMAGE and pose a minimal health hazard, as long as they are properly maintained.

Room 119 Mechanical Boiler Flue Insulation

(12%-15% Chrysotile)

Disturbance of this material is unlikely unless exposed during renovations or maintenance.

Response Action 8 - Low Concern

These identified Functional Spaces and Homogeneous Areas were positively identified to contain ACM Fibers, but the physical assessments were all considered to be Non-Friable and/or of Low Accessibility, and as a result, pose minimal health hazard as long as they are properly maintained.

Miscellaneous ACM

Throughout Various Floor Tile and Mastic

(1%-5% Chrysotile)

Soils Lab Office, Storage Floor Tile and Mastic

(1%-5% Chrysotile)

Suite 262 Office Residual Black Mastic

(3%-5% Chrysotile)

6 Nov 2019

Mech. G-3 Mechanical AHU Door Coating

(5%-7% Chrysotile)

Asbestos containing floor tile and mastic remain throughout the building exposed and under carpet. All black floor mastic should be assumed to be asbestos containing.

Tarry coating existed on the inside of the AHU access door. Additional coating material may be present within the unit.

7 Nov 2019

V. ACTION PLAN PRIORITIES

The Re-inspection of the Gallup Federal Building has assessed the location and physical condition of ACM previously identified by an Asbestos Survey Report performed in 1995, updated 2005, 2011, and 2019. An additional eighteen samples were collected and analyzed for further confirmation. The physical condition of all of these materials represent some level of concern and associated response action. It is imperative that an updated ACTION PLAN takes into consideration the results of this

Building Audit Survey Re-inspection documentation. This will assist in prioritizing required administrative actions, as well as preventing any additional damage or release of any suspect ACM from occurring in these identified materials.

Based on the observations documented and the physical assessment of conditions for future disturbance or degree of damage identified, EPA/AHERA criteria have standardized the following specific Decision Tree/Response Action Key recommendations for the types of materials identified:

Response Action Plan

Action # Priority

7 Low

Material Type Location(s) Quantity Unit Price Cost

Boiler Flue Insulation Room 119 250 square. ft. $30.00/ft. $7500

Action Plan Description Continue O&M, until major renovation or demolition requires removal under NESHAPS, or until hazard assessment factors change. Review Operations and Maintenance Plan plans prior to renovations that would include wall penetrations.

Response Action Plan

Action # Priority

8 Low

Miscellaneous ACM

Material Type Location(s) Quantity Unit Price Cost

Floor Tile and Mastic Various 30676 sq. ft. $3.00/ft. $92,028

Floor Tile and Mastic Soils Lab 1,667 sq. ft. $3.00/ft. $5001

8 Nov 2019

Material Type Location(s) Quantity Unit Price Cost

Residual Black Mastic Suite 262 600 sq. ft. $3.00/ft. $18,000

AHU Door Coating Mech Room G-3 20 sq. ft. NA NA

Action Plan Description

Continue O&M, until major renovation or demolition requires removal under NESHAPS, or until hazard assessment factors change.

NOTE: Estimates do not include costs for material replacement.

General Recommendations

1. Additional sampling and physical inspections of all identified/suspect ACM materials prior to any scheduled renovation, demolition, or disturbance of the areas identified are recommended. Classify all referenced suspect materials as asbestos-containing until laboratory tests prove otherwise.

2. Maintain all identified/suspect ACM in good condition until removed or replaced.

3. Annually, hereafter, verify contractor/building maintenance personnel with updated

EPA/AHERA accredited asbestos training, to provide adequate administrative support in understanding the identified asbestos building conditions and the options available in maintaining and servicing these materials safely.

Another administrative consideration for the resulting Audit Survey documentation is background information for the establishment of frequencies for air monitoring surveys and visual inspections, when there are indications that material could become damaged by changes in building use, changes in operations and maintenance practices, or with changes in occupancy.

A review of this report should be performed prior to scheduling any renovation or demolition work within this building to assure that all suspect asbestos-containing material locations have been identified. Subsequent to this inspection, if a previously concealed or undetermined suspect building material is identified, it shall be treated as asbestos-containing, until laboratory analysis proves otherwise.

Asbestos Audit – NM0038

APPENDIX A BUILDING

FLOOR PLANS

ACM HOMOGENEOUS AREAS/FLOOR PLAN LOCATIONS

This SUB-APPENDIX represents a basic set of floor plans outlining general locations of identified Asbestos Containing Materials.

Floor Type Page

First Floor Misc. Materials 2

Second Floor Misc. Materials 3

Third Floor Misc. Materials 4

Soils Lab Misc. Materials 5

Garage Misc. Materials 6

First Floor Thermal ACM

A-

N

November 2019

Nov

APPENDIX B

PHOTOGRAPHS

This APPENDIX provides an Indexed Listing of the attached photographs; the

Location pictured; the Homogeneous Area and/or Functional Space represented;

as well as the respective Material Description associated with the photograph.

This SUB-APPENDIX provides an Indexed Listing of the attached photographs;

the Location pictured; the Homogeneous Area and/or Functional Space represented; as well as the respective Material Description associated with the photograph.

Photograph

Number

Location Homogeneous

Area

Material

Description

1. Room 119

Boiler Flue

No Damage ACM

2. 1 Hallway Floor Tile and Mastic No Damage ACM

3. Mech G-3 White Mastic on AHU Non-Friable No Damage ACM

4. Soils Lab Pipe Fitting Insulation Non-Asbestos (Labeled as ACM)

5. Mech. G-3 Domestic Water Fitting Non-Asbestos ((Labeled as ACM)

6. Mech.107 Duct Insulation Non-Asbestos ((Labeled as ACM)

Photograph 1: Asbestos containing boiler flue insulation in Room 119.

Photograph 2: Typical asbestos containing floor tile found throughout the building.

Photograph 3: An asbestos m as t i c coating applied to the door of the abandoned air handling unit in garage mechanical room G-3.

Photograph 4: Typical suspect pipe fittings in the Soils Lab. Previous and current sampling and analysis results did not identify asbestos in these materials.

Photograph 5: Labeled domestic water fittings in garage mechanical room G-3 were tested and not found to contain asbestos.

Photograph 6: Labeled duct insulation in mechanical room 107 was tested and not found to contain asbestos.

APPENDIX C

BULK SAMPLE LABORATORY RESULTS

ASBESTOS LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY

PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code 102056-0

2051 Valley View Lane TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241-8460

Client : Federal Occupational Health Lab Job No. : 19B-14797

Project : GSA Gallup NM Federal Building NM0038 Report Date : 11/29/2019

Project # : MN00358 Sample Date : 11/20/2019

Identification : Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Test Method : Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Page 1 of 2

On 11/22/2019, twenty one (21) bulk material samples were submitted by Jamie Bryant of Federal Occupational Health for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below:

Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content

NM 0038-01 Wall Plaster, 307 Southeast Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-02 Wall Plaster, 311 C Northwest Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-03 Wall Plaster, 319 South Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-04 Wall Plaster, 215 Southwest Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-05 Wall Plaster, 208 Northwest Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-06 Wall Plaster, 240 East Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-07 Wall Plaster, 116A Northwest Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-08 Wall Plaster, 130 Northeast Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-09 Wall Plaster, 146 Northeast Wall None Detected - Plaster

NM 0038-10 Window Caulk Ck 1, 307 Exterior Wall None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-11 Window Caulk Ck 1, 315 Exterior Wall None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-12 Window Caulk Ck 1, 301 Northwest Wall None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-13 Window Caulk Ck 2, 107 AHR Window North None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-14 Window Caulk Ck 2, 107 AHR Window North None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-15 Window Caulk Ck 2, 107 AHR Window North None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-16 Window Caulk Ck 3, 118 Window None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-17 Window Caulk Ck 3, 118D Window None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-18 Window Caulk Ck 3, 176A Window None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-19 Window Caulk Ck 4, Exterior Building West Window None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-20 Window Caulk Ck 4, Exterior Building North Window None Detected - Caulking

NM 0038-21 Window Caulk Ck 4, Exterior Building East Window None Detected - Caulking

2051 Valley View Lane

PLM Summary Report

NVLAP Lab Code 102056-0

TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241-8460

Client :

Project :

Project # :

Identification :

Test Method :

Federal Occupational Health

Not Provided

Not Provided

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116

Lab Job No. : 19B-14797

Report Date : 11/29/2019

Sample Date : 11/20/2019

On 11/22/2019, twenty one (21) bulk material samples were submitted by Jamie Bryant of Federal Occupational Health for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below:

Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content

These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. The test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results relate only to the items tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S.

Government. Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code 102056-0.

Analyst(s): Shaun Wilkerson

Lab Manager : Heather Lopez Approved Signatory :

Lab Director : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory :

Thank you for choosing Moody Labs

Moody Labs PLM Detail Report NVLAP Lab Code 102056-0

2051 Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241-8460

Client : Federal Occupational Health Lab Job No. : 19B-14797

Project : Not Provided Report Date : 11/29/2019

Project # : Not Provided

Sample Number

Layer % Of

Sample

Components % of Layer

Analysis Date

Analyst

NM 0038-01 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-02 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-03 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-04 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-05 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-06 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-07 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-08 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-09 Plaster (White) 100% Aggregate 65% 11/29 SW

Calcite / Binders 35%

NM 0038-10 Caulking (Black) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-11 Caulking (Black) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-12 Caulking (Black) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-13 Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-14 Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

Moody Labs PLM Detail Report NVLAP Lab Code 102056-0

2051 Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241-8460

Client : Federal Occupational Health Lab Job No. : 19B-14797

Project : Not Provided Report Date : 11/29/2019

Project # : Not Provided

Sample Number

Layer % Of

Sample

Components % of Layer

Analysis Date

Analyst

NM 0038-15 Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

NM 0038-16 Caulking (Brown) 100% Cellulose Fibers 5% 11/29 SW

Calcite 45%

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-17 Caulking (Brown) 100% Cellulose Fibers 5% 11/29 SW

Calcite 45%

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-18 Caulking (Brown) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-19 Caulking (Brown) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-20 Caulking (Brown) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Binders / Fillers 50%

NM 0038-21 Caulking (Brown) 100% Calcite 50% 11/29 SW

Asbestos O&M – NM0038

1.2 RELATED DOCUMENTS

This plan is intended to be used in conjunction with several guidance documents including but not limited to the following:

• Managing Asbestos in Place – A building Owner’s Guide to Operations and Maintenance Programs for Asbestos-Containing Materials (“Green Book”) (EPA publication 20T-2003)

• Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings (“Purple

Book”) (EPA publication 560/5-85-024)

• Guidance Manual Asbestos Operations & Maintenance Work Practices, the National Institute of Building Sciences.

• All other applicable Federal, state, and local regulations must be complied with as well as any approved GSA work practices.

1.3 ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT

The O&M plan is based on the inspection report listed below.

Asbestos Building Audit Survey Reinspection (NM0038) Gallup Federal Building Third and Hill Gallup, NM

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 GENERAL

Asbestos is a mineral that is mined predominantly in Canada, South Africa, and

Russia. It forms long, thin fibers that may be only 0.33 microns wide (1 micron = 1 millionth of a meter), which are not visible to the human eye. Because they are so small, asbestos fibers can remain airborne for long periods of time. Three forms of asbestos are commonly used commercially: chrysotile, crocidolite, and amosite (often known as white, blue, and brown, respectively). While some countries regulate these minerals separately, US regulatory agencies consider them equally hazardous and group them together within the regulations. Three forms of asbestos less commonly used commercially are tremolite, actinolite, and anthophyllite.

Much of what is known about asbestos-related diseases comes from studying workers in the various asbestos industries. Exposure to levels of airborne asbestos typical of the asbestos work place prior to 1972 has been related to a significantly higher incidence of asbestosis, a debilitating lung disease; mesothelioma, a rare cancer of the chest and abdominal lining; and cancers of the lung, esophagus, stomach, colon, and other organs.