47PH0223R0003 FIGURE L-2 - El Paso TX and Southeastern NM Region Operations and Maintenance and Related Services - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 11 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PH0223R0003
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FIGURE L-2
Past Performance Questionnaire
CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION Comment by David Hyson - 7PQD: @aaren.hanson@gsa.gov @david.e.holland@gsa.gov @bret.stubbs@gsa.gov FIGURE L-2 Past Performance Questionnaire _Assigned to Aaren Hanson - 7PQB_
Contractor Name
Contract Number
Contractor role:
[i.e., Prime, Subcontractor, or Joint Venture]
Dates of Contract Performance
Contractor Performance and Assessment Report (CPARS) YES NO
Address, City, and State of contract performance
Total Contract Value (including options)
Building Name, Square Footage, and Type of Services:
[Identify each building name, the square footage of each building, and what types of services were provided in that building]
Type of Space Serviced: [i.e., Commercial Office Building, Federal Courthouse, Federal Parking Garage, etc.]
Contract Requirements: [Describe all services provided under the contract and any special/unique contract requirements. Briefly describe any problems encountered and how they were resolved]
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Name
Title
Agency/Company
Address
Telephone
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please check the level of the Contractors overall performance in each of the business management factors listed below. Leave blank if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated.
| EVALUATION FACTOR |
| Excellent |
| Very good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
Quality . accuracy, and timeliness of required documentation
Identification and reporting of problems and potential problems
Compliance with technical/contractual terms and conditions
Provides personnel to perform all contract requirements
Responsiveness to requests for information
Accommodates fluctuating workload
Adheres to safety policies and procedures
Success of Quality Control Program
Empowerment of onsite management [authority to hire/fire personnel and authority to purchase necessary supplies, materials, and equipment]
Ability to obtain required corporate resources
Quality and stability of key personnel
Effectiveness of phase-in/close out activities
Overall rating of contractor's performance
| Would you award to this contractor again? |
| YES NO |
Please comment on all Fair and Poor ratings given, or on any other ratings, as desired.
COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .