Madawaska 91 and 93 Vital 170 Main Hazardous Material Assessment Reports Combined.pdf

PDF 36 MB Posted Jan 22, 2021

Attached to: Madawaska Land Port of Entry Demolition Project
Solicitation number: 47PB0021Q0008
Issued by: General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 1

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Tab 10 SF1442-14b FX1.pdf	PDF	Jan 29, 2021
Tab 10 BetaSam 508 SAT GC LPTA Sol Oct 20202 Mod 3 FOXIT .pdf	PDF	Jan 25, 2021
Madawaska Demolition 93 and 91 Vital 170 Main and Aztec Slab SoW docx Google Docs.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
Madawaska Property Demolition Pictures.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
19-117 Madawaska Clavette Del01.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
_US LPOE_MADAWASKA_Final BCD_C102.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
19-117 Madawaska McDonalds Del01.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
19-117 Madawaska Combined Del01.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
19-117 Madawaska Charette Del01.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
AttachD_93Vital_Plan.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
PhaseIESA FINAL 5 161 170 Main.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
Madawaska Virtual Site Walk README_FINAL (1).pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
91 and 93 Vital 170 and 180 Main ESA Reports 1.pdf	PDF	Jan 22, 2021
Tab 10 Wage Determniation ME20210001.pdf	PDF	Jan 14, 2021
Tab 10 Madawaska SOW.pdf	PDF	Jan 14, 2021
Tab 10 508 SAT Agreement.docx	DOCX document	Jan 14, 2021
Tab 10 BetaSam 508 SAT GC LPTA Sol Oct 20202 .docx	DOCX document	Jan 14, 2021
Tab 10 Wage Determination 2 ME20210020.pdf	PDF	Jan 14, 2021
Tab 10 SAT Reps and Certs Nov 2020 508 (3).docx	DOCX document	Jan 14, 2021

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

ASSESSMENT REPORT

NEW LAND POINT OF ENTRY PROJECT

(NME0012)

93 VITAL DRIVE

(PARCEL NO. 5-162)

MADAWASKA, MAINE

Prepared for: U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Thomas P. O’Neill, Jr. Federal Building 10 Causeway Street Boston, Massachusetts 02222-1076

December 3, 2020 Revised November 16, 2020

JN: 11488.002

Report Prepared By:

CES, Inc.

One Merchants Plaza Suite 701

Bangor, Maine 04401 207.989.4824

JN: 11488.002 I U.S. General Services Administration Revised Hazardous Materials Assessment Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CES, Inc. (CES) completed a Hazardous Materials Assessment of a former single-family, residential structure located at 93 Vital Drive (Parcel No. 5-162) in Madawaska, Maine to support a planned demolition as part of the New Land Point of Entry (LPOE) project. The building consists of a two-story, wood-framed structure with a full basement and pitched asphalt shingle roof system.

This assessment was completed to identify Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-Based

Paint (LBP), Potentially Hazardous Materials/Wastes and Universal Wastes, and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCB) on the interior and exterior of the building that would require special handling and disposal or would be regulated prior to/during demolition of the structure and site cleanup.

CES also performed an interior visual assessment for the presence of “black mold.” The initial assessment, which was conducted on October 7, 2020, included the interior and the exterior of the building. A subsequent site visit was conducted on November 19, 2020 to collect an exterior sample of the window trim for TCLP analysis

The following is a summary of results of the Hazardous Materials Assessment:

1. ACM was identified by laboratory analysis on the interior of the building and consisted of:

◆ Yellow sheet flooring

◆ Painted sheet flooring (used as shelf liner)

◆ Brown/green sheet flooring

2. LBP was identified on the exterior of the building including:

◆ Soffit

◆ Window trim

LBP was not identified on the interior surfaces of the building.

3. An exterior window trim sample was collected for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching

Procedure (TCLP) testing. The collected sample was submitted to Alpha Analytical (Alpha) for analysis. The laboratory analytical results indicated levels of lead below five parts per million (ppm; non-hazardous).

4. Potential Universal Wastes and Hazardous Materials identified include a light ballast and

37 individual one-gallon containers of paint. A single, above-ground petroleum storage tank is located within the basement of the structure.

5. Suspect PCB-containing caulk was not identified on window and/or door systems for the structure.

6. A visual assessment of the building interior did not identify the presence of “black mold.”

JN: 11488.002 II U.S. General Services Administration

Should the identified materials above be impacted by planned renovation, demolition, site work or any other disturbance, removal or remediation of the identified materials is required prior to disturbance, in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.

JN: 11488.002 III U.S. General Services Administration

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. I

1.0 | INTRODUCTION

2.0 | ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

2.1 Asbestos Demolition Impact Survey

2.2 Asbestos Sampling Results

3.0 | POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTES ASSESSMENT

4.0 | LEAD-BASED PAINT DETERMINATION (LBP)

4.1 LBP Determination

5.0 | TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE

6.0 | POLYCHLORINATED BI-PHENYLS (PCBs) SCREENING

7.0 | VISUAL ASSESSMENT FOR BLACK MOLD

8.0 | CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

8.2 Potentially Hazardous Materials/Wastes and Universal Wastes

8.3 Lead-Based Paint

9.0 | REPORT CERTIFICATION

TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Identified Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

Table 2 Estimated Asbestos Abatement Costs

Table 3 Hazardous Materials Inventory/Cost Estimate

Table 4 Sample Matrix (GSA)

APPENDICES

Appendix A Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor Certifications

Appendix B Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Certifications

Appendix C Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Results

Appendix D Photographic Log

Appendix E Field Sketches

Appendix F Lead Based Paint Determination Report

Appendix G TCLP Laboratory Analytical Results

JN: 11488.002 1 U.S. General Services Administration

1.0 | INTRODUCTION

residential structure located at 93 Vital Drive (Parcel No. 5-162) in Madawaska, Maine to support a planned demolition as part of the New Land Point of Entry (LPOE) project. The building consists of a two-story, wood-framed structure with a full basement and pitched asphalt shingle roof system.

This assessment was completed to identify Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-Based

Paint (LBP), Potentially Hazardous Materials/Wastes and Universal Wastes, and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCB) on the interior and exterior of the building that would require special handling and disposal or would be regulated prior to, or during, demolition of the structure and site cleanup.

CES also performed a visual assessment for the presence of “black mold.” The assessment, which was conducted on October 7, 2020, included the interior and exterior of the building.

2.0 | ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

2.1 Asbestos Demolition Impact Survey

The Asbestos Demolition Impact Survey was conducted in accordance with the Maine

Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP) Asbestos Management Regulations (06-096

C.M.R. Chapter 425 (2011)) to provide information regarding the presence of interior and exterior

ACM associated with the structure. Ms. Deborah Kasik and Mr. Chad McPherson (CES), both

MDEP-licensed asbestos inspectors, performed the field survey on October 7, 2020. Copies of

Ms. Kasik’s and Mr. McPherson’s Asbestos Inspector certifications are included in Appendix A.

Completion of the Asbestos Demolition Impact Survey included:

◆ Visual identification of suspect ACM on the interior and exterior of building, including the roof system.

◆ Collection of 92 bulk samples of identified suspect ACM in accordance with MDEP regulations.

◆ Quantification of ACM identified by laboratory analysis.

As with any scientific study, an asbestos demolition impact survey is subject to a variety of limitations. Limitations to be considered when interpreting the results of the survey performed on this building include the following:

◆ An asbestos demolition impact survey may not be able to identify all ACM present throughout a building.

◆ Variations in building materials used during construction and subsequent renovations.

◆ Inaccessible areas within wall cavities, under floors, and above solid ceilings.

Bulk samples of suspect ACM collected during the survey were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) of South Portland, Maine for analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed using the MDEP required analytical methods: “PLM-EPA 600/R-93/116” (for surfacing, thermal system insulation, and cementitious materials), and “PLM NOB-EPA 600/R-93/116” (for non-friable organically

JN: 11488.002 2 U.S. General Services Administration bound materials (NOBs)) (e.g., floor tile, adhesives, and roofing) with “gravimetric reduction”.

EMSL’s laboratory is certified to perform asbestos analysis by both the National Voluntary

Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association

(AIHA). EMSL is a MDEP licensed Asbestos Analytical Laboratory. Copies of EMSL’s laboratory certifications are included in Appendix B. Laboratory analytical results and chain of custodies are Appendix C.

The following is a summary of field findings and laboratory analytical results of the survey.

The former residential structure consists of a two-story, wood-framed structure with a full basement. A total of 92 samples of identified suspect ACM were collected from the interior and exterior of the building including the following:

Interior:

◆ Cementitious board

◆ Sheetrock wall and ceiling material

◆ Six types of floor tiles and associated adhesives

◆ Fourteen types of sheet flooring

◆ Two types of ceiling tile adhesives

◆ Floor adhesive (including residual adhesive)

◆ Two types of wall panel adhesives

◆ Refractory cement

◆ Textured wall material

Exterior:

◆ Asphalt siding (brick pattern)

◆ Asphalt roof shingles

The number of samples collected was determined by the number of homogeneous sampling areas identified by the inspector. A homogeneous area is an area that based on the inspector’s judgment, contains materials that are uniform in color and texture and are present on similar building or utility components. Representative photographs of the building including identified

ACM are included as Appendix D.

2.2 Asbestos Sampling Results

According to MDEP regulations, locations and occurrences of materials that tested positive and are homogenous (similar in color and texture) in nature are considered as ACM, provided the material contains greater than or equal to (≥) one percent (1%) asbestos based on laboratory analysis. A material can only be considered negative for asbestos if analytical results from all bulk samples in a group of samples representing that material indicate an asbestos content of less than (<) 1%.

ACM identified by laboratory analysis consisted of:

◆ Yellow sheet flooring (Sample 93V-017A)

◆ Painted sheet flooring (shelf; Sample 93V-018A)

◆ Brown/green sheet flooring (Sample 93V-029A)

JN: 11488.002 3 U.S. General Services Administration

A summary of identified asbestos is included in Table 1. Sample locations and identified ACM are included on the basement through second floor field sketches included as Appendix E.

Budgetary cost estimates for removal of identified ACM are included in Table 2.

Budgetary cost estimates have been prepared to provide a budget for removal of identified ACM.

These estimates do not include material replacement costs, regulatory agency notification fees, or a contingency. Estimates assume the contractor will be responsible to prepare the asbestos abatement design(s). Regulatory agency notification fees associated with this project will vary depending phasing and project schedule. Actual abatement costs may vary depending upon the quantity of ACM abated and abatement methods utilized.

3.0 | POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTES ASSESSMENT

CES conducted a visual assessment of the interior of the former residence to identify potential hazardous material and potentially hazardous wastes, including both Universal Waste and

Potential Universal Wastes, used or stored at the structure. A summary of identified materials and associated estimates for removal and disposal of the identified materials is included as Table

4.0 | LEAD-BASED PAINT DETERMINATION (LBP)

4.1 LBP Determination

An LBP determination was conducted at the building by Ms. Deborah A. Kasik (CES), a MDEP certified Lead Risk Assessor. A copy of Ms. Kasik’s Lead Risk Assessor certification is included in Appendix A. The purpose of the determination was to identify LBP, if present, on the interior and exterior surfaces of the building. The LBP determination was performed in accordance with the established protocols outlined in the MDEP Lead Management Regulations, 06-096 C.M.R.

Chapter 424 § 7 (2016) and as applicable to this project. The testing provides information on the

LBP content and assessment of condition for the surfaces tested.

The LBP testing was conducted utilizing a portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Lead Paint

Analyzer (RMD LPA-1), which non-destructively tests for the presence of LBP. The XRF analyzer is licensed with the Maine Department of Human Services Radiation Control Program and operated in accordance with all applicable regulations and conditions of licensure. The determination as to whether a component contains LBP is based upon the MDEP Lead

Management Regulations (Chapter 424). The MDEP defines a component as lead-containing if the XRF result is greater than or equal to (≥) 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2). A visual assessment of the existing condition of the identified LBP was also completed at the time of the determination.

LBP was identified on the exterior of the residential structure and included the following:

◆ Soffit and associated trim

LBP was not identified on the interior surfaces of this former residential building.

JN: 11488.002 4 U.S. General Services Administration

A detailed LBP determination report for the building is included as Appendix F. Refer to the report for specific type, location, and condition of materials tested for LBP.

5.0 | TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE

An exterior window trim sample was collected on November 19, 2020 for Toxicity Characteristic

Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing which is used to characterize the waste generated from the demolition of a structure to meet environmental regulatory requirements. The collected sample was shipped to Alpha Analytical via an Alpha courier on November 24, 2020 for lead analysis. The laboratory analytical result was below the established regulatory requirements for lead of five parts per million (ppm). A copy of the analytical result is included in Appendix G.

6.0 | POLYCHLORINATED BI-PHENYLS (PCBs) SCREENING

PCBs were used as a plasticizer in caulk and in elastic sealant materials, primarily from 1950 through 1978. These caulk/sealants were commonly used in windows and associated window systems, door frames, stairways, masonry columns, and other masonry building materials. PCBs were not used in these materials after 1978. Consistent with U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (USEPA) guidelines, PCB containing caulk has a PCB content of ≥ 50.0 parts per million

(ppm). At this level, the caulk containing PCBs is not an authorized use under the PCB regulations and must be removed. When removed, these materials are considered a controlled hazardous waste material under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA).

On October 7, 2020, Ms. Deborah Kasik and Mr. Chad McPherson (both of CES) conducted the field assessment and did not identify suspect PCB-containing caulk/sealants used in window and door systems of the structure.

7.0 | VISUAL ASSESSMENT FOR BLACK MOLD

CES performed a visual assessment of the surfaces within the structure for historical/current indications of water related issues. The following is an outline of the observations at the time of assessment:

◆ No visible evidence of mold growth (black mold) and/or musty odors throughout the first and second floors.

◆ A musty odor was detected in the basement.

8.0 | CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This investigation revealed the following relevant information.

JN: 11488.002 5 U.S. General Services Administration

8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

Asbestos-Containing Materials were identified as follows:

◆ Yellow sheet flooring

◆ Painted sheet flooring (used as shelf liner)

◆ Brown/green sheet flooring (fourth layer, beneath three non-ACM sheet floorings)

Current State regulations require that identified ACM, which may be impacted by planned renovation/demolition activity, be removed by a MDEP licensed asbestos abatement contractor in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations prior to disturbance by such planned activities. In accordance with National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP) (40 CFR 61), State of Maine, MDEP, and Asbestos Management Regulations (06-096

C.M.R. Chapter 425 (2011)), a contractor conducting any renovation and/or demolition activity that would disturb regulated ACM must: (1) notify the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) Administrator and the MDEP of such activities, (2) use proper removal procedures, (3) use proper engineering controls to limit emissions of asbestos fibers, and (4) utilize proper waste disposal. If any hidden suspect ACM (behind walls, in chases, above permanent ceilings, etc.) is uncovered during renovation or demolition activities, work must be stopped, and the material tested for asbestos content. All ACM must be disposed of in accordance with all applicable state and federal requirements.

Additionally, notification requirements, as required by Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) Occupational Health Standards for Asbestos (29 CFR 1910.1001 and 29

CFR 1926.1101), must be adhered to as part of routine communication with employees and outside contractors. Potential contractors bidding on the renovation work must first be informed of the results of this survey. Notification regarding the presence of the ACM must also be provided to employees who occupy an area containing ACM.

8.2 Potentially Hazardous Materials/Wastes and Universal Wastes

Potentially Hazardous Materials/Wastes and Universal Wastes identified within the former residential building included:

◆ Fluorescent light ballast

◆ 37 individual one-gallon cans of paint

◆ Above-ground storage tank (AST)

Fluorescent light ballasts contain capacitors that may be filled with PCB-containing dielectric fluid;

however, it is unknown whether PCB ballasts (a Universal Waste) are present in the building. The recommended Best Management Practice (BMP) is to individually remove each light fixture and have individual ballasts evaluated to confirm the presence or absence of PCBs. Non-PCB light ballasts will be clearly labeled as not containing PCBs and may be disposed of as solid waste. If no such labeling is present, the ballast should be treated as PCB-containing and be segregated and handled as Universal Waste and disposed under current MDEP regulations (06-096 C.M.R.

Chapter 858 (2018).

JN: 11488.002 6 U.S. General Services Administration

If the AST will no longer be used, remaining contents should be removed for re-use or recycling, and the AST cleaned and re-used or recycled.

8.3 Lead-Based Paint

LBP was identified on exterior surfaces of the building including:

◆ Soffit and associated trim

LBP was not identified on the interior surfaces of the building.

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) result for the exterior window trim was below the established regulatory requirement for lead of five parts per million (ppm).

PCB-Containing Caulk

Suspect PCB-containing caulk was not identified on the window and door systems of the residential structure.

Black Mold Visual Assessment

A visual assessment of the building interior did not identify the presence of “black mold.”

9.0 | REPORT CERTIFICATION

This report was prepared and reviewed by CES for the use of U.S. General Services

Administration (GSA) and its constituents and should not be reproduced without GSA’s full, written authorization.

Deborah A. Kasik

Project Scientist

MDEP Certified Asbestos Inspector License No. AI-0177

MDEP Certified Lead Risk Assessor License No. LR-0003

Michael D. Sauda, MPH, CSP

Senior Environmental Scientist

DAK/MDS/jok

Attachments

JN: 11488.002 U.S. General Services Administration

Table 1 Summary of Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

Table 2 Estimated Asbestos Abatement Costs

Table 3 Hazardous Materials Inventory/Cost Estimates

Table 4 Sample Matrix

First Floor - Room 5 93V-017A 12 Closet

Basement - Stairway 93V-018A 9 Used as shelf liner

Second Floor - Hallway 93V-029A 46 Fourth layer (beneath three layers of non-ACM flooring)

Sub Total 12 46 9

TOTAL 12 46 9

INTERIOR

CommentSample #

ACM

Brown/Green

Sheet Flooring

(SF)

TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED BUILDING MATERIALS

93 VITAL DRIVE (PARCEL NO. 5-162), MADAWASKA, MAINE

Room Name

ACM Yellow

Sheet Flooring

(SF)

ACM Painted

Sheet Flooring

(SF)

Note:

SF = Square Feet

LF = Linear Feet

EA = Each

Total

Estimated Estimated

Quantity Abatement Cost

ACM sheet flooring 67 $20/Square Foot (SF) 1,005$

TOTAL 1,005$

INTERIOR

TABLE 2

93 VITAL DRIVE (PARCEL NO. 5-162), MADAWASKA, MAINE

Identified ACM Unit Cost

ESTIMATED ACM ABATEMENT COSTS

SF = Square Feet

LF = Linear Feet

Identified Quantity Quantity Estimated Unit Estimated

Hazardous Materials (Each) Per Unit Quantity Cost Remediation Cost

Fluorescent Light Tubes - 4 foot 6 4 LF/EA 24 $0.20 5$

Suspect PCB-Containing Light Ballasts 3 5 lbs/EA 15 $0.50 8$

Batteries 3 5 lbs/EA 15 $5.00 75$

Mercury-containing Thermostats 1 5 lbs/EA 5 $5.00 25$

Above-Ground Storage Tank (AST) 1 1 / EA 1 $500.00 500$

Sub Total 612$

Transportation (per pickup) 1 - - $1,000 1,000$

Labor (Mandays) 1 - - $250 250$

Sub Total 1,250$

TOTAL 1,862$

TABLE 3

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY

93 VITAL DRIVE, MADAWASKA, MAINE

LF = Linear Feet lb= Pound 1

Estimated

Quantity

ACM Sheet Flooring SF 67

Lead-Based Paint (exterior) LF 250

PCB Caulk LF None Identified

PCB Ballasts EACH 1

Mercury - Fluorescent Bulbs EACH None Identified

Mercury - Thermostats EACH None Identified

Above-Ground Storage Tank (275-gallon) EACH 1

Paint Containers EACH 37

"Black Mold" (visual assessment SF None Identified

Unit

TABLE 4

93 VITAL DRIVE (PARCEL NO. 5-162), MADAWASKA, MAINE

Sample Matrix

SAMPLE MATRIX

SF = Square Feet

LF = Linear Feet

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT

RISK ASSESSOR CERTIFICATIONS

APPENDIX B

ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Laboratory ID: 100194 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation

Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and

Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: November 01, 2020

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: November 01, 2020

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: November 01, 2020

FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA-LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

Elizabeth Bair

Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board

Cheryl O. Morton

Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Revision 17 – 09/11/2018 Date Issued: 11/30/2018 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

Effective: 04/10/2015

100194_Scope_IHLAP (Method Name Adjustment)_2019_02_19

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMSL Analytical, Inc. Laboratory ID: 100194

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Issue Date: 02/19/2019

The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation.

Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 02/01/1989

IHLAP Scope