Attachment__4-GSA_BIM_Guide_Series_03.pdf

U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service

Office of the Chief Architect

January 2009

This version of the GSA Building Information Modeling Guide Series: 03 – GSA BIM Guide for 3D Imaging is identified as Version

1.0. With its publication, the GSA BIM (Building Information Model) Guide becomes available for public review and comment.

This guide will continue to serve as the basis for further development, pilot validation, and professional editing. All readers of this guide are encouraged to submit feedback to the National 3D-4D-BIM Program. Updated versions will continue to be issued to address and incorporate on-going feedback in an open, collaborative process.

Currently, GSA Building Information Modeling Guide Series: 01 – Overview of GSA’s National 3D-4D-BIM Program and Series: 02 – Spatial Program Validation are also available for review and comment.

For further information about GSA’s National 3D-4D-BIM Program, additional BIM Guide Series, or to submit comments or questions, visit the National 3D-4D-BIM webpage at http://www.gsa.gov/bim.

The National 3D-4D-BIM Program Office of the Chief Architect Public Buildings Service U.S. General Services Administration 1800 F Street NW, Suite 3341 Washington, DC 20405 http://www.gsa.gov/bim

GSA BIM Guide Series w w w . g s a . g o v / b i m

GSA

BIM Guide For 3D Imaging

GSA BIM Guide Series 03 www.gsa.gov/bim

Version 1.0 – January 2009 Version 0.20 – May 2007

COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY

General Services Administration

If you would like to contact the authors, please write to:

The National 3D-4D-BIM Program Office of the Chief Architect Public Buildings Service U.S. General Services Administration 1800 F Street NW, Suite 3341 Washington, DC 20405 table of contents 3d imaging table of contents........................................................................................................ i executive summary ...................................................................................................iv section 1: introduction ................................................................................................v

1.1. What is 3D Imaging..............................................................................................v

1.2. 3D Imaging vs. Alternative Methods .........................................................................xi

1.3. Benefits of 3D Imaging.........................................................................................xi

1.4. GSA 3D Imaging Applications ................................................................................ xii section 2: solicitation phase

2.1. Background and Project Description

2.1.1. Potential challenges

2.2. Objectives

2.2.1. Primary

2.2.2. Secondary

2.3. Types of Deliverables from 3D Data

2.3.1. Areas of Interest

2.3.2 Deliverable Type

2.3.2.1 Type 1 - 2D Drawings

2.3.2.2 Type 2 - 3D Models

2.3.2.3 Type 3 - Scan Data

2.3.2.4 Type 4 - Raw Scan Data

2.4. Deliverable Specifications

table of contents i

2.4.1. Scanning

2.4.1.1. Scan Plan

2.4.1.2. Safety

2.4.2. Modeling Plan

2.4.3. Quality Control

2.4.3.1. Control network

2.4.4. Resolution Requirements

2.4.1.1. Specific feature requirements

2.5. Data

2.5.1. Data Security and Ownership

2.5.2. Special requirements

2.6. Terminology

section 3: evaluation phase

3.1. Quality Control

3.1.1. Sources of Error

3.1.1.1. Calibration

3.1.1.1.1 3D imaging instruments

3.1.1.1.2.Survey instruments

3.1.1.1.3.Calibration certificates

3.1.1.2. Scanning

3.1.1.2.1.Scan Plans

3.1.1.3. Registration

3.1.1.3.1.Registration Procedures

3.1.1.3.2.Registering Data from Different 3D Imaging Systems

3.1.1.4. Modeling

3.1.2. Control network

3.2. Deliverables

table of contents ii

3.2.1. Point Cloud

3.2.2. 2D Drawings, Plans

3.2.3. 3D CAD Models

3.2.3.1. Geometric Integrity

3.2.3.2. Resolution

3.3. Data

3.4. Personnel and training

section 4: project management

4.1. Coordination issues unique to GSA

4.2. Project Schedule

4.2.1. Solicitation

4.2.2. Planning

4.2.3. Execution

4.2.4. Factors Affecting Project Schedule

4.3. Information Management and Delivery

4.4. 3D Imaging Targets

4.5. Environmental Conditions

appendix a: terminology and references

A.1. Terminology acknowledgements table of contents iii executive summary This BIM Guide Series on 3D Imaging is intended for incorporation by reference in Public Buildings Service (PBS) contracts for new construction and major modernization projects that require documentation of as-built conditions. As such, GSA Project Executives, the PBS Project Managers, and Contracting Officers administering the contracts are its primary audience. The Guide has been prepared to assist the project teams in contracting for and ensuring quality in 3D imaging contracts. It provides guidelines for the solicitation of 3D imaging services and evaluation criteria to ensure that the specified requirements for the deliverables are met.

This Guide is also of general interest to other members of the project teams, including PBS staff, customer agencies, and contracted parties such as designer consultants, construction managers, construction and design-build contractors. In addition, software solution providers will find this Guide of interest, in particular, those who offer 3D imaging services and software applications.

executive summary iv section 1: introduction Private sector industries such as aerospace, automobile, and petroleum have been using 3D imaging for several years. The benefits of determining the spatial environment and as-built conditions have played a key role in reducing costs and delivering a higher quality engineering effort. 3D imaging has also become more prevalent in the architectural/engineering/construction (AEC) industry in pursuit of similar results. Federal institutions using 3D imaging technologies include the Department of Defense, U.S. and State Departments of Transportations, U.S. General Services Administration, U.S. Geological Society, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Secret Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

GSA has implemented 3D imaging technology as part of many projects to date. Applications include: documenting historic structures and architectural features, identifying construction discrepancies of aging buildings, determining above ceiling conditions prior to the construction phase, and as-built conditions of entire federal campuses. Results and best practices extracted from continuing projects will be incorporated into this Guide on an ongoing basis.

1.1. What is 3D Imaging

3D imaging refers to the practice of using 3D imaging systems to measure or to capture existing conditions in the built or natural environment. 3D imaging systems are instruments that are used to rapidly measure (typically on the order of thousands of measurements per second or faster) the range and bearing to and/or the 3D coordinates of points on an object or within a region of interest (Figures 1 and 2). Most current instruments use light in the visible to near infrared spectrum. Examples of 3D imaging systems are laser scanners [also known as laser radars, LADARs (laser detection and ranging), or LIDARS (light detection and ranging)], triangulation-based systems such as those using pattern projectors or lasers, and other systems based on interferometry [as used to this Guide, an interferometer is an optical instrument that measures distances based on the interference phenomena between a reference wave and the reflected wave]. In general, the information gathered by a 3D imaging system, in addition to polar [(r, θ, φ) - range, azimuth angle, elevation angle] or Cartesian (x, y, z) coordinates, can also include return pulse intensity and color associated with each coordinate (Figure 2). The color information (e.g., RGB - red, green, blue) is usually obtained by an integrated camera or video or an externally mounted camera or video.

Measurements from 3D imaging systems are made without physical contact between the instrument and the object, and the surfaces of objects to be measured do not require any special surface finish (although specular surfaces such as mirrors or highly reflective materials are problematic). The maximum ranges of 3D imaging systems vary from under 1 m to over a kilometer (several feet to over half a mile), and measurement errors vary from sub-millimeter level to centimeter level (thousandths of an inch to tenths of inches) - with greater errors more often associated with the longer range instruments.

section 1: introduction v

Zoomed-in view

Figure 1: Digital photo of a mock disaster site - Compare to Figure 2: Point cloud of the mock disaster site shown in Figure 1 the point cloud image shown in Figure 2. (Courtesy of NIST) with color information. The white patches indicate no data regions. (Courtesy of NIST)

The technology for 3D imaging systems has been around since the 1970s. However, it has only been in the past decade that the use of 3D imaging systems has become more prevalent and accepted. The applications for 3D imaging cover the spectrum from industrial metrology to remote sensing. These applications include creating 3D models (e.g., as-builts, inventory, maintenance, visualization), surveying and mapping, reverse engineering, quality control, autonomous vehicle navigation, collision avoidance, section 1: introduction vi object and target recognition, forensics, historic preservation/archaeology, disaster reconnaissance, space exploration (docking of space craft and assessing damage to the exterior of space shuttle), and forest management. Some of these applications are shown in Figure 3. The applications and discussions in this Guide will focus on those from ground-based 3D imaging systems and those related to imaging of constructed facilities.

a. Autonomous vehicle navigation, collision avoidance (Courtesy of NIST) b. Manufacturing inspection and quality control (Courtesy of Boeing) section 1: introduction vii

Santa Clarita, CA www.gsa.gov/bim

Hurricane Katrina, 2005

c. 3D models, as-builts, as-is documentation, historical preservation. d. Disaster reconnaissance. (Courtesy of Brian Collins and Robert Kayen, (Courtesy of Riegl) USGS)

Downtown Baltimore, MD

e. Urban planning, route planning. (Courtesy of Jeff Turner, Ft. Belvoir) f. Terrain mapping, surveying, bathymetry, coastal erosion.

(Courtesy of Airborne 1) section 1: introduction viii

g. Interference checking, retrofits/revamps, reverse engineering, decommissioning. Courtesy of Quantapoint.

h. Object recognition

i. Forest biomass determination, flood plain, and wetland analysis

Figure 3: Examples of 3D Imaging Applications

For architectural, engineering, construction (AEC) applications, either a pulsed time-of-flight (TOF) or phased-based 3D imaging system is typically used to obtain 3D information of a scene. In general, TOF systems have longer maximum ranges (over a kilometer), and phase-based systems have shorter maximum ranges (less than 100 m) and have faster data acquisition rates. 3D section 1: introduction ix imaging systems are line of sight (LOS) instruments (most instruments use light in the visible to near infrared range); therefore, solid objects will cast “shadows” representing regions of missing data (Figure 4) along the LOS of the instrument. Therefore, scenes need to be scanned from several positions to capture occluded regions and to minimize missing data. Each scan generates a point cloud (Figures 2 and 4), which may consist of millions of data points. The time to acquire the data is dependent on the size of the object or region being measured, field of view of the instrument, point density, desired accuracy, and instrument.

The field of view and point density are user specified parameters that are set prior to starting data collection. The field of view is the angular (horizontal and vertical) coverage of a scene [e.g., 100º (horizontal) x 60º (vertical)]. The point density is specified by the angular increment or by a point spacing at a given distance. Some systems have the capability of averaging measurements. That is, measuring the same point several times (the number of times is usually user specified) and reporting the average value as the measured value (the other measurements are not reported). This capability reduces the noise in the data and if the instrument were calibrated, gives a better estimate of the true value. However, the time to acquire the data will increase due to the acquisition of multiple measurements. The method used to point or steer the beam varies with instrument (e.g., encoders, rotating mirrors) and affects the speed of data acquisition.

Figure 4: Point cloud showing some examples of shadows - regions with no data. (Courtesy of NIST)

Shadows section 1: introduction x

The point clouds can be used without processing or can be post-processed to generate 2D drawings and 3D models or to extract other information.

1.2. 3D Imaging vs. Alternative Methods

The economic decision to use 3D imaging systems versus other methods depends on several factors. A good discussion on this topic may be found in Greaves and Jenkins [4] and their findings are summarized in this section.

Important factors affecting the decision include project requirements (e.g., measurement uncertainty, resolution, level of detail), project schedule, and costs (see Section 2 for more information). Cost should not be an exclusive consideration, but cost is often a large component in the decision process. The potential for multi-use of the 3D imaging data is high and this benefit should be factored into the cost consideration. Of note, there are many case studies which indicate significant cost savings realized from properly scoped and executed 3D imaging projects [8-12].

For jobs involving simple geometries and readily accessible work sites, 3D imaging systems may not be the best choice. However, even if the alternative is less costly, 3D imaging may still be a better alternative depending on the expected use of the information. For example, the information may be multi-use in that it may be used by both HVAC and AEC contractors.

In some situations, the use of 3D imaging systems for documenting existing conditions may be a viable alternative if:

• A high level of detail is required for complex geometries and/or congested areas. For example, if the objective is to document the existing conditions in a process plant with many pipes and objects so that it is possible to locate all pipes and objects, then using a 3D imaging system to get the data would be more viable than traditional survey methods which gather data one point at a time.

• Competing methods introduce safety risks - e.g., exposure to road traffic or toxic environments.

• Areas may be inaccessible or there is limited space - e.g., overheads and mechanical spaces.

1.3. Benefits of 3D Imaging

A major benefit of 3D imaging systems is the ability to capture existing conditions more completely and with a higher level of detail than most manual methods. Additionally, ranges can be measured to non-specialized targets, objects, or surfaces (i.e., there is no requirement for a special type of material nor the need for highly reflective surfaces). These capabilities can result in [5]:

• Increased accuracy and reduced variance in engineering and construction bids

• Reduced errors and rework section 1: introduction xi

• Improved responsiveness to project changes

• Schedule reduction

• Increased worker safety

• Improved quality control

• 3D visualization and spatial analysis (e.g., line of sight) [5]

3D visualization is at times essential in explaining and understanding complex or complicated conditions.

1.4. GSA 3D Imaging Applications

As mentioned in Section 2.2.1, clear objectives and how the data will be used, are critical in ensuring that the project manager gets what is required in a cost effective manner. Some example objectives of previous GSA 3D imaging projects are:

• Repair and restoration of a historic building façade. The 3D imaging data was used to provide 2D CAD elevations and section profiles, 3D geometric models, and/or 3D building information models to document as-built conditions. The data will also be used to assist in developing architectural and engineering restoration and renovation designs.

• Generation of 2D CAD and/or elevations of building exteriors where none exists. There was also a need to document representative as-built conditions due to deficiencies in the original construction. The 3D imaging data will be used to analyze beam deflections and enable designers to develop potential retrofit measures.

• Provide a facility plan to map and link several buildings in a BIM site model. Visualization of data in 3D will greatly aid in the development of physical security and force protection models.

• Document mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP)/above ceiling conditions. The 3D imaging data was used to develop a reflected ceiling plan.

• Document roof patterns.

• Document deformation or current assessment of existing structures. The renovation A/E was able to use the point cloud and 3D model information throughout the design and allowed them to see different views of the building without the need to return to the site.

section 1: introduction xii section 02:

solicitation phase

GSA BIM Guide Series section 2: solicitation phase Identifying contexts and projects in which the benefits of 3D imaging can be exploited is a critical and essential first step. There are other technologies (e.g., photogrammetry) as well as traditional surveying methods that may offer better or more cost-effective alternatives depending on the scope of work and the anticipated deliverables. If 3D imaging is selected, all members of the project team should have a fair understanding of how 3D imaging works. At a minimum, the members of the project team should include the GSA project manager of the renovation project, the building manager, and any design team or consultants that will be using the 3D imaging data. Other project team members may include GSA BIM Champions, historic preservation officers, building tenants, etc. GSA project teams can contact the National 3D-4D-BIM Program for sample solicitation language.

2.1. Background and Project Description

First, the project team should clearly state the objectives for the 3D imaging project. It should identify the areas, surfaces, and objects which need to be imaged. A good understanding of the objectives (Section 2.2) is essential in helping the contractor design a scan plan (e.g., instrument locations, required resolutions) that maximizes the product deliverable while minimizing costs. Past experience has shown that it is critical to have clear objectives as they will reduce future misunderstanding, the need for re-work, re-letting of the solicitation, and re-negotiation of the scope of work.

Exterior pictures of the building(s), from as many angles as possible, should be included in the solicitation as an appendix. If certain areas cannot be photographed or if the photos cannot be released to the public, a detailed narrative description of the area should be provided so that service providers can accurately conceptualize the environment, space limitations, and total area to be imaged.

For interior areas, the project team should identify all rooms and spaces to be imaged. Floor plans, drawings (e.g., architectural, reflected ceiling) or sketches, if available, should be included in the solicitation. This information is important when service providers are putting together their bids. Should the layout of interior spaces be classified, describe in as much detail the approximate square footage, number of rooms, how the spaces are configured, and the placement of objects that would impact line of sight measurements. If ceiling tiles are to be removed for the 3D imaging operation, the scope should indicate that all ceiling tiles are to be replaced by the contractor.

It is important to note that capturing a comprehensive and complete overhead scan in any building is difficult and time consuming. It is almost impossible to capture 100 % of the overhead area in a scan without “shadows” (Figure 4). Project managers need to ensure that they allow access to as much of the ceiling as possible if they desire an accurate representation.

Areas of interest should be clearly identified and photos of these areas should be included in the solicitation. The type of features (e.g., cracks, architectural details) to be captured should be described in detail. It may also be helpful to describe how the data will be used (e.g., visualization, layout design, structural analysis) as it may give the service provider a better section 2: solicitation phase 2 understanding of what is required. The areas of interest often require a higher level of detail and may result in more effort to obtain the required level of detail.

A site visit for service providers will allow them to determine more accurately the work involved. The site visit will allow the service providers to determine the potential instrument locations, required data resolution to meet the specified objectives, and any technical difficulties that may be encountered. A site visit may be necessary if no floor plans are available.

2.1.1. Potential challenges

Potential challenges should be clearly identified in the solicitation. These challenges include:

• required security clearance of the 3D imaging crew

• accompaniment of the 3D imaging crew by security personnel

• obstructions caused by heavy vegetation or congested work spaces

• restricted access to certain areas

• restricted times that the 3D imaging crew can work

• security restrictions on the handling and storage of the data

• imaging objects with specular surfaces (e.g., polished surfaces, windows) or surfaces with low reflectivity (e.g., dark, matte surfaces)

In past cases, educating the tenants by introducing and demonstrating the technology was useful in alleviating the tenants’ apprehension about the technology and the potential disruption of their workspace and workflow. This led to increased access to spaces.

2.2. Objectives

2.2.1. Primary

A detailed description of the desired end use of the 3D data should be given in the solicitation. Past experience has shown that a qualified service provider who is well informed about a client’s goals is the best resource for developing innovative, efficient, and cost-effective methods to achieve the desired project objectives (see Section 3.1.1). Thus, a concise and clear description of the project objective(s) should be provided in the solicitation.

A Project Definition Matrix similar to the one shown in Table 1 may be used to identify how the 3D imaging data will support the project objectives.

section 2: solicitation phase 3

Table 1. Project Definition Matrix

DATA

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

(see Section 1.4) Generic Requirements (see Section 2.4)

AOI (Area of Scan Plan Modeling Plan Interest) (see Type

(see Section (see Section QC Report section 2.3) (see section 2.3.2) 2.4.1) 2.4.2)

Urban Design x x x Level 1 Type 1 Type 3

Architectural Design x x x Level 2 Type 1 Type 2

Façade Restoration x x x Level 3 Type 1

Room Space Measurement x x x Level 2 Type 1

Maintenance/Damage Identification x x x Level 3 Type 1 Type 3

Historic Documentation x x x Level 1 Type 1Level 2

Renovation x x x Level 2 Type 1 Level 3 Type 2

Above ceiling condition capture x x x Level 2 Type 1 Type 3

2.2.2. Secondary

A description of secondary objectives, if any, should be included in the solicitation. Secondary objectives include potential future applications of the 3D imaging data. The project team should keep in mind that if the resolution requirements for the secondary objectives are more stringent than those for the primary objective, then the project costs could potentially be skewed towards achieving the requirements of the secondary objectives.

2.3. Types of Deliverables from 3D Data

section 2: solicitation phase 4

The deliverables are specified per the Deliverable Selection Matrix (DSM) (Table 2). The parameters in Table 2 are defined in Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2. Please note that the deliverables in Table 2 are examples - some projects may not require the deliverables shown in Table 2 and may require other deliverables. Project managers should use good engineering judgment when specifying the tolerances and minimum artifact size (resolution) as tighter tolerances and higher resolutions increase scan times and costs.

Table 2: Deliverable Selection Matrix

Level of Detail (Section 2.3.1)

Area of Interest

(Section 2.3.1)

Deliverable (Section 2.3.2)

Type Description

Category Tolerance mm (in)

Minimum Artifact Size (resolution) mm x mm (in x in)

Level 1 (Description) 3.1 Point cloud Base ± 51 (± 2) 152 x 152 (6 x 6)

Level 2

2-A (Description)

1.1 1.3 2.1 3.1

Plan Elevation

Surface model Point cloud

Base Base

Option Base

± 13 (± ½) ± 13 (± ½) ± 13 (± ½) ± 13 (± ½)

25 x 25 (1 x 1) 25 x 25 (1 x 1) 25 x 25 (1 x 1) 25 x 25 (1 x 1)

2-B (Description)

1.3 2.1 3.1

Elevation Surface model

Point cloud

Base Option Base

± 13 (± ½) ± 13 (± ½) ± 13 (± ½)

25 x 25 (1 x 1) 25 x 25 (1 x 1) 25 x 25 (1 x 1)

3-A (Description)

1.3 3.1

Elevation Point cloud

Base Base

± 6 (± ¼) ± 6 (± ¼)

13 x 13 (½ x ½) 13 x 13 (½ x ½)

Level 3 3-B (Description)

1.1 1.3 3.1

Plan Elevation

Point cloud

Base Base Base

± 6 (± ¼) ± 6 (± ¼) ± 6 (± ¼)

13 x 13 (½ x ½) 13 x 13 (½ x ½) 13 x 13 (½ x ½)

3-C (Description)

1.3 3.1

Elevation Point cloud

Base Base

± 6 (± ¼) ± 6 (± ¼)

13 x 13 (½ x ½) 13 x 13 (½ x ½)

Level 4 (Description) 2.1 3.1

Surface model Point cloud

Base Base

± 3 (± 1/8) ± 3 (± 1/8)

13 x 13 (½ x ½) 13 x 13 (½ x ½)

The column headings in Table 2 are described below,

– “Category” refers to the requirement of either Base deliverables or Optional deliverables as determined by GSA COTR.

– “Tolerance” is the allowable dimensional deviation in the deliverable from truth (truth being a measurement obtained by some other means - see Section 3.2), in the specified coordinate frame. Some examples of tolerances are: 1) Point cloud: the distance between two points in a point cloud as compared to the true distance between the same two points section 2: solicitation phase 5 in the actual scene should be less than or equal to the specified tolerance, 2) Plan: the difference between the length of a wall length in a 2D plan and the actual wall length should be less than the specified tolerance.

– The “Minimum Artifact Size (resolution)” are the dimensions of the smallest recognizable feature.

2.3.1. Areas of Interest

Areas of Interest - A hierarchical system of scale in which each scan is registered per the following criteria:

– Level 1: Total project area. Coordinate Frame: Local coordinate frame (coordinate frame used by the local jurisdiction) or the State Plane Coordinate Frame. The control network should be tied to this coordinate frame.

– Level 2: Subsection of Level 01 (e.g., building). Coordinate Frame: Local coordinate frame (coordinate frame used by the local jurisdiction) or project coordinate frame

– Level 3: Subsection of Level 02 (e.g., floor level). Coordinate Frame: Project coordinate frame or instrument coordinate frame.

– Level 4: Subsection of Level 03 (e.g., room or artifact). Coordinate Frame: Instrument coordinate frame.

There can be multiple Areas of Interest with common coordinate frames. For this, the following syntax applies: Level 1-A, Level 1-B, etc. Note that projects, particularly small projects, may only have one level of detail. For example, if the objective is to get a 2D plan of an office space, then Level of detail is Level 1 and the coordinate frame is the project coordinate frame.

Another example is if the data can be obtained in one scan, then there is only one Level of detail, Level 1, and the coordinate frame is the instrument coordinate frame.

A control network is used for dimensional control and quality control (Sections 2.4.3.1 and 3.1.2). A project coordinate frame is a coordinate frame that is established by a service provider and is used as a frame of reference for all the data obtained in the project. The project coordinate frame should be tied to the control network. An instrument coordinate frame is local to the instrument. The origin of the instrument coordinate frame is the instrument center. This schematic of the different frames is shown in Figure 7.

As discussed in Section 3.1.1.3, the process of registration introduces errors to the measurements with the errors, in general, increasing as the process is repeated - especially for long linear chains without closure. For example, two point clouds, A and B, are registered to the project coordinate frame to form a combined point cloud - point cloud C. The error in the distance between two points (both points from either point cloud A or B and not one from each) in point cloud C would, in general, be greater than the error between the same two points in point cloud A or point cloud B, respectively. When point cloud C is then registered with point cloud D, the error will likely increase. This accumulation of error should be considered when setting tolerances - higher tolerance for a point cloud in Level 1 than for a point cloud in Level 3.

section 2: solicitation phase 6

Figure 5: Network Control, Project Coordinate Frame, Instrument Coordinate Frame.

2.3.2 Deliverable Type

Deliverable Type - The service provider shall prepare and submit the deliverables in the formats listed below.

section 2: solicitation phase 7

2.3.2.1 Type 1 - 2D Drawings

The GSA PBS CAD (computer aided drawing) standards apply for all cases of this deliverable. The PBS CAD standards can be found at the public GSA website: http://www.gsa.gov (Home > Buildings > Public Buildings > Design and Construction > CAD Standards > CAD Standards Library).

o Type 1.1 = Plans o Type 1.2 = Sections o Type 1.3 = Elevations (see Figures 8, 9, and 10) o Type 1.4 = Details (see Figures 11 and 12)

Submit two sets of large paper drawings < X” x Y” > to the COTR (Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative) and the regional representative of the project; submit two additional electronic copies of the same drawings in “.dwg” format.

section 2: solicitation phase 8 http://www.gsa.gov

Figure 6: First example of an Elevation - high rise building. (Courtesy of Packer Engineering) section 2: solicitation phase 9

Figure 7: Second example of an Elevation - historic building. (Courtesy of Optira) section 2: solicitation phase 10

Figure 8: Third example of an Elevation. (Courtesy of Arcadis) section 2: solicitation phase 11

Figure 9: Details in a Point Cloud - historic building. (Courtesy of Optira) section 2: solicitation phase 12

Figure 10: Details in a 3D Model - historic building. (Courtesy of Optira)

2.3.2.2 Type 2 - 3D Models

o Type 2.1 = Surface Model (see Figure 13) o Type 2.2 = Object Model (see Figures 14 and 15). Specifications of an object model may include component information (e.g., wall, column), relationships between components, space information (e.g., rooms), and attributes (e.g., wall material) section 2: solicitation phase 13

Figure 11: Example of a surface model - road surface. (Courtesy of Arcadis) section 2: solicitation phase 14

Figure 12: First example of a 3D object model - high rise building. (Courtesy of Packer Engineering)

Figure 13: Second example of a 3D object model. (Courtesy of Arcadis) section 2: solicitation phase 15

2.3.2.3 Type 3 - Scan Data

o Type 3.1 = Registered point cloud (Figures 16, 17, and 18) either as:

– one file containing all the transformed data

– individual files (each scan is a separate file) with the transformation information included in the file. For situations where the transformation information is in a separate file, the linkage between this file and the data file should be clearly identified.

o Type 3.2 - Intensity images

There is currently no standard format for 3D imaging data although there are on-going efforts to achieve this goal (e.g., ASTM E57 committee for 3D imaging systems, ASPRS Lidar Committee, ISO 15926). One format for these data is ASCII: x, y, z, I, R, G, B (if intensity [I] and color [R, G, B] information are available). Other formats may be acceptable and are subject to negotiation and approval by the COTR. All point cloud and registered electronic data will be submitted in electronic format.

The registered point cloud data shall be reduced in size, to filter noise and redundant data to the maximum extent possible without compromising the accuracy and resolution of the model. Submitted media will become the property of the U.S.

government upon delivery to the COTR. Due to the size of the deliverables, hard drives may be submitted to GSA.

Deliverables from service providers are not limited to CAD models generated from the raw point clouds. Other forms of data delivery take advantage of the higher information content included in the image data. These include registered scan files which can be queried directly within a viewing program or imported into third-party design packages, or other data representations (vendor specific) which provide filtered delivery of the point cloud data in a manner that maintains much more information content than the CAD model.

In past GSA projects, when GSA project teams provided additional information regarding equipment information or HVAC piping information, the contractor was able to utilize this information to create a BIM, instead of a 3D geometric model only.

section 2: solicitation phase 16

Figure 14: First example of a registered point cloud - high rise building. (Courtesy of

Packer Engineering) section 2: solicitation phase 17

Figure 15: Second example of a registered point cloud - historic building. (Courtesy of Optira) section 2: solicitation phase 18

Figure 16: Third example of a registered point cloud. (Courtesy of Arcadis)

2.3.2.4 Type 4 - Raw Scan Data

These data are the data from individual scans that have not been registered or filtered (Figures 19 and 20). The data is from a single scan as exported by the instrument software. Lacking a standard format1, one format for these data is ASCII: x, y, z, I, R, G, B (if intensity [I] and color [R, G, B] information is available) - other formats may be acceptable and is subject to negotiation and approval by the COTR. At a minimum, the documentation for these files should contain the date of the scan, the location of the scan, the instrument used, the instrument settings, and operator name.

o Raw data for each scan in individual files. Raw data are data that are “as exported” from the 3D imaging system and are not processed in any way.

o Digital photographs o A survey report of the control network (see section 2.4.3.1), if used, is also required as well as a closure report of the scan registrations.

1 The development of a standard format is one of the objectives of ASTM E57.04 subcommittee - Data Interoperability.

section 2: solicitation phase 19

Figure 17: One example of raw scan data - unprocessed point cloud from a single instrument location of a high rise building.

(Courtesy of Packer Engineering) section 2: solicitation phase 20

Figure 18: Second example of raw scan data - unprocessed point cloud from a single instrument location. (Courtesy of Arcadis)

2.4. Deliverable Specifications

The project team should specify the required units [e.g., U.S. customary units (English units), SI (International System of Units -metric)] for the deliverables.

2.4.1. Scanning

2.4.1.1. Scan Plan

All solicitations should require an initial scan and post-processing plan as part of the contractor’s proposal. A more detailed scan plan should be required after contract award and prior to commencement of on-site 3D imaging. The scan plan should describe the general procedures used to obtain the spatial data. The procedures to achieve the specified tolerance of the deliverables section 2: solicitation phase 21 should be described - especially at locations where a high level of detail is required. The procedures used to register the data should also be described.

Specifications of the 3D imaging system(s) used should be included in the scan plan. However, these specifications should not be used to determine if the tolerances of the project can be met for the following reasons:

• as there are many factors affecting the measurement accuracy (see Section 3.1.1)

• field techniques/practices (i.e., service provider experience) play an important role in the achieved field results

• instrument specifications are based on ideal conditions

Access to adjoining sites may be required if they provide preferable instrument locations. Optimal locations should:

• provide an unobstructed or less obstructed view

• enable the capture of a higher level of detail. For example, an instrument located at street level may not be able to capture the necessary level of detail of the upper stories of a building, or if the instrument has limited field of regard, it may not be able to image the upper stories at all. The roofs of adjacent buildings may provide better locations in these cases.

• provide a view that would not be possible otherwise

The responsibility of obtaining the required approvals/permits for access to adjoining sites should be stated in the solicitation.

2.4.1.2. Safety

If the 3D imaging system uses a laser, the system must be in compliance with the regulations for lasers and laser products issued by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration. When using a laser 3D imaging system, the U. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) or state or local standards and regulations on exposure to laser hazards should be followed (whichever governing body has jurisdiction).

The service provider should provide GSA with documentation on whether the 3D imaging system(s) used are eye safe or not. Even if eye safe, the laser should not be viewed through optical devices (e.g., total stations, binoculars, camera). Therefore, information regarding the hazard should be posted around the site, and personnel working around the site should be informed.

If the instrument(s) is not eye-safe, the service provider must describe the methods employed to ensure the safety of personnel working in the area to be imaged. Such methods include informing the tenants of the hazard and the mitigation measures taken, restricting access to the area, and posting laser hazard signs around the site and at all entrances/exits into the area.

If required, the service provider should provide a safety plan. For example, if the instrument location is next to a roadway, the service provider should describe the safety precautions that will be taken for the safety of the work crew and the public, section 2: solicitation phase 22 coordinate with local authorities (e.g., police, local/state transportation departments), and be responsible for getting the necessary permits or permission.

In all cases, it must be clear that the safety of the service provider’s work crew is the responsibility of the service provider. The service provider is also required to have liability insurance.

2.4.2. Modeling Plan

Project managers should use good engineering judgment when setting a model’s level of detail. The amount of time it takes to generate a model from 3D data is proportional to the level of detail. GSA’s typical detail for exteriors is any feature greater than 2 in. in size. This requirement means that any assembly less than that size will not be modeled. Typical interior level of detail is 1 in. or greater. There are cases where a higher level of detail is required. Project managers should identify all areas and objects, interior and exterior, that deviate from the GSA standard and require more detailed modeling, and they should specify the level of detail required.

Additionally, project managers should specify what level of modeling is required (e.g., only geometric primitives such as planes, cylinders; grouping of primitives into building components, relationships between components).

2.4.3. Quality Control

The service provider is required to describe the methods to:

• ensure proper functioning of instruments (e.g., 3D imaging system, total station) used in the project

• verify that the deliverables are within the specified tolerances (e.g., point cloud, 2D drawings, 3D models)

If corrective actions are required, the responsibility of any cost associated with the corrective action should be specified in the solicitation. Examples of corrective actions include obtaining missing data and/or augmenting incomplete data, which would require going back to the site, and incorrect data due to a malfunctioning or improperly calibrated instrument.

2.4.3.1. Control network

Dimensional control is a primary concern when performing 3D imaging in the field. The likelihood of inadvertently introducing systematic errors into the data is very high should dimensional control measures be neglected. One highly recommended method of monitoring this is through the use of a control network. A control network (see Appendix A) is a collection of identifiable points (visible or inferable) with stated uncertainties in a single coordinate system. An example of an inferable point is the center of a sphere, while not visible, can be obtained by processing suitable data. A control point (see Appendix A) may be derived from an object that is permanent (e.g., benchmark) or temporary (e.g., targets specifically placed in a scene). The purpose of the control network may include: monitoring/controlling data quality (e.g., controlling scale error, removing systematic error), registration, verifying the position of an instrument (drift), defining the extent of a measuring environment. A section 2: solicitation phase 23 control network should be established by an accepted best practice. The installation/placement of the control points. should be coordinated with the GSA facilities manager.

The control network may be tied to a coordinate frame used by the local jurisdiction or a State Plane Coordinate Frame. The control network should be adjusted using least squares methods. The required 3D standard deviation of the control network should be stated. The service provider should describe procedures to establish the control network, control layout, and how the control network will be used.

2.4.4. Resolution Requirements

2.4.1.1. Specific feature requirements

If there are very specific project needs that do not fit into Table 2, the project team shall make a matrix of required needs in the various portions of the deliverable. It is up to the service provider to ensure they establish a method of obtaining the 3D and other sensor data with sufficient resolution to extract the needed information.

2.5. Data

2.5.1. Data Security and Ownership

Frequently, questions regarding model and information ownership arise around technologies that promote interoperability. PBS shall have ownership of and rights to all data contained in BIMs and other deliverables developed and provided by the A/E in accordance with the applicable provisions of the A/E contract, including relevant clauses detailed under FAR 52.227 and GSA Order 3490.1.

All 3D, 4D, and Building Information Modeling-related information are considered to be Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU). SBU documents provided under contract are intended for use by authorized users only. In support of the contracted requirements, GSA will require vendors to exercise reasonable care when handling documents and data relating to SBU building information.

Dissemination of any information provided for, generated by, and resulting from BIM projects is only allowed to authorized users.

It is the responsibility of the person or firm disseminating the information to assure that the recipient is an authorized user and to keep records of recipients. Valid identification for non-Government users is required to receive SBU building information. For qualifying forms of identification, refer to GSA Order 3490.1.

The efforts required above shall continue throughout the entire term of the contract and for whatever specific time thereafter as may be necessary. Authorized users should store electronic information in a password protected (non-public) environment.

Necessary record copies for legal purposes (such as those retained by the architect, engineer, or contractor) must be safeguarded against unauthorized use for the term of retention. Documents no longer needed shall be destroyed (such as after contract award, after completion of any appeals process or completion of the work). Destruction shall be done by burning or shredding hardcopy, and/or physically destroying CD's, deleting and removing files from the electronic recycling bins, and removing section 2: solicitation phase 24 material from computer hard drives using a permanent erase utility or similar software. A Written Agreement of Disposal must be provided to the GSA upon contract completion.

For further detail, refer to GSA Order 3490.1, FAR 52.227, and other relevant data ownership and rights regulations.

For 3D imaging projects, GSA requires service providers to provide limited support after delivery of the data to ensure it is readable and free of conflicts. Should this information be unreadable or contain conflicts/discrepancies, the government should allow the 3D imaging service provider the opportunity to correct the data. It is recommended that a period of six to twelve months be allotted for post scanning support services. This will allow GSA project teams to ensure the deliverables meet the requirements and allow service providers time to help clarify, address, and/or resolve discrepancies.

2.5.2. Special requirements

Data backup - If needed, backup (e.g., daily, weekly) of data during the execution of the contract should be included in the solicitation or contract.

Data encryption - If required, data encryption should be included in the solicitation or contract.

2.6. Terminology

To avoid confusion as to the meaning of terms used in the contract, a list of terms should be included (e.g., as an appendix) in the solicitation. A list of terms and their suggested definitions are given in Appendix A.1.

section 2: solicitation phase 25 section 03:

evaluation phase

GSA BIM Guide Series section 3: evaluation phase GSA project managers must evaluate contractor submissions at three major stages throughout the project. To assist in the evaluation of submitted proposals and deliverables for 3D imaging projects, the project team may want to bring in professionals who have expertise in surveying and 3D imaging. First, GSA project managers must evaluate the contractor’s initial scan plan and post-processing plan before contract award, along with cost considerations. The submission of the initial scan plan provides the project team with an understanding of how the service provider will approach the work, and will also help identify potential conflicts (such as building access). After contract award and possible on site visits, the contractor must submit a more detailed scan plan and post-processing plan for review. The review and acceptance of the scan plan by the project team does not obviate the provider from the responsibility of their specified deliverable in any way. Finally, GSA project managers must evaluate the final deliverables to ensure they meet GSA requirements. The criteria for evaluation are described below. GSA project teams should ensure the contractor has adequately addressed all of these topics in their plans and throughout the scanning and post processing phase.

3.1. Quality Control

Most 3D imaging software products provides quality reports that identify the fidelity of the scans and the registration. Service providers should at a minimum provide a narrative report that proves the accuracy of their work and the accuracy of the control network, if used. The contents of this report should include the quality report from the 3D imaging software.

Past GSA 3D imaging service providers have utilized two measures to help reduce errors in data. The first is to independently measure the locations of targets and key points in order to verify and correct raw scan data. The other measure used in the past is to scan targets twice, at the beginning and end of each scan operation, in order to ensure the scanning equipment has not moved during the scan.

It is also very important that the quality control plan describe the methods that will be used in the field to check that all necessary data is captured (e.g., no data missing for critical areas, too many shadows) and is not corrupted and that the required resolution can be extracted from the 3D data. The field checks should include, at a minimum, viewing of the data to ensure that there is good coverage and is correctly registered and comparison of random measurements (measurements from point cloud vs.

same measurements using another method) of typical sections or key features. These checks will help reduce:

• the need to return to the job site at a later time to obtain missing data or to augment insufficient data

• project delays due to the missing or insufficient data

• incidences of not being able to produce a deliverable due to bad or no data section 3: evaluation phase 27

The occurrence of these checks should also be specified (e.g., at each instrument location prior to moving to the next instrument location, at the end of each day).

3.1.1. Sources of Error

All measurements contain errors. Even measurements from a calibrated instrument are subject to random fluctuations or “noise”. Besides random errors, systematic errors will cause incorrect measurements unless corrected (e.g., applying a correction factor to the measurements). These errors, systematic and random, can originate from the instrument, operator, and/or environmental conditions. The processes that can introduce errors to the 3D imaging measurements or to the end-product of 3D imaging data are briefly described in the following sections.

3.1.1.1. Calibration

Errors from an improperly calibrated instrument are systematic errors and result in an offset or bias in the measurements. This offset may be constant, linear, nonlinear, or periodic.