41NHA-S3848 Technical Proposal Questions- Attachment A.docx
DOCX document 168 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Non-Emergency Transportation (NET)
- Solicitation number
- 41NHA-S3848
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This is a Technical Proposal Questions attachment for a Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Brokerage Services request for proposal issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division on behalf of the Nevada Health Authority. The document outlines mandatory evaluation criteria and submission requirements for contractors responding to the NET solicitation. Contractors must provide comprehensive responses to technical proposal questions organized into four scoring categories: Overall Experience (15%), Operations and Collaboration (35%), Provider Network (30%), and Complex Case Scenarios (20%), for a total of 100 points. The Overall Experience section requires contractors to detail Medicaid NET brokerage experience with similar populations over the past five years, including contract dates, delivery models, services covered, population served, provider network adequacy, and any sanctions or non-compliance actions. The Operations and Collaboration section requires proposals on authorizing and scheduling services, engagement strategies with recipients including translation services, and outreach approaches to community providers including Tribal entities and Child Welfare Agencies.
The Provider Network section requires contractors to demonstrate experience developing statewide transportation provider networks capable of delivering multiple modalities including public transportation, paratransit, taxicabs, TNCs, wheelchair-accessible vans, stretcher vehicles, gas mileage reimbursement, airline services, and travel-related expenses. Contractors must address network development strategies specific to Nevada's geographic challenges, quality assurance and utilization management approaches including subcontractor oversight, and provider training and retention programs with documented examples of successful implementation. The Complex Case Scenarios section requires contractors to provide detailed responses demonstrating how they would handle two hypothetical situations: educating a recipient on transportation policy limitations regarding non-medically necessary attendants and managing emergency transportation of 20 youth from a facility closure within one week while maintaining safety. All responses must include relevant experience examples citing specific programs, states, years, and Medicaid outcomes where applicable; contractors using subcontractors must identify them and demonstrate equivalent performance capability.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 41NHA-S3848-Request-for-Proposals.docx | DOCX document | |
| 41NHA - S3848 - Insurance Schedule - RFP.doc | DOC document | |
| Standard-form-contract~4.docx | DOCX document | |
| 41NHA-S3848 - Business Continuity Agreement 12.01.25.docx | DOCX document | |
| Certification-regarding-lobbying~6.pdf | ||
| 41NHA-S3848 - SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| 41NHA-S3848-Request-for-Proposals - Updated 5-21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 41NHA-S3848-Reference-Questionnaire~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 41NHA-S3848 - Cost Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 41NHA-S3848-Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~6.pdf | ||
| 41NHA-S3848 - Business Associate Addendum 07.01.25.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment A – Technical Proposal Questions This Request for Proposal (RFP) attachment outlines the Technical Proposal Questions that Contractors must answer in their Technical Proposal responding to this Solicitation. Contractors will be evaluated on the quality and completeness of their responses to the questions, and responses should demonstrate the Contractor’s full understanding of all contractual requirements contained in Scope of Work.
The Contractor must provide a response to each question in this attachment. As prompted by the question, Contractors are expected to discuss their:
1. Approach to addressing the issue in the narrative question, highlighting how their approach will (a) allow the Contractor to fulfill the contractual requirements, (b) align with outlined program goals, and (c) represent innovation and/or best practices;
1. Capabilities to implement their proposed approach, which could include organizational structure, staffing resources, operational infrastructure, intended approach to engaging subcontractors, established operational protocols, and technology infrastructure and resources (e.g., IT systems and system capabilities); and
1. Experience related to the issue in the narrative question that illustrates how the Contractor has successfully addressed this issue in contexts comparable to those required of the Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Contractor in Nevada.
Contractors should not assume that the individuals involved in the evaluation process are familiar with any current or past work activities with the State or in other states.
Responses to each question should be complete and may not reference responses provided to other questions in the Technical Proposal.
When citing relevant experience, the Contractor must clearly state what program(s), state(s), and year(s) the experience comes from and how it will translate to Non-Emergency Transportation program (e.g., total enrollees in program, covered populations, covered services) and to the issues discussed in the question. In responding to a question, if the Contractor will use a subcontractor to fulfill any part of the response, the Contractor must provide the name of the subcontractor and explain how the subcontractor’s performance will be no less effective than if done by the Contractor. Contractors with experience delivering Medicaid NET are strongly encouraged to use Medicaid examples whenever possible. Contractors without relevant Medicaid experience may provide examples from a comparable low-income insurance program.
When providing data in a response, Contractors must include a brief description of each data measure, why it is a relevant measure of impact for the example provided, and a brief explanation of the data methodology (including sample size, where appropriate).
Contractors must adhere to the formatting requirements outlined in Section 9.2 of the RFP. Each question has a maximum number of points available and are outlined in the table below.
Joe Lombardo Governor
NEVADA HEALTH AUTHORITY
NEVADA MEDICAID
4070 Silver Sage Drive Carson City, Nevada 89701
NVHA.NV.GOV
Stacie Weeks, Director
Ann Jensen, Administrator
Technical Proposal Question Scoring:
| Topic Area |
| Question Number |
| Scoring (Weight) |
| A. Overall Experience |
| 1 |
| 15% |
| Total |
| 15% |
| B. Operations and Collaboration |
| 1 |
| 15% |
| 2 |
| 10% |
| 3 |
| 10% |
| Total |
| 35% |
C. Provider Network
| 1 |
| 10% |
| 2 |
| 10% |
| 3 |
| 10% |
| Total |
| 30% |
| D. Complex Case Scenarios |
| 1 |
| 10% |
| 2 |
| 10% |
| Total |
| 20% |
| TOTAL |
| 100.0% |
Technical Proposal Questions Overall Experience
| 1. Contractor experience with similar Medicaid programs including outcomes |
| Describe the Contractor’s Medicaid NET brokerage experience serving populations similar to the eligible populations in this RFP in the past five years. Detail how such experience provides the Contractor with the capability, expertise, and capacity to address Nevada’s goals to better serve the eligible population. |
Responses must include a summary table with the information listed below for each state where the Contractor served in a similar capacity:
· Name of state/state program;
· Start and end date of the contract;
· Delivery model of services by geography
· Services and population covered under the contract
· Provider network adequacy
· Instances of sanctions due to non-compliance including contract suspensions, termination, penalties, or corrective action plans (imposed by the State or other regulator
Operations and Collaboration
| 1. Authorizing and Scheduling of NET services |
| Propose Contractor’s approach to authorizing and scheduling NET services. At minimum, examples must include: |
· The ways a recipient or other individuals can request services
· How medically appropriate and cost-effective modes will be determined for each request
· What technology will be used to facilitate the operations of the NET program for both Contractor staff, subcontracted providers, community partners, and members.
· Accommodation of last-minute requests for appointment changes, transportation provider no-shows and delayed vehicles.
| 2. Engagement with Recipients |
| Propose the Contractor’s approach to engaging recipients to ensure maximum utilization of the NET service. Provide an example of the Contractor’s experience and proposal to: |
· Successfully using the approach to achieve program improvements
· Offering translation services to recipients for transportation requests, grievances and notices of decisions.
| 3. Outreach and Collaboration with Community Providers |
| Propose the Contractor’s approach to conducting outreach to Nevada’s community providers. |
The response should at minimum include:
· A detailed plan outlining outreach tasks and cadence for activities.
· Type of entities to which outreach will be conducted.
· Examples of Contractor’s experience working with Tribal entities and Child Welfare Agencies.
Provider Network
| 1. Network development |
| Propose the Contractor’s experience and approach to successfully developing a network of transportation providers and how those experiences will inform the Contractor’s approach to develop, maintain, and monitor a comprehensive, statewide provider network to deliver all covered services. |
The response should include:
· The Contractor’s understanding of current network challenges in Nevada and strategies to address them.
· How the Contractor will ensure timely access to:
· Cost-effective transportation for medically necessary Medicaid-covered services statewide, taking into consideration geographic variations in where recipients reside across Nevada.
· A comprehensive range of transportation modalities, including public transportation (fixed-route and paratransit), taxicabs, transportation network companies (TNCs), wheelchair-accessible vans, community-based non-professional drivers, stretcher vehicles, gas mileage reimbursement (GMR), commercial airline services, and other travel-related expenses such as meals and lodging when appropriate.
· Specialized transportation services for recipients with specific medical conditions or treatment needs, including but not limited to dialysis, pregnancy-related care, and other health conditions, including coordination with Regional Transportation Commissions.
· Secure behavioral health transport designed and staffed to ensure safe transport of individuals experiencing a mental health crisis.
| 2. Quality Assurance and Administration |
| Propose the Contractor’s approach to employing utilization management strategies to ensure recipients receive the most appropriate modes while also ensuring a high level of program integrity. |
The response should also include detail on how the Contractor proposes to oversee subcontractor requirements and the process for implementing subcontractor corrective action plans for non-compliance.
| 3. Provider Training and Support |
| Propose the Contractor’s approach in developing and managing its network of providers to improve NET service utilization and provider retention. |
Response should include two examples in which the Contractor implemented a successful program for provider recruitment and retention.
1. Complex Case Scenarios
| Case Scenario #1 |
| Example of frequent traveler with unrealistic expectations and additional requests for family travel. |
Jane is a twenty-nine-year-old who lives in Las Vegas and travels with her 8-year-old daughter, Maggie, who has frequent dental appointments. They also travel monthly to Los Angeles for appointments with an endodontics specialist.
Policy states that one attendant is allowed to be authorized when medically necessary for the recipient to attend the medical appointment. As the parent, Jane is authorized as the attendant to accompany her daughter’s appointment; however, Jane repeatedly requests that her husband and other three-year-old son also be allowed to travel even though no medical necessity justification is provided for the additional attendants. Jane expresses frustration at not being approved for her entire family to travel with her and demands the Contractor accommodate her request.
Describe the Contractor’s approach to educating Jane on the transportation policy and addressing her complaints.
| Case Scenario #2 |
| Example of facility closure which requires multiple transports at the same time. |
Sage Psychiatric Residential Treatment Center is a 20-bed facility which services youth under 21 years of age with complex mental health needs. Due to health and safety concerns, this facility is being shut down and all 20 kids need to be transported to a new location within a week.
The Contractor should provide a detailed response outlining how all transports will be accomplished within the tight timeframe while ensuring the safety of the minor recipients.
image1.png image2.png image3.svg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .