4-FINAL Copy of 2026 CAPS CTE DESIGN SOQ062426 - Sheet1.pdf
PDF 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- CCSD-SOQ063026
- Issued by
- Cache County, Utah
About this file
This is a Technical Scoring Sheet for a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) in response to a Request for Architectural Design Services issued by Cache County School District (CCSD) in Utah. The District is seeking qualified architectural firms and consultant teams to provide professional design services for a new Career and Technical Education (CTE) facility that will primarily support the District's CAPS (Career and Technical Education) program and related profession-based learning initiatives. The SOQ evaluation process utilizes a technical scoring methodology with nine scoreable criteria, each weighted according to importance and totaling 100 points possible.
The nine evaluation criteria are: Relevant K-12 CTE/CAPS profession-based learning experience (20 points), Qualifications and availability of proposed key personnel (15 points), Programming and stakeholder engagement approach (15 points), Project understanding and approach (10 points), Budget management and cost control approach (10 points), Demonstrated past budget performance and scope control (10 points), Consultant team coordination, BIM/REVIT, and quality control (10 points), Construction administration approach (5 points), and References and past performance (5 points). Cost proposal evaluation will be calculated using a competitive formula where the firm with the lowest proposed price receives 100 percent of the price points, with all other offerors receiving points based on the percentage difference between their price and the lowest price using the formula: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES - CCSD-SOQ063026
TECHNICAL SCORING SHEET
FIRM NAME:
EVALUATOR #
DATE:
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete informa 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Scoreable Technical Criteria SOQ Section
Evaluator Score (0- 5)
Criteria Weight
Points Possible
Points Earned
Relevant K-12 CTE/CAPS profession-based learning experience
4 20
Qualifications and availability of proposed key personnel
3 15
Programming and stakeholder engagement approach
3 15
Project understanding and approach
2 10
5 Budget management and cost control approach Page 10 2 10
6 Demonstrated past budget performance and scope control Page 10 2 10
Consultant team coordination, BIM/REVIT, and quality control
2 10
Construction administration approach
1 5
9 References and past performance Page 11 1 5
TOTAL POINTS 100
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
FOR PURCHASING DEPT ONLY
Total Evaluation Points Percent of
Total Points Possible
Points Earned
Total Evaluation Points 100.0 0.0
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .