4-[DCS IT Maintenance and Operations Services] Attachment 4 - BPM004453 Comformace Statements and Supplements.pdf
PDF 234 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR062780
- Contract number
- CTR062780
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is Attachment 4: Conformance Statements and Supplements for Solicitation No. BPM004453, issued by the State of Arizona, Department of Child Safety's Office of Procurement & Contracts, located in Phoenix, Arizona. The document is specifically related to DCS IT Maintenance and Operations Services, with IBM appearing to be the primary offeror submitting the conformance statement.
The conformance document indicates that IBM is taking exceptions to three key areas of the solicitation: Instructions to Offerors, Scope of Work and Pricing, and Contract Terms and Conditions. By checking the "NO" boxes for these sections, IBM signals its intent to propose modifications to the original solicitation documents, with detailed exceptions to be listed in Attachment Supplements 1, 2, and 3. The document also notes that IBM has included an Attachment 4 Supplement 4 with redlined changes in "track changes" mode to provide transparency about its proposed modifications to the state agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4: Conformance Statements and Supplements
Solicitation No. BPM004453 DCS IT Maintenance and Operations Services
State of Arizona Department of Child Safety
Office of Procurement & Contracts 3003 N. Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85012
If taking exceptions, the Attachment Supplements must be uploaded as a separate word doc. file titled “Attachment Supplement -”
STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY EXCEPTIONS UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.
READ PARAGRAPH 6.8 OF THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS BEFORE TAKING ANY EXCEPTIONS – TAKING EXCEPTIONS
CAN BE GROUNDS FOR STATE REJECTING OR DOWN-GRADING YOUR OFFER IN EVALUATION.
CONFORMANCE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
☒ YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Instructions to Offerors and Uniform Instructions to Offerors of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors in the Solicitation Documents, and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 1.
CONFORMANCE TO SCOPE OF WORK AND PRICING
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work Document and the Pricing Document of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work Document and the Pricing Document of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 2.
CONFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understand the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices 2 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 3.
Note: Please be advised that IBM is including Attachment 4 Supplement 4 document for the State’s convenience. This attachment includes all the redlines and rationale detailed in Attachment Supplement 3 to see
IBM’s proposed changes in “track changes” mode.
Kapil Gupta
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .