36C26119R0002-001.docx
DOCX document 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Upgrade Site for USP800 Compliant
- Solicitation number
- 36C26119R0002
About this file
36C26119R0002 36C26119R0002_1.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26119C0111-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002_0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002_0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pharmacy_Trailer_Salients_(002).pdf | ||
| 36C26119R0002_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-008.doc | DOC document | |
| 36C26119R0002-004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-013.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-010.pdf | ||
| 36C26119R0002-005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-011.pdf | ||
| 36C26119R0002-006.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-009.doc | DOC document | |
| 36C26119R0002-014.pdf | ||
| 36C26119R0002-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-007.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-012.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26119R0002-002.pdf | ||
| 36C26119R0002-000.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C26119R0002 Attachments
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
3. DATE ISSUED
PAGE OF PAGES
4. CONTRACT NUMBER
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER
6. PROJECT NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY
CODE
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
a. NAME
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date) 12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
12b. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)
STANDARD FORM 1442
Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 52.236-1(d)
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
SOLICITATION
SOLICITATION
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
9. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within ____________ calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See _____________________________).
YES
NO
a.
Sealed offers in original and ___________________copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _____________ (hour) local time _____________________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, the date and time offers are due.
b.
An offer guarantee is, is not required.
c.
All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
d.
Offers providing less than _______________________ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
36C26119R0002 X 12-04-2018 640-19-1-5294-0001 640-19-907 36C261 Department of Veterans Affairs VA Sierra Pacific Network (VISN 21) VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System 975 Kirman Avenue Reno NV 89502-2597 See offer instructions at page
Charee Harris 775-788-5511 This is a design build solictation under FAR Part 36.301.
Project: 640-19-107 Location: VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California NAICS Code: 236220 - Size Standard $36.5M
Per VAAR 836.204 Disclosure of Magnitude of Construction Projects - Estimate is between $1,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00 In accordance with Public Law 109-461, 38 U.S.C. Sec. 8127, this procurement is 100% Set-Aside for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB).
The contractor shall include all design work, construction,labor, materials, equipment, excavation, shoring, testing, inspection, commissioning and necessary general conditions for project 640-19-107 Site Preparation for USP 800 Compounding Trailer.
NOTE#1 to Offerors: Pre-Offer Conference/Site visit is schedule for: December 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Pacific Time at the Va Palo Alto Health Care System, Bldg. 105 Front Entrance, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto CA
NOTE #2 to Offerors: This solicitation is a Request for Proposal. Phase one is the qualifying stage of the solicitation, Phase Two consist of qualified candidates submitting technical and price proposals.
NOTE #3 to Offerors: Addendum to block 11, Standard Form 1442: A seperate Notice to Proceed will be issued for Design and construction. Design shall be completed prior to the start of construction. Design time is 210 Calendar Days.
Note #4 to Offerors: ote #3 TO OFFERORS: IAW Acquisition Flash 12-20 at the time of submission of Offer, Offeror must r that it is a SDVOSB concern and is verified for eligibilityin VETBIZ VIP Database
Note #5 TO OFFERORS: IAW FAR 15.101-2, the acquisition method is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process. A responsive Offer must consist of both a Price Proposal and Technical Proposal
Note #6 TO OFFERORS: Addendum to block 13 b) Offer Gurantee is required after the design is complete and prior to construction Notice to Proceed.
x x 52.211-10 X
3:00 PM PST
01-0 -2019 X
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR
15. TELEPHONE NUMBER
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
CODE
FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within __________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
AMENDMENT
NUMBER
DATE.
20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) (
26. ADMINISTERED BY
27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
PHONE:
FAX:
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
29. AWARD
Your Contractor agrees offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further cont-this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract ractual document is necessary.
shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
TO SIGN
30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. AWARD DATE
BY
OFFER
AWARD
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK
(Include ZIP Code) (Include area code) (Include only if different than Item 14.)
(Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each) (Type or print) (4 copies unless otherwise specified) (Type or print) (Type or print) (Contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)
(Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
(Must be fully completed by offeror) (To be completed by Government)
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
Department of Veterans Affairs VA Sierra Pacific Network (VISN 21) VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System 975 Kirman Avenue Reno NV 89502-2597 Department of Veteran Affairs FMS-VA-2(101) Financial Services Center PO Box 149971 Austin TX 78714-9971
Design Build Scope of Work Upgrade Site for USP 800 Compliant Mobile Compounding Trailer I. Statement of Services – Contractor shall provide all design, material, and labor to prepare existing utilities and site for the installation of new pharmacy trailers at VAPAHCS Palo Alto Division.
II. Site Location VA Palo Alto Health Care System Palo Alto Division 3801 Miranda Ave Palo Alto, CA 94304 III. Specific Areas of Emphasis – New pharmacy trailers will be installed at parking lot 100 east as show in attached exhibit. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will provide site maps of proposed area of work upon request where available.
IV. Description of Work – Contractor shall provide a comprehensive service including utilities and site preparation to support the installation of new pharmacy trailers. Utilities shall be thoroughly investigated and constructed to ensure long term durability and meet all applicable standards and codes All work shall be done in accordance with, all laws, ordinances, building codes, rules and regulations applying to the work, including, but not limited to VA, Federal, State, County, City, Industry design guides, codes, standards, regulations and policies. Contractor shall work with COR to minimize construction impact to daily operation of VAPAHCS at Palo Alto Division while maintaining vehicular traffic circulation. Minimum project requirements are listed below.
a. Contractor shall perform a site visit before providing a proposal
b. Contractor shall clearly separate design cost and construction cost in the proposal
c. Demolish and off haul all existing site features in work area as shown in attached exhibit
d. All off-haul soil is to be treated as non-clean class 2 and require additional soil testing followed TCLP procedure
e. Clear and grub a 40’ x 80’ area to prepare for trailers pad
f. Provide a 6” x 40’ x 80’ reinforced concrete slab on top of 10” 95% compaction class 2 AB.
Concrete strength shall be at 3000 PSI at 28 days. Use #4 rebars at 12” O.C. See attached detail
g. Contractor shall be responsible to level new pharmacy trailers, ramps, etc. after the trailers and other equipment get delivered on site
h. If the trailers are mobile, contractor shall level with jack stands. Jack stands shall not rely on the AC but concrete footing cut into the asphalt
i. All existing utilities shall be investigated thoroughly, protected, and adjusted to grade
j. Reconstruct any existing site features including but not limited to sidewalk, lighting, etc. to ensure proper egress from building 100 and Radiology
k. Sidewalk shall directly link to the entrance(s) and exit(s) of the trailers
l. Contractor is responsible for all third-party testing and commissioning services for all utilities work performed in this contract including but not limited to coordination study, arch flash, etc.
m. Contractor shall perform power study for 30 days if required by the facility
n. Contractor shall plan and coordinate with COR for any utilities shutdown
o. Design provision for normal and emergency power distribution for pharmacy trailers and equipment. Each trailer requires 65kVA at 208V, 3PH, 60Hz, 200 A single point of connection.
i. Normal power to be tied into new Radiology Suite in Building 100, and emergency power to be tied into new 103 Building. See attached exhibit for reference.
ii. All underground conduits shall be 4” minimum schedule 80 PVC. Encase conduits in red concrete – 3000 psi minimum. Conductors to be sized per load and the current NEC 70 requirements. Provide detectable warning tape above buried duct bank at 12 inches from FG. Top of duct bank to be 36” below grade minimum. Provide minimum of 1 spare conduit with installed pull string. All conductors to be copper. All duct banks shall be reinforced with four #4 rebars in long direction and #4 stirrups at 48” O.C. Provide continuous ground encased in duct bank.
iii. Contractor is responsible for all commissioning services applicable to the electrical system.
p. Design provision for domestic water and sewer utilities. Connect to nearest utilities lines as shown in attached exhibit.
i. For domestic water use schedule 80 PVC meeting the requirements of ASTM D-1785, Type 1, Grade 1. All exposed piping shall be copper with insulated sleeve and wrapped with sheet metal jacket.
ii. For gravity flow sanitary sewer underground line use SDR 21. All exposed piping shall be cast iron. Pipe and fittings shall have elastomeric gasket joints providing a watertight seal when tested in accordance with ASTM D3212. Gaskets shall conform to ASTM F477. Solvent welded joints shall not be permitted.
iii. Contractor is response for all commissioning services applicable to domestic water including to water dichlorination, legionella testing.
q. Design provision for communication system. Provide conduits, innerduct, and 12 pair single mode OS2 fiber from basement of building 100 MDF to the new OIT closet in pharmacy trailer. All fiber to be landed, terminated, tested, and labeled following VA OIT Code of Practice. Provide minimum of 1 spare conduit with installed pull string.
r. Design provision for physical security including but not limited to gate, bollards, etc. to protect the new pharmacy trailers.
s. Assist the trailers’ manufacturer for final utilities connection and other testing.
V. Design Build Scope of Work
a. Period of performance for design and construction is 300 calendar days.
b. Design Service: DBC shall comply with VA design guidelines including, but not limited to, electrical, plumbing, site improvement, and physical securities. DBC shall address all items necessary for construction and operation of the completed facility. Design services are anticipated to include but are not limited to following:
i. DBC shall survey the site and meet with the facility prior commencing work.
ii. DBC shall provide a comprehensive design service to fulfill project requirements as shown in description of work.
iii. DBC shall revise applicable specifications available on TIL website to be used for this project.
iv. DBC shall follow the design schedule as outlined below:
1. Design Development (SD) Documents 35%:
a. DBC shall submit SD documents within 21 calendar days after award.
b. VA review completed no later than 14 calendar days after submission of DD documents.
c. DD documents shall include 2 half size sets and 1 full size set along with 2 specifications binders and 1 CD of electronic copies.
d. DBC shall attend in person design review with the VA to go over VA comments.
2. Design Development (DD) Documents 65%:
a. DBC shall address and incorporate the VA comments in the 65% CD.
b. DBC shall submit a written response to VA comments no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the SD feedbacks from the VA.
c. DBC shall submit DD documents within 21 calendar days after award.
d. VA review completed no later than 14 calendar days after submission of DD documents.
e. DD documents shall include 2 half size sets and 1 full size set along with 2 specifications binders and 1 CD of electronic copies.
f. DBC shall attend in person design review with the VA to go over VA comments.
3. 95% Construction Documents (CD):
a. DBC shall address and incorporate the VA comments in the 95% CD.
b. DBC shall submit a written response to VA comments no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the DD feedbacks from the VA.
c. DBC shall submit 95% CD within 14 calendar days after receiving DD feedbacks from the VA.
d. VA review completed no later than 7 calendar days after submission of 95% CD.
e. 95% CD shall include 2 half size sets and 1 full size set along with 2 specifications binders and 1 CD of electronic copies.
f. DBC shall attend in person design review with the VA to go over VA comments.
4. 100% Construction Documents:
a. DBC shall address and incorporate the VA comments in the 100% CD.
b. DBC shall submit a written response to VA comments no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the DD feedbacks from the VA.
c. DBC shall submit 100% CD within 7 calendar days after receiving 95% CD feedbacks from the VA.
d. VA review completed no later than 7 calendar days after submission of 100% CD.
i. Note: DBC is required to revise the 100% CD until fully approved by the VA.
e. 100% CD shall include 2 half size sets and 2 full size sets along with 2 specifications binders and 1 CD of electronic copies.
i. Note: 100% CD shall be stamped and signed by licensed engineers and architects in the State of California.
f. DBC shall attend in person design review with the VA to go over VA comments.
5. As-Built Drawings:
a. DBC shall submit complete As-Built sets no later than 21 calendar days after construction completion.
b. As-Built submission shall include 2 half size sets and 2 full size sets along with 2 specifications binders and 2 CD of electronic copies in CAD, PDF, and Word format.
c. Construction Service:
i. DBC shall complete construction no later than October 2019.
ii. DBC is responsible for developing alternate egress routes from building 100/103/Radiology due to construction impact if applicable.
iii. DBC shall perform in a manner and time that least interrupt to the facility operation and patient/staff safety.
iv. DBC shall work after hours or on weekends for all utilities interruption activities including but not limited to electrical shutdown, road closures, etc.
v. DBC shall coordinate with COR for any work that impacts the facility.
vi. DBC is responsible for assist with trailers delivery and set up to final project completion.
d. Construction Administration Service:
i. Design team shall perform comprehensive construction administration service including but not limited to RFI response, submittal review, weekly meeting, punch walk, update as-built, etc.
VI. Site Impact of Services and Response – Normal business hours at the VA Palo Alto Health Care Palo Alto Division are 8:00am to 4:30pm. Special time arrangements can be made by contacting the COR. No work shall be performed before 8:00 am due to local noise ordinance. Should emergency services be required during business hours, contractor will coordinate with COR. Contractor shall perform work after hours and weekends when there is major traffic impact. Contractor will abide by all station policies when on site.
VII. Exhibits
a. Reference Documents
b. Specifications VIII. Site Contact/COR Ryan Ngo, P.E.
Office of Facility Planning and Development (720B) VA Palo Alto Health Care System 3801 Miranda Ave.
Palo Alto, CA 94304 Ph: (650) 493-5000 x69888
Table of Contents
| INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS | 10 |
| INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS | 11 |
| Basis of Award | 11 |
| PHASE I REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION CRITERIA | 12 |
| PHASE I SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS | 13 |
| PHASE I EVALUATION PROCESS/METHODOLOGY | 13 |
| PHASE II REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) EVALUATION CRITERIA | 15 |
| PHASE II SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS | 17 |
| PHASE II EVALUATION PROCESS/METHODOLOGY | 18 |
| 2.1 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 20 |
| 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) | 20 |
| 2.2 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) | 20 |
| 2.3 52.225-10 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014) | 21 |
| 2.4 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006) | 22 |
| 2.5 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) | 22 |
| 2.6 VAAR 852.228-72 ASSISTING SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED AND VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES IN OBTAINING BONDS (DEC 2009) | 23 |
| 2.7 VAAR 852.233-70 PROTEST CONTENT/ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JAN 2008) | 23 |
| 2.8 VAAR 852.270-1 REPRESENTATIVES OF CONTRACTING OFFICERS (JAN 2008) | 23 |
| REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS | 24 |
| 3.1 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2018) | 24 |
| 3.2 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JUL 2013) | 27 |
| GENERAL CONDITIONS | 29 |
| 4.1 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 29 |
| 4.2 52.223-9 ESTIMATE OF PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERED MATERIAL CONTENT FOR EPA-DESIGNATED ITEMS (MAY 2008) | 32 |
| 4.3 52.225-9 BUY AMERICAN—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014) | 33 |
| 4.4 52.225-12 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNDER TRADE AGREEMENTS (MAY 2014) ALTERNATE I (MAY 2014) AND ALTERNATE II (JUN 2009) | 36 |
| 4.5 52.236-4 PHYSICAL DATA (APR 1984) | 37 |
| 4.6 VAAR 852.203-70 COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING (MAY 2018) | 37 |
| 4.7 VAAR 852.219-10 VA NOTICE OF TOTAL SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (JUL 2016) (DEVIATION) | 37 |
| 4.8 VAAR 852.228-70 BOND PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT (JAN 2008) | 38 |
| 4.9 VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2012) | 38 |
| 4.10 VAAR 852.236-71 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 40 |
| 4.11 VAAR 852.236-74 INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 40 |
| 4.12 VAAR 852.236-76 CORRESPONDENCE (APR 1984) | 40 |
| 4.13 VAAR 852.236-77 REFERENCE TO "STANDARDS" (JUL 2002) | 40 |
| 4.14 VAAR 852.236-78 GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION (APR 1984) | 41 |
| 4.15 VAAR 852.236-79 DAILY REPORT OF WORKERS AND MATERIAL (APR 1984) | 41 |
| 4.16 VAAR 852.236-80 SUBCONTRACTS AND WORK COORDINATION (APR 1984) ALTERNATE I (JUL 2002) | 41 |
| 4.17 VAAR 852.236-82 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (WITHOUT NAS) (APR 1984) | 42 |
| 4.18 VAAR 852.236-84 SCHEDULE OF WORK PROGRESS (NOV 1984) | 45 |
| 4.19 VAAR 852.236-85 SUPPLEMENTARY LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIONS (APR 1984) | 45 |
| 4.20 VAAR 852.236-86 WORKER'S COMPENSATION (JAN 2008) | 46 |
| 4.21 VAAR 852.236-87 ACCIDENT PREVENTION (SEP 1993) | 46 |
| 4.22 VAAR 852.236-88 CONTRACT CHANGES--SUPPLEMENT (JUL 2002) | 46 |
| 4.23 VAAR 852.236-89 BUY AMERICAN ACT (JAN 2008) ALTERNATE I (JAN 2008) | 48 |
| 4.24 VAAR 852.236-89 BUY AMERICAN ACT (JAN 2008) | 49 |
| 4.25 VAAR 852.236-91 SPECIAL NOTES (JUL 2002) | 49 |
| 4.26 VAAR 852.246-74 SPECIAL WARRANTIES (JAN 2008) | 50 |
| 4.27 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS | 50 |
| 4.28 PARTNERING | 51 |
| 4.29 GENDER | 51 |
| 4.30 CONTRACTOR'S COST BREAKDOWN | 51 |
| 4.31 SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS FOR DESIGN SERVICES | 51 |
| 4.32 OWNERSHIP OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS | 52 |
| 4.33 RETENTION OF REVIEW DOCUMENTS | 52 |
| 4.34 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PLANNING INFORMATION | 52 |
| 4.35 COORDINATION WITH MEDICAL CENTER | 53 |
| ATTACHMENTS | 53 |
INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS
(a) All offerors shall be registered in SAM, CVE/Vetbiz and VETS 4212 at the following URLs prior to award: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/, http://www.vetbiz.gov and https://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm#verify
(c) The cut off for questions shall be January 4, 2018, at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time. All enquiries regarding the solicitation package shall be sent to Ms. Charee Harris, Contract Specialist via email charee.harris@va.gov entitled, "Questions Site Preparation USP 800 Trailer"
(d) All offerors shall follow the instructions included on Pages 9 to 19.
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS
BASIS OF AWARD
The Government intends to award without discussions the proposal offering the Best Value to the Government. Award will be made on a Best Value trade off basis where all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.
Phase I Submission Requirements
(a) All proposals shall be submitted in one part, a Technical Proposal. Your submittal must include a one-sided original to be emailed to the Contracting Officer at charee.harris@va.gov. Emails cannot contain attachments that exceed 5MB.
(b) All pages containing text shall be consecutively numbered, type-written to fit on 8-1/2x11 inch paper if printed. Factor 1, to include all four sub-factors, and Factor 2 shall not exceed 10 pages each. Submissions shall be made electronically in pdf format. Past performance information shall be submitted separately. All technical proposals shall be compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 Microsoft Word.
(c) The format used for the areas and factors below shall be strictly adhered to. All responses in the offeror’s package shall clearly indicate the applicable Evaluation Area, and Section, if applicable.
(d) It is the offeror’s responsibility to insure the completeness of the proposal. The evaluation panel for the Government may evaluate solely on the information provided in the initial proposal and will not assume that an offeror possesses any capability that is not specifically identified in the proposal.
(e) Only one technical proposal will be evaluated for each offeror. Alternate methods of accomplishing the work required by this solicitation will not be evaluated.
Please Note: Missing, incomplete, or ambiguous information could result in a proposal deemed “non-responsive.” The evaluation factors for Phase I are listed below. It is intended that technical proposals be evaluated and three (3) offers may be invited to participate in Phase II of this acquisition. Only the most highly qualified offers as determined by the VA will be selected to submit Phase II proposals.
NOTE: DO NOT SUBMIT THE SF1442 OR BID GUARANTEE DURING PHASE I. A COVER PAGE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ANY ISSUED AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. NO PRICING OR COST INFORMATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED DURING PHASE I OF THE SELECTION PROCESS
PHASE I REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION CRITERIA
Offeror packets will be evaluated based upon the following criteria:
The following evaluation factors will be used to determine the highly qualified Offerors that will be invited to submit Phase II proposal.
Factor 1: Corporate Specialized Experience: Provide information on relevant and recent experience on design-build contracts of comparable size, complexity and scope within the last three years as described in the sub-factors. Include for each sub-factor this information:
· Project title, location and brief description.
· Project owner and name and telephone number of owner’s contact person.
· Project Statistics including start and completion dates (original vs. actual) for design and construction;
· Project cost (with brief explanation of what is included in the cost).
· Project Team; A/E Firm and General Contractor that participated on the project 1A -- Provide a minimum of one example project demonstrating the offeror’s design-build project management experience and capability as a prime contractor on a construction project of similar type and scope;
1B -- Provide a minimum of one example project demonstrating similar construction capability of the firm (proposed prime or subcontractor) that will be performing the largest construction effort; and 1C -- Provide a minimum of one example project demonstrating the experience and capability of the lead Architect-Engineer firm (as proposed prime or subcontractor) that will be designing the project;
1D – Provide a minimum of one example design/build project that the prime contractor and proposed Architect-Engineering firm Factor 2: Technical Approach: Provide a written narrative of the technical approach to be used for this design-build project. Proposals shall be evaluated based on inclusion of the major elements of the design-build process from notice to proceed to project completion, including all deliverables.
Factor 3: Past Performance: Past Performance Questionnaire’s shall be submitted from customers directly to the contracting officer. The questionnaire is an attachment to this solicitation.
The Offeror also shall have Past Performance Questionnaire & Forms completed for all projects listed in the technical proposal under this evaluation criterion. The response to this factor will be evaluated as to its relevance and similarity to work under this project. The Government may contact the offeror’s references for information and may review performance ratings on file for prior Government projects the offeror has performed. Past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the offeror may be used. All relevant facts and circumstances gathered from information from the offeror’s listed references and other sources of information available to the Government (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)/Past Performance Information Retrieval System [PPIRS]) will be used to evaluate the offeror’s overall past performance and quality of performance. If an offeror has not commented on negative past performance evaluations obtained by the Source Selection Evaluation Board, the offeror may be given the opportunity to clarify and/or mitigate adverse past performance during “exchanges” (clarifications, communications, or discussions) after receipt of proposals (FAR 15.306). If discussions are required, and past performance issues remain, these issues will be addressed during discussions.
Offerors who do not have relevant past performance will receive a neutral rating (neither favorable nor unfavorable) (FAR 15.305) (a)(iv).
PHASE I SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
The Bid Guarantee shall not be submitted with the Phase I requirement Factors 1, and 3 shall not exceed 10 pages each. Submissions shall be made electronically in pdf format. Past performance information shall be submitted separately.
Please include in the cover page the request for technical qualification solicitation number, project number and principle points of contact’s, name, phone numbers and email address. Cover page does not count toward the page limitation.
Text - Text shall be at least single spaced, with a minimum one-inch margin all around. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. Files submitted in excess of the page limitations stated throughout this document will not be evaluated.
Font Size - Print shall be of a minimum 10-point font size. Bolding, underlining, and italics may be used to identify topic demarcations or points of emphasis. Graphic presentations, including tables, while not subject to the same font size and spacing requirements, shall have spacing and text that is easily readable.
Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior clients a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment A) and instruct the clients to forward directly to the contracting office via e-mail to the address below. The due date for receipt of Past Performance Questionnaires shall be on or before the proposal due date shown in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Offerors shall be responsible for ensuring Past Performance Questionnaires are delivered to the Contracting Officer on or before the proposal due date. Questionnaires must be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Office. Offerors should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner. Do not include copies of these transmittal letters, communications, or questionnaires in the proposal
PHASE I EVALUATION PROCESS/METHODOLOGY
Each Proposal will receive an overall assessment of technical merit using the following ratings with the below definitions.
Evaluation Rating Standard for Factor 1 - Corporate Specialized Experience, Factor 2 - Technical Approach – Design Build Narrative, and Factor 3 Capabilities All three Factors have equal weight in the evaluation process.
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Exceptional |
| An exceptional proposal contains significant strengths and no weaknesses. The proposal exceeds the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator has no doubt that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. The Offeror acknowledges risks and develops an approach that proactively identifies and mitigates risks, and looks to reduce or eliminate future risks. |
| Good |
| A good proposal contains significant strengths, and only a few minor weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements as defined in the SOW. The evaluator has a high degree of confidence that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. The Offeror acknowledges technical or schedule risk and develops an approach capable of mitigating all apparent risks effectively. |
| Acceptable |
| An acceptable proposal contains strengths that outweigh any existing weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator is confident that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. |
| Marginal |
| The proposal meets the bare minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW and at the same time have multiple weaknesses. The evaluator is not confident that the Offeror can successfully complete the required tasking without significant Government oversight or participation. The proposal either fails to address risks or the proposed risk mitigation approach is not deemed to be sufficient to manage the risk. |
| Unacceptable |
| An unacceptable proposal that contains one or more weaknesses and deficiencies. Proposal fails to meet specified minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator is confident that the Offeror will be unable to successfully complete the required tasking. The proposal does not adequately acknowledge or address risk, mitigate risk, or may actually introduce risk. |
Evaluation Scale for Factor 3 – Past Performance – Customer Satisfaction
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Low Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides essentially little doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Moderate Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides some doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| High Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Risk |
| Offeror has no relevant performance record on contracts of similar scope, size or complexity. |
Each proposal will receive an overall assessment of its technical and past performance merits using the following ratings with the below definitions.
Standard Definitions
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Strength |
| A strong attribute or quality of particular worth or utility; an inherent asset. Note: Simple adherence to the requirements or ability to meet a requirement is compliance but should not be listed as strength. |
| Weakness |
| A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance |
| Deficiency |
| A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. |
Debriefings of unsuccessful firms will be held after final selection has taken place and will be conducted, to the extent practicable, in accordance with 15.503, 15.506(b) through (f), 15.507(c), and 15.506(d)(2) through (d)(5).
PHASE II REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Bid Guarantee shall be submitted with the Phase II requirement.
Responses to Phase II Request for Proposal shall only be accepted after Phase I is complete, and only from the selected offerors.
All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price. Evaluation will be based on the following evaluation factors:
Factor 1: Construction Management
| Sub Factor 1A, Project Personnel Experience |
| Sub Factor 1B, Management Approach |
| Sub Factor 1C, Design and Construction Concept Narratives |
Factor 2: Schedule Factor 3: Price Factor 1: Construction Management - Proposals shall be evaluated based on design concept narrative, relevant and recent specialized experience of key personnel, management approach and scheduled of design scope with the last five years.
Sub Factor 1A: Project Personnel Experience - Key Personnel shall be evaluated based on relevant management, design and construction knowledge and experience on past projects of comparable size, complexity and scope, key personnel must have at least 5 years of experience doing design and construction work.
· Biographical data shall include the following:
· Name of individual.
· Company employed by.
· Company position title.
· Years with the company.
· Describe work experience with projects that were of comparable size, complexity, and scope.
· Position that the individual will hold in regard to this contract/project team, description of duties and what percentage of the individual’s time would be committed to the project during both the design and construction phases.
· Describe job related educational experience including degrees, certificates etc. and granting institutions.
· Supply this biographical data for key personnel for at least the following: (Note if one individual is proposed for more than one position listed):
· Prime Contractor’s Design-Build Project Manager.
· Architectural Design Project Manager.
· Architect
· Structural Engineer
· Landscape Architect
· Engineering Project Manager
· Mechanical Engineer
· Electrical Engineer
· Plumbing Engineer
· Irrigation Specialist
· Construction Project Manager.
· Construction Field Representative/Superintendent
Sub Factor 1B: Management Approach – Shall be evaluated based on Project Delivery Philosophy, Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan, Organizational Chart and Narratives.
· Project Delivery Philosophy – Include expectation statements concerning:
· Elements for Successful Partnering: Communication, Commitment and Conflict Resolution.
· Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan
· Provide Quality Control Plan for both design and construction phases of the project.
· Project Organizational Chart and narrative – Include team members submitted under Project Personnel Experience above.
· Provide Organizational Chart.
· Provide narrative, clearly describe the prime contracting firm (or firms if a J/V) and individuals as well as the roles and responsibilities of individuals proposed as consultants and sub-contractors.
· Provide a list of consultants and all proposed major sub-contractors, include web sites address for each.
Sub Factor 1C, Design and Construction Concept Narratives: Contractor’s understanding of project scope shall be evaluated based on the Design and Construction narratives.
· Design Narrative
· Provide a design narrative that describes all the design elements included in this scope of work, include information about materials and finishes to be used for the structures, utility systems, and any special considerations as applicable.
· Constructive Narrative
· Provide a construction narrative that describes phasing of the work as applicable, mobilization, staging, site preparation, and utility work, erection of structures, irrigation and landscaping.
Factor 2. Schedule: Provide project design and construction schedule. Contractor’s understanding of schedule and project specific schedule parameters shall be evaluated.
· Project Progress Schedule - The progress schedule will be in a time scaled bar graph format. The horizontal axis will be scaled for time beginning with the Notice to Proceed and concluding with contract completion. The vertical axis will show the milestones and major portions of the contract work. All schedule items will show a start date and a completion date. The detailed schedule will indicate specific tasks with dates for each step of the process including:
· Design Period: Include pre-design site survey work, each design and construction document review submittal milestone, and indicate government review periods.
· Construction Period: Include permitting as applicable, mobilization, site prep, staging, long lead items, start and completion of construction scope items.
· Narrative of Schedule Parameters: Provide written commitment as to the time frame for project completion. Specify how much allowance has been made for anticipated weather delays and potential delays due to cemetery operations and events.
Factor 3 Price: Price is not rated, but evaluated based on the Offeror’s total proposed price being complete, reasonable, and realistic given the proposed technical approach.
PHASE II SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Volume I
| Description |
| Page Limit |
| Technical Proposal |
| Sub-factor 1A |
| Project Personnel Experience: key personnel, relevant management, design and construction knowledge, experience on past projects of comparable size, complexity and scope |
| Tab One (1) |
Each resume Shall not exceed Two Pages
| Sub-factor 1B |
| Management Approach: (Project Delivery Philosophy, Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan, Organizational Chart and Narrative |
| Tab Two (2) |
Shall not exceed 25 pages
| Sub-factor 1C |
| Design Concept Narrative: Design Narrative, Construction Narrative |
| Tab Three (3) |
Shall not exceed 15 Pages
| Factor 2 |
| Description |
| Page Limit |
| Schedule |
| Schedule detail: Project design and construction schedule |
| Tab Four (4) |
Shall not exceed 10 Pages
Volume II Price Proposal
| 1442 |
| Solicitation, Offer and Award |
| Page One (1) and Two (2) of the solicitation |
| Bid Guarantee |
| 20% or $3,000,000.00 whichever is less |
| N/A |
| Reps & Certs |
| Including those completed electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) |
| N/A |
| Price |
| See supplies or services and price/costs (Price Table) |
| N/A |
Text shall be at least single spaced, on 8 1/2 x 11-inch paper, with a minimum one-inch margin all around. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. A page printed on both sides shall be counted as two pages. Submission as double-sided printing/copying on recycled paper is encouraged. No foldout pages shall be used. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations stated throughout this document will not be evaluated.
Font Size shall be of a minimum 12-point font size or a maximum 10 characters per inch (10-pitch, pica) spacing. Bolding, underlining, and italics may be used to identify topic demarcations or points of emphasis. Graphic presentations, including tables, while not subject to the same font size and spacing requirements, shall have spacing and text that is easily readable.
PHASE II EVALUATION PROCESS/METHODOLOGY
Factor 1: Construction Management The offeror shall set forth its construction management to performing the work that is the subject of this Request for Proposal based on the following sub factors.
Sub factor 1A, Project Personnel, Experience of Key Personnel: Key Personnel shall be evaluated based on relevant management, design and construction knowledge and experience on Design-Build projects, and/or contracts of comparable size, complexity and scope.
Sub Factor 1B, Technical/Management Approach: Shall be evaluated based on Project Delivery Philosophy, Quality Assurance Plan, Organizational Chart and Narratives.
Sub factor 1C, Design Concept Narrative Proposals shall be evaluated based on if all major elements of design site preparation and installation are included. Proposals shall be evaluated based on inclusion of the overall plan elements, their placement on the site. Proposals shall also be evaluated on the design concept narrative that shows the offeror has a thorough understanding of site preparation and installation requirements as outlined in the statement of work.
Factor 2: Schedule The offeror shall be evaluated based on the progress schedule entered in the time scaled bar graph. The bar graph included the horizontal axis for time beginning with the Notice to Proceed and concluding with contract completion, the vertical axis included the milestones and major portions of the contract work. All schedule items show a start date and a completion date. The detailed schedule indicates specific tasks with dates for each phase of the process including: construction period mobilization, project delivery schedule and narrative.
Each Proposal will receive an overall assessment of technical merit using the following ratings with the below definitions.
Evaluation Rating Standards for Phase II Evaluation Criteria
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Exceptional |
| An exceptional proposal contains significant strengths and no weaknesses. The proposal exceeds the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator has no doubt that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. The Offeror acknowledges risks and develops an approach that proactively identifies and mitigates risks, and looks to reduce or eliminate future risks. |
| Good |
| A good proposal contains significant strengths, and only a few minor weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements as defined in the SOW. The evaluator has a high degree of confidence that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. The Offeror acknowledges technical or schedule risk and develops an approach capable of mitigating all apparent risks effectively. |
| Acceptable |
| An acceptable proposal contains strengths that outweigh any existing weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator is confident that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW if the technical approach proposed is followed. |
| Marginal |
| The proposal meets the bare minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW and at the same time have significant weaknesses. The evaluator is not confident that the Offeror can successfully complete the required tasking without significant Government oversight or participation. The proposal either fails to address risks or the proposed risk mitigation approach is not deemed to be sufficient to manage the risk. |
| Unacceptable |
| An unacceptable proposal that contains one or more significant weaknesses and deficiencies. Proposal fails to meet specified minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator is confident that the Offeror will be unable to successfully complete the required tasking. The proposal does not adequately acknowledge or address risk, mitigate risk, or may actually introduce risk. |
Each proposal will receive an overall assessment of its merits using the following ratings with the below definitions.
Standard Definitions
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Strength |
| A strong attribute or quality of particular worth or utility; an inherent asset. Note: Simple adherence to the requirements or ability to meet a requirement is compliance but should not be listed as strength |
| Weakness |
| A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. |
| Deficiency |
| A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. |
Debriefings of unsuccessful firms will be held after final selection has taken place and will be conducted, to the extent practicable, in accordance with 15.503, 15.506(b) through (f), 15.507(c), and 15.506(d)(2) through (d)(5).
Factor 3: Price Price will be evaluated separately from Technical and other non-cost/price factors.
(a) Award will be made to the lowest evaluated price proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.
(b) The reasonableness of the prices proposed will be evaluated on the basis of adequate price competition, by comparing the proposed prices among offers; Comparing proposed prices to the Independent Government Cost Estimate to ensure that prices are reasonable for the results to be achieved.
2.1 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
http://www.acquisition.gov/far/index.html http://www.va.gov/oal/library/vaar/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffar1.htm (End of Provision)
| FAR Number |
| Title |
| Date |
| 52.204-7 |
| SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT |
| OCT 2016 |
| 52.204-16 |
| COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE REPORTING |
| JUL 2016 |
| 52.204-22 |
| ALTERNATIVE LINE ITEM PROPOSAL |
| JAN 2017 |
| 52.215-1 |
| INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS—COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION |
| JAN 2017 |
| 52.222-23 |
| NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION |
| FEB 1999 |
| 52.228-1 |
| BID GUARANTEE |
| SEP 1996 |
| 52.236-28 |
| PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS—CONSTRUCTION |
| OCT 1997 |
52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a Firm Fixed Price contract resulting from this solicitation.
2.2 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) (a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, of this solicitation.
(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.
(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.
(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.
(End of Provision)
2.3 52.225-10 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014)
(a) Definitions. "Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item," "construction material," "domestic construction material," and "foreign construction material," as used in this provision, are defined in the clause of this solicitation entitled "Buy American—Construction Materials" (Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.225-9).
(b) Requests for determinations of inapplicability. An offeror requesting a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute should submit the request to the Contracting Officer in time to allow a determination before submission of offers. The offeror shall include the information and applicable supporting data required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9 in the request. If an offeror has not requested a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute before submitting its offer, or has not received a response to a previous request, the offeror shall include the information and supporting data in the offer.
(c) Evaluation of offers.
(1) The Government will evaluate an offer requesting exception to the requirements of the Buy American statute, based on claimed unreasonable cost of domestic construction material, by adding to the offered price the appropriate percentage of the cost of such foreign construction material, as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9.
(2) If evaluation results in…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.