36C26119Q0184-004.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
ANSWER FOR NUMBER 3 OF Q AND A DATED 3-20-2019 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C26119Q0184
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 21

About this file

From the source

36C26119Q0184 Attach 4 Past Performance Survey.docx

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to ANSWER FOR NUMBER 3 OF Q AND A DATED 3-20-2019, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C26119Q0184-009.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C26119Q0184-008.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-007.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-006.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-003.pdf PDF
36C26119Q0184-005.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-001.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-002.docx DOCX document
36C26119Q0184-000.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment #6

Past Performance Survey

OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the offeror’s technical proposal.

EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the Offeror listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.

Name of Company being evaluated:

Evaluator’s Name:

Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:

Indicate what contracts did this offeror provided for your company? Provide the total contract amount, dates of performance, and contract number.

Evaluation Questions

Comment on the overall quality of contractor’s work.

Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?

If any changes were needed, was the contractor flexible in responding to those changes?

File details come from the government source that posted it.