36C26025R0017 Amemdment 0001.pdf

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and ame ndment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR

ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRAC T ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, rema ins unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

1 3

0001 08-04-2025

663-21-101

36C260

Network Contracting Office 20

ATTN: V4CONT

1601 E. Fourth Plain Blvd Bldg.17, Suite B428 Vancouver WA 98661

To all Offerors/Bidders

36C26025R0017

X

X X

X 1

Project Number: 663-21-101 Project Title: Seattle Nurse Call Replacement Location: VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle WA.

The purpose of this amendment is to provide answers to questions from offerors. Please see attached details of RFIs 1 - 6.

All other terms, conditions, requirement, and deadlines for this solicitation remain unchanged.

Susan Howe

Contracting Officer

36C26025R0017 0001

SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE(S)

1. SOLICTATION CHANGE(S)

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following answers to questions from offerors:

Black text – Qs from potential offeror

Red text – VA response

36C26025R0017

Project 663-21-101 Seattle Nurse Call Replacement

RFIs 1 - 6

1.) Considering this project is titled “Nurse Call Replacement” and the SF 1442 states “This project does not require any specific brands of any items, equipment, fixtures, etc. Any reference of a brand name shall be interpreted as “brand name or equal.”

a. Based on this statement, will the government revise the specifications and remove the following statements from the specifications?

▪ Page 292 of the specifications, in section 1.5 Qualifications, B., “The OEM shall have at least one (1) operating, functional Nurse Call system on the VAMC Seattle, WA that is of current manufacture and can be used as the base for extending the system to areas of replacement.”

• Yes, this can be removed.

▪ Page 282 Section 1.1 Section Summary, A., “This project extends the existing nurse call systems in the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Seattle, WA.”

• Yes, this can be reworded to:

o This project replaces the existing nurse call system in the

Veterans medical Center (VAMC) in Seattle, WA.

▪ Page 301 Section 2.3 Manufacturers, A. “The OEM basis of design is

Rauland-Borg Responder V using the Enterprise platform software and is designed as an extension to existing Responder V systems currently in use at the VAMC Seattle, WA.”

• Yes, this can be removed.

▪ Attachment 8, page 2, “This project expands the existing Rauland

Responder V Nurse Call systems in the Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Seattle, Washington, a part of the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care system.”

• This can be reworded to:

o This project is a replacement of the existing nurse call system in the Seattle VAMC.

▪ Attachment 8, Page 3, “VAMC existing nurse call system is primarily a

Rauland-Borg Responder IV system with portions of the system still using Responder III devices and components. Some areas of the building have been equipped with Rauland-Borg Responder V systems. To provide the least disruption to the campus and to keep from replacing those systems already equipped with Responder V systems, the basis of design and proprietary specification will be to expand the Responder V systems to all areas of the campus receiving new Nurse Call systems.”

• Yes, this can be removed.

2.) The statement on page 292 of the specifications, Section 1.5 Qualifications, B., states “The OEM shall have at least one (1) operating, functional Nurse Call system on the VAMC Seattle, WA that is of current manufacture and can be used as the base for extending the system to areas of replacement.”

a. Will the government clarify that the entire system is being replaced? This statement directs a Rauland only purchase. This RFI needs to be addressed immediately as it limits competition to a select vendor, and others need to book travel immediately.

• The entire system is getting replaced per the drawings. The only area that won’t be replaced is in Building 37 since there are already upgraded devices in that area. This OEM requirement cannot be removed.

3.) The specifications 27523 mention expansion of the existing system in sections 1.1 Section Summary, A (page 282), Section 1.5 Qualifications, B (page 292), and Section

2.3 Manufacturers A (page 301). However, there is no reference to tying into an existing Nurse Call system in the drawings. This is also not mentioned in Attachment 13, Salient Characteristics of the Nurse Call System. Will the government confirm this is a full facility replacement, not an extension to the existing system?

This is a full facility replacement with new installation in some areas per the drawings.

4.) On the SF1442, section 10, it states that the bid is due 09/02/25 @ 0800. Lower down in section 13-b, it says bids are due 09/01/25 @ 0800. Can you please clarify the bid deadline?

The due date is clarified as 8:00am, Tuesday, September 2, 2025 as September 1 is a

Holiday.

5.) On RFP Page 89, the second paragraph under Factor 3 Past Performance states that if the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and the JV does not have relevant projects, such projects shall be submitted for each JV partner. We believe this should not apply to an SBA approved All Small Mentor-Protégé Joint-Venture as the purpose of this program is for the mentor to help the protégé develop their capabilities and experience. We respectfully request the Government allow projects submitted by the mentor only of a Mentor-Protégé JV to satisfy the requirements for Past Performance/Relevant Experience.

As stated in the solicitation, projects shall be submitted for each JV partner.

6.) SF1442 Block 13.a. indicates bids are due 09/01/2025 at 8:00 AM. On RFP Page 81 under General Submission Requirements it states that proposals are due September 2, 2025 at 9:00 AM. If possible, we request proposals due September 2nd as it can be very difficult to secure subcontractor pricing on a Monday morning with enough time to thoroughly review bids. Please advise.

The due date is clarified as 8:00am, Tuesday, September 2, 2025 as September 1 is a

Holiday.

**End of Amendment**