36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT B.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Z2DZ--Project #667-24-114 (D/B) Install Decon Shower Drainage System Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C25624R0065
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 16

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that a contractor must complete and send to their past performance references as part of a federal contract proposal submission. The questionnaire asks the reference to rate the contractor's performance on various factors such as management, quality control, scheduling, and responsiveness on a previous contract. The reference is also asked to indicate if the contractor was ever issued a cure or show cause notice, and whether the reference would award another contract to the contractor. The relevant federal contract opportunity is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a design-build project to install a decontamination shower drainage system at the Overton Brooks VA Medical Center in Shreveport, Louisiana. The RFP will be issued as a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB), with proposals due approximately 30 days after the RFP is issued on or around 7/15/2024. The contract performance period is 130 calendar days after the notice to proceed is issued, and the construction cost range is between $100,000 and $250,000.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Z2DZ--Project #667-24-114 (D/B) Install Decon Shower Drainage System, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT A.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 WD LA20240031 MOD 0 01052024.pdf PDF
36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT F.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT E.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 SOW.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 RFP.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT C.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 EXHIBIT D.docx DOCX document
36C25624R0065 Pre-Sol.docx DOCX document
SOW - DB Install Decon Shower Drainage System.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Sensitive Information—See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Project No. 667-24-114; Install Decon Shower Drainage System 36C25624R0065

EXHIBIT B

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR

Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.

INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT

The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via postal mail or email, directly to:

Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 16 Contracting Office Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System ATTN: Alexis Meyers REF: 36C25624R0065 400 Veterans Ave. (NCO 16) Biloxi, MS 39531 Email Address (preferred): alexis.meyers@va.gov

Please return the completed form no later than the time set for receipt of proposals. If you have any questions, please contact Alexis Meyers via email. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]

Contractor Company Name

Street Address

Contractor Point of Contact Name

City

Point of Contact Phone Number

State

Reference Project Title

Zip Code

Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):

Email

Contract Number

Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel

RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]

Company Name

Street Address

POC Name

City

Phone Number

State

Fax Number

Zip Code

Email

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.[endnoteRef:1] [1: ]
The Contractor …
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
☐☐☐☐☐☐
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
13.
Met established project schedules.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
☐☐☐☐☐☐
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
☐☐☐☐☐☐
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
☐YES
☐NO
23
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐YES
☐NO
24
To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS?
☐YES
☐NO

REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .