36C25219Q0065-004.doc
DOC document 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25219Q0065
About this file
36C25219Q0065 ATTACHMENT B Past Performance Questionaire.doc
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25219Q0065_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25219Q0065_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25219Q0065-003.pdf | ||
| 36C25219Q0065-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25219Q0065-001.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
COMPANY: __________________________________
REFERENCE: ______________________________________
TYPE OF WORK: ___________________________________________
CONTRACT PERIOD: __________________________________________________
LENGTH OF SERVICES PERFORMED: ______________________________________________
ESTIMATED CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT: _________________________________________
For the following questions, please choose the number on the scale from 1 to 5, which most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance on the contract referenced above.
Unacceptable performance
Marginally acceptable
Fully acceptable or Good
Very Good, with very few incidents
Superior performance.
1 Evaluate the company’s compliance with contractual
N/A terms and conditions and the technical requirements of the contract.
Comments:
2 Has the company demonstrated reasonable and cooperative N/A behavior in resolving customer requests and or complaints?
Comments:
3 Is the offeror flexible in satisfying the requirements of the N/A customer?
Comments:
4 To what extend did the company meet the response times N/A in the contract?
Comments:
5 Are invoices easily understood and do they accurately reflect N/A charges?
Comments:
6 Rate the company’s overall performance:
N/A
Comments:
7. Would you award to this company again?
N/A
Comments:
Please provide any other comments you wish to let us know:
File details come from the government source that posted it.