S02 SDVOSB Joint Venture Certification Attachment.docx

DOCX document 54 KB Posted

Attached to
Z1DA--Replace Sinks and Counters 553-21-202
Solicitation number
36C25024B0027
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and sample transmittal letter for a federal contractor to provide as a reference. The questionnaire requests ratings on quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, cost and financial management, safety, and general performance for contracts between the contractor and client. Narrative responses are also sought on project strengths, weaknesses, and other relevant comments. The transmittal letter template provides instructions for contractors to send the questionnaire to previous clients for feedback to submit with proposals. No specific opportunity, products, or services are referenced.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C25024B0027 0005.docx DOCX document
36C25024B0027 0004.docx DOCX document
36C25024B0027 0003.docx DOCX document
S06 553-21-202 new ICRA rev003.pdf PDF
36C25024B0027 0002.docx DOCX document
S04 Pre-Bid Site Visit Agenda 553-21-202 - signed.pdf PDF
36C25024B0027 0001.docx DOCX document
S04 Pre-Bid Conference Sign-In Sheet - 553-21-202.pdf PDF
S02 RFI Form - 553-21-202.doc DOC document
S02 Contractor EMR Certification Form - 553-21-202.docx DOCX document
S02 Drawings - 553-21-202.pdf PDF
S02 Specifications book - 553-21-202 01.25.2024.pdf PDF
36C25024B0027_2.docx DOCX document
S02 Wage Determination - MI20240101 mod 20240119.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (SDVOSB)

JOINT VENTURE CERTIFICATION

Any offeror submitting an offer as a Joint Venture (JV) must provide a certification from each SDVOSB joint partner, signed by an authorized official of each partner to the JV, stating that the parties to the JV:

1)have entered into a joint venture agreement that fully complies with paragraph (c) of 13 CFR § 128.402;

2) and will perform the contract in compliance with the JV agreement. Failure to submit the certification with the offeror's proposal will render the offeror ineligible for award.

Failure of a JV to provide a completed and legibly signed JV certification signed by an authorized official of each JV partner shall result in the bid being determined non-responsive and shall be rejected.

Service-Disabled Veteran JV Partner Name: _________________________________________

Service-Disabled Veteran JV Partner Signature: ______________________________________

Date Signed: _____________

Other JV Partner Name: _________________________________________

Other JV Partner Signature: ______________________________________

Date Signed: _____________

EXHIBIT C-1

SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER

AND

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Your Company Letterhead

Date: _________________ To: ______________________________________

We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the Department of Veterans Affairs- Network Contracting Officer 10, 5500 Armstrong Rd., Bldg. 9 – Room 105, Battle Creek, MI 49037. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.

Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN May 19, 2009. DO NOT return them to our company.

Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 10 5500 Armstrong Rd. Bldg 9/Room 105 Mailcode: 515/90VC Battle Creek, MI 49037 or email to: scott.brennan2@va.gov

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Scott D. Brennan at scott.brennan2@va.gov or telephone 269-223-6075. Thank you for your assistance. E-Mail is preferred for all communications.

Signature and Title

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***** RETURN THIS PAGE WITH QUESTIONAIRE

EXHIBIT C-2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: VA REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO VA WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON VA SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO VA. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR VA POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

Revised April 2011

Exhibit “C” – PPQ, Page 1 of 5 (Rev 12/19)

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control
E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)
E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .