Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Y1NE--Construct Contingency Water Supply 583-17-102 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C25022R0134
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 10

About this file

This solicitation is for construction services to construct a contingency water supply at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center in Indianapolis, Indiana. The project has a magnitude between $5 million to $10 million and must be completed within 550 calendar days of receiving the notice to proceed. The solicitation includes standard clauses for bonding, subcontracting plans, safety and environmental requirements, and past performance evaluations. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management and have an acceptable record of safety, environmental, and insurance ratings. The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 10 is the agency issuing this solicitation. The closing date for questions is July 29, 2022 and proposals are due by the date and time specified in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Y1NE--Construct Contingency Water Supply 583-17-102, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C25022R0134 0005.docx DOCX document
R - 163-428 Geotechnical Report.pdf PDF
36C25022R0134 0004.docx DOCX document
36C25022R0134 0003.docx DOCX document
Performance Relevancy Survey.docx DOCX document
ConServ Sole Source_Redacted.pdf PDF
JCI Sole Source_Redacted.pdf PDF
36C25022R0134 0002.docx DOCX document
36C25022R0134 0001.docx DOCX document
VHA Directive1192.01 Seasonal Influenza Prevention.pdf PDF
583-17-102 NEPA .pdf PDF
583-17-102 dwg pkg 1 of 4.pdf PDF
583-17-102 Specifications.pdf PDF
Wage determination July 2022.txt TXT text file
583-17-102 dwg pkg 4 of 4.pdf PDF
583-17-102 dwg pkg 3 of 4.pdf PDF
36C25022R0134.docx DOCX document
RFI Form.docx DOCX document
Contractor Certification Regarding Safety and Environmental.docx DOCX document
583-17-102 dwg pkg 2 of 4.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Sensitive Information—See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Construct Contingency Water Supply 583-17-102

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. TRANSMITTAL LETTER SAMPLE

<Your Company Letterhead>

Date: ___________________ To:

We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by Network Contracting Office 21 (NCO 21), located at 3230 Peacekeeper Way, Bldg. 209, McClellan Park, CA 95765.

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance, and you our candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible.

Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.

Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address. Do not return them to our company.

Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 10 Attn: Julie Stout or via email to: Julie.stout@va.gov 8888 Keystone Crossing, Ste. 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46240

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Julie Stout at (612) 968-4473.

Thank you for your assistance.

Please be advised that “E-Mail” is the preferred method of receiving the requested information.

<Signature and Title of Principal>

2. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Contractor to be evaluated)

Name of Contractor:

Point of Contact: Title: E-mail:

Address of Record: Office Phone: Fax:

Contract#: Dollar Amount:

Dates of Performance:

Contractor Performed as: |_|Prime Contractor |_|Sub-Contractor |_|Key Personnel

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

3. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: (Government Official)

Name of Respondent: Title: E-mail:

Address of Record: Office Phone: Fax:

4. TRANSMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: E-mail completed survey to Julie Stout, Network Contracting Office 10 at Julie.stout@va.gov.

5. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate adjectival rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance.

Exceptional
Performance exceeded many contractual requirements to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Good
Performance exceeded some contractual requirements to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assess was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assess was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-elements being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
Unsatisfactory
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
Neutral/ Not Applicable or Unknown
No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. MANAGEMENT:

Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Utilization of Small Business concerns
E
VG
S
M
U
N

2. WORKLOAD:

Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Utilization of Small Business concerns
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E
VG
S
M
U
N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Overall customer satisfaction
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Please provide frank responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .