L- PP Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 169 KB Posted

Attached to
El Paso Community Based Outreach Clinic (CBOC)
Solicitation number
36C24W27R0004
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used to collect feedback on contractor performance related to federal contracts or leases. The form captures evaluations from government agencies or firms that have worked with a contractor, documenting their experience across multiple performance dimensions.

The questionnaire is organized into four main sections. Section 1 requests identifying information about the firm or agency providing feedback, including the project name, period of performance, contract type, award date, completion date, and contract values (both awarded and current). Section 2 collects details about the assessing official, including their name, email, phone number, role relative to the firm being rated, and the associated contract or order number. Section 3 contains a rating matrix requiring assessors to evaluate the contractor across eight core performance categories—compliance with lease requirements, quality of services, timely delivery of services, business relations, management of key personnel, reliability, customer support, and overall performance—using a five-point scale (Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, Exceptional) plus a Not Applicable option. The form also includes two additional rows under "Other Areas" for evaluators to assess supplementary performance factors relevant to specific engagements. Section 4 provides space for narrative comments to support or clarify the numerical ratings. This template serves as a standardized instrument for documenting past performance data that federal agencies use in evaluating contractor proposals for future solicitations.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

1. NAME OF FIRM/AGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:

PROJECT NAME:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT TYPE (if applicable):

CONTRACT AWARD DATE: CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:

AWARDED VALUE: CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:

2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:

EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:

ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):

CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):

3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)

4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A

a. COMPLIANCE WITH LEASE REQUIREMENTS

b. QUALITY OF SERVICES

c. TIMELY DELIVERY OF SERVICES

d. BUSINESS RELATIONS

e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

f. RELIABILITY

g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT

h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE

i. OTHER AREAS:

(1)

(2)

1 NAME OF FIRMAGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
PROJECT NAME:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
CONTRACT TYPE if applicable:
CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
AWARDED VALUE:
CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL:
PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role:
CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER if applicable:
Assessment Categories:
Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Marginalb SCHEDULE:
Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Very Goodb SCHEDULE:
Exceptionalb SCHEDULE:
NAb SCHEDULE:
Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Marginalc COST CONTROL:
Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Very Goodc COST CONTROL:
Exceptionalc COST CONTROL:
NAc COST CONTROL:
Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Marginalf RELIABILITY:
Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Very Goodf RELIABILITY:
Exceptionalf RELIABILITY:
NAf RELIABILITY:
Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Marginali OTHER AREAS:
Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Very Goodi OTHER AREAS:
Exceptionali OTHER AREAS:
NAi OTHER AREAS:
1:
Unsatisfactory1:
Marginal1:
Satisfactory1:
Very Good1:
Exceptional1:
NA1:
2:
Unsatisfactory2:
Marginal2:
Satisfactory2:
Very Good2:
Exceptional2:
NA2:
4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .