Attachment 3. Past Perfomance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 281 KB Posted

Attached to
F999--Flush and Clean Campus Storm Drains at Robley Rex VA Medical Center (VAMC) in Louisville, Kentucky
Solicitation number
36C24925Q0388
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) to evaluate contractor performance for award decisions. The form requires completion by firms or agencies that have previously worked with the contractor being evaluated, and responses must be submitted directly to Scott Dickey at scott.dickey@va.gov by August 19, 2025 at 11:00am CST.

The questionnaire collects basic contract information including contractor name, period of performance, award date, completion date, contract type, awarded value, and current dollar value. It requires the assessing official to provide their contact information and relationship to the firm being rated. The core evaluation covers eight performance categories rated on a six-point scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional: Quality of Product or Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, Reliability, Customer Support, and Overall Performance. The form also includes space for two additional assessment areas and written comments, with instructions emphasizing that responses should not be sent to the contractor requesting the evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24925Q0388 0002.pdf PDF
36C24925Q0388 0001a.pdf PDF
Attachment 1. Site Plan S1.pdf PDF
Attachment 2. Service Contract Act WD # 2015-4717.pdf PDF
RFQ 36C24925Q0388-1.pdf PDF
SOW Flush and Clean Campus Storm Drains.docx DOCX document
Site Plan S-1.pdf PDF
36C24925Q0388.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

CONTRACT TYPE (if applicable):

CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:

1. NAME OF FIRM/AGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:

CONTRACTOR NAME:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

CONTRACT AWARD DATE:

AWARDED VALUE: CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:

2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:

EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:

ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):

CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):

3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)

4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A

a. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

b. SCHEDULE

c. COST CONTROL

d. BUSINESS RELATIONS

e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

f. RELIABILITY

g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT

h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE

i. OTHER AREAS:

(1)

(2)

Responses may used in an award decision by Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). Please submit the response directly to Scott Dickey, scott.dickey@va.gov by 8/19/2025 at 11:00am CST. Do not send to the Contractor requesting the

Questionnaire. We greatly thank you for your assistance!

1 NAME OF FIRMAGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
CONTRACT TYPE if applicable:
CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
AWARDED VALUE:
CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL:
PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role:
CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER if applicable:
Assessment Categories:
Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Marginalb SCHEDULE:
Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Very Goodb SCHEDULE:
Exceptionalb SCHEDULE:
NAb SCHEDULE:
Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Marginalc COST CONTROL:
Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Very Goodc COST CONTROL:
Exceptionalc COST CONTROL:
NAc COST CONTROL:
Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Marginalf RELIABILITY:
Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Very Goodf RELIABILITY:
Exceptionalf RELIABILITY:
NAf RELIABILITY:
Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Marginali OTHER AREAS:
Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Very Goodi OTHER AREAS:
Exceptionali OTHER AREAS:
NAi OTHER AREAS:
1:
Unsatisfactory1:
Marginal1:
Satisfactory1:
Very Good1:
Exceptional1:
NA1:
2:
Unsatisfactory2:
Marginal2:
Satisfactory2:
Very Good2:
Exceptional2:
NA2:
4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
CONTRACTOR NAME:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .