PPQ - Project 621-17-110.pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24922R0038
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and notice of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is for a contractor bidding on Project 621-17-110 to renovate a women's health clinic building at the James H. Quillen VA Medical Center. It requests assessments from previous clients on quality, schedule, and business relations for use in evaluating proposals. The opportunity notice is for the same renovation project, with an estimated value between $1 million and $2 million. It is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The solicitation is expected to issue on March 9th, 2022 and close on April 8th, 2022. The renovation will be procured using lowest price technically acceptable procedures. The agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 9 network.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24922R0038 0002.pdf | ||
| Price Proposal Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C24922R0038 0001.pdf | ||
| 36C24922R0038_1.pdf | ||
| General Conditions Breakout.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Drawing Set.pdf | ||
| EMR 36C24922R0038.pdf | ||
| WD TN20220111 2-25-22.pdf | ||
| Specs Combined Set.pdf | ||
| RFI Form - 36C24922R0038.pdf | ||
| 36C24922R0038.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 621-17-110, Renovate Women’s Health Clinic – Bldg 162
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Project 621-17-110, Renovate Women’s Health Clinic at James H. Quillen VA Medical Center.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist-Diana K. Grube by way of email at diana.grube@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than May 10, 2022 at 11:00 AM CT. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (diana.grube@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24922R0038 Project/Requirement Project 621-17-110, Renovate Women’s Health Clinic Customer/Agency Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, Murfreesboro, TN 37129
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award number:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining
A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
Role Period of Involvement
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Numb
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .